I'm getting this error a lot in using tweenr in RStudio on mac but I'm unable to replicate it using dummy dataset. My dataset is a list of data frames with I want to apply tween_states. Works fine on dummy data, but always return Error in col2rgb(d) : invalid color name and recognise my first character column as a 'color' whenever I use real data.
Hard to be sure, but I think you are passing too many columns to the tweenr function.
The data you send to the tweenr function should be trimmed column wise to only contain the columns used as argument names and one additional column of values that will be tweened
Getting the same issue! I fixed it by making sure the first column only has numbers, no strings. For whatever reason the first column is interpreted as colors if it contains strings. I didn't need to trim any columns down as the other poster suggested.
Related
I am working with a dataframe from NYC opendata. On the information page it claims that a column, ACRES, is numeric, but when I download it is chr. I've tried the following:
parks$ACRES <- as.numeric(as.character(parks$ACRES))
which turned the column info type into dbl, but I was unable to take the mean, so I tried:
parks$ACRES <- as.integer(as.numeric(parks$ACRES))
I've also tried sapply() and I get an error message with NAs introduced by coercion. I tried convert() to but R didn't recognize it though it is supposed to be part of dplyr.
Either way I get NA as a result for the mean.
I've tried taking the mean a few different ways:
mean(parks[["ACRES"]])
mean(parks$ACRES)
Which also didn't work? Is it the dataframe? I'm wondering since it is from the government there are limits?
I'd appreciate any help.
You have NAs in your data. Either they were there before you converted or some of the data can't be converted to numeric directly (do you have comma separators for the 1000s in your input? Those need to be removed before converting to numeric).
Identifying why you have NAs and fixing if necessary is the first step you'll need to do. If the NAs are valid then what you want to do is to add the na.rm = TRUE parameter to the mean function which ignores NAs while calculating the mean.
Check to see how ACRES is being loaded in (i.e., what data type is it?). If it's being loaded in as a factor, you will have trouble changing a factor to a numerical value. The way to solve this is to use the 'stringsAsFactors = FALSE' argument in your read.csv or whatever function you're using to read in the data.
this might be a dumb/obvious question but unfortunately I haven't had much luck finding information about it online so I thought I'd ask it here. Basically, I'm working with the data.table package in R and I have imported a data set into R where, in a particular column, the values can be both numeric values and character values (and even blank/empty values), and I want to be able to obtain a value from that column and use it for calculations.
The thing about the data.table package though is that when you import a file using the fread() function it automatically sets all values in that file as a character data type, so this can cause a few issues since this means that all numbers are automatically character types as well. I have worked around this slightly by using the as.numeric() function so that if a value obtained from that column is a number then it can be easily converted to numeric type and used in calculations. However, since the column also contains other characters (specifically, it can also have \N or N as values) and since it can also contain blank/empty values, then this means the as.numeric() function will show up with an error. For example, I initially wrote an IF loop to detect whether a column cell had a character value or a numeric value as follows:
if( as.numeric(..{Reference to column cell from file here}...) == NA ) {
x <- 0
}
(where x is just some variable), but it did not work and instead gave the output:
Error in if ((as.numeric(.... :
missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
In addition: Warning message:
In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
(I should note that is.numeric() also did not work since all values in a data.table data set are automatically character values so this function always gives FALSE regardless of it's actual data type).
So clearly I need a better function or method to work around this. Is there a function capable of reading a 'character' value from a column and being able to detect whether that value is truly a numeric type or character type (or even neither, in the case of an empty cell)? Thanks in advance
I have this csv with 4000+ entries and I am trying to create a histogram of one of the variables. Because of the way the data was collected, there was a possibility that if data was uncollectable for that entry, it was coded as a period (.). I still want to create a histogram and just ignore that specific entry.
What would be the best or easiest way to go about this?
I tried making it so that the histogram would only use the data for every entry except the one with the period by doing
newlist <- data1$var[1:3722]+data1$var[3724:4282]
where 3723 is the entry with the period, but R said that + is not meaningful for factors. I'm not sure if I went about this the right way, my intention was to create a vector or list or table conjoining those two subsets above into one bigger list called newlist.
Your problem is deeper that you realize. When R read in the data and saw the lone . it interpreted that column as a factor (categorical variable).
You need to either convert the factor back to a numeric variable (this is FAQ 7.10) or reread the data forcing it to read that column as numeric, if you are using read.table or one of the functions that calls read.table then you can set the colClasses argument to specify a numeric column.
Once the column of data is a numeric variable then a negative subscript or !is.na will work (or some functions will automatically ignore the missing value).
I did some reading on similar SO questions, but couldn't figure out how to resolve my error.
I have written the following string of code:
points[paste0(score.avail,"_pts")] <-
Map('*', points[score.avail], mget(paste0(score.avail,'_m')) )
Essentially, I have a list of columns in the 'points' data frame, defined by 'score.avail'. I am multiplying each of the columns by a respective constant, defined as the paste0(score.avail, '_m') expression. It appends new fields based on the multiplication, given by paste0(score.avail, "_pts") expression.
I have used this function before in a similar setup with no issues. However, I am now getting the following error:
Error in .Primitive("*")(dots[[1L]][[1L]], dots[[2L]][[1L]]) :
non-numeric argument to binary operator
I'm pretty sure R is telling me that one of the fields I'm trying to multiply is not numeric. However, I have checked all my fields, and they are numeric. I have even tried running a line as.numeric(score.avail) but that doesn't help. I also ran the following to remove NA's in the fields (before the Map function above).
for(col in score.avail){
points[is.na(get(col)) & (data.source == "average" |
data.source == "averageWeighted"), (col) := 0]}
The thing that stumps me is that this expression has worked with no issues before.
Update
I did some more digging by separating out each component of my original function. I'm getting odd output when running points[score.avail]. Previously when I ran this, it would return just the columns for all of my rows. Now, however, I'm getting none of the rows in my original data frame -- rather, it is imputing the column names in the 'score.avail' list as rows and filling in NA's everywhere (this is clearly the source of my problem).
I think this is because I'm using the object I'm pointing to is a data.table with keyvars set. Previously with this function, I had been pointing to a data frame.
Off to try a few more things.
Another Update
I was able to solve my problem by copying the 'points' object using as.data.frame(). However, I will leave the question open to see if anyone knows how to reset the data table key vars so that the function I specified above will work.
I was able to solve my problem by copying the 'points' object using as.data.frame(). Apparently classifying the object as a data.table was causing my headaches.
I have a table containing mixed values, including character string and numerical value. I chose to use a data.frame to store it. However, I have met serious difficulties in adding extra rows to the data frame. Error messages, like invalid factor level, NA generated, keep occurring.
Besides using a data.frame, are there any data structure that can help avoid the issue of invalid factor level, NA generated, while still supporting the mixed data format?
data.frame (or data.table) would most likely me the data structure you are looking for.
To put it plainly: in order to add "a new row", every new element needs to confirm to whatever restrictions pertain to its column. Mostly, that means being of the same class.
If you are adding elements to a factor column (as the error you received indicates) then there is an additional requirement that the new values must also be levels of that factor. (see ?factor for more info)
If one is using factors deliberately, then the above is a good thing. However, if one has a column that was unintentionally coerced to a factor, then the above is a P.I.T.A.
Unfortunately, the default on most functions that generate data.frames is to have stringsAsFactors=TRUE. This, imho, is annoying. But all you have to do is turn that flag off, and you should be set.