I'm trying to position clid divs in parent div but the height of parent div should be dynamic so it should either expand or shrink after child divs are positioned inside. How can I accomplish it? Childs should remain inside of parent all times.
Since I'm not designer at all I read "Learn CSS Positioning in Ten Steps" to learn a bit.
And this question "Make absolute positioned div expand parent div height".
Thanks
JSFIDDLE
CSS
#header
{
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid #000000;
width: 500px;
background: #aa0000;
}
#body
{
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid #000000;
width: 500px;
background: #ff0000;
}
#footer
{
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid #000000;
width: 500px;
background: #dd0000;
}
#section_one
{
position: relative;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: #EEEEEE;
top: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
#section_two
{
position: relative;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: #EEEEEE;
top: 10px;
left: 150px;
}
HTML
<div id="header">HEARDER</div>
<div id="body">
<div id="section_one">SECTION ONE</div>
<div id="section_two">SECTION TWO</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">FOOTER</div>
You could use float:left and then postion the sections with margin
FIDDLE
Markup
<div id="header">HEARDER</div>
<div id="body">
<div class="section one">SECTION ONE</div>
<div class="section two">SECTION TWO</div>
<div class="section three">SECTION THREE</div>
<div class="section four">SECTION FOUR</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">FOOTER</div>
CSS
.section
{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: #EEEEEE;
float:left;
}
.two
{
margin: 20px 0 0 10px;
}
.three
{
margin: 80px 0 0 50px;
}
.four
{
margin: 220px 0 0 -200px;
}
if it's just a matter of aligning those boxes, use margin&padding and inline-block instead of absolute positioning.
like this: http://jsfiddle.net/avrahamcool/JVh8e/1/
HTML:
<div id="cover">
<div id="section_one">SECTION ONE</div>
<div id="section_two">SECTION TWO</div>
</div>
CSS
#cover
{
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 5px;
width: 500px;
background-color: #000000;
}
#section_one, #section_two
{
display: inline-block;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: 5px;
background-color: #EEEEEE;
}
as you already read in the link you provided, an absolute element is removed from the flow, so unless you're willing to write a script that finds the necessary height of the cover, its impossible.
also: use background-color instead of background (if you apply only the color)
Update
this is the new fiddle (after your editing):
http://jsfiddle.net/avrahamcool/JVh8e/5/
Update 2:
check out this working example with script.
http://jsfiddle.net/avrahamcool/JVh8e/6/
Related
I am currently trying to figure out a way to be able to have a layout that has a bottom-up, content-oriented resizing behavior.
I have the following situation: https://codepen.io/Flash1232/pen/JJYPVQ
What is wrong here is obviously that the wrapper divs do not wrap around the table divs. Now is there any solution for this involving just plain CSS and HTML or do I have to write something in JS like "set wrapper width to the width of its inner div"?
Thanks in advance for any clues!
Man i solved my problem with display:flex on parent element :)
You may want to consider using a flexbox. Please see below. If there is anything that needs to be different, just let me know.
.outer-div {
position: absolute;
background: black;
width: 800px;
left: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
overflow: auto;
padding: 10px;
}
.area {
overflow: auto;
display: flex;
border: 5px solid red;
background: white;
margin: 10px 40px 10px 10px;
}
.column {
background: green;
border: 5px solid blue;
}
.wrapper {
display: flex;
border: 5px solid yellow;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
.table {
white-space: nowrap;
}
.violet {
background: violet;
width: 120%;
height: 80px;
}
.red {
background: red;
width: 150%;
height: 80px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.icons {
Background: yellow;
float: right;
height: auto;
width: auto;
}
<div class="outer-div">
<div class="area">
<div class="column">
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="table red">
<span>***Table Content***</span>
</div>
</div>
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="table violet">
<span>***Table Content***</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="table violet">
<span>***Table Content***</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="icons">
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
<p>Icon</p>
</div>
</div>
You should read the definition of the width attribute.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/CSS/width
Percentages: refer to the width of the containing block
If you set width to 150%, you explicitly say, that the child should be bigger than the parent. You can not expect, that the parent has the same width like the child, if you force the child to be wider.
i have a web page with an image panel and a few div elements, with the same width, each containing an image.
I want to put them into 2 cascading columns with no spaces between them (except for the padding)
I have the following css code for image container:
.imageContainer
{
position:relative;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
border:4px solid #333;
float: left;
display:inline-block;
min-height: 40px;
width: 48%;
}
This causes the columns to like like image 1 but i need the columns to look like number 2
Thank you!
EDIT:
.pg-main
{
float: left;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
}
.entries
{
float: left;
width: 800px;
padding: 8px 20px 0 0;
}
.entries p
{
display: block;
}
.imageContainer
{
position:relative;
margin:4px 4px 4px 4px;
border:4px solid #333;
float: left;
display:inline-block;
min-height: 40px;
width: 48%;
}
Here is a possible solutions using columns -- does not work on IE9 or earlier.
FIDDLE: http://jsfiddle.net/YjHzd/
HTML
<div id="container">
<div class="block" style="height:30px"></div>
<div class="block" style="height:30px"></div>
<div class="block" style="height:70px"></div>
<div class="block" style="height:70px"></div>
<div class="block" style="height:50px"></div>
</div>
CSS
#container {
-moz-column-count:2;
-webkit-column-count:2;
column-count:2;
height: 145px;
width: 80px;
}
.block {
width: 40px;
background-color: red;
margin: 0 0 5px 0;
}
Unlike many of the other solutions on this page, mine works in all semi-modern browsers, including IE 6, 7, 8, 9; Firefox 3.6 through 29, and all versions of Chrome. See below for screenshots.
If they are of fixed widths, as illustrated, just 1) wrap your boxes inside another div and 2) do the following:
Here's the JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/SqQqZ/
HTML:
<div>
<div id="leftBoxesBox">
<div class="redbox"></div>
<div class="redbox"></div>
<div class="redbox" style="height: 15em"></div>
</div>
<div id="rightBoxesBox">
<div class="redbox" style="height: 12em"></div>
<div class="redbox"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
div.redbox {
background: red;
width: 10em;
height: 5em;
margin: 10px;
}
div#leftBoxesBox {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
width: 12em;
}
div#rightBoxesBox {
position: absolute;
left: 13em;
width: 12em;
}
Internet Explorer 6:
Firefox 3.6:
Please post your HTML, it would help.
Maybe this will help :
clear:left;
after your 2nd imagediv. so the 3rd div can float without problems.
Basically there are only two ways to do this. You can use Javascript to determine the position of the element. Or you can create two seperate columns that have the images contained within them. Left and Right Column
I am looking to create a vertically scrolling website. I'll have a set of 5 divs that I want to have a height of 100% that are stacked on one another, basically making the body 1500% in height. Yeah?
Here is my code so far:
CSS
#contentWrapper {
position: relative;
width: 600px;
height: 1500%;
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.panel {
position: relative;
height: 6.66%;
border: 1px solid blue;
}
.panelGuts {
position: relative;
top: 50%;
width: 100%;
height: 600px;
margin: -300px 0 0 0;
border: 1px solid green;
}
HTML:
<div id="contentWrapper">
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
<div class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
content
</div>
</div>
</div>
This seems to work in Safari, Firefox, and Chrome but it doesn't work on an iPad or iPhone, and knowing how IE like's to behave, it probably won't work there either.
What I am wanting to know is 1) Why is won't work on an iPad/iPhone, 2) is there a better way to do this, maybe with jQuery?
I need each panel to have a height of 100% and have the content (panelGuts) be vertically centered. I'll be using jQuery ScrollTo (or some scrollTo plugin) to scroll to each div. I'd like to NOT have to set a specific height to each div...
Can anyone help?
I actually figured this out with HTML5. It was pretty simple. For anyone who wants to see my results
CSS
body, html {
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
background: #FFF;
height: 100%;
}
#contentWrapper {
position: relative;
width: 600px;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.panelContainer { display: inline; }
.panel {
position: relative;
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background:green;
}
article.panel:nth-child(2n+2) {
background:blue;
}
.panelGuts {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
width: 100%;
height: 600px;
margin: -300px 0 0 0;
border: 1px solid black;
}
And my HTML
<div id="contentWrapper">
<section class="panelContainer">
<article class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
text 1
</div>
</article>
<article class="panel">
<div class="panelGuts">
text 2
</div>
</article>
</section>
</div>
And a Fiddle for you: http://jsfiddle.net/ryanjay/dwspJ/
I'm trying to put two blocks into one fixed-height block to create the following layout:
------------------------
UL (initial height=0),
grows on element add until maximum height reached
scroll should be added after max height is reached
------------------------
DIV (initial height=100% of parent)
decreases until min height is reached
------------------------
HTML part of the layout:
<div style="height:100px">
<ul style="max-height:70px;height:auto;overflow:auto"></ul>
<div style="min-height:30px;height:auto">
<span>TEST CONTENT</span>
</div>
</div>
You really can't do this cleanly with just CSS. I'd suggest using a bit of jQuery for this where you just query the height of both at any given time, figure out which is taller, and then set the other element to match
I'm not sure that the DIV's properties are entirely clear. Note, this is not an answer (yet), just too long to put into a comment.
<div id="container">
<div id="list">
<ul></ul>
</div>
<div id="content">
<span>TEST CONTENT</span>
</div>
</div>
#container {
height: 100px;
background: grey;
}
#list {
max-height: 70px;
overflow: auto;
background: #ddf;
}
#content {
min-height: 30px;
height: auto;
background: #fdf;
}
// For testing
setInterval(function(){
$('ul').append('<li>Test</li>');
},3000);
http://jsfiddle.net/V8yuN/
Now, if you want the DIV#content to at first take up the entire height, but then shrink as the DIV#list UL grows, what is it you're trying to accomplish with DIV#content? Note, I put the UL within a DIV.
Now, the above fiddle demonstrates in a way what you're describing (the DIV#content gets pushed to the bottom). The question I have is, what does the height of the DIV#content matter in your design?
EDIT
Note, if you make the #container overflow: hidden and make the #content's height: 100%, it would appear as if the #container is shrinking.
#container {
height: 100px;
background: grey;
overflow: hidden;
}
#list {
max-height: 70px;
overflow: auto;
background: #ddf;
}
#content {
height: 100%;
background: #fdf;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/V8yuN/2
I have no idea, though, if that would cause your design to break, if the #content's actual content needs to display (for instance, if it is changed dynamically).
EDIT 2
The following accomplishes everything but the vertical-align of the #content text:
HTML
<div id="container">
<div id="push">
<div id="list">
<ul></ul>
</div>
<div id="content">
<div class="border-top"></div>
<div id="content-inner">
<span>TEST CONTENT</span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="border-bottom"></div>
</div>
CSS
#container {
height: 100px;
background: grey;
}
#push {
height: 95px;
overflow: hidden;
}
#list {
max-height: 70px;
overflow: auto;
background: #ddf;
}
#content-inner {
min-height: 100px;
background: #dfd;
margin: 0;
border-left: 5px solid #fdf;
border-right: 5px solid #fdf;
}
.border-top {
background: #fdf;
border-radius: 5px 5px 0 0;
height: 5px;
}
.border-bottom {
background: #fdf;
border-radius: 0 0 5px 5px;
height: 5px;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/V8yuN/6/
Let's say your html looks like this:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="top">
</div>
<div id="bottom">
</div>
</div>
then your CSS could look like this, with #wrap height set, and a min-height for the bottom.
Mind the height 100% !important.
#wrap{
height: 400px;
background: #ccc;
}
#top{
//height: 200px; for testing
background: #f0f;
}
#bottom{
height: 100% !important;
min-height: 200px;
overflow: scroll;
background: #000;
}
is that kind of what you're searching for?
Would help though if you could post the stuff you've already done.
I have a container layer with a width of 850px. Inside of that i have 4 layers displayed as inline-blocks floating left, each of which are 100px high and 200px wide.
How can i space them so the outside ones line up at the edges of the container div but are spaced evenly within?
css
#content {
width: 850px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
}
#featured {
display: inline-block;
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
float: left;
margin-left: 10px;
margin-top: 10px;
background-color: #09F;
}
html
<div id=content>
<div id=featured></div>
<div id=featured></div>
<div id=featured></div>
<div id=featured></div>
</div>
It's not really going to work, because you have a container that's 850px wide and you're trying to spread 4 200px wide containers with three gutters between them. 4*200 = 800 so you have 50px spread in which to split 3 gutters 50/3 is 16.6666ish which isn't going to work for pixels.
The following works, but I don't know how useful it is for you.
#content {
width: 848px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
background: #666;
overflow: hidden;
}
#featured {
display: inline-block;
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
float: left;
margin-left: 16px;
margin-top: 10px;
background-color: #09F;
}
#featured.first { margin-left: 0px;}
<div id=content>
<div id=featured class="first"></div>
<div id=featured></div>
<div id=featured></div>
<div id=featured></div>
</div>
There are a couple of ways to do this. One cross-browser solution I have found is to use an extra wrapper div and get creative with it's true dimensions and negative margins.
<div id="content">
<div class="kludge">
<div class="featured"></div>
<div class="featured"></div>
<div class="featured"></div>
<div class="featured"></div>
</div>
</div>
I changed id=featured to a class name because ids should be unique if you want your HTML to be valid.
The CSS:
#content {
width: 850px;
margin: 0 auto; /* short-hand for margin, first value is top+bottom, second value is left+right */
overflow: hidden; /* not actually necessary but will make #container contain the floated items */
}
.kludge {
width: 900px; /* create room for the right hand margin of last item */
margin-right: -50px;
}
.featured {
display: block; /* inline-block not necessary for floated elements */
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
float: left;
margin: 0 10px;
background-color: #09F;
}
I think the easiest way is:
<style>
#content {
width: 850px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
border:1px solid #000
}
#featured1 {
display: inline-block;
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
float: left;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-top: 10px;
background-color: #09F;
}
#featured2 {
display: inline-block;
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
float: left;
margin-left: 16px;
margin-top: 10px;
background-color: #09F;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id=content>
<div id=featured1></div>
<div id=featured2></div>
<div id=featured2></div>
<div id=featured2></div>
</div>
Maybe not what you need, but If IE6 support is not important pseudo selectors are perfect for this, and avoid any HTML fudges (tested in IE7, FF3.5):
CSS:
#content {
width: 848px;
margin: 0 auto;
overflow: auto;
}
.featured {
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
float: left;
margin-left: 16px;
margin-top: 10px;
background-color: #09F;
}
.featured:first-child {
margin-left: 0;
}
HTML:
<div id="content">
<div class="featured"></div>
<div class="featured"></div>
<div class="featured"></div>
<div class="featured"></div>
</div>