I'm currently using this layout:
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-4">...</div>
<div class="col-md-4">...</div>
<div class="col-md-4">...</div>
<div class="col-md-4">...</div>
<div class="col-md-4">...</div>
<div class="col-md-4">...</div>
<div class="col-md-4">...</div>
<div class="col-md-4">...</div>
<!-- and on and on -->
</div>
The content in each column is variable in size, this causes a strange flow in the browser. Something like this.
As you can see, columns 4,5,6 are in a new "row". and columns 7 and 8 have skipped a whole column. These behaviors are not desireable, Instead I want the columns to flow like so.
In this situation every column hugs the column it's under. I haven't found a fix yet for this problem. I have looked into clearfix. and it does not seem to help the situation, as it just moves a column to a newline/row.
What you are looking for is often reffered as a Pinterest style grid.
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
</div>
CSS
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
font-size: 22px;
font-family: "Helvetica", sans-serif;
color: #333333;
}
.container {
background-color: #f2f2f2;
padding: 10px;
border: 2px solid #CCCCCC;
max-width: 900px;
margin: 0 auto;
height: 470px;
display: flex;
flex-flow: column wrap; /* Shorthand – you could use ‘flex-direction: column’ and ‘flex-wrap: wrap’ instead */
justify-content: flex-start;
align-items: flex-start;
}
.item {
background-color: orange;
height: 150px;
width: 31%;
margin: 1%;
padding: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(2) {
background-color: pink;
height: 250px;
}
.item:nth-child(3) {
height: 190px;
}
.item:nth-child(4) {
background-color: aqua;
height: 220px;
}
Demo: https://codepen.io/michellebarker/pen/zvxpoG
Or this alternative: https://bootsnipp.com/snippets/featured/pinterest-like-responsive-grid. Or search for more examples
Related
I'm trying to use gap to specify gaps between flexed items within my grid system, but running in to a major drawback. It seems that when you're using flex-grow: 0;/flex-shrink: 0; in conjunction with gap and flex-basis values that fill the entire available width (i.e. three columns with flex: 0 0 33.3333%;), the columns overflow their parent container as the gap doesn't account for the fixed width as specified with flex: 0 0 33.3333%.
Similar to box-sizing: border-box;, is there some way to instruct the rendering engine that the gap should be subtracted when determining the width of these columns?
Demonstration:
.row {
display: flex;
gap: 30px;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.col {
flex: 0 0 33.3333%;
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
}
:root {
font-family: sans-serif;
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<h2>With gap:</h2>
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
</div>
<h2>Without gap:</h2>
<div class="row" style="gap:0;">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
</div>
Note: I could account for this with a formula like flex-basis: calc($width - ($gap / ($number-of-columns / 2));, but as this is for a reusable grid system, I can't practically account for every possible scenario.
Here is another not very elegant quick way to hack your way forward. Similar to the answer by UPinar it alters the outer flex container. Here with negative margin on the right (this might cause other layout problems!). This "solution" is using shrink 0. Also it works with a wrapping flex.
I agree that this should not be so complicated and hacky. Maybe we are missing something? I am also under the impression that this is not the really the desired box-sizing border-box behavior which I hoped to find in combination with the gap property.
flex and gap should be hack free like: Draw three containers each consuming a third of the width and have some space between em. AFAIK gap works that way with CSS grid and CSS columns.
.flex {
display: flex;
flex-grow: 0;
flex-shrink: 0;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.flex.gap {
gap: var(--space-s);
margin-right: calc(-1 * var(--space-s));
}
.col {
flex-basis: 33.3333%;
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
}
.flex.gap .col {
flex-basis: calc(33.3333% - var(--space-s));
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
}
:root {
font-family: sans-serif;
--space-s: 1rem;
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<h2>With gap</h2>
<div class="flex gap">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
<div class="col">
4
</div>
<div class="col">
5
</div>
<div class="col">
6
</div>
</div>
<h2>Without gap</h2>
<div class="flex">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
<div class="col">
4
</div>
<div class="col">
5
</div>
<div class="col">
6
</div>
</div>
The formula you mentioned works... you can use CSS variables to make a reuseable grid system. A buddy and I came up with this:
.flex{
--columns:3;
--gap:30px;
--gap-count:calc( var(--columns) - 1 );
display:flex;
gap:var(--gap);
}
.flex-child {
flex-basis: calc( calc( 100% / var(--columns) ) - calc( var(--gap) / var(--columns) * var(--gap-count) ) );
}
#media (max-width: 992px) {
.flex{
--columns:2;
}
}
#media (max-width: 767px) {
.flex{
--columns:1;
}
}
So then all you need to change are the variables --columns and --gap
https://codepen.io/pyledigital/pen/mdWmjQb
When you add a padding-right: calc(var(--gap-space) * 2); to parent container. Parent container width will calculte before child containers use 100% which is parent container width. You need to change parent containers width before using its width inside child container.
*,
*::before,
*::after {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body {
min-height: 100vh;
text-rendering: optimizeSpeed;
line-height: 1.5;
margin: 0;
background-color: bisque;
display: grid;
place-content: center;
}
:root{
--gap-space:30px;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
.row-1 {
display: flex;
gap: var(--gap-space);
border: 2px solid red;
padding-right: calc(var(--gap-space) * 2);
}
.row-1 .col{
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
flex: 0 0 calc(100% / 3);
}
.row-2{
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.row-2 .col{
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
flex: 0 0 calc(100% / 3);
}
<h2>With gap:</h2>
<div class="row-1">
<div class="col">1</div>
<div class="col">2</div>
<div class="col">3</div>
</div>
<h2>Without gap:</h2>
<div class="row-2" style="gap: 0">
<div class="col">1</div>
<div class="col">2</div>
<div class="col">3</div>
</div>
What's wrong with using only width?
.col {
width: 33.3333%;
...
}
.row {
display: flex;
gap: 30px;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.col {
width: 33.3333%;
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
}
:root {
font-family: sans-serif;
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<h2>With gap:</h2>
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
</div>
<h2>Without gap:</h2>
<div class="row" style="gap:0;">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
</div>
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I need help laying out my html with css flexbox (I hope this is doable with flexbox).
I have a Container with a variable amount of images. Image can be either landscape or portrait orientation. If image is landscape (Image 1) - it will occupy one 'row'. If image is portrait - there are two cases:
If there is one portrait image in a 'row' (either it's the last image, or the next one is landscape) - then Image 2 should be centered on the 'row'.
If there are two successive portrait images - I'd like them to both fit into one 'row'
Pls note, that the 'rows' are an abstract notion here. I don't want to use css grid (unless there are absolutely no other options).
Using a flexbox in combination with the justify-content: center; and flex-wrap: wrap; should achieve the exact effect you are looking for.
Please see the two code snippets below for the two examples. I have used multiple coloured div with a width and height to simulate the horizontal and vertical image types you referred to.
.flex {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 100px;
border: 2px black solid;
padding: 1em;
justify-content: center;
}
.horizontal {
background: yellow;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
margin-bottom: 1em;
}
.vertical {
background: green;
width: 50px;
height: 100px;
}
<div class="flex">
<div class="horizontal">Image 1</div>
<div class="vertical">Image 2</div>
</div>
.flex {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 100px;
border: 2px black solid;
padding: 1em;
justify-content: center;
}
.horizontal {
background: yellow;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
margin-bottom: 1em;
}
.vertical {
background: green;
width: 50px;
height: 100px;
}
#blue {
background: blue;
}
<div class="flex">
<div class="horizontal">Image 1</div>
<div class="vertical">Image 2</div>
<div class="vertical" id="blue">Image 3</div>
</div>
This can be done with align-items: center and flex-wrap:wrap:
.flex{
width: 220px;
display:flex;
align-items: center;
flex-wrap:wrap;
}
.flex img{
border: solid 4px #efefef;
box-sizing:border-box;
margin: 0 auto;
}
<h3>Example 1</h3>
<div class="flex">
<img src="https://placekitten.com/220/60">
<img src="https://placekitten.com/110/120">
</div>
<h3>Example 2</h3>
<div class="flex">
<img src="https://placekitten.com/220/60">
<img src="https://placekitten.com/100/120">
<img src="https://placekitten.com/100/120">
</div>
You can easily achieve this using the same grid system as Bootstrap using class like container, row, col:
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.row {
display: flex;
}
.align-center {
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.image1 {
width: 500px;
height: 300px;
background-color: red;
}
.image2,
.image3 {
width: 250px;
height: 500px;
}
.image2 {
background-color: yellow;
}
.image3 {
background-color: blue;
}
.image1,
.image2,
.image3 {
border: solid #000 2px;
}
<div class="container align-center">
<div class="row">
<div class="col image1">
<h1>image1</h1>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row align-center">
<div class="col image2">
<h1>image2</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="container align-center">
<div class="row">
<div class="col image1">
<h1>image1</h1>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row align-center">
<div class="col image2">
<h1>image2</h1>
</div>
<div class="col image3">
<h1>image3</h1>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I am trying to use a flexbox approach to create a layout that will resize the header width and content dimensions when a window is resized, but maintain the sidebar dimensions.
I found the following example from this Flexbox Approach to get me started, and it works as desired for the content div itself. But after looking it over, I'm unsure how to make it work as described with a fixed width, 100% height sidebar.
CSS from example:
<style>
html, body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0
}
.box {
display: flex;
flex-flow: column;
height: 100%;
}
.box .row {
border: 1px dotted grey;
}
.box .row.header {
flex: 0 1 auto; /* The above is shorthand for: flex-grow: 0, flex-shrink: 1, flex-basis: auto */ }
.box .row.content {
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
.box .row.footer {
flex: 0 1 40px;
}
</style>
HTML from example:
<div class="row header">
<p><b>header</b> <br /> <br />(sized to content)</p>
</div> <div class="row content">
<p> <b>content</b> (fills remaining space) </p>
</div>
<div class="row footer">
<p><b>footer</b> (fixed height)</p>
</div>
</div>
The following codepen example gave me the information I needed to get my layout working:
http://codepen.io/JosephSilber/pen/HqgAz
CSS:
.header {
height: 50px;
}
.body {
position: absolute;
top: 50px;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
display: flex;
}
.sidebar {
width: 140px;
}
.main {
flex: 1;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.content {
flex: 1;
display: flex;
overflow: auto;
}
.box {
min-height: -webkit-min-content;
display: flex;
}
.column {
padding: 20px;
border-right: 1px solid #999;
}
.column > div {
height: 2000px;
background: red;
}
.column:nth-child(2) > div {
height: auto;
}
/* All of these are just for this demo's design. */
body {
font-family: sans-serif;
font-size: 20px;
line-height: 50px;
text-transform: uppercase;
font-weight: bold;
}
.header {
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
background: #444;
}
.sidebar {
background: #666;
padding: 4px 20px;
color: #fff;
}
.page-header {
padding: 6px 20px;
background: #004141;
color: #fff;
font-size: .8em;
}
.content {
background: #ddd;
}
HTML:
<div class="header">Main header</div>
<div class="body">
Move this: <div class="sidebar">Sidebar</div>
<div class="main">
<div class="page-header">Page Header. Content columns are below.</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="box">
<div class="column">
<div>Column 1</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div>Column 1</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div>Column 1</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
To here: <div class="sidebar">Sidebar</div>
</div>
To get the sidebar on the right side, I simply moved <div class="sidebar">Sidebar</div>to just above the closing div tag for the .body class.
Is there a way to make a line break in multiple line flexbox?
For example to break after each 3rd item in this CodePen.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
Like
.item:nth-child(3n){
/* line-break: after; */
}
The simplest and most reliable solution is inserting flex items at the right places. If they are wide enough (width: 100%), they will force a line break.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(4n - 1) {
background: silver;
}
.line-break {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
But that's ugly and not semantic. Instead, we could generate pseudo-elements inside the flex container, and use order to move them to the right places.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
background: silver;
}
.container::before, .container::after {
content: '';
width: 100%;
order: 1;
}
.item:nth-child(n + 4) {
order: 1;
}
.item:nth-child(n + 7) {
order: 2;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
</div>
But there is a limitation: the flex container can only have a ::before and a ::after pseudo-element. That means you can only force 2 line breaks.
To solve that, you can generate the pseudo-elements inside the flex items instead of in the flex container. This way you won't be limited to 2. But those pseudo-elements won't be flex items, so they won't be able to force line breaks.
But luckily, CSS Display L3 has introduced display: contents (currently only supported by Firefox 37):
The element itself does not generate any boxes, but its children and
pseudo-elements still generate boxes as normal. For the purposes of
box generation and layout, the element must be treated as if it had
been replaced with its children and pseudo-elements in the document
tree.
So you can apply display: contents to the children of the flex container, and wrap the contents of each one inside an additional wrapper. Then, the flex items will be those additional wrappers and the pseudo-elements of the children.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
display: contents;
}
.item > div {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n) > div {
background: silver;
}
.item:nth-child(3n)::after {
content: '';
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item"><div>1</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>2</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>3</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>4</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>5</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>6</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>7</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>8</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>9</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>10</div></div>
</div>
Alternatively, according to an old version of the spec, Flexbox allowed forced breaks by using break-before, break-after or their old CSS 2.1 aliases:
.item:nth-child(3n) {
page-break-after: always; /* CSS 2.1 syntax */
break-after: always; /* CSS 3 syntax */
}
But these forced line breaks only work on Firefox, and I don't think they are supposed to work according to the current spec. The new proposed way (not implemented anywhere) is with wrap-before or wrap-after:
.item:nth-child(3n) {
wrap-after: flex; /* New proposed syntax */
}
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
page-break-after: always;
break-after: always;
wrap-after: flex;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
From my perspective it is more semantic to use <hr> elements as line breaks between flex items.
.container {
display: flex;
flex-flow: wrap;
}
.container hr {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div>1</div>
<div>2</div>
<hr>
<div>3</div>
<div>2</div>
...
</div>
Tested in Chrome 66, Firefox 60 and Safari 11.
#Oriol has an excellent answer, sadly as of October 2017, neither display:contents, neither page-break-after is widely supported, better said it's about Firefox which supports this but not the other players, I have come up with the following "hack" which I consider better than hard coding in a break after every 3rd element, because that will make it very difficult to make the page mobile friendly.
As said it's a hack and the drawback is that you need to add quite a lot of extra elements for nothing, but it does the trick and works cross browser even on the dated IE11.
The "hack" is to simply add an additional element after each div, which is set to display:none and then used the css nth-child to decide which one of this should be actually made visible forcing a line brake like this:
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n-1) {
background: silver;
}
.breaker {
display: none;
}
.breaker:nth-child(3n) {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">2</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">3</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">4</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">5</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">6</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">7</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">8</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">9</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">10</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
</div>
You want a semantic linebreak?
Then consider using <br>. W3Schools may suggest you that BR is just for writing poems (mine is coming soon) but you can change the style so it behaves as a 100% width block element that will push your content to the next line. If 'br' suggests a break then it seems more appropriate to me than using hr or a 100% div and makes the html more readable.
Insert the <br> where you need linebreaks and style it like this.
// Use `>` to avoid styling `<br>` inside your boxes
.container > br
{
width: 100%;
content: '';
}
You can disable <br> with media queries, by setting display: to block or none as appropriate (I've included an example of this but left it commented out).
You can use order: to set the order if needed too.
And you can put as many as you want, with different classes or names :-)
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.container > br
{
width: 100%;
content: '';
}
// .linebreak1
// {
// display: none;
// }
// #media (min-width: 768px)
// {
// .linebreak1
// {
// display: block;
// }
// }
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<br class="linebreak1"/>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
No need to limit yourself to what W3Schools says:
I think the traditional way is flexible and fairly easy to understand:
Markup
<div class="flex-grid">
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-3">.col-3</div>
<div class="col-9">.col-9</div>
<div class="col-6">.col-6</div>
<div class="col-6">.col-6</div>
</div>
Create grid.css file:
.flex-grid {
display: flex;
flex-flow: wrap;
}
.col-1 {flex: 0 0 8.3333%}
.col-2 {flex: 0 0 16.6666%}
.col-3 {flex: 0 0 25%}
.col-4 {flex: 0 0 33.3333%}
.col-5 {flex: 0 0 41.6666%}
.col-6 {flex: 0 0 50%}
.col-7 {flex: 0 0 58.3333%}
.col-8 {flex: 0 0 66.6666%}
.col-9 {flex: 0 0 75%}
.col-10 {flex: 0 0 83.3333%}
.col-11 {flex: 0 0 91.6666%}
.col-12 {flex: 0 0 100%}
[class*="col-"] {
margin: 0 0 10px 0;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
#media (max-width: 400px) {
.flex-grid {
display: block;
}
}
I've created an example (jsfiddle)
Try to resize the window under 400px, it's responsive!!
I just want to throw this answer in the mix, intended as a reminder that – given the right conditions – you sometimes don't need to overthink the issue at hand. What you want might be achievable with flex: wrap and max-width instead of :nth-child.
ul {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
max-width: 420px;
list-style-type: none;
background-color: tomato;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0;
}
li {
display: inline-block;
background-color: #ccc;
border: 1px solid #333;
width: 23px;
height: 23px;
text-align: center;
font-size: 1rem;
line-height: 1.5;
margin: 0.2rem;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
<div class="root">
<ul>
<li>A</li>
<li>B</li>
<li>C</li>
<li>D</li>
<li>E</li>
<li>F</li>
<li>G</li>
<li>H</li>
<li>I</li>
<li>J</li>
<li>K</li>
<li>L</li>
<li>M</li>
<li>N</li>
<li>O</li>
<li>P</li>
<li>Q</li>
<li>R</li>
<li>S</li>
<li>T</li>
<li>U</li>
<li>V</li>
<li>W</li>
<li>X</li>
<li>Y</li>
<li>Z</li>
</ul>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/age3qp4d/
Another possible solution that doesn't require to add any extra markup is to add some dynamic margin to separate the elements.
In the case of the example, this can be done with the help of calc(), just adding margin-left and margin-right to the 3n+2 element (2, 5, 8)
.item:nth-child(3n+2) {
background: silver;
margin: 10px calc(50% - 175px);
}
Snippet Example
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n+2) {
background: silver;
margin: 10px calc(50% - 175px);
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
For future questions, It's also possible to do it by using float property and clearing it in each 3 elements.
Here's an example I've made.
.grid {
display: inline-block;
}
.cell {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
float: left;
margin: 8px;
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
background-color: #bdbdbd;
font-family: 'Helvetica', 'Arial', sans-serif;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: 400;
line-height: 20px;
text-indent: 4px;
color: #fff;
}
.cell:nth-child(3n) + .cell {
clear: both;
}
<div class="grid">
<div class="cell">1</div>
<div class="cell">2</div>
<div class="cell">3</div>
<div class="cell">4</div>
<div class="cell">5</div>
<div class="cell">6</div>
<div class="cell">7</div>
<div class="cell">8</div>
<div class="cell">9</div>
<div class="cell">10</div>
</div>
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
<div class="container">
<div>
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
you could try wrapping the items in a dom element like here. with this you dont have to know a lot of css just having a good structure will solve the problem.
I was under the impression that a margin can be added to flex items/children, and flexbox should automatically take that into account and calculate the correct spacing between the items.
I can't seem to get this working as I would like though.
Fiddle here: https://jsfiddle.net/dba5ehcw/1/
.flex-item{
border: 1px solid blue;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 160px;
width: 50%;
}
So each flex item at the moment is half the width of the container, and they flow nicely next to each other.
I would like to be able to add a margin of say, 1em to the flex-items in order to give them some breathing room, but in doing so, they become larger than the 50% and no longer stack next to each other on the same line because they are too wide.
Is there a way to use margin on the flex-items and have the flexbox container take this into account and adjust (decrease) their widths accordingly?
There are multiple ways to do this:
Use calc:
.flex-item {
width: calc(50% - 2em);
margin: 1em;
}
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item {
border: 1px solid blue;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: calc(160px - 2em);
width: calc(50% - 2em);
margin: 1em;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
Use nested boxes:
.flex-item {
width: 50%;
display: flex;
}
.flex-item > div {
border: 1px solid blue;
flex: 1;
margin: 1em;
}
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item {
height: 160px;
width: 50%;
display: flex;
}
.flex-item > div {
border: 1px solid blue;
flex: 1;
margin: 1em;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
</div>
Place each row in a nowrap container, and use a positive flex-shrink factor
.row {
display: flex;
}
.flex-item {
width: 50%;
margin: 1em;
}
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 320px;
}
.row {
height: 160px;
display: flex;
}
.flex-item {
border: 1px solid blue;
width: 50%;
margin: 1em;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="row">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
</div>
Don't use width. Instead, force line-breaks at the right places, and use flex: 1 to make the elements grow to fill remaining space.
.flex-item {
flex: 1;
}
.line-break {
width: 100%
}
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item {
border: 1px solid blue;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: calc(160px - 2em);
flex: 1;
margin: 1em;
}
.line-break {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
You need to do it with padding - which, when in border-box mode does not make the container larger than it's specified width - not margin, and a nested flex div. This is how all flexbox-based grid systems work. Code below:
.flex-container{
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item{
padding:1em;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 160px;
width: 50%;
display:flex;
}
.flex-item>div {
border: 1px solid blue;
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
</div>
instead of using margins, try adding a gap on your flex container
.flex-container {
display: flex;
gap: 1em
}
flex-item {
width 50%
}
Try this : -
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item {
justify-content: space-around;
margin: 1%;
background: red;
border: 1px solid blue;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 160px;
width: 48%;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
I believe I was trying to achieve the same thing, from my understanding, with the addition that I wanted the two boxes to stack on top of each other when the viewport gets small enough (when viewing on mobile/tablet).
For some reason I thought this would be way easier as I saw something similar in a Bootstrap tutorial video I watched but I think he was using row and col classes, with a g gutter class, and not Flex.
Anyway, HTML:
<div class="d-flex flex-wrap flex-half-screen-responsive">
<div class="col-lg-6">
Lorem Ipsum
</div>
<div class="col-lg-6">
Lorem Ipsum
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.flex-half-screen-responsive {
margin: -0.5em;
}
.flex-half-screen-responsive > * {
flex: 1 1 48%;
margin: 0.5em;
}
I don't like how I have to specify that hardcoded 48% value but it seems to work just as I want it so whatever; spent way too much time on this already lol. Anyway I hope this helps someone looking for the same behavior.