How to overlap component? - css

I have the following angular component lets call it child-component
<div>
<a-component-tag></a-component-tag>
<router-outlet></router-outlet>
</div>
which is itself being rendered into another router-outlet like this
<div>
<top-component></top-component>
<router-outlet></router-outlet>
<div>
I would like the component that is rendered in the first router-outlet above to either render below a-component-tag or cover a-component-tag, depending on the user clicking a maximize, minimize button. It shouldn't cover anything but a-component-tag (i.e. it should not cover top-component).
This component is defined by
<div id="thiscomp" [ngclass]="max?cover:minimize">...</div>
I tried to define these two classes as
.cover{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index:100;
}
.minimize {
margin-top:30px;
}
but the cover class is not working: Some of the subcomponents in the thiscomp div are rendered above some stay minimized.

You're trying to change the order in which two DOM elements appear -- there are better techniques than absolute positioning available for that.
The javascript in this example is just for demo; the work is being done in the CSS:
document.getElementById("example").onclick = function() {
document.getElementById("container").classList.toggle('flip');
}
#container {display: flex; flex-direction:column}
#container.flip {flex-direction: column-reverse}
<div id="container">
<div class="componentA">Component A</div>
<div class="componentB">Component B</div>
</div>
<button id="example">Toggle</button>

Related

Refactoring CSS to reduce adjoining classes

Is there a way of writing CSS to reduce the file size of a style sheet containing lots of adjoining classes. Example...
body .elementor-2 .elementor-element.elementor-element-949d9dd .elementor-widget-spacer,
body .elementor-2 .elementor-element.elementor-element-427933f .elementor-widget-spacer,
body .elementor-2 .elementor-element.elementor-element-cb8ce37 .elementor-widget-spacer {
margin-bottom: 0px;
}
hey Use :is selector to reduce the code please check. to learn more about it here
body .elementor-2 .elementor-element:is(.elementor-element-949d9dd, .elementor-element-427933f, .elementor-element-cb8ce37 ) .elementor-widget-spacer {
margin-bottom: 10px;
background: red
}
<div class="elementor-2">
<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-949d9dd ">
<div class="elementor-widget-spacer">spacer</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="elementor-2">
<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-427933f">
<div class="elementor-widget-spacer">spacer</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="elementor-2">
<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-cb8ce37 ">
<div class="elementor-widget-spacer">spacer</div>
</div>
</div>
If you use the widget spacer in a different position every single widget makes those classes with the different ids. So you can't reduce the classes.
So if you need not write all the classes on the CSS file.
Use this CSS.
body .elementor-widget-spacer {
margin: 0 !important;
}
or
body .elementor-widget-spacer {
margin: 0;
}
It works with all of the spacer widgets on the webpage.
if you are using elementor.you don't need to do it with custom CSS. Elementor has a dedicated control for this. edit the column, select the layout tab to find widget space, and make it 0. Inside the column, your widget gap will be 0.
Before Doing 0
After Doing 0
Or
you are not using Elementor you can go with :is().To learn more about it follow the article Here

Twitter Bootstrap 3 breakpoints based on actual width of container

I am using Bootstrap 3 (and Angular) for a webapp. I have sidebars which can be toggled, they are not using bootstrap (but table-cell layout)
I created a demo here: http://plnkr.co/edit/0pGjRqfqF21lGvhuNb9k?p=preview
Is it possible to make bootstrap columns break relative to the actual with of the container they are in?
Example:
A col-sm-* should break if its container (aside-main) is <768px, not the screen ?
<div class="row" ng-controller="demoCtrl">
<div class="aside-container">
<div class="aside-main">
<div class="col-sm-12">
<h2>Main Content Area</h2>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-sm-6">
<strong>column 1</strong>
</div>
<div class="col-sm-6">
<strong>column 2</strong>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="aside" ng-if="asideIn">
<div class="col-sm-12">
<h2>Aside Area</h2>
here is the aside content
</div>
</div>
</div>
In 2018 seems there are such possibilities.
According to the documentation of project https://github.com/marcj/css-element-queries all you have to do is following.
Let's say you have following html element.
<div class="parent">
<h2>Test</h2>
</div>
And you define following css
.parent h2 {
font-size: 12px;
}
.parent[min-width~="400px"] h2 {
font-size: 18px;
}
.parent[min-width~="600px"] h2 {
padding: 55px;
text-align: center;
font-size: 24px;
}
.parent[min-width~="700px"] h2 {
font-size: 34px;
color: red;
}
And include scripts
<script src="src/ResizeSensor.js"></script>
<script src="src/ElementQueries.js"></script>
Functionality of the project will find html elements that css is referring to and will only listen to changes of those elements.
"no performance issues since it listens only on size changes of
elements that have element query rules defined through css. "
e.g. when an element that is "watched" exceeds width of 400 on watched element will be added css attribute min-width 400px and defined css will be applied to it.
Also for this to work you need to trigger the event listening or initialization yourself:
var ElementQueries = require('css-element-queries/src/ElementQueries');
//attaches to DOMLoadContent
ElementQueries.listen();
//or if you want to trigger it yourself.
// Parse all available CSS and attach ResizeSensor to those elements which have rules attached
// (make sure this is called after 'load' event, because CSS files are not ready when domReady is fired.
ElementQueries.init();
It's not exactly breaking bootstrap columns, but you can control css based on the width of the container. Should suffice.

Bootstrap Modal sitting behind backdrop

So I'm having nearly the exact same problem as #Jamescoo was but I think that my issue is coming from the fact that I have already positioned a couple of DIVs to create a sliding nav panel.
Here's my exact setup replicated: http://jsfiddle.net/ZBQ8U/2/
BONUS: Feel free to grab the code for the sliding panel if you'd like :)
The z-indexes shouldn't conflict and their values would show that they are stacking correctly, but visually they are not.
Once you click the 'Open Modal' button the <div class="modal-backdrop fade in"></div> covers everything! (you'll have to re-run the code to reset it)
I don't know quite how to remedy this one...Any ideas?
Just move the entire modal outside of the rest of your code, to the very bottom. It doesn't need to be nested in any other element, other than the body.
<body>
<!-- All other HTML -->
<div>
...
</div>
<!-- Modal -->
<div class="modal fade" id="myModal">
...
</div>
</body>
Demo
They hint at this solution in the documentation.
Modal Markup Placement
Always try to place a modal's HTML code in a top-level position in your document to avoid other components
affecting the modal's appearance and/or functionality.
In my case, I could fix it by adding css for the .modal-backdrop
.modal-backdrop {
z-index: -1;
}
Although this works, form controls still seem to appear above the backdrop, clicking anywhere dismisses the modal, but it doesn't look great.
A better workaround for me is to bind to the shown event (once the page is loaded) and to correct the z-index property.
$('.modal').on('shown.bs.modal', function() {
$(this).css("z-index", parseInt($('.modal-backdrop').css('z-index')) + 1);
});
In this case, if you are OK with changing the DOM on modal shown:
$('.modal').on('shown.bs.modal', function() {
//Make sure the modal and backdrop are siblings (changes the DOM)
$(this).before($('.modal-backdrop'));
//Make sure the z-index is higher than the backdrop
$(this).css("z-index", parseInt($('.modal-backdrop').css('z-index')) + 1);
});
Although the z-index of the .modal is higher than that of the .modal-backdrop, that .modal is in a parent div #content-wrap which has a lower z-index than .modal-backdrop (z-index: 1002 vs z-index: 1030).
Because the parent has lower z-index than the .modal-backdrop everything in it will be behind the modal, irrespective of any z-index given to the children.
If you remove the z-index you have set on both the body div#fullContainer #content-wrap and also on the #ctrlNavPanel, everything seems to work ok.
body div#fullContainer #content-wrap {
background: #ffffff;
bottom: 0;
box-shadow: -5px 0px 8px #000000;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
}
#ctrlNavPanel {
background: #333333;
bottom: 0;
box-sizing: content-box;
height: 100%;
overflow-y: auto;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
width: 250px;
}
NOTE: I think that you may have initially used z-indexes on the #content-wrap and #ctrlNavPanel to ensure the nav sits behind, but that's not necessary because the nav element comes before the content-wrap in the HTML, so you only need to position them, not explicitly set a stacking order.
EDIT
As Schmalzy picked up on, the links are no longer clickable. This is because the full-container is 100% wide and so covers the navigation. The quickest way to fix this is to place the navigation inside that div:
<div id="fullContainer">
<aside id="ctrlNavPanel">
<ul class="nav-link-list">
<li><label>Menu</label></li>
<li><span class="fa fa-lg fa-home"></span> Home</li>
<li><a><span class="fa fa-lg fa-group"></span>About Us</a></li>
<li><a><span class="fa fa-lg fa-book"></span> Contacts</a></li>
</ul>
</aside>
<div id="content-wrap">
...
</div>
</div>
DEMO HERE
None of the answers worked well enough for me.
The problem appeared to lie where the modal windows needs to be outside of the body.and it is not best
So this code done the job just prefectly:
$('.modal ').insertAfter($('body'));
$('#product_' + product_id + ' .modal ').insertAfter($('body'));
I'm wary of moving the modal content outside its original context: other JS or styles might depend on that context.
However, I doubt there are any scripts or styles that require a specific context for the backdrop.
So my solution is to move the backdrop adjacent to the modal content, forcing it into the same stacking context:
$(document).on('shown.bs.modal', '.modal', function () {
$('.modal-backdrop').before($(this));
});
It's only a slight deviation from jacoswarts' solution, so thanks for the inspiration!
Try remove the backdrop, if you don't realy need it (data-backdrop= "false"):
<div class="modal fade" data-backdrop="false" role="dialog" id="my-modal" aria-labelledby="modal-title">
<div class="modal-dialog" role="document">
<div class="modal-content">
<div class="modal-header">
<h3 class="modal-title" id="modal-title">No Backdrop</h3>
</div>
<div class="modal-body">
<p>
Look! No backdrop here!
</p>
</div>
<div class="modal-footer">
<button class="btn btn-default" data-dismiss="modal">Cancel</button>
<button class="btn btn-primary">Ok</button> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I know it is late, I encountered the same problem but I had to hack it out as below;
.modal-backdrop {
/* bug fix - no overlay */
display: none;
}
.modal{
/* bug fix - custom overlay */
background-color: rgba(10,10,10,0.45);
}
I was fighting with the same problem some days... I found three posible solutions, but i dont know, which is the most optimal, if somebody tell me, i will be grateful.
the modifications will be in bootstrap.css
Option 1:
.modal-backdrop {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 1040; <- DELETE THIS LINE
background-color: #000000;
}
Option 2:
.modal-backdrop {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: -1; <- MODIFY THIS VALUE BY -1
background-color: #000000;
}
Option 3:
/*ADD THIS*/
.modal-backdrop.fade.in {
z-index: -1;
}
I used the option 2.
In my case one of parents of my modal was animated and had this
.animated {
-webkit-animation-duration: 1s;
animation-duration: 1s;
-webkit-animation-fill-mode: both;
animation-fill-mode: both;
z-index: 100;
}
The blocker here is animation-fill-mode: both;. I could not just move modal outside, so the solution was to override 'animation-fill-mode' to animation-fill-mode: none;. Animation still worked fine.
Another resolution for this problem is to add z-index: 0; to .modal-backdrop class in your bootstrap-dialog.css file if you don't want to modify bootstrap.css.
if we cannot delete backdrop and/or we have component framework such angular or vue we cannot move modal to the root. i did this trick: put my custom modal-backdrop container(with aditional class) as sibling for modal-dialog container and added some css
<div bsModal #moneyModal="bs-modal" class="modal fade" tabindex="-1" role="dialog">
<!-- magic container-->
<div class="modal-holder modal-backdrop" (click)="moneyModal.hide()"></div>
<div class="modal-dialog modal-sm" role="document">
<div class="modal-content">
<div class="modal-body">
....
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
and css
.modal-backdrop{z-index: -1}// or you can disable modal-backdrop
.modal-holder.modal-backdrop{z-index: 100}
.modal-holder + .modal-dialog {z-index: 1000}
You could use this :
<div
class="modal fade stick-up disable-scroll"
id="filtersModal"
tabindex="-1"
role="dialog"
aria-labelledby="filtersModal"
aria-hidden="false"
style="background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);" data-backdrop="false"
>
....
</div>
Adding style="" and data-backdrop false would fix it.
For those using ASP.NET MVC,
Needing to move the modal div just before the </body> tag but can't do it because you are using a Layout page
Define a section in you _Layout.cshtml file just before the body tag, eg:
... some html in layout page ...
#RenderSection("bottomHTML", required: false)
</body>
</html>
Then in your view
#section bottomHTML
{
<div class="modal fade" id="myModalID" role="dialog" tabindex="-1" aria-labelledby="demo-default-modal" aria-hidden="true">
... rest of the modal div HTML ...
}
This way, the modal HTML will be rendered before the body tag and the modal now should be displayed correctly..
If you use JQuery, you can use the appendTo() to append the modal to a specific element, in this case, the , in most case, a simple one line can move your modal on top of the backdrop regardless where your modal div's position
$("#myModal").appendTo("body");
here's the reference of the JQuery appendTo function:
http://api.jquery.com/appendto/
I updated it to your fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/ZBQ8U/240/
Just remove the backdrop, insert this code in your css file
.modal-backdrop {
/* bug fix - no overlay */
display: none;
}
The problem persists if any ancestor of the [.modal] element has CSS property z-index set.
The [.modal] element inherits the CSS z-index from that container element.
While the [.modal-backdrop] is inserted into the [body] element dynamically from jQuery code, which has default z-index: 1040 from bootstrap.css.
I came out with two way CSS solution, is better than changing any other behavior of the default event and element.
Set the z-index: 1041 or higher value for the parent element of the [.modal], that ancestor element is causing the [.modal] is underneath the [.modal-backdrop].
Or
Set the z-index: 1039 or lower value for the [.modal-backdrop] in CSS file, if available. Because the HTML [.modal-backdrop] is not available in your code.
[Note: the CSS z-index property may require using !important flag]
[Note: default z-index: 1040 for [.modal-backdrop] is completely depended on bootstrap.css]
just remove z-index: 1040;
from this file bootstrap.css class .modal-backdrop
I was missing the follow html
<div class="modal fade" tabindex="-1" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="myModalLabel">
added it and worked without problems
Since I don't have the chance to move the modal markup since i added it in a partial template within a conditional what worked for me is add CSS bellow
.modal.fade {
display: none;
}
Then, when boostrap add class "in" through js apply display: block and everything works fine.
I Found that applying ionic framework (ionic.min.cs) after bootstrap coursing this issue for me.
If you can't put the modal to the root (if your use angular and the modal is in a controller for example), modifying bootstrap or using js is obviously a bad solution.
so saying you have your website structure:
//not working
<div>
<div>
<div>
<modal></modal>
</div>
</div>
</div>
open your code inspector and move the modal to the root, it should be working (but no where you want):
//should be working
<div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<modal></modal>
now put it in the first div and check if it's working: if yes check the next child until it's not working and find the div that is the problem;
//should be working
<div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
<modal></modal>
</div>
Once you know which div is the problem you can play with the css display and position to make it work.
everyone has a different structure but in my case setting a parent to display: table; was the solution
Put this code wherever you want
$('.modal').on('shown.bs.modal', function () {
var max_index = null;
$('.modal.fade.in').not($(this)).each(function (index , value){
if(max_index< parseInt( $(this).css("z-index")))
max_index = parseInt( $(this).css("z-index"));
});
if (max_index != null) $(this).css("z-index", max_index + 1);
});
Many times , you cannot move the modal outside as this affects your design structure.
The reason the backdrop comes above your modal is id the parent has any position set.
A very simple way to solve the problem other then moving your modal outside is move the backdrop inside structure were you have your modal. In your case, it could be
$(".modal-backdrop").appendTo("main");
Note that this solution is applicable if you have a definite strucure for your application and you cant just move the modal outside as it will go against the design structure
just move your modal outside of all div contents, place it mostly prior to closing of body.
First make sure the modal is not in any parent div.
Then add
$('#myModal').appendTo("body")
It worked fine for me.
In Addition to all answers here, i found out, that the bootstrap4 "animated fadeIn" is also causing this error (not clickable modal behind background):
check if your modal is in the following parent tag (bootstrap animation)
<div class="animated fadeIn"></div>
I removed this tag - solved the problem for me.
this works for me.
<div class="modal fade" id="modalDecision" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="myModalLabel" aria-hidden="true" data-backdrop="false">
<div class="modal-dialog modal-sm">
<div class="modal-content">
<div class="modal-body text-center">
<asp:Label runat="server" Height="30px">Please select recovery delivery option</asp:Label>
<asp:LinkButton ID="btnEmail" CssClass="submit btn btn-primary" Width="100px" runat="server"
OnClick="ModalRecovery">Email</asp:LinkButton>
<asp:LinkButton ID="btnText" CssClass="submit btn btn-primary" Width="100px" runat="server"
OnClick="ModalRecovery">Text</asp:LinkButton>
</div>
</div>
</div>
var element = $('#modalDecision');
// also taken from bootstrap 3 docs
$(element).on('shown.bs.modal', function (e) {
// keep in mind this only works as long as Bootstrap only supports 1 modal at a time, which is the case in Bootstrap 3 so far...
var backDrop = $("<div class='modal-backdrop' style='z-index:-1;opacity:.5'></div>");
$(element).append($(backDrop));
});
i encountred this problem, and after investigating my css, the main container (direct child of the body) had:
position: relative
z-index: 1
the backdrop worked well after i removed those two properties. You may also encounter this problem if the main wraper have a position: fixed
I had a similar problem that the fade was not working and the overlay stayed on the page.
I had dynamic content added back to the page (refresh on some content only on modal action).
I also had this $('#rejectModal-'+itemId).modal('hide') (itemId is dynamic id for multiple modals in a single page for rejecting some information) but the problem was still not gone.
The overlay was staying because my layout was not set to null in the partial view
After setting this the problem was gone:
#{
Layout = null;
}
if you have nested modals this is the clue :
$('body').on('shown.bs.modal', '.modal', function (e) {
e.stopPropagation();
$(this).css("z-index", parseInt($('.modal-backdrop').css('z-index')) + 1);
});

Bootstrap Element 100% Width

I want to create alternating 100% colored blocks. An "ideal" situation is illustrated as an attachment, as well as the current situation.
Desired setup:
Currently:
My first idea was to create an div class, give it a background color, and give it 100% width.
.block {
width: 100%;
background: #fff;
}
However, you can see that this obviously doesn't work. It's confined to a container area. I tried to close the container and that didn't work either.
The container class is intentionally not 100% width. It is different fixed widths depending on the width of the viewport.
If you want to work with the full width of the screen, use .container-fluid:
Bootstrap 3:
<body>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8"></div>
<div class="col-lg-4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12"></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Bootstrap 2:
<body>
<div class="row">
<div class="span6"></div>
<div class="span6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span8"></div>
<div class="span4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span12"></div>
</div>
</body>
QUICK ANSWER
Use multiple NOT NESTED .containers
Wrap those .containers you want to have a full-width background in a div
Add a CSS background to the wrapping div
Fiddles: Simple: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/ , Container borders: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/1/
HTML:
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 1</h2>
</div>
<div class="specialBackground">
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 2</h2>
</div>
</div>
CSS: .specialBackground{ background-color: gold; /*replace with own background settings*/ }
FURTHER INFO
DON'T USE NESTED CONTAINERS
Many people will (wrongly) suggest, that you should use nested containers. Well, you should NOT.
They are not ment to be nested. (See to "Containers" section in the docs)
HOW IT WORKS
div is a block element, which by default spans to the full width of a document body - there is the full-width feature. It also has a height of it's content (if you don't specify otherwise).
The bootstrap containers are not required to be direct children of a body, they are just containers with some padding and possibly some screen-width-variable fixed widths.
If a basic grid .container has some fixed width it is also auto-centered horizontally.
So there is no difference whether you put it as a:
Direct child of a body
Direct child of a basic div that is a direct child of a body.
By "basic" div I mean div that does not have a CSS altering his border, padding, dimensions, position or content size. Really just a HTML element with display: block; CSS and possibly background.
But of course setting vertical-like CSS (height, padding-top, ...) should not break the bootstrap grid :-)
Bootstrap itself is using the same approach
...All over it's own website and in it's "JUMBOTRON" example:
http://getbootstrap.com/examples/jumbotron/
This is how you can achieve your desired setup with Bootstrap 3:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row"> <!-- Give this div your desired background color -->
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
... your content here ...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The container-fluid part makes sure that you can change the background over the full width. The container part makes sure that your content is still wrapped in a fixed width.
This approach works, but personally I don't like all the nesting. However, I haven't found a better solution so far.
There is a workaround using vw. Is useful when you can't create a new fluid container.
This, inside a classic 'container' div will be full size.
.row-full{
width: 100vw;
position: relative;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
After this there is the sidebar problem (thanks to #Typhlosaurus), solved with this js function, calling it on document load and resize:
function full_row_resize(){
var body_width = $('body').width();
$('.row-full').css('width', (body_width));
$('.row-full').css('margin-left', ('-'+(body_width/2)+'px'));
return false;
}
In bootstrap 4, you can use 'w-100' class (w as width, and 100 as 100%)
You can find documentation here:
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/utilities/sizing/
If you can't change the HTML layout:
.full-width {
width: 100vw;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">a</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">b</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 full-width">c</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">d</div>
</div>
</div>
Demo: http://www.bootply.com/tVkNyWJxA6
Sometimes it's not possible to close the content container.
The solution we are using is a bit different but prevent a overflow because of the
firefox scrollbar size!
.full-width {
margin-top: 15px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
position: relative;
width: calc(100vw - 10px);
margin-left: calc(-50vw + 5px);
left: 50%;
}
Here is a example: https://jsfiddle.net/RubbelDeKatz/wvt9253q
Instead of
style="width:100%"
try using
class="col-xs-12"
it will save you 1 character :)
Sorry, should have asked for your css as well. As is, basically what you need to look at is giving your container div the style .container { width: 100%; } in your css and then the enclosed divs will inherit this as long as you don't give them their own width. You were also missing a few closing tags, and the </center> closes a <center> without it ever being open, at least in this section of code. I wasn't sure if you wanted the image in the same div that contains your content or separate, so I created two examples. I changed the width of the img to 100px simply because jsfiddle offers a small viewing area. Let me know if it's not what you're looking for.
content and image separate: http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/2/
content and image in same div (img floated left): http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/3/
I would use two separate 'container' div as below:
<div class="container">
/* normal*/
</div>
<div class="container-fluid">
/*full width container*/
</div>
Bare in mind that container-fluid does not follow your breakpoints and it is a full width container.
I'd wonder why someone would try to "override" the container width, since its purpose is to keep its content with some padding, but I had a similar situation (that's why I wanted to share my solution, even though there're answers).
In my situation, I wanted to have all content (of all pages) rendered inside a container, so this was the piece of code from my _Layout.cshtml:
<div id="body">
#RenderSection("featured", required: false)
<section class="content-wrapper main-content clear-fix">
<div class="container">
#RenderBody()
</div>
</section>
</div>
In my Home Index page, I had a background header image I'd like to fill the whole screen width, so the solution was to make the Index.cshtml like this:
#section featured {
<!-- This content will be rendered outside the "container div" -->
<div class="intro-header">
<div class="container">SOME CONTENT WITH A NICE BACKGROUND</div>
</div>
}
<!-- The content below will be rendered INSIDE the "container div" -->
<div class="content-section-b">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
MORE CONTENT
</div>
</div>
</div>
I think this is better than trying to make workarounds, since sections are made with the purpose of allowing (or forcing) views to dynamically replace some content in the layout.
Though people have mentioned that you will need to use .container-fluid in this case but you will also have to remove the padding from bootstrap.
The following answer is not exactly optimal by any measure, but I needed something that maintains its position within the container whilst it stretches the inner div fully.
https://jsfiddle.net/fah5axm5/
$(function() {
$(window).on('load resize', ppaFullWidth);
function ppaFullWidth() {
var $elements = $('[data-ppa-full-width="true"]');
$.each( $elements, function( key, item ) {
var $el = $(this);
var $container = $el.closest('.container');
var margin = parseInt($container.css('margin-left'), 10);
var padding = parseInt($container.css('padding-left'), 10)
var offset = margin + padding;
$el.css({
position: "relative",
left: -offset,
"box-sizing": "border-box",
width: $(window).width(),
"padding-left": offset + "px",
"padding-right": offset + "px"
});
});
}
});
This must work (Mobile phone as well as Desktop screen):
class: alignfull and class: img-fluid will do the magic.
<div class="alignfull">
<img class="img-fluid" style="background-size: cover;
background-position: center ;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: auto;
min-width: 100%;
width: -moz-available; "
src="{{ $image->image }}" alt="An image">
</div>

How to float image inside of div

I have this html:
<div class="speaker-list">
<div class="view-content">
<div class="views-row views-row-1 views-row-odd views-row-first">
<div class="views-field views-field-title">
<span class="field-content">
Keith Anderson
</span>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-job-title">
<div class="field-content">VP, Digital Advisory</div>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-company">
<div class="field-content">RetailNet Group</div>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-title-1">
<span class="field-content">
Store of the Future
</span>
</div>
<div class="views-field views-field-field-headshot">
<div class="field-content">
<div id="file-53" class="file file-image file-image-jpeg contextual-links-region">
<div class="content">
<img typeof="foaf:Image" src="/kanderson.jpg" width="180" height="180" alt="" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
It's dynamically generated by a Drupal view, so I can't change the output html at all. I need to work with what is here. Here's the desired result:
Without any styling on the headshot, this is what it looks like:
I tried to style the image to force it to float to the left of the text:
.view-speaker-list div.view-content div.views-row div.views-field
div.field-content div.file-image div.content img {
border: 1px solid #666;
float: left;
position: relative; /* tried with and without position (inc. absolute) */
left: 30px;
}
Obviously I'm doing something wrong, because this is what I get (with relative position):
and with absolute position:
I've also tried putting the float on the "uppermost" div class that holds the image, with no position on the div:
.view-speaker-list div.view-content div.views-row
div.views-field-field-headshot {
float: left;
}
It gives the same result as the position: relative screenshot.
Where am I going wrong? If I had control over the html I'd do it differently, but I'm not sure how to deal with all of these nested divs.
EDITED TO ADD NEW SCREENSHOT FOR #WEX
Here's what it looks like when I tried to use your code with the html reordered - http://jsfiddle.net/mPa7z/
I'll try to explain the "right" way to use float so that you can see why your way didn't work.
In your post, you try to apply float: left to the <div> surrounding your image, but that technique only works when the element you are floating is above all the elements you want to wrap around it. That "may" solve your problem, but that technique has it's pitfalls if you're trying to use it to create two distinct columns - if the text on the right is taller than the floated element, the text on the right will wrap below it. So then you have to add another container around your non-floated elements to ensure that it won't wrap. This solves your problem, but doesn't really help if you can't even edit your markup!
I'd argue that the technique I've posted below works better, and solves your problem: http://jsfiddle.net/Wexcode/AQQwX/
.view-content {
position: relative;
min-height: 180px;
padding: 0 0 0 180px; }
.views-row { padding: 20px 0 0 20px; }
.views-field-field-headshot {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0; }​
If you have access to the View itself in Drupal, you can reorder the elements. When logged into Drupal, open the View (in Drupal 7: Structure > Views > Viewname), look for "Fields" and click on the triangle next to "add", which will have a popup, then click "rearrange". You can then drag the photo field to be the first item in the View, then adjust your CSS to float the image to the left.
EmmyS,
Instead of trying to get the headshot to float:left, have you considered making the others float:right? This will give the impression that the image is floating left without having to change the markup in any way.
div.speaker-list div.views-row > div.views-field {
float:right;
clear:both;
}
div.speaker-list div.views-row > div.views-field.views-field-field-headshot {
float:none;
clear:none;
}
The above CSS should work with that specific configuration without altering any of your other Drupal generated markup. In order to make sure that other CSS does not interfere, I've applied as much specificity as possible. Since the headshot will be back in the containing <div>, you shouldn't need to alter the size of it unless the store is simply too large (I don't know without looking at your data). Finally the CSS is concise, so you can add any additional styling you need on a per-element basis.
Hope this helps,
FuzzicalLogic
When you can drop somewhere else on the page some code, you can gain control over the HTML by using jQuery. Then you could make modifications to the DOM tree.
But I do not understand why you can not edit the HTML. Isn't Drupal open source? You should be able to find the file using FTP and manipulate it.

Resources