I am currently trying to figure out a way to be able to have a layout that has a bottom-up, content-oriented resizing behavior.
I have the following situation: https://codepen.io/Flash1232/pen/JJYPVQ
What is wrong here is obviously that the wrapper divs do not wrap around the table divs. Now is there any solution for this involving just plain CSS and HTML or do I have to write something in JS like "set wrapper width to the width of its inner div"?
Thanks in advance for any clues!
Man i solved my problem with display:flex on parent element :)
You may want to consider using a flexbox. Please see below. If there is anything that needs to be different, just let me know.
.outer-div {
position: absolute;
background: black;
width: 800px;
left: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
overflow: auto;
padding: 10px;
}
.area {
overflow: auto;
display: flex;
border: 5px solid red;
background: white;
margin: 10px 40px 10px 10px;
}
.column {
background: green;
border: 5px solid blue;
}
.wrapper {
display: flex;
border: 5px solid yellow;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
.table {
white-space: nowrap;
}
.violet {
background: violet;
width: 120%;
height: 80px;
}
.red {
background: red;
width: 150%;
height: 80px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.icons {
Background: yellow;
float: right;
height: auto;
width: auto;
}
<div class="outer-div">
<div class="area">
<div class="column">
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="table red">
<span>***Table Content***</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="table violet">
<span>***Table Content***</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="table violet">
<span>***Table Content***</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="icons">
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
</div>
</div>
You should read the definition of the width attribute.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/CSS/width
Percentages: refer to the width of the containing block
If you set width to 150%, you explicitly say, that the child should be bigger than the parent. You can not expect, that the parent has the same width like the child, if you force the child to be wider.
Related
Here is my problem. I have inline-block divs inside another div.
.timeEvents {
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
text-align: center;
}
.timeline {
border: 1px solid;
}
.events1, .events2 {
border: 1px solid;
}
.ev1, .ev3 {
border: 1px solid red;
}
.ev2 {
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid red;
display: inline-block;
}
.mDiv {
display: inline-block;
padding-left: 12px;
padding-right: 12px;
border: 1px solid blue;
}
<div class="timeEvents">
<div class="events1">
<div class="ev1">Data Field 1</div>
</div>
<div class="timeline">
<div class="ev2">
<div class="mDiv">5</div>
<div class="mDiv">10</div>
<div class="mDiv">15</div>
<div class="mDiv">20</div>
<div class="mDiv">25</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="events2">
<div class="ev3">Data Field 2</div>
</div>
</div>
I want the .ev2 to be wrapped around its children which are inline. Then, the two data fields, respectively .ev1 and .ev3 placed above and below, should have the same width as .ev2. Which means that all divs with a red border (in my JSFiddle) should have the same width (dynamic, I don't know it) and that width should not be 100% as it's in the jsFiddle example: https://jsfiddle.net/mzjqw2wx/17/.
EDIT - I updated my fiddle. I don't want to lose the outside 100% divs, I want to align the three red sections to have the same width, the page and the outside divs all remain 100%. The tip to use inline-block on the wrapper was great, it did what I wanted with the middle one. I wanted to align all red containers and I did it with jQuery.
You need to also set display: inline-block; for the common wrapper (and give text-align: center to its parent)
body { text-align: center; }
.timeEvents {
display: inline-block;
margin: 0 auto;
}
JSFiddle
Result:
That's pretty easy to implement using Flexbox.
Just assign display: flex; to .ev2 and flex-grow: 1; to the the .myDiv class.
You can see it in the following code:
.timeEvents {
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
text-align: center;
}
.timeline {
border: 1px solid;
}
.events1, .events2 {
border: 1px solid;
}
.ev1, .ev3 {
border: 1px solid red;
}
.ev2 {
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid red;
display: flex;
}
.mDiv {
display: inline-block;
padding-left: 12px;
padding-right: 12px;
border: 1px solid blue;
flex-grow: 1;
}
<div class="timeEvents">
<div class="events1">
<div class="ev1">Data Field 1</div>
</div>
<div class="timeline">
<div class="ev2">
<div class="mDiv">5</div>
<div class="mDiv">10</div>
<div class="mDiv">15</div>
<div class="mDiv">20</div>
<div class="mDiv">25</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="events2">
<div class="ev3">Data Field 2</div>
</div>
</div>
Check out CSS-Trick's Complete guide to Flexbox for more information.
Use display:table to timeEvents and remove width:100% will make as per your expected.
.timeEvents {
display: table;
overflow: hidden;
text-align: center;
}
Fiddle
I'm trying to position clid divs in parent div but the height of parent div should be dynamic so it should either expand or shrink after child divs are positioned inside. How can I accomplish it? Childs should remain inside of parent all times.
Since I'm not designer at all I read "Learn CSS Positioning in Ten Steps" to learn a bit.
And this question "Make absolute positioned div expand parent div height".
Thanks
JSFIDDLE
CSS
#header
{
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid #000000;
width: 500px;
background: #aa0000;
}
#body
{
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid #000000;
width: 500px;
background: #ff0000;
}
#footer
{
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid #000000;
width: 500px;
background: #dd0000;
}
#section_one
{
position: relative;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: #EEEEEE;
top: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
#section_two
{
position: relative;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: #EEEEEE;
top: 10px;
left: 150px;
}
HTML
<div id="header">HEARDER</div>
<div id="body">
<div id="section_one">SECTION ONE</div>
<div id="section_two">SECTION TWO</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">FOOTER</div>
You could use float:left and then postion the sections with margin
FIDDLE
Markup
<div id="header">HEARDER</div>
<div id="body">
<div class="section one">SECTION ONE</div>
<div class="section two">SECTION TWO</div>
<div class="section three">SECTION THREE</div>
<div class="section four">SECTION FOUR</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">FOOTER</div>
CSS
.section
{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: #EEEEEE;
float:left;
}
.two
{
margin: 20px 0 0 10px;
}
.three
{
margin: 80px 0 0 50px;
}
.four
{
margin: 220px 0 0 -200px;
}
if it's just a matter of aligning those boxes, use margin&padding and inline-block instead of absolute positioning.
like this: http://jsfiddle.net/avrahamcool/JVh8e/1/
HTML:
<div id="cover">
<div id="section_one">SECTION ONE</div>
<div id="section_two">SECTION TWO</div>
</div>
CSS
#cover
{
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 5px;
width: 500px;
background-color: #000000;
}
#section_one, #section_two
{
display: inline-block;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: 5px;
background-color: #EEEEEE;
}
as you already read in the link you provided, an absolute element is removed from the flow, so unless you're willing to write a script that finds the necessary height of the cover, its impossible.
also: use background-color instead of background (if you apply only the color)
Update
this is the new fiddle (after your editing):
http://jsfiddle.net/avrahamcool/JVh8e/5/
Update 2:
check out this working example with script.
http://jsfiddle.net/avrahamcool/JVh8e/6/
I'm a tables guy, but I'll need to drag and drop some divs, so I tried doing it tabeless (the right way).
This is what I want to do:
The space between all elements should be 24px. My main problem is having the divs (1,2,3) occupying 100% of available space. The width: 100% its sending them beyond the main container.
This is my code so far:
html
<div id="mainContainer">
<div id="topContainer">Just the top one
</div>
<div id="table">
<div id="Line1Container">
<div id="container1" class="container">1
</div>
<div id="container2" class="container">2
</div>
<div id="container3" class="container">3
</div>
</div>
<div id="Line2Container">
<div id="container4" class="container">4
</div>
<div id="container5" class="container">5
</div>
<div id="container6" class="container">6
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
And my css
#mainContainer {
border: 1px solid lightgray;
position:fixed;
top: 80px;
bottom:20px;
left:80px;
right:80px;
overflow-y: scroll;
overflow-x: hidden;
border-top-left-radius: 10px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 10px;
}
#topContainer {
border: 1px solid lightgray;
border-radius: 10px;
margin-left: 24px;
margin-right: 24px;
margin-top: 24px;
}
#table {
display: table;
margin: 24px;
width: 95%;
}
#Line1Container, #Line2Container {
display: table-row;
}
.container {
border: 1px solid lightgray;
display: table-cell;
width: 33%;
border-radius: 10px;
}
As you see I tried the table-cell approach, but before I have tried the float: left approach.
Thanks
Fiddle
You can't properly use px values with % values together with dynamic sizes.
You should use x% instead of 24px.
And you can use float: left on the "cells"
How about using a table for separating the divs? that way with the td padding there will always be 24px between them
check out this fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/5zfEq/
added:
#Line1Container {
padding:12px;
}
#inner-table {
width: 100%;
}
#inner-table td {
padding: 12px;
}
based on #Edifice fiddle .... thanks ;)
I am looking to create a vertically scrolling website. I'll have a set of 5 divs that I want to have a height of 100% that are stacked on one another, basically making the body 1500% in height. Yeah?
Here is my code so far:
CSS
#contentWrapper {
position: relative;
width: 600px;
height: 1500%;
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.panel {
position: relative;
height: 6.66%;
border: 1px solid blue;
}
.panelGuts {
position: relative;
top: 50%;
width: 100%;
height: 600px;
margin: -300px 0 0 0;
border: 1px solid green;
}
HTML:
<div id="contentWrapper">
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
</div>
This seems to work in Safari, Firefox, and Chrome but it doesn't work on an iPad or iPhone, and knowing how IE like's to behave, it probably won't work there either.
What I am wanting to know is 1) Why is won't work on an iPad/iPhone, 2) is there a better way to do this, maybe with jQuery?
I need each panel to have a height of 100% and have the content (panelGuts) be vertically centered. I'll be using jQuery ScrollTo (or some scrollTo plugin) to scroll to each div. I'd like to NOT have to set a specific height to each div...
Can anyone help?
I actually figured this out with HTML5. It was pretty simple. For anyone who wants to see my results
CSS
body, html {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
background: #FFF;
height: 100%;
}
#contentWrapper {
position: relative;
width: 600px;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.panelContainer { display: inline; }
.panel {
position: relative;
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background:green;
}
article.panel:nth-child(2n+2) {
background:blue;
}
.panelGuts {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
width: 100%;
height: 600px;
margin: -300px 0 0 0;
border: 1px solid black;
}
And my HTML
<div id="contentWrapper">
<section class="panelContainer">
<article class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
text 1
</div>
</article>
<article class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
text 2
</div>
</article>
</section>
</div>
And a Fiddle for you: http://jsfiddle.net/ryanjay/dwspJ/
I'm trying to put two blocks into one fixed-height block to create the following layout:
------------------------
UL (initial height=0),
grows on element add until maximum height reached
scroll should be added after max height is reached
------------------------
DIV (initial height=100% of parent)
decreases until min height is reached
------------------------
HTML part of the layout:
<div style="height:100px">
<ul style="max-height:70px;height:auto;overflow:auto"></ul>
<div style="min-height:30px;height:auto">
<span>TEST CONTENT</span>
</div>
</div>
You really can't do this cleanly with just CSS. I'd suggest using a bit of jQuery for this where you just query the height of both at any given time, figure out which is taller, and then set the other element to match
I'm not sure that the DIV's properties are entirely clear. Note, this is not an answer (yet), just too long to put into a comment.
<div id="container">
<div id="list">
<ul></ul>
</div>
<div id="content">
<span>TEST CONTENT</span>
</div>
</div>
#container {
height: 100px;
background: grey;
}
#list {
max-height: 70px;
overflow: auto;
background: #ddf;
}
#content {
min-height: 30px;
height: auto;
background: #fdf;
}
// For testing
setInterval(function(){
$('ul').append('<li>Test</li>');
},3000);
http://jsfiddle.net/V8yuN/
Now, if you want the DIV#content to at first take up the entire height, but then shrink as the DIV#list UL grows, what is it you're trying to accomplish with DIV#content? Note, I put the UL within a DIV.
Now, the above fiddle demonstrates in a way what you're describing (the DIV#content gets pushed to the bottom). The question I have is, what does the height of the DIV#content matter in your design?
EDIT
Note, if you make the #container overflow: hidden and make the #content's height: 100%, it would appear as if the #container is shrinking.
#container {
height: 100px;
background: grey;
overflow: hidden;
}
#list {
max-height: 70px;
overflow: auto;
background: #ddf;
}
#content {
height: 100%;
background: #fdf;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/V8yuN/2
I have no idea, though, if that would cause your design to break, if the #content's actual content needs to display (for instance, if it is changed dynamically).
EDIT 2
The following accomplishes everything but the vertical-align of the #content text:
HTML
<div id="container">
<div id="push">
<div id="list">
<ul></ul>
</div>
<div id="content">
<div class="border-top"></div>
<div id="content-inner">
<span>TEST CONTENT</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="border-bottom"></div>
</div>
CSS
#container {
height: 100px;
background: grey;
}
#push {
height: 95px;
overflow: hidden;
}
#list {
max-height: 70px;
overflow: auto;
background: #ddf;
}
#content-inner {
min-height: 100px;
background: #dfd;
margin: 0;
border-left: 5px solid #fdf;
border-right: 5px solid #fdf;
}
.border-top {
background: #fdf;
border-radius: 5px 5px 0 0;
height: 5px;
}
.border-bottom {
background: #fdf;
border-radius: 0 0 5px 5px;
height: 5px;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/V8yuN/6/
Let's say your html looks like this:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="top">
</div>
<div id="bottom">
</div>
</div>
then your CSS could look like this, with #wrap height set, and a min-height for the bottom.
Mind the height 100% !important.
#wrap{
height: 400px;
background: #ccc;
}
#top{
//height: 200px; for testing
background: #f0f;
}
#bottom{
height: 100% !important;
min-height: 200px;
overflow: scroll;
background: #000;
}
is that kind of what you're searching for?
Would help though if you could post the stuff you've already done.