I have these columns:
text.NANA text.22 text.32
1 Female RNDM_MXN95.tif No NA
12 Male RNDM_QOS38.tif No NA
13 Female RNDM_WQW90.tif No NA
14 Male RNDM_BKD94.tif No NA
15 Male RNDM_LGD67.tif No NA
16 Female RNDM_AFP45.tif No NA
I want to create a column that only has the barcode that starts with RNDM_ and ends with .tif, but not including .tif. The tricky part is to get rid of the gender information that is also in the same column. There are a random amount of spaces between the gender information and the RNDM_:
text.NANA text.22 text.32 BARCODE
1 Female RNDM_MXN95.tif No NA RNDM_MXN95
12 Male RNDM_QOS38.tif No NA RNDM_QOS38
13 Female RNDM_WQW90.tif No NA RNDM_WQW90
14 Male RNDM_BKD94.tif No NA RNDM_BKD94
15 Male RNDM_LGD67.tif No NA RNDM_LGD67
16 Female RNDM_AFP45.tif No NA RNDM_AFP45
I made a very poor attempt with this, but it didn't work:
dfrm$BARCODE <- regexpr("RNDM_", dfrm$text.NANA)
# [1] 8 6 9 7 7 8 9 9 8 8 9 9 6 6 7 8 9 8
# attr(,"match.length")
# [1] 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
# attr(,"useBytes")
# [1] TRUE
Please help. Thanks!
So you just want to remove the file extension? Use file_path_sans_ext:
dfrm$BARCODE = file_path_sans_ext(dfrm$text.NANA)
If there’s more stuff in front, you can use the following regular expression to extract just the suffix:
dfrm$BARCODE = stringr::str_match(dfrm$text.NANA, '(RNDM_.*)\\.tif')[, 2]
Note that I’m using the {stringr} package here because the base R functions for extracting regex matches are terrible. Nobody uses them.
I strongly recommend against using strsplit here because it’s underspecified: from reading the code it’s absolutely not clear what the purpose of that code is. Write code that is self-explanatory, not code that requires explanation in a comment.
You can use sapply() and strsplit to do it easy, let me show you:
sapply(strsplit(dfrm$text.NANA, "_"),"[", 1)
That should work.
Edit:
sapply(strsplit(x, "[ .]+"),"[", 2)
Related
Say, I have a dataframe df in R as follows,
id inflam
1 1 0.03093764
2 2 0.50115406
3 3 0.82153770
4 4 0.01985961
5 5 0.04994588
6 6 0.91714810
7 7 0.83438400
8 8 0.80832225
9 9 0.12360681
10 10 0.08490079
I can access the entirety of the inflam column by indexing as df[,2] or df[2]. However, typeof(df[,2]) returns double, whereas typeof(df[2]) returns list. The comma seems to be the differentiator, but why is this the case? What is going on under the hood?
I have a .txt file.
The colnames were including the crossbar (-). if i use the read.delim or read.table, the crossbar(-) will be changed into dot (.).
for example
I use the read.table function for the txt as following.
a-10 A10 a11
1 570713.1532 4347.127038 560074.5148
2 361794.0426 4365.151908 271537.033
3 400072.0642 4448.913543 278229.5815
4 1413702.462 1961060.359 1290639.429
5 1825921.357 917867.7933 1744369.165
6 1392255.25 3239883.128 497342.8758
7 404629.443 377138.1097 396159.1927
8 879366.5207 1002531.369 989364.4228
9 1736700.906 4226107.776 3281239.818
X a.10 A10 a11
1 1 570713.2 4347.127 560074.5
2 2 361794.0 4365.152 271537.0
3 3 400072.1 4448.914 278229.6
4 4 1413702.5 1961060.359 1290639.4
5 5 1825921.4 917867.793 1744369.2
6 6 1392255.2 3239883.128 497342.9
7 7 404629.4 377138.110 396159.2
8 8 879366.5 1002531.369 989364.4
9 9 1736700.9 4226107.776 3281239.8
I hope to keep the crossbar, but not the dot. Can anyone give helps and tell me how to read the table?
Thanks
Say I have data that look like this:
level start end
1 1 133.631 825.141
2 2 133.631 155.953
3 3 146.844 155.953
4 2 293.754 302.196
5 3 293.754 302.196
6 4 293.754 301.428
7 2 326.253 343.436
8 3 326.253 343.436
9 4 333.827 343.436
10 2 578.066 611.766
11 3 578.066 611.766
12 4 578.066 587.876
13 4 598.052 611.766
14 2 811.228 825.141
15 3 811.228 825.141
or this:
level start end
1 1 3.60353 1112.62000
2 2 3.60353 20.35330
3 3 3.60353 8.77526
4 2 72.03720 143.60700
5 3 73.50530 101.13200
6 4 73.50530 81.64660
7 4 92.19030 101.13200
8 3 121.28500 143.60700
9 4 121.28500 128.25900
10 2 167.19700 185.04800
11 3 167.19700 183.44600
12 4 167.19700 182.84600
13 2 398.12300 418.64300
14 3 398.12300 418.64300
15 2 445.83600 454.54500
16 2 776.59400 798.34800
17 3 776.59400 796.64700
18 4 776.59400 795.91300
19 2 906.68800 915.89700
20 3 906.68800 915.89700
21 2 1099.44000 1112.62000
22 3 1099.44000 1112.62000
23 4 1100.14000 1112.62000
They produce the following graphs:
As you can see there are several time intervals at different levels. The level-1 interval always spans the entire duration of the time of interest. Levels 2+ have time intervals that are shorter.
What I would like to do is select the maximum number of non-overlapping time intervals covering each period that contain the maximum number of total time within them. I have marked in pink which ones those would be.
For small dataframes it is possible to brute force this, but obviously there should be some more logical way of doing this. I'm interested in hearing some ideas about what I should try.
EDIT:
I think one thing that could help here is the column 'level'. The results come from Kleinberg's burst detection algorithm (package 'bursts'). You will note that the levels are hierarchically organized. Levels of the same number cannot overlap. However levels successively increasing e.g. 2,3,4 in successive rows can overlap.
In essence, I think the problem could be shortened to this. Take the levels produced, but remove level 1. This would be the vector for the 2nd example:
2 3 2 3 4 4 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 3 2 3 4
Then, look at the 2s... if there are fewer than or only one '3' then that 2 is the longest interval. But if there are two or more 3's between successive 2's, then those 3s should be counted. Do this iteratively for each level. I think that should work...?
e.g.
vec<-df$level %>% as.vector() %>% .[-1]
vec
#[1] 2 3 2 3 4 4 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 2 2 3 4 2 3 2 3 4
max(vec) #4
vec3<-vec #need to find two or more 4's between 3s
vec3[vec3==3]<-NA
names(vec3)<-cumsum(is.na(vec3))
0 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 8
2 NA 2 NA 4 4 NA 4 2 NA 4 2 NA 2 2 NA 4 2 NA 2 NA 4
vec3.res<-which(table(vec3,names(vec3))["4",]>1)
which(names(vec3)==names(vec3.res) & vec3==4) #5 6
The above identifies rows 5 and 6 (which equate to rows 6 and 7 in original df) as having two fours that lie between 3's. Perhaps something using this sort of approach might work?
OK here is a stab using your second data set to test. This might not be correct in all cases!!
library(data.table)
dat <- fread("data.csv")
dat[,use:="maybe"]
make.pass <- function(dat,low,high,the.level,use) {
check <- dat[(use!="no" & level > the.level)]
check[,contained.by.above:=(low<=start & end<=high)]
check[,consecutive.contained.by.above:=
(contained.by.above &
!is.na(shift(contained.by.above,1)) &
shift(contained.by.above,1)),by=level]
if(!any(check[,consecutive.contained.by.above])) {
#Cause a side effect where we've learned we don't care:
dat[check[(contained.by.above),rownum],use:="no"]
print(check)
return("yes")
} else {
return("no")
}
}
dat[,rownum:=.I]
dat[level==1,use:=make.pass(dat,start,end,level,use),by=rownum]
dat
dat[use=="maybe" & level==2,use:=make.pass(dat,start,end,level,use),by=rownum]
dat
dat[use=="maybe" & level==3,use:=make.pass(dat,start,end,level,use),by=rownum]
dat
#Finally correct for last level
dat[use=="maybe" & level==4,use:="yes"]
I wrote these last steps out so you can trace in your own interactive session to see what's happening (see the print to get an idea) but you can remove the print and also condense the last steps into something like lapply(1:dat[,max(level)-1], function(the.level) dat[use=="maybe" & level==the.level,use:=make.pass......]) In response to your comment if there are an arbitrary number of levels you will definitely want to use this formalism, and follow it with a final call to dat[use=="maybe" & level==max(level),use:="yes"].
Output:
> dat
level start end use rownum
1: 1 3.60353 1112.62000 no 1
2: 2 3.60353 20.35330 yes 2
3: 3 3.60353 8.77526 no 3
4: 2 72.03720 143.60700 no 4
5: 3 73.50530 101.13200 no 5
6: 4 73.50530 81.64660 yes 6
7: 4 92.19030 101.13200 yes 7
8: 3 121.28500 143.60700 yes 8
9: 4 121.28500 128.25900 no 9
10: 2 167.19700 185.04800 yes 10
11: 3 167.19700 183.44600 no 11
12: 4 167.19700 182.84600 no 12
13: 2 398.12300 418.64300 yes 13
14: 3 398.12300 418.64300 no 14
15: 2 445.83600 454.54500 yes 15
16: 2 776.59400 798.34800 yes 16
17: 3 776.59400 796.64700 no 17
18: 4 776.59400 795.91300 no 18
19: 2 906.68800 915.89700 yes 19
20: 3 906.68800 915.89700 no 20
21: 2 1099.44000 1112.62000 yes 21
22: 3 1099.44000 1112.62000 no 22
23: 4 1100.14000 1112.62000 no 23
level start end use rownum
On the off chance this is correct, the algorithm can roughly be described as follows:
Mark all the intervals as possible.
Start with a given level. Pick a particular interval (by=rownum) say called X. With X in mind, subset a copy of the data to all higher-level intervals.
Mark any of these that are contained in X as "contained in X".
If consecutive intervals at the same level are contained in X, X is no good b/c it wastes intervals. In this case label X's "use" variable as "no" so we'll never think about X again. [Note: if it's possible that non-consecutive intervals are contained in X, or that containing multiple intervals across levels could ruin X's viability, then this logic might need to be changed to count contained intervals instead of finding consecutive ones. I didn't think about this at all, but it's just occurring to me now, so use at your own risk.]
On the other hand, if X passed the test, then we've already established it's good. Mark it as a "yes." But importantly, we also have to mark any single interval contained in X as "no," or else when we iterate the step it will forget that it was contained inside a good interval and mark itself as "yes" as well. This is the side effect step.
Now, iterate, ignoring any results that we've already determined.
Finally any "maybe"s leftover at the highest level are automatically in.
Let me know what you think of this--this is a rough draft and some aspects might not be correct.
I'm having trouble with the na.spline() function in the zoo package. Although the documentation explicitly states that this is an interpolation function, the behaviour I'm getting includes extrapolation.
The following code reproduces the problem:
require(zoo)
vector <- c(NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,5,NA,7,8,NA,NA)
na.spline(vector)
The output of this should be:
NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 6 7 8 NA NA
This would be interpolation of the internal NA, leaving the trailing NAs in place. But, instead I get:
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
According to the documentation, this shouldn't happen. Is there some way to avoid extrapolation?
I recognise that in my example, I could use linear interpolation, but this is a MWE. Although I'm not necessarily wed to the na.spline() function, I need some way to interpolate using cubic splines.
This behavior appears to be coming from the stats::spline function, e.g.,
spline(seq_along(vector), vector, xout=seq_along(vector))$y
# [1] -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Here is a work around, using the fact that na.approx strictly interpolates.
replace(na.spline(vector), is.na(na.approx(vector, na.rm=FALSE)), NA)
# [1] NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 6 7 8 NA NA
Edit
As #G.Grothendieck suggests in the comments below, another, no doubt more performant, way is:
na.spline(vector) + 0*na.approx(vector, na.rm = FALSE)
I always get angry at my R code when I have to process dataframes, i.e. filtering out certain rows. The code gets very illegible as I tend to choose meaningful, but long, names for my objects. An example:
all.mutations.extra.large.name <- read.delim(filename)
head(all.mutations.extra.large.name)
id gene pos aa consequence V
ENSG00000105732 ZN574_HUMAN 81 x/N missense_variant 3
ENSG00000125879 OTOR_HUMAN 7 V/3 missense_variant 2
ENSG00000129194 SOX15_HUMAN 20 N/T missense_variant 3
ENSG00000099204 ABLM1_HUMAN 33 H/R missense_variant 2
ENSG00000103335 PIEZ1_HUMAN 11 Q/R missense_variant 3
ENSG00000171533 MAP6_HUMAN 39 A/G missense_variant 3
all.mutations.extra.large.name <- all.mutations.extra.large.name[which(all.mutations.extra.large.name$gene == ZN574_HUMAN)]
So in order to kick out all other lines in which I am not interested I need to reference 3 times the object all.mutations.extra.large.name. And reating this kind of step for different columns makes the code really difficult to understand.
Therefore my question: Is there a way to filter out rows by a criterion without referencing the object 3 times. Something like this would be beautiful: myobj[,gene=="ZN574_HUMAN"]
You can use subset for that:
subset(all.mutations.extra.large.name, gene == "ZN574_HUMAN")
Several options:
all.mutations.extra.large.name <- data.frame(a=1:5, b=2:6)
within(all.mutations.extra.large.name, a[a < 3] <- 0)
a b
1 0 2
2 0 3
3 3 4
4 4 5
5 5 6
transform(all.mutations.extra.large.name, b = b^2)
a b
1 1 4
2 2 9
3 3 16
4 4 25
5 5 36
Also check ?attach if you would like to avoid repetitive typing like all.mutations.extra.large.name$foo.