Can someone explain why the following code yields different results on the second printf if I comment the first printf line or not, in 64 bits?
/* gcc -O0 -o test test.c */
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main() {
char a[20] = {0};
char b = 'a';
int count=-1;
// printf("%.16llx %.16llx\n", a, &b);
printf("%x\n", *(a+count));
return 0;
}
I get the following results for the second printf:
commented: 0
uncommented: 61
Thanks in advance!
iansus
Can someone explain why the following code yields different results on the second printf if I comment the first printf line or not
Your program uses a[-1], and thus exhibits undefined behavior. Anything can happen, and figuring out exactly why one or the other thing happenes is pointless.
The precise reason is that you are reading memory that gets written to by the first printf (when commented in).
I get a different result (which is expected with undefined behavior):
// with first `printf` commented out:
ffffffff
// with it commented in:
00007fffffffdd20 00007fffffffdd1b
ffffffff
You could see where that memory is written to by setting a GDB watchpoint on it:
(gdb) p a[-1]
$1 = 0 '\000'
(gdb) p &a[-1]
$2 = 0x7fffffffdd1f ""
(gdb) watch *(int*)0x7fffffffdd1f
Hardware watchpoint 4: *(int*)0x7fffffffdd1f
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Hardware watchpoint 4: *(int*)0x7fffffffdd1f
Old value = 0
New value = 255
main () at t.c:12
12 printf("%.16llx %.16llx\n", a, &b);
It my case above, the value is written as part of initializing count=-1. That is, with my version of gcc, count is located just before a[0]. But this may depend on compiler version, exactly how this compiler was built, etc. etc.
Related
In a Julia program which run under Linux, I need to launch a dedicated action when a console window is resized. So how in Julia, can I intercept the system signal SIGWINCH (window resizing) and attach to it a function which performs the required action ?
In Ada it is rather straightforward to declare it :
protected Signalhandler is
procedure Handlewindowresizing;
pragma Attach_Handler (Handlewindowresizing, SIGWINCH);
end Signalhandler;
TENTATIVE SOLUTION BASED ON IDEA OF SCHEMER : I try to use a C Library which conducts the SIGWINCH interruption monitoring.
myLibrary.h
void Winresize (void Sig_Handler());
myLibrary.c
#include "myLibrary.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>
void Winresize(void sig_handler (void)) {
signal(SIGWINCH, sig_handler);
}
Compilation & Library preparation
gcc -c -Wall -fPIC myLibrary.c
gcc -shared -fPIC -o myLibrary.so myLibrary.o
Program in Julia which uses the C-Library :
function getc1()
ret = ccall(:jl_tty_set_mode, Int32, (Ptr{Cvoid},Int32), stdin.handle, true)
ret == 0 || error("unable to switch to raw mode")
c = read(stdin, UInt8)
ccall(:jl_tty_set_mode, Int32, (Ptr{Cvoid},Int32), stdin.handle, false)
c
end
function traitement() println(displaysize(stdout)); end
Mon_traitement_c = #cfunction(traitement, Cvoid, ())
ccall((:Winresize, "/home/Emile/programmation/Julia/myLibrary.so"), Cvoid, (Ptr{Cvoid},), Mon_traitement_c)
while true
println(getc1())
end
The Julia program run properly but when the terminal window is resized a Segmentation fault (core dumped) is issued and program is said exited with code: 139.
So the question is where does this segmentation fault come from ? From the compilation model ? Julia has not the right to control code execution in the memory part where C manages the signal monitoring ?
Removing println operation in Sig_handler suppress the segmentation fault :
curr_size = displaysize(stdout)
new_size = curr_size
function traitement() global new_size ; new_size = displaysize(stdout); return end
Mon_traitement_c = #cfunction(traitement, Cvoid, ())
ccall((:Winresize, "/home/Emile/programmation/Julia/myLibrary.so"), Cvoid, (Ptr{Cvoid},), Mon_traitement_c)
while true
global curr_size, new_size
if new_size != curr_size
curr_size = new_size
println(curr_size)
end
sleep(0.1)
end
Since no one has answered this question so far, one possible workaround could be asynchronously monitoring the size of the terminal in some time intervals.
function monitor_term(func)
#async begin
curr_size = displaysize(stdout)
while (true)
sleep(0.1)
new_size = displaysize(stdout)
if new_size != curr_size
curr_size = new_size
func()
end
end
end
end
And now sample usage:
julia> monitor_term(() -> print("BOO!"))
Task (runnable) #0x0000000013071710
As long as the terminal is alive, any change to its size will print BOO!.
Yes, it is indeed a fallback solution which is hardly what one expects from a new language full of promises ... but for lack of thrushes we can actually eat blackbirds (smile).
But if Julia hasn't planned to be able to take into account the system signals of the Unix/Linux world, it might be possible to do it using a C library like the one that signal.h accesses.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>
void sig_handler(int signum)
{
printf("Received signal %d\n", signum);
}
int main()
{
signal(SIGINT, sig_handler);
sleep(10); // This is your chance to press CTRL-C
return 0;
}
We would have to define a julia function doing what is expected when the system signal is received. Make it usable in C as Sig_handler and call from julia the C statement signal(SIGWINCH, Sig_handler);
I am not enough familiar with julia to write the exact code. But this is the idea...
Is there a way to do a single read() in non-blocking mode on a pipe/terminal/etc, the way I can do it on a socket with recv(MSG_DONTWAIT)?
The reason I need that is because I cannot find any guarantee that a read() on a file-descriptor returned as ready for reading by select() or poll() will not block.
I know can make the file descriptor non-blocking with fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, fcntl(fd, F_GETFL) | O_NONBLOCK) but this will change the mode on that file descriptor globally, not just in the calling thread/process. For example:
% perl -MFcntl=F_SETFL,F_GETFL,O_NONBLOCK -e 'fcntl STDIN, F_SETFL, fcntl(STDIN, F_GETFL, 0) | O_NONBLOCK; select undef, undef, undef, undef'
^Z # put it in the background
% cat
cat: -: Resource temporarily unavailable
This will also make the fd non blocking for both reading and writing, which may confuse the hell out of another process doing the opposite on the same fd, as in:
non_blocking_read | filter | blocking_write
One way I think of is to save the file status flags on starting up and SIGCONT, and restore them on exiting and on SIGTSTP (just the way it's done with the termios settings), but this is very limited, race-prone, and will leave a mess behind in the case where the program exited abnormally.
Putting a save/restore with fcntl() before/after each read() also feels ugly and dumb, and may have other issues too. The same with an ioctl(FIONREAD) just before the read (which I'm not even sure it will work reliably with any fd; assurances in that direction will be welcome, though).
I would be happy even with system specific (eg. linux or bsd-only) solutions.
For reference, here is a discussion about fixing it in linux; the idea didn't seem to get anywhere, though.
A Linux only solution would be to reopen the file descriptor via
"/dev/stdin"|"/dev/tty"|"/dev/fd/$fd".
C example:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
int fd;
char buf[8];
int flags;
if(0>(fd=open("/dev/stdin", O_RDONLY))) return 1;
if(0>(flags = fcntl(fd,F_GETFL))) return 1;
if(0>(flags = fcntl(fd,F_SETFL,flags|O_NONBLOCK))) return 1;
sleep(3);
puts("reading");
ssize_t nr = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf));
printf("read=%zd\n", nr);
return 0;
}
Unlike a duplicated file descriptor, a reopened filedescriptor will have independent file status flags.
I find breakpad does not handle sigsegv sometimes.
and i wrote a simple example to reproduce it:
#include <vector>
#include <breakpad/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.h>
int InitBreakpad()
{
char core_file_folder[] = "/tmp/cores/";
google_breakpad::MinidumpDescriptor descriptor(core_file_folder);
auto exception_handler_ =
new google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler(descriptor,
nullptr,
nullptr,
nullptr,
true,
-1);
}
int main()
{
InitBreakpad();
// int* ptr = nullptr;
// *ptr = 1;
std::vector<int> sum;
sum.push_back(1);
auto it = sum.begin();
sum.erase(it);
sum.erase(it);
return 0;
}
and gcc is 4.8.5 and my comiple cmd is
g++ test_breakpad.cpp -I./include -I./include/breakpad -L./lib -lbreakpad -lbreakpad_client -std=c++11 -lpthread
run a.out, get "Segmentation fault" but no minidump is generated.
if i uncomment nullptr write, breakpad works!
what should i do to correct it?
GDB debug output:
(gdb) b google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::~ExceptionHandler()
Breakpoint 2 at 0x402ed0: file src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc, line 264.
(gdb) c
The program is not being run.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/zen/tmp/a.out
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
Breakpoint 1, google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::ExceptionHandler (this=0x619040, descriptor=..., filter=0x0, callback=0x0, callback_context=0x0, install_handler=true, server_fd=-1) at src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc:224
224 ExceptionHandler::ExceptionHandler(const MinidumpDescriptor& descriptor,
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.17-157.el7_3.1.x86_64 libgcc-4.8.5-11.el7.x86_64 libstdc++-4.8.5-11.el7.x86_64
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff712f19d in __memmove_ssse3_back () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00007ffff712f19d in __memmove_ssse3_back () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
The program no longer exists.
and i tried breakpad out of process dump, but still got nothing(nullptr write works).
After some debugging I think that the reason that the sum.erase(it) does not create a minidump in your example is due to stack corruption.
While debugging you can see that the variable g_handler_stack_ in src/client/linux/handler/exception_handler.cc is correctly initialized and the google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler instance is correctly added to the vector. However when google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::SignalHandler is called the vector is reported empty despite no calls to google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::~ExceptionHandler or any of the std::vector methods that would change the vector.
Some further data points that point to stack corruption is that the code works with clang++. Additionally, as soon as we change the std::vector<int> sum; to a std::vector<int>* sum, which will ensure that we don't corrupt the stack, the minidump is written to disk.
i write a simple MPI program:
#include <stdio.h>
2 #include "mpi.h"
3
4 int main(int argc,char* argv[])
5 {
6 int rank;
7 int size;
8
9 MPI_Init(0,0);
10 MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD,&rank);
11 MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD,&size);
12 printf("Hello World from process %d of %d\n",rank,size);
13 MPI_Finalize();
14 return 0;
15 }
the program compile successflly,but can't run
i use "mpirun -np 4 ./hello" or "mpirun -np 4 hello"
it shows like this:
_create_ep, create command failed: Operation not permitted
GLEX_ERR(ln0): _init_glex(608), _create_ep: system error
_create_ep, create command failed: Operation not permitted
GLEX_ERR(ln0): _init_glex(608), _create_ep: system error
_create_ep, create command failed: Operation not permitted
GLEX_ERR(ln0): _init_glex(608), _create_ep: system error
Fatal error in MPI_Init: Other MPI error, error stack:
MPIR_Init_thread(498)........:
MPID_Init(187)...............: channel initialization failed
MPIDI_CH3_Init(89)...........:
MPID_nem_init(320)...........:
MPID_nem_glex_init(74).......:
MPIDI_nem_glex_init_glex(610): Cannot create GLEX endpoint.
besides,i wirite this program on HPC.And I guess the problem "Cannot create GLEX endpoint" maybe related to the HPC(HPC has already deployed MPI).
I'm not too sure of the level of support for MPI_Init() when null pointers are passed as arguments (I think there is something like calling it without arguments supported since MPI 3.0, but I wouldn't commit on that).
However, I would definitely replace MPI_Init(0,0) in your code by MPI_Init( &argc, &argv ) for a starter.
EDIT: my bad, MPI_Init() is supposed to support null pointer as argument as stated here.
However, trying with MPI_Init( &argc, &argv ) would still be my first try for fixing the issue.
I would like to change a program to automatically detect whether a terminal is color-capable or not, so when I run said program from within a non-color capable terminal (say M-x shell in (X)Emacs), color is automatically turned off.
I don't want to hardcode the program to detect TERM={emacs,dumb}.
I am thinking that termcap/terminfo should be able to help with this, but so far I've only managed to cobble together this (n)curses-using snippet of code, which fails badly when it can't find the terminal:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <curses.h>
int main(void) {
int colors=0;
initscr();
start_color();
colors=has_colors() ? 1 : 0;
endwin();
printf(colors ? "YES\n" : "NO\n");
exit(0);
}
I.e. I get this:
$ gcc -Wall -lncurses -o hep hep.c
$ echo $TERM
xterm
$ ./hep
YES
$ export TERM=dumb
$ ./hep
NO
$ export TERM=emacs
$ ./hep
Error opening terminal: emacs.
$
which is... suboptimal.
A friend pointed me towards tput(1), and I cooked up this solution:
#!/bin/sh
# ack-wrapper - use tput to try and detect whether the terminal is
# color-capable, and call ack-grep accordingly.
OPTION='--nocolor'
COLORS=$(tput colors 2> /dev/null)
if [ $? = 0 ] && [ $COLORS -gt 2 ]; then
OPTION=''
fi
exec ack-grep $OPTION "$#"
which works for me. It would be great if I had a way to integrate it into ack, though.
You almost had it, except that you need to use the lower-level curses function setupterm instead of initscr. setupterm just performs enough initialization to read terminfo data, and if you pass in a pointer to an error result value (the last argument) it will return an error value instead of emitting error messages and exiting (the default behavior for initscr).
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <curses.h>
int main(void) {
char *term = getenv("TERM");
int erret = 0;
if (setupterm(NULL, 1, &erret) == ERR) {
char *errmsg = "unknown error";
switch (erret) {
case 1: errmsg = "terminal is hardcopy, cannot be used for curses applications"; break;
case 0: errmsg = "terminal could not be found, or not enough information for curses applications"; break;
case -1: errmsg = "terminfo entry could not be found"; break;
}
printf("Color support for terminal \"%s\" unknown (error %d: %s).\n", term, erret, errmsg);
exit(1);
}
bool colors = has_colors();
printf("Terminal \"%s\" %s colors.\n", term, colors ? "has" : "does not have");
return 0;
}
Additional information about using setupterm is available in the curs_terminfo(3X) man page (x-man-page://3x/curs_terminfo) and Writing Programs with NCURSES.
Look up the terminfo(5) entry for the terminal type and check the Co (max_colors) entry. That's how many colors the terminal supports.