I am writing an automated test using Spock/Geb and I want to verify that a field is actually required.
Here is the code:
Code for Client Name and Client ID fields which are both required
Here is what I have tried to write that did NOT successfully check to make sure the two fields are actually required:
Assertions
Does anyone have any idea what my code should look like?
Here is what the actual page looks like - I am trying to verify the red asterisk:
enter image description here
Update: The following code worked:
assert clientConfigPage.modalClientNameTextBox.getAttribute("required")
You want to use Navigator.hasClass(String className). This will return a boolean whether the element has a class by the given name. In your example you use .getAttribute("class") == "req" but the class attribute is "required" so you must check for that string literal.
Related
My use case is simple: I am sending text emails, i am trying to make integrations tests in order to check the full text body of the message, please note I don't want to check if message contain a string, i am looking for format and structure. No fancy check since it is just text.
The current public API, as in documentation, and as I see in code allows me to check only whether the message contains a string assertEmailTextBodyContains().
I did read: https://symfony.com/doc/current/mailer.html#write-a-functional-test, from MailerAssertionsTrait can only get a RawMessage, i tried, but did not get a strait way to wrap it within an Email.
What am I missing?
Is there any technical/non technical issue preventing to have such Constraint implemented?
Something like: assertEmailTextBodySameAs() for example.
Just for the sake of documentation.
After informing my self more, i realise that in my ignorance i was looking for an idiomatic syntax in the MailerAssertionsTrait instead what i needed was just to use the IsIdentical constraint from phpunit.
$this->assertThat($email->getTextBody(), new IsIdentical($expectedText), 'Mail body are not the same');
Why such assertion is not built in in trait i did assume it is just to keep it simple allowing others like me to extend later on easily, it is just an speculation though.
I'm writing a Gatling simulation, and I want to verify both that a certain element exists, and that the content of one of its attributes starts with a certain substring. E.g.:
val scn: ScenarioBuilder = scenario("BasicSimulation")
.exec(http("request_1")
.get("/path/to/resource")
.check(
status.is(200),
css("form#name", "action").ofType[String].startsWith(BASE_URL).saveAs("next_url")))
Now, when I add the startsWith above, the compiler reports an error that says startsWith is not a member of io.gatling.http.check.body.HttpBodyCssCheckBuilder[String]. If I leave the startsWith out, then everything works just fine. I know that the expected form element is there, but I cant confirm that its #action attribute starts with the correct base.
How can I confirm that the attribute start with a certain substring?
Refer this https://gatling.io/docs/2.3/general/scenario/
I have copied the below from there but it is a session function and will work like below :-
doIf(session => session("myKey").as[String].startsWith("admin")) { // executed if the session value stored in "myKey" starts with "admin" exec(http("if true").get("..."))}
I just had the same problem. I guess one option is to use a validator, but I'm not sure how if you can declare one on the fly to validate against your BASE_URL (the documentation doesn't really give any examples). You can use transform and is.
Could look like this:
css("form#name", "action").transform(_.startsWith(BASE_URL)).is(true)
If you also want to include the saveAs call in one go you could probably also do something like this:
css("form#name", "action").transform(_.substring(0, BASE_URL.length)).is(BASE_URL).saveAs
But that's harder to read. Also I'm not sure what happens when substring throws an exception (like IndexOutOfBounds).
I'm a newbie but I think Paw can do what i need :
I need to extract a session id behind a login page.
I go to https://admin.booking.com, filling the form (login and pass) and the landing page behind includes a session id :
https://admin.booking.com/pc/index.html?ses=xxxxyyyyyzzzzz11112222233333
I'd like to :
1) Push credentials with Paw as part of my request,
2) get the above item (ses) item as a response so i can use the php script extension provided by Paw and then call this script "on demand".
Is this possible ? If so, what should i do ?
Thanks for your help
UPDATE*: we've added a documentation article to describe the process a little more: Login via a web form in Paw. We've detailed the process to deal with CSRF tokens too.
Paw isn't quite yet ready for handling web/HTML forms. Though, there's one way to do it the right way: if you inspect the form with the Chrome dev tools you'll find the name of the input from the DOM/HTML:
In your case, you have the inputs: loginname, password, lang.
Also, find the <form…> tag to see what's the action attribute. If there's no action attribute (like in your example), it means the target URL for your form is the current page's URL (https://admin.booking.com/ in your case). Also, make sure the method="POST" is also there in the <form…> tag, otherwise this method won't work.
Then jump into Paw and set:
URL (in your case https://admin.booking.com/)
method to POST
go to the Body tab and use "Form URL-Encoded + fill up the fields from your form
If all works, you'll see Paw show a redirection request, and if you go to the right-hand side panel under "Response" > "Headers", you should see a Location header with a value similar to the URL you initially mentioned (https://admin.booking.com/pc/index.html?ses=xxxxyyyyyzzzzz11112222233333). Hurray! You got your value into Paw!
Now that you have that, you can create in a new request (click on the + button at the bottom of the left-hand side list). And wherever you want to use this session token/ID, you can insert a dynamic value to retrieve that URL value. You have more infos here, in our docs, but I'll describe the steps here:
On whichever field you want to insert the token, right-click and pick Responses > Response Header.
Make sure you pick the first request in the "Request" dropdown menu, and enter Location in the "Header" field:
You should see the value of the Location header of the previous response appear here.
Now what you want to do is to extract only the part you want (i.e. the value of the ses param in your case). For that you'll need that extension for Paw, so please install it now: https://luckymarmot.com/paw/extensions/RegExMatch
Copy the dynamic value you have just inserted (the blue token), and right-click on that field to insert a new dynamic value, and pick Extensions > RegExp match:
In the Input field, paste the previous dynamic value you copied. And use the RegExp field to write a regular expression that will successfully extract the part of the URL you want (this should work in your case ses=(.*)).
Now that you're set up. You should be able to use this little new blue token wherever you like and automagically extract the value from the previous form. And whenever you send again the initial request, and get a new token, everything else will also update! :)
It was a little long guide, but I hope this will help you and hopefully others too.
I am trying to find entities (Tags) in the database via their Name property, where it is important to ignore the case (When database is searched and the Database contains a Tag with the name Database, that one should be returned). Right now, my code looks like this:
public IEnumerable<db.Tag> FindByNames(IEnumerable<string> tagNames)
{
return this.DatabaseContext.Tags
.Where(tag => tagNames.Contains(tag.Name));
}
Obviously, this one is case sensitive. I have tried to provide StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase as comparer to the Contains method, but got a warning during execution that the expression could not be translated and would be executed in code rather than in the database (I don't remember the exact message, I will edit as soon as I am back on my development machine). I can live with that if I have to, but it would be nice to know how to let the database do the work in this case. Is it possible?
No change should be necessary. SQLite's "LIKE" is already case-insensitive.
The default behavior of the LIKE operator is to ignore case for ASCII characters.
(cref https://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_case_sensitive_like and Case sensitive and insensitive like in SQLite)
Of course, you can always use .FromSql() to get the exact query you want. Example:
context.Tags.FromSql("SELECT * FROM tags WHERE name LIKE '%{0}%'", tagName)
Is it possible to write your own validator in grails that will return a valid object?
Something like:
static constraints = {
name(validator: {val, obj ->
if (Drink.findByName(val)) return [Drink.findByName(val)]
})
}
In other words - if the Drink already exists in the DB, just return the existing one when someone does a
new Drink("Coke")
and coke is already in the database
You cannot do this with a custom validator. It's not really what it was meant for. From the Grails Reference:
The closure can return:
null or true to indicate that the value is valid
false to indicate an invalid value and use the default message code
a string to indicate the error code to append to the "classname.propertName." string used to resolve the error message. If a field specific message cannot be resolved, the error code itself will be resolved allowing for global error messages.
a list containing a string as above, and then any number of arguments following it, which can be used as formatted message arguments indexed at 3 onwards. See grails-app/i18n/message.properties to see how the default error message codes use the arguments.
An alternative might be to just create a service method that 1) looks for the domain and returns it if it exists, 2) otherwise, saves the domain and returns it.
There's probably a more elegant alternative. Regardless, Grails' constraints mechanism isn't (and shouldn't be) capable of this.
Not sure if you can do this from inside the validator, but:
Drink d = Drink.findOrSaveWhere(name: 'Smooth Drink', alcoholLevel: '4.5')