I have copied the code from Save Data.
which is like this:
void addScoreToLeaders(string name, int score ,string
key,Dictionary<string,object> childUpdates){
reference.Child ("leaders").KeepSynced (true);
reference.Child ("leaders").RunTransaction(mutableData =>{
List<Dictionary<string,object>> leaders = mutableData.Value as
List<Dictionary<string,object>>;
if(leaders == null){
leaders = new List<Dictionary<string,object>>();
} else if(mutableData.ChildrenCount >= MAX_SCORE){
int minScore = int.MaxValue;
Dictionary<string,object> minValue = null;
foreach(var child in leaders){
if(!(child is Dictionary<string,object>)) continue;
int childScore = (int)((Dictionary<string,object>)child)
["score"];
if(childScore < minScore){
minScore = childScore;
minValue = child;
}
}
if(minScore > score){
return TransactionResult.Abort ();
}
leaders.Remove (minValue);
}
//Add the new high score
Dictionary<string ,object> newScoreMap = new
Dictionary<string,object> ();
LeaderBoardEntry entry = new LeaderBoardEntry (name, score);
newScoreMap = entry.ToDictionary ();
leaders.Add (newScoreMap);
mutableData.Value = leaders;
return TransactionResult.Success (mutableData);
});
}
okay, there's two things not happens correctly :
TransactionResult.Success(mutableData) does not store the new data at the location
Return mutableData null for every first time i call the method
[Solved] after examining the code and several attempts of testing found the solution .
line number five (5) of the code causing problem which is :
List<Dictionary<string,object>> leaders = mutableData.Value as
List<Dictionary<string,object>>;
replace with :
Dictionary<string,object> leaders = mutableData.Value as
Dictionary<string,object>;
because mutableData.Value returned the data contained in this instance as native types, and i saved the data like Dictionary<.string,object>;
Related
Can anyone give where to look, or what I am missing, for how to use runTransaction in 9.0.3? (Flutter, Firebase realtime DB)
I updated firebase_database ^7.0.0 to ^9.0.3. Had to change runTransaction(MutableData mutable) to runTransaction(Object object), and the Object is null for Map data. Does return a String when point to single node of a String.
For something to work I placed + ‘/sap’ at end of .ref(…), and it gave ‘DROID’
Code Updated for Comment below:
bool bCanWeStartGame = false;
bool bIfiOS = false;
bIfiOS = Theme.of(referencedData.mngGamesPageMaterialContext)
.platform == TargetPlatform.iOS;
DatabaseReference playersRef = referencedData.database.ref(
TABLENAME_STARTS + '/' + referencedData.strFBGameUniqueIDKey);
if(bIfiOS){
//apparently iPhone needs to 'open line to DB record' to work
playersRef.once()
.then((DatabaseEvent event) {//dont need to do anything??
});
}
TransactionResult txResult;
//while loop to repeat runTransaction until solved
int iWhileLoopCheck = 0; //so whileLoop does not go forever
bool bTransactionCommittedOrGetOutAnyWay = false;
while(!bTransactionCommittedOrGetOutAnyWay
&& (iWhileLoopCheck<30)){
iWhileLoopCheck++;
txResult = await playersRef
.runTransaction(
(Object post) {
if (post == null) {
if(bIfiOS){sleep(Duration(milliseconds: 3));}
return Transaction.abort(); //out, but will retry transaction
}
Map<String, dynamic> _post = Map<String, dynamic>.from(post as Map);
bTransactionCommittedOrGetOutAnyWay = true; //whichever of
//options below take effect, dont want to continue while loop
if (_post[STARTS_TABLE_ALL_PLAYERS] !=
startingGames[iIndexInStartingGames].allplayers) {
//someone has joined since trying to start
bCanWeStartGame = false;
//Transaction.abort() as dont want to change data
return Transaction.abort();
} else {
//Nobody has joined, so can Start. Tell others Game is starting
_post['stg'] = true;
bCanWeStartGame = true;
return Transaction.success(_post);
}
});
} //while runtransaction doesnot get at data```
I have a custom PXbutton called UploadRecords, when I click this button I should populate the grid with records and release the records.
Release Action is pressed in the UploadRecords action delegate. The problem I get with this code is, the code here function properly for less records by release action but when passes thousands of records to release, it takes huge time(> 30 min.) and show the error like Execution timeout.
suggest me to avoid more execution time and release the records fastly.
namespace PX.Objects.AR
{
public class ARPriceWorksheetMaint_Extension : PXGraphExtension<ARPriceWorksheetMaint>
{
//public class string_R112 : Constant<string>
//{
// public string_R112()
// : base("4E5CCAFC-0957-4DB3-A4DA-2A24EA700047")
// {
// }
//}
public class string_R112 : Constant<string>
{
public string_R112()
: base("EA")
{
}
}
public PXSelectJoin<InventoryItem, InnerJoin<CSAnswers, On<InventoryItem.noteID, Equal<CSAnswers.refNoteID>>,
LeftJoin<INItemCost, On<InventoryItem.inventoryID, Equal<INItemCost.inventoryID>>>>,
Where<InventoryItem.salesUnit, Equal<string_R112>>> records;
public PXAction<ARPriceWorksheet> uploadRecord;
[PXUIField(DisplayName = "Upload Records", MapEnableRights = PXCacheRights.Select, MapViewRights = PXCacheRights.Select)]
[PXButton]
public IEnumerable UploadRecord(PXAdapter adapter)
{
using (PXTransactionScope ts = new PXTransactionScope())
{
foreach (PXResult<InventoryItem, CSAnswers, INItemCost> res in records.Select())
{
InventoryItem invItem = (InventoryItem)res;
INItemCost itemCost = (INItemCost)res;
CSAnswers csAnswer = (CSAnswers)res;
ARPriceWorksheetDetail gridDetail = new ARPriceWorksheetDetail();
gridDetail.PriceType = PriceTypeList.CustomerPriceClass;
gridDetail.PriceCode = csAnswer.AttributeID;
gridDetail.AlternateID = "";
gridDetail.InventoryID = invItem.InventoryID;
gridDetail.Description = invItem.Descr;
gridDetail.UOM = "EA";
gridDetail.SiteID = 6;
InventoryItemExt invExt = PXCache<InventoryItem>.GetExtension<InventoryItemExt>(invItem);
decimal y;
if (decimal.TryParse(csAnswer.Value, out y))
{
y = decimal.Parse(csAnswer.Value);
}
else
y = decimal.Parse(csAnswer.Value.Replace(" ", ""));
gridDetail.CurrentPrice = y; //(invExt.UsrMarketCost ?? 0m) * (Math.Round(y / 100, 2));
gridDetail.PendingPrice = y; // (invExt.UsrMarketCost ?? 0m)* (Math.Round( y/ 100, 2));
gridDetail.TaxID = null;
Base.Details.Update(gridDetail);
}
ts.Complete();
}
Base.Document.Current.Hold = false;
using (PXTransactionScope ts = new PXTransactionScope())
{
Base.Release.Press();
ts.Complete();
}
List<ARPriceWorksheet> lst = new List<ARPriceWorksheet>
{
Base.Document.Current
};
return lst;
}
protected void ARPriceWorksheet_RowSelected(PXCache cache, PXRowSelectedEventArgs e, PXRowSelected InvokeBaseHandler)
{
if (InvokeBaseHandler != null)
InvokeBaseHandler(cache, e);
var row = (ARPriceWorksheet)e.Row;
uploadRecord.SetEnabled(row.Status != SPWorksheetStatus.Released);
}
}
}
First, Do you need them all to be in a single transaction scope? This would revert all changes if there is an exception in any. If you need to have them all committed without any errors rather than each record, you would have to perform the updates this way.
I would suggest though moving your process to a custom processing screen. This way you can load the records, select one or many, and use the processing engine built into Acumatica to handle the process, rather than a single button click action. Here is an example: https://www.acumatica.com/blog/creating-custom-processing-screens-in-acumatica/
Based on the feedback that it must be all in a single transaction scope and thousands of records, I can only see two optimizations that may assist. First is increasing the Timeout as explained in this blog post. https://acumaticaclouderp.blogspot.com/2017/12/acumatica-snapshots-uploading-and.html
Next I would load all records into memory first and then loop through them with a ToList(). That might save you time as it should pull all records at once rather than once for each record.
going from
foreach (PXResult<InventoryItem, CSAnswers, INItemCost> res in records.Select())
to
var recordList = records.Select().ToList();
foreach (PXResult<InventoryItem, CSAnswers, INItemCost> res in recordList)
heres my code below...
TableColumn tc = new TableColumn();
TableColumn[] tc2 = new TableColumn[10];
for(int i=0; i<5, i++){
tc.getColumns().add(tc2[i]);
}
and i try to override commit method for editing cells.
public void commit(Object val) {
// Get the table
TableView<MainTable> t = this.getTableView();
// Get the selected row/column
MainTable selectedRow = t.getItems().get(this.getTableRow().getIndex());
TableColumn<MainTable, ?> selectedColumn = t.getColumns().get(t.getColumns().indexOf(this.getTableColumn()));
// Get current property name
String propertyName = ((PropertyValueFactory) selectedColumn.getCellValueFactory()).getProperty();
// Create a method name conforming to java standards ( setProperty )
propertyName = ("" + propertyName.charAt(0)).toUpperCase() + propertyName.substring(1);
// Try to run the update
try {
// Type specific checks - could be done inside each setProperty() method
if(val instanceof Double) {
Method method = selectedRow.getClass().getMethod("set" + propertyName, double.class);
method.invoke(selectedRow, (double) val);
}
if(val instanceof String) {
Method method = selectedRow.getClass().getMethod("set" + propertyName, String.class);
method.invoke(selectedRow, (String) val);
}
if(val instanceof Integer) {
Method method = selectedRow.getClass().getMethod("set" + propertyName, int.class);
method.invoke(selectedRow, (int) val);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
// CommitEdit for good luck
commitEdit((String) val);
}
and i got ArrayIndexOutofBoundsException on console view.
so my question is
how can i select getcolumns added other column???
TableColumn<MainTable, ?> selectedColumn = t.getColumns().get(t.getColumns().indexOf(this.getTableColumn()));
i think this code has to be changed...
anyone got ideas??
Nested columns are not part of the TableView.columns list.
If you need the corresponding TableView column, just go up through the hierarchy until you reach a column without a parentColumn:
TableColumn<MainTable, ?> selectedColumn = this.getTableColumn();
TableColumn<MainTable, ?> c = selectedColumn;
while ((c = selectedColumn.getParentColumn()) != null) {
selectedColumn = c;
}
If you just need the column itself, simply use this.getTableColumn(), instead of finding the index of the column in the columns list and then accessing that index in the same list. (I guess the latter is what you need.)
Furthermore, if PropertyValueFactory returns properties of the item class, you could use this property to set the value instead of using reflection:
ObservableValue obs = selectedColumn.getCellObservableValue(this.getIndex());
if (obs instanceof WritableValue) {
((WritableValue) obs).setValue(val);
} else {
// reflecitive approach
}
Furthermore you shouldn't add null as a nested column, but you're doing it here:
TableColumn[] tc2 = new TableColumn[10];
for(int i=0; i<5, i++){
tc.getColumns().add(tc2[i]);
}
I am getting an XML data from server (please refer to xmlData value).
I need to:
Create another XML with non-duplicates Folders
Create another XML with final count on monthly basis.
I am unable to do this with below code and getting duplicate records.
private var xmlData:XML = new XML("<root><SUMMARY_RECORD><FOLDER>Folder1</FOLDER><COUNT>100</COUNT><MONTH>Feb</MONTH><QUARTER>Q1</QUARTER><YEAR>2014</YEAR></SUMMARY_RECORD><SUMMARY_RECORD><FOLDER>Folder1</FOLDER><COUNT>100</COUNT><MONTH>Feb</MONTH><QUARTER>Q1</QUARTER><YEAR>2014</YEAR></SUMMARY_RECORD></root>");
var folderDataXML:XML = new XML("<root></root>");
var folderDGDataXML:XML = new XML("<root></root>");
private function loaded():void{
var item:XML;
folderDGDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<FOLDER_NAME><Name>ALL</Name></FOLDER_NAME>"));
for each (item in xmlData.SUMMARY_RECORD){
if (folderDGDataXML.FOLDER_NAME.(Name==item.FOLDER).toString() == ""){
folderDGDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<FOLDER_NAME><Name>"+item.FOLDER+"</Name></FOLDER_NAME>"));
}
if (folderDataXML.SUMMARY_RECORD.(Name==item.MONTH).toXMLString() == ""){
folderDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<SUMMARY_RECORD><Name>"+item.MONTH+"</Name><COUNT>"+item.COUNT+"</COUNT></SUMMARY_RECORD>"));
}else{
var count:int = Number(folderDataXML.SUMMARY_RECORD.(Name==item.MONTH).COUNT) + Number(item.COUNT);
folderDataXML.SUMMARY_RECORD.(Name==item.MONTH).COUNT = count;
}
}
}
Final output, folderDGDataXML:
<root>
<FOLDER_NAME>
<Name>ALL</Name>
</FOLDER_NAME>
<FOLDER_NAME>
<Name>Folder1</Name>
</FOLDER_NAME>
<FOLDER_NAME>
<Name>Folder1</Name>
</FOLDER_NAME>
</root>
folderDataXML:
<root>
<SUMMARY_RECORD>
<Name>Feb</Name>
<COUNT>100</COUNT>
</SUMMARY_RECORD>
<SUMMARY_RECORD>
<Name>Feb</Name>
<COUNT>100</COUNT>
</SUMMARY_RECORD>
</root>
What am I doing wrong?
After getting correct XML, I need to populate datagrid & column chart.
Try this one
In XML Checking the elements present or not with hasOwnProperty or we can use in operator anyhow our case if it is based on value try like this way folderDGDataXML.descendants("FOLDER_NAME").(Name.text() == "Folder1"); //Return always XMLList. With the help of length() we can predict element with value occur or not.
Hope this will work for you.
var xmlData:XML = new XML("<root><SUMMARY_RECORD><FOLDER>Folder1</FOLDER><COUNT>100</COUNT><MONTH>Feb</MONTH><QUARTER>Q1</QUARTER><YEAR>2014</YEAR></SUMMARY_RECORD><SUMMARY_RECORD><FOLDER>Folder1</FOLDER><COUNT>100</COUNT><MONTH>Feb</MONTH><QUARTER>Q1</QUARTER><YEAR>2014</YEAR></SUMMARY_RECORD></root>");
var folderDataXML:XML = new XML("<root></root>");
var folderDGDataXML:XML = new XML("<root></root>");
var item:XML;
folderDGDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<FOLDER_NAME><Name>ALL</Name></FOLDER_NAME>"));
for each (item in xmlData.SUMMARY_RECORD)
{
var folderName:String = item.FOLDER.text();
var monthName:String = item.MONTH.text();
var existXMLList:XMLList = folderDGDataXML.descendants("FOLDER_NAME").(Name.text() == folderName);
if (existXMLList.length() == 0)
{
folderDGDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<FOLDER_NAME><Name>"+item.FOLDER+"</Name></FOLDER_NAME>"));
}
var monthXMLList:XMLList = folderDataXML.descendants("SUMMARY_RECORD").(Name.text() == monthName);
if (monthXMLList.length() == 0)
{
folderDataXML.appendChild(new XML("<SUMMARY_RECORD><Name>"+item.MONTH+"</Name><COUNT>"+item.COUNT+"</COUNT></SUMMARY_RECORD>"));
}
else
{
monthXMLList..COUNT = Number(monthXMLList..COUNT) + Number(item.COUNT);
//If more than one node it throws error. you need to use loop operation
}
}
trace("folderDGDataXML" + folderDGDataXML);
trace("folderDataXML" + folderDataXML);
The code below works, but I know it can't be the most efficient. Is there another way to ask if there are any rows rather than using Any()?
I'd like to have the NoResults Div hidden by default and only turned on when no rows are present, likewise have the repeater show up by default and only hidden when no results are listed.
using (AgileEntities context = new AgileEntities())
{
int StoryID = Convert.ToInt32(Request["StoryID"]);
var tasks = from t in context.Tasks
where t.StoryId == StoryID
orderby t.Number
select t;
rptTasks.DataSource = tasks;
rptTasks.DataBind();
if (tasks.Any())
{
rptTasks.Visible = true;
NoResults.Visible = false;
}
else
{
rptTasks.Visible = false;
NoResults.Visible = true;
}
}
Caution - calling .Any() may re-execute your query
I would do this a bit 'safer' to ensure single execution.
//force execution once
var taskList = tasks.ToList();
rptTasks.Visible = taskList.Count>0;
NoResults.Visible = taskList.Count==0;
And
rptTasks.DataSource = tasksList;
rptTasks.DataBind();
The problem with Any() and Count() is they cause your code to execute over and over - a test case
static void Main(string[] args)
{
//Populate the test class
List list = new List(1000);
for (int i=0; i o.CreateDate.AddSeconds(5) > DateTime.Now);
while (newList.Any())
{
//Note - are actual count keeps decreasing.. showing our 'execute' is running every time we call count.
Console.WriteLine(newList.Any());
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(500);
}
}
You can replace Any() with Count() above to show. Basically the code keeps evaluating the query when you call Any() - I'm not sure if this applies to Linq to Sql though if there is any different caching mechanism.
var tasks = from t in context.Tasks
where t.StoryId == StoryID
orderby t.Number
select t;
var tasksList = tasks.ToList();
rptTasks.DataSource = tasksList;
rptTasks.DataBind();
if (tasksList.Count > 0)
{
rptTasks.Visible = true;
NoResults.Visible = false;
}
else
{
rptTasks.Visible = false;
NoResults.Visible = true;
}
The ToList() call will execute the query and create a list of tasks objects
Your DataBind() call has already caused the query to be executed, so calling Any() on top of that shouldn't cost you anything further.
You can change this with :
rptTasks.Visible = tasks.Any();
NoResults.Visible = !rptTasks.Visible;