I am scanning the frequencies of BTSs (Base station) around me with my RTL-SDR device. I found a few. For example the frequency of one was 958.4 MHz. After three days later I scanned again but this time it disappeared. There was no BTS with frequency 958.4MHz instead I found frequencies completely different.
Can the frequency of the base station change? Or how did I get a completely different result from the scan I made three days ago.
Related
I am currently trying to compile temperature information from the WDFE5 Data set which is quite large in size and am struggling to find an efficient way to meet my goal. My main goals are to:
Determine the max temperature for individual days for each individual grid cell
Change the time step from hourly to daily and from UTC to MST.
The data set is stored in monthly NC4 files and contains the temperature data in a 3 dimensional matrix (time lat lon). My main question is if there is a efficient way to compile this data to meet my goals or to manipulate the NC4 files to be easier to play around with (Somehow merge the monthly files into one mega file?)
I have tried two rather convoluted ways to catch holes between months (Example : due to the time conversion, some dates end up spanning between two months, which requires me to read in the next file and then continuing to read the data).
My first try was to individually read 1 month / file at a time, using pmax() to get the max value of each grid cell, and comparing time steps for 24 hours, and then repeating the process. I have been using
ncvar_get() with start and count to only read one time step at a time. To catch days that span two months, I was able to create a convoluted function to merge the two, by calculating the number of 1 hour periods left in one month, and how much would be needed from the next.
My second try still involved pmax(), but I tried a different method to fill in any holes between months. I set a date vector from the time variable to each hour time step, and match by same day. While this seems better, it still has to read multiple NC4 files which gets very convoluting compared to being able to just reading one NC4 file with all the needed information.
In the end, I tested a few test cases and both seem to solutions seem to work, but run extremely slow and seem very overcomplicated to me. I was wondering if anyone had suggestions on how to better set up the NC4 files for reading and time conversion.
I am working with some observation data and have run into a bit of an issue beyond my current capabilities. I surveyed different polygons (the column "PolygonID" in the screenshot) for lizards two times during a survey season. I want to determine the total search effort (shown in the column "Effort") for each individual polygon within each survey round. Problem is, the software I was using to collect the data sometimes creates unnecessary repeats for polygons within a survey round. There is an example of this in the screenshot for the rows with PolygonID P3.
Most of the time it does not affect the effort calculations because the start and end time for the rows (the fields used to calculate effort) are the same, and I know how to filter the dataset so it only shows one line per polygon per survey, but I have reason to be concerned there might be some lines where the software glitched and assigned incorrect start and end times for one of the repeat lines. Is there a way I can test whether start and end time match for any such repeats with R, rather than manually going through all the data?
Thank you!
To create a ts-object in R, one has to specify a data frame, a start date and the frequency of the time series.
When searching the internet (e.g. Role of frequency parameter in ts), I get the impression that by choosing the frequency, one can emphasise whatever periodic pattern one believes is the most important in the data. However, I doubt that this is actually true. My impression is that it is solely used to compute the dates of the time series on-the-fly. E.g. when I set the start date “2015-08-01”, R automatically transforms it into a decimal date and I get something like 2015.58. If I now choose a frequency of 365 (or 365.25), R divides one unit by 365 and assigns this fraction to each day as one unit ahead, so the entry 366 days later is exactly 2016.58. However, if I choose frequency=7, the fraction assigned to each day is 1/7th, so the date assigned to the 8th day after my start date corresponds to a decimal number between 2016 and 2017. So the only choice for a data set with 365 entries per year is 365, isn’t it? And it is only used to actually create the time series?
Otherwise, if I choose the xts-class, an xts-object is built from a vector and a matrix where the vector has to be created in advance. So here there is no need to compute the date on-the-fly using a start date and a frequency and that is the reason why no frequency has to be assigned at all.
In both cases I can apply forecasting packages to either ts or xts objects (such as ARIMA, ets, stl, bats, bats etc) without specifying anything else so this shows that the frequency is actually not used for anything else. Or am I missing something here?
Thanks in advance for your comments!
Good day.
I am 3 month old in R and R-Studio but am getting the hang of things. I am implementing a SOM solution with 38k records/observations using Kohonen SuperSOM following Self-Organising Maps for Customer Segmentation using R.
My data have no missing values but almost 60 columns many of them are dummyVars (I received this data in this format)
I have removed the ONE char Column (URL)
My Y column (as I understand it) is "shares" (How many times it was shared)
My data only consist of numerical data (dummyVars are of course 1 or 0)
I have Centered and Scaled my data (entire dataFrame)
As per the example I followed I dod convert the entire DF to a matrix
My problem is that my SOM takes ages to train even with multi core processing and my progress graph does not reach a nice flat"ish" plateau, it does come nicely down but still is very erratic, all my other graphs are extremely high in population and there are no nice clustering. I have even tried a 500 iteration with a 100x100 grid ;-(
I think /guess it is because of the huge amount of columns including mostly dummyVars e.g. dayOfWeek.Monday, dayOfWeek.Tuesday, category.LifeStile, category.Computers, etc.
What am I to do?
Should I convert the dummyVars back into another format, How and Why?
Please do not just give me a section of code as I would like to understand why I need to do What.
Thanx
I am trying to extract data from one data set (contains water quality data -- chlorophyll, dissolved oxygen, temp, etc), using information from another data set that contains tidal information (low tide times).
Background: It has recently come to my attention that due to hydrodynamics it will be best to only look at WQ data points measured at low tide, when I had previously just taken the daily average.
Is there a way I can extract specific WQ data based on if it aligns with date/time of the tidal data??? Caveats -- the times might not match up exactly, WQ data was measured every 15 minutes so I need the closest point(s) to the low tide time.
It is difficult to give the exact code without knowing the frequency of your tidal data. However, you can take a look at the following links, using which you could match the timestamps on both your datasets by rounding them off to the nearest hour/half hour/quarter hour (as the case may be):
rounding times to the nearest hour in R
Rounding time to nearest quarter hour
Hope this helps.