I'm have a list with string types and i want to get each one that have maximum of occurence element grouped by another column. I'm trying to do this by linqu expression but it doesn't work. Is it possible to run my code that i show below ?
#test=(from a in #data
group a by new {a.PostCode}
into obj
select obj).ToDictionary(x => x.Key,x=>x.ToList()
.Select(y=>y.Statistic).GroupBy(s => s)
.OrderByDescending(s => s.Count())
.First().Key);
Related
I am trying to figure out how to have aggregate functions in the having clause with CakePHP's query builder.
Background: the intent is to correct all rows in a table with compound primary-keys (page-ID and URL) such that each page-ID-group has only one default video. There are some groups with no, and some groups with more than one "default" row, which needs to be corrected. I've figured out all the steps – except for this detail.
This is the query that I'm trying to build.
SELECT
video_page_id, video_url
FROM page_video
WHERE
video_page_id IN (
SELECT video_page_id
FROM page_video
GROUP BY video_page_id
HAVING SUM(video_is_default) < 1
)
AND video_order = 0
;
And this is what I have built:
// sub-select: all groups that have too few defaults.
// Returns list of page-IDs.
$qb = $this->getQueryBuilder();
$group_selection = $qb
->select(array(
'video_page_id',
))
->from('page_video')
->group('video_page_id')
->having(array(
'1 >' => $qb->func()->sum('video_is_default'),
))
;
// sub-select: compound-primary-key identifiers of all rows where
// `video_is_default` has to be modified from `0` to `1`.
// Returns list of two columns.
$qb = $this->getQueryBuilder();
$modifiable_selection = $qb
->select(array(
'video_page_id',
'video_url',
))
->from('page_video')
->where(array(
'video_page_id IN' => $group_selection,
'video_order = 0',
))
;
But then I get this exception: Column not found: 1054 Unknown column '1' in 'having clause'
The crux is the HAVING clause. I basically don't know how to combine the aggregate function with the attribute-value properties of an array. Usually, in order to craft lower/greater-than clauses, you write it like this: array('col1 >' => $value). But here, I needed to flip the equation because the complex expression can't fit into an array key. And now the 1 gets interpreted as a column name.
Writing it as a concatenated string doesn't seem to help either.
array(
$qb->func()->sum('video_is_default') .' > 1',
)
Exception: PHP Recoverable fatal error: Object of class Cake\Database\Expression\FunctionExpression could not be converted to string
I know I could do …
SELECT (…), SUM(video_is_default) AS default_sum FROM (…) HAVING default_sum < 1 (…)
… but then the sub-select column count doesn't match anymore.
Exception: ERROR 1241 (21000): Operand should contain 1 column(s)
I feel silly for figuring out the solution so soon after asking the question.
The lt method acccepts complex values as the first parameter.
->having(function($exp, $qb) {
$default_sum = $qb->func()->sum('video_is_default');
return $exp->lt($default_sum, 1);
})
I have a dictionary of phone numbers where number is Key and country is value. I want to update the key and add country code based on value country. I tried to use the map function for this:
print('**Exmaple: Update phone book to add Country code using map function** ')
user=[{'952-201-3787':'US'},{'952-201-5984':'US'},{'9871299':'BD'},{'01632 960513':'UK'}]
#A function that takes a dictionary as arg, not list. List is the outer part
def add_Country_Code(aDict):
for k,v in aDict.items():
if(v == 'US'):
aDict[( '1+'+k)]=aDict.pop(k)
if(v == 'UK'):
aDict[( '044+'+k)]=aDict.pop(k)
if (v == 'BD'):
aDict[('001+'+k)] =aDict.pop(k)
return aDict
new_user=list(map(add_Country_Code,user))
print(new_user)
This works partially when I run, output below :
[{'1+952-201-3787': 'US'}, {'1+1+1+952-201-5984': 'US'}, {'001+9871299': 'BD'}, {'044+01632 960513': 'UK'}]
Notice the 2nd US number has 2 additional 1s'. What is causing that?How to fix? Thanks a lot.
Issue
You are mutating a dict while iterating it. Don't do this. The Pythonic convention would be:
Make a new_dict = {}
While iterating the input a_dict, assign new items to new_dict.
Return the new_dict
IOW, create new things, rather than change old things - likely the source of your woes.
Some notes
Use lowercase with underscores when defining variable names (see PEP 8).
Lookup values rather than change the input dict, e.g. a_dict[k] vs. a_dict.pop(k)
Indent the correct number of spaces (see PEP 8)
I am trying to concat the value of an element based on certain condition, but unable to do so. What's wrong here?
For below given sample structure, I need to concat the value of CID based upon OutcomeCode code. Say if we have OutcomeCode as OC and PC, then we should display concatenated value of CId in a string variable.
<v4:ValidateResponse xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:v4="http://service.com/v4">
<v4:Details>
<v4:Detail>
<v4:CId>001</v4:CId>
</v4:Detail>
<v4:OutcomeCode>FC</v4:OutcomeCode>
</v4:Details>
<v4:Details>
<v4:Detail>
<v4:CId>002</v4:CId>
</v4:Detail>
<v4:OutcomeCode>PC</v4:OutcomeCode>
</v4:Details>
<v4:Details>
<v4:Detail>
<v4:CId>003</v4:CId>
</v4:Detail>
<v4:OutcomeCode>OC</v4:OutcomeCode>
</v4:Details>
</v4:ValidateResponse>
Here is my transformation
as xs:string
{
for $Details in $ValidateResponse /*:Details
let $OutcomeCode := data($Details/*:OutcomeCode)
return
if (($OutcomeCode ='OC') or ($OutcomeCode='PC'))
then
contact('CID is-',data($Details/*:Detail/*:CId))
else
fn:data('Technical_Check')
};
I am unable to get concat values.
Expected result should be like: CID is- 002,003
as these 2 meet the OC and PC condition.
You could simplify this for loop and combine the criteria into a single XPath to select the CId from Details that have OutcomeCode of "OC" or "PC".
Then, use string-join() in order to produce a comma separated value.
Then, use concat() to produce a string with the prefix and the CSV value:
concat('CID is- ',
string-join(
$ValidateResponse/*:Details[*:OutcomeCode =('OC','PC')]/*:Detail/*:CId,
",")
)
Required suggestion on below part.please any one give solution.
We have mapping from 850 to FlatFile
X12/PO1Loop1/PO1/PO109 and I need to map to field VALUE which is under record Option which is unbounded.
Split PO109 into substrings delimited by '.', foreach subsring after the first, create new Option with value=substring
So in input sample we have value like 147895632qwerqtyuui.789456123321456987
Similarly the field repeats under POLoop1.
So I need to split value based on (.) then pass a value to value field under option record(unbounded).
I tried using below code snippet
public string SplitValues(string strValue)
{
string[] arrValue = strValue.Split(".".ToCharArray());
foreach (string strDisplay in arrValue)
{
return strDisplay;
}
}
But it doesn't works, and I am not really familiar with the String methods and I am not sure if there's an easy way to do this. I have a String which contains couple of values delimited with "." .
So I need to separate values based on delimiter(.) and pass value to field.
How can I do this
As I mentioned, not too clear what is your objective, but I think you want to split a node that has some kind of delimiter into multiple nodes... if so, Try this: https://seroter.wordpress.com/2008/10/07/splitting-delimited-values-in-biztalk-maps/
He is doing exactly that. Given a node with a|b|c|d as value, output multiple nodes, each containing the value after splitted by |, so node1 = a, node2 = b, node3 = c, node4 = d.
EDIT: I accidentally misrepresented the problem when trying to pare-down the example code. A key part of my code is that I am attempting to sort the array after adding elements to it. The hang appears on sort, not insert. The following abstracted code will consistently hang:
<?=
local('a' = array)
#a->insert('test1' = map('a'='1'))
#a->insert('test2' = map('b'='2')) // comment-out to make work
#a->sort
#a
?>
I have a result set for which I want to insert a pair of values into an array for each unique key, as follows:
resultset(2) => {
records => {
if(!$logTypeClasses->contains(field('logTypeClass'))) => {
local(i) = pair(field('logTypeClass'), map('title' = field('logType'), 'class' = field('logTypeClass')))
log_critical(#i)
$logTypeClasses->insert(#i) // Lasso hangs on this line, will return if commented-out
}
}
}
Strangely, I cannot insert the #i local variable into thread variable without Lasso hanging. I never receive an error, and the page never returns. It just hangs indefinitely.
I do see the pairs logged correctly, which leads me to believe that the pair-generating syntax is correct.
I can make the code work as long as the value side of the pair is not a map with values. In other words, it works when the value side of the pair is a string, or even an empty map. As soon as I add key=value parameters to the map, it fails.
I must be missing something obvious. Any pointers? Thanks in advance for your time and consideration.
I can verify the bug with the basic code you sent with sorting. The question does arise how exactly one sorts pairs. I'm betting you want them sorted by the first element in the pair, but I could also see the claim that they should be sorted by last element in the pair (by values instead of by keys)
One thing that might work better is to keep it as a map of maps. If you need the sorted data for some reason, you could do map->keys->asArray->sort
Ex:
local(data) = map('test1' = map('a'=2,'b'=3))
#data->insert('test2' = map('c'=33, 'd'=42))
local(keys) = #data->keys->asArray
#keys->sort
#keys
Even better, if you're going to just iterate through a sorted set, you can just use a query expression:
local(data) = map('test1' = map('a'=2,'b'=3))
#data->insert('test2' = map('c'=33, 'd'=42))
with elm in #data->eachPair
let key = #elm->first
let value = #elm->second
order by #key
do { ... }
I doubt you problem is the pair with map construct per se.
This test code works as expected:
var(testcontainer = array)
inline(-database = 'mysql', -table = 'help_topic', -findall) => {
resultset(1) => {
records => {
if(!$testcontainer->contains(field('name'))) => {
local(i) = pair(field('name'), map('description' = field('description'), 'name' = field('name')))
$testcontainer->insert(#i)
}
}
}
}
$testcontainer
When Lasso hangs like that with no feedback and no immediate crash it is usually trapped in some kind of infinite loop. I'm speculating that it might have to do with Lasso using references whenever possible. Maybe some part of your code is using a reference that references itself. Or something.