The index property of my delegate component is not recognized when it is used in console.log() function:
onClicked: {
identities.qml_del_account(index);
console.log(index);
}
/*Application output:*/
qrc:/Accounts2.qml:74: ReferenceError: index is not defined
line 74 is this:
console.log(index);
Why does it work for the first line but fails on the second? Both lines are located within the same javascript function.
Full QML code is:
Identities {
id: identities
}
ListView {
id: list_identities
width: list_area.width
height: 100
model: identities
delegate: Rectangle {
id: identities_delegate
height: 40
width: parent.width
Text {
id: identities_item
height: parent.height
anchors.left: parent.left
width: 100
text: email
}
Image {
source: "qrc:/images/dots-menu.png"
id: toolbtn_img
anchors.right: parent.right
width: 24
height: 24
MouseArea {
width: parent.width
height: parent.height
onClicked: {
identities.qml_del_account(index);
console.log(index);
}
}
}
}
}
The model is defined in C++ and it contians the function qml_del_account() which works fine and I am not complaining about it.
My guess is: qml_del_account deletes the model's entry for the current delegate, which is subsequently removed, so the log is executed on an no longer existing object model entry context.
Try to reverse the order of log and call to the model's function.
In general I would also recommend to improve the readability by referring to model data in delegates through the model accessor, e.g. model.index
Related
I'm trying to send a signal from an object in one QML file to another object in a different QML file, but can't seem to find any good resources to use as a guide. Most of the examples I have come across show signals and slots being used to communicate between either two objects implemented in the same QML file (i.e. inside the same component), or in two different component files that come together inside a third QML file, which differs from my use case.
I need to send a string value from an object in a QML file (which represents a screen) to another object in a different QML file (representing yet another screen). The way the screens are linked currently is via StackView QML type in the main.qml file.
The closest I have seen the same problem described is here. The problem with the accepted answer in my case is the fact that the objects Rect1 and Rect2 are later defined in the same file. This means that they can be given an id and the signal and slot can be connected together, something I'm unable to do on my side.
Here's some code to demonstrate the problem.
main.qml:
ApplicationWindow {
id: app_container
width: 480
height: 600
visible: true
StackView {
id: screen_stack
anchors.fill: parent
initialItem: Screen1 {
}
}
}
Screen1:
Item {
id: screen_1
width: 480
height: 600
property var input
TextField {
id: user_input
width: parent.width
height: parent.height - 100
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
placeholderText: qsTr("Enter your name")
onEditingFinsihed: {
input = user_input.text
}
}
Button {
width: parent.width
height: 100
anchors.top: user_input.bottom
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
onClicked: {
console.log("Moving to Screen2")
screen_stack.push("qrc:/Screen2.qml")
}
}
}
Screen2:
Item {
id: screen_2
width: 480
height: 600
Rectangle {
anchors.fill: parent
color: "yellow"
Text {
id: txt_rect
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
anchors.verticalCenter: parent.verticalCenter
text: qsTr("")
}
}
}
What I would like to be able to do is send the user input from TextField user_input in Screen1 to Text txt_rect in Screen2. How can I achieve this?
You can push properties:
screen_stack.push("qrc:/Screen2.qml", {"inputText": user_input.text})
Screen2:
Item {
id: screen_2
width: 480
height: 600
property var inputText
Rectangle {
anchors.fill: parent
color: "yellow"
Text {
id: txt_rect
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
anchors.verticalCenter: parent.verticalCenter
text: screen_2.inputText
}
}
}
When using using Package, State and ParentChange to re-parent a delegate to one of several views, the delegate seems to momentarily have a null parent while bindings are re-evaluated. This causes errors if the delegate has bindings to parent.width or similar.
This is disturbing because Qt's published Package example displays the same problem if the initial state is changed to the other alternative
(To reproduce: copy ..../Qt/Examples/Qt-5.14.1/quick/views/package/{view.qml,Delegate.qml} and change the initial upTo value from 0 to 7 in view.qml and then run "qmlscene view.qml".).
Below is a simplification of Qt's example, with a constant state. The active State uses a ParentChange which defines width; this somehow causes the delegate to momentarily have a null parent, and the binding for width:parent.width gets an error:
test.qml line 26: TypeError: Cannot read property 'width' of null
What causes this, or rather, how to avoid it? And, how could the Package mechanism ever work given that Qt's example has the same problem as noted above?
import QtQuick 2.0
import QtQml.Models 2.1
Rectangle {
width: 300; height: 400
ListModel {
id: myModel
ListElement { display: "One" }
ListElement { display: "Two" }
ListElement { display: "Three" }
}
DelegateModel {
id: visualModel
model: myModel
delegate:
Package {
Rectangle { id: rectA;
width: 40; height: 25; Package.name: 'pkgA'
}
Rectangle { id: rectB;
width: 40; height: 25; Package.name: 'pkgB'
}
Rectangle {
id: wrapper
width: parent.width; // ERROR HERE: parent is sometimes null!
height: 25
color: 'lightsteelblue'
state: 'state1'
states: [
State {
name: 'state1'
ParentChange {
target: wrapper; parent: rectB
width: rectB.width; height: rectB.height // **CAUSES ERROR**
}
}
]
Component.onCompleted: {
console.log("wrapper onCompleted: parent is",parent);
}
onParentChanged: {
console.log("wrapper parent changed to",parent);
}
}
}
}
ListView {
width: 300; height: 200
model: visualModel.parts.pkgA
}
ListView {
width: 300; height: 200
model: visualModel.parts.pkgB
}
}
Ok, finally figured this out. You are starting with this:
width: parent.width
which is a Qt binding expression. It will update whenever parent or parent.width changes. And when the wrapper Rectangle first is created, parent starts rightly as null - it has no visual parent yet.
But then you do a ParentChange like this:
ParentChange {
target: wrapper; parent: rectB
width: rectB.width; height: rectB.height // **CAUSES ERROR**
}
The width assignment in the ParentChange is removing your previous binding and placing a new one of rectB.width width on it. This is why console logging on the original binding stops firing at this point. That binding has been removed.
So, bottom line, you are misinterpreting what is happening. Parent is null to start with and gets set via the state initial value before Component.onCompleted fires. Then when you do the ParentChange, you are wiping out the original binding so the debugging you went through was misleading.
So back to your original question, to stop the error, just remove the width and height bindings altogether from wrapper and let the ParentChange apply the ones there which won't throw errors.
I have a screen with some rectangles which can contain text. The text content of these rectangles should be allowed to change through clicking on buttons in the screen where this component is used. The problem I am having is how to know in the screen which uses this component which instance is selected. I thought about solving this via emitting a signal, which transmits the id of the instance as reference, but it seems this does not work. How could this be accomplished? Here my custom rectangle component
Rectangle {
id: root
width: 50
height: 50
color: "#000000"
anchors.verticalCenter: parent.verticalCenter
border.color: "#555555"
property int value: 0
signal sendId(Item)
Text {
id: displayed_text
color: "#ffffff"
text: root.value
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
anchors.verticalCenter: parent.verticalCenter
horizontalAlignment: Text.AlignHCenter
verticalAlignment: Text.AlignVCenter
font.pixelSize: 15
}
MouseArea {
id: mouseArea
anchors.fill: parent
onClicked: {
root.border.color="#222222"
root.sendId(root.id)
}
}
}
and here the file where other buttons should change the content of the custom component:
property Item selected: myRectangle
function changeSelected(value) {
selected.value=5
}
function setSelected(it) {
root.selected=it
}
MyRectangle {
id: myRectangle
Component.onCompleted: {
myRectangle.sendId.connect(tempNumber.setSelected)
}
}
MyRectangle {
id: myRectangle1
Component.onCompleted: {
myRectangle1.sendId.connect(tempNumber.setSelected)
}
}
MyRectangle {
id: myRectangle2
Component.onCompleted: {
myRectangle2.sendId.connect(tempNumber.setSelected)
}
}
root.sendId(root.id)
The id is not a regular property. Don't use it as such. The purpose of the id is to get you a reference, with which you can refer to a particular object, so all you really need is:
root.sendId(root)
And if root is your qml file root object, sendId(root) would work too as long as sendId is not shadowed, root members can be referenced directly, keep in mind this only applies to the root object, it won't work for a object that is a direct or indirect parent but not root.
It is recomended practice to abstain from giving everything an id - only use ids when you really need to reference a particular object and no other way exists.
Another thing you are missing is that unlike JS functions, you do have to provide some typing for a signal. You can still use var and pass anything, but usually it is more efficient to narrow down the scope. So you need type and identifier:
signal sendId(Item item)
This way you can access item in the signal handlers, so you can avoid the awkward imperative connection syntax, so instead you can simply:
MyRectangle {
onSendId: tempNumber.setSelected(item)
}
However, I'd say your design is not optional. Signals are supposed to be employed when you aim for generality and reuse. Your usage scenario is more specific, thus the usage of signals can be avoided altogether:
// Rect.qml
Rectangle {
width: 50
height: 50
color: manager.selected === this ? "red" : "blue"
MouseArea {
anchors.fill: parent
onClicked: manager.selected = parent
}
}
// main.qml
Window {
id: manager
visible: true
width: 600
height: 300
property Item selected: null
Row {
spacing: 2
Repeater {
model: 10
delegate: Rect {}
}
}
}
As the following example shows, you can directly access objects by id as long as they can be found down the object tree. The same applies to properties, however while the id will work for any object down the tree, properties will only work if they are declared in the root object of the particular qml file.
I've been playing around with dialogs and there is something that bothers me.
I have the following code:
ApplicationWindow {
visible: true
width: 640
height: 480
title: qsTr("Hello World")
Button {
id: click
x: 285
y: 189
text: qsTr("Click")
onClicked: dlgTest.open()
}
Dialog{
id:dlgTest
visible:false
contentItem: Rectangle{
width: 300
height: 300
TextField{
id: tfText
anchors.top: parent.top
}
Button{
anchors.top: tfText.bottom
onClicked: dlgTest.close()
text: "Close"
}
}
}
}
When I open it the first time I add some text to the TextField and then I close it. However, If I open it again, the text will still be there. What I want is to "reset" the dialog to it's original state when I opened it the first time (with an empty TextField). It seems that calling the method "close" is exactly the same as changing visible to false.
Is there a way of doing this "reset"?
I have an other dialog with a lot of controls and it's annoying having to restore everything manually.
In your code you create the Dialog once, as a child of the ApplicationWindow.
To 'reset' it, you have two options:
Have a reset-function, that you call, and restores everything. You can use this to set it up in the first place as well
Create a new Object with everything set in place.
For the latter you can either use JavaScript Dynamic Object Creation or a Loader.
JavaScript Dynamic Object Creation:
Button {
id: click
x: 285
y: 189
text: qsTr("Click")
onClicked: {
var d = diaComp.createObject(null)
d.open()
}
}
Component {
id: diaComp
Dialog{
id:dlgTest
visible:false
contentItem: Rectangle{
width: 300
height: 300
TextField{
id: tfText
anchors.top: parent.top
}
Button{
anchors.top: tfText.bottom
onClicked: {
dlgTest.close()
dlgTest.destroy()
}
text: "Close"
}
}
}
}
However, as you destroyed the Object, the contents of your properties are lost, and you can't access them anymore. So you need to make sure, to copy them (not bind them) to some property that is not destroyed, first.
With the Loader you have the posibility to unload the Dialog right before you load it again, which basically resets it. But until you unloaded it, you can still access it's values, as you can see in the Buttons onClicked-handler.
Button {
id: click
x: 285
y: 189
text: qsTr("Click")
onClicked: {
console.log((dlgLoad.status === Loader.Ready ? dlgLoad.item.value : 'was not loaded yet'))
dlgLoad.active = false
dlgLoad.active = true
dlgLoad.item.open()
}
}
Loader {
id: dlgLoad
sourceComponent: diaComp
active: false
}
Component {
id: diaComp
Dialog{
id:dlgTest
visible:false
property alias value: tfText.text
contentItem: Rectangle{
width: 300
height: 300
TextField{
id: tfText
anchors.top: parent.top
}
Button{
anchors.top: tfText.bottom
onClicked: {
dlgTest.close()
}
text: "Close"
}
}
}
}
Of course, you could also copy the values from the Loader's item as well, and then unload it earlier, to possible free the memory.
But if the Dialog is frequently (most of the time) shown, it might be the wisest to avoid the creation and destruction of the objects, by reusing it and resetting it manually.
GridView {
id: gridv
model: ListModel {
id: modelone;
}
delegate: componentId
}
Rectangle {
id: whattheproblem
color: red
ListView {
id: listv
model: ListModel {
id: modeltwo;
}
delegate: anotherComponentId
}
}
I can do gridv.model.append(element), it adds elements to displayed GridView.
But, I can't do listv.model.append(element), it doesn't draw anything (the component code is valid, though), but at the same time, modeltwo.count shows that element is added to model. Rectangle was added to check the layout (it's managed by RowLayout currently), and it seems to be working; other layout things (think anchor, x/y/z) do not help.
QT 5.3, QtQuick 2..
From my point of view, I can only think now, that modelone associates all the ListModel logics to GridView it's created from, so ListModel can't work with ListView anymore. Sounds illogical, but already spent two hours on this.
is there a necessity to create custom Model's, when dealing with multiple views?
I think the problem is with the delegate, since i tried your example with some modifications and it worked.
Following is the code:
Item {
width: 200
height: 200
GridView {
id: gridv
width: 200
height: 100
model: ListModel {
id: modelone;
}
delegate: Text { text: name }
}
Rectangle {
id: whattheproblem
anchors.top: gridv.bottom
ListView {
id: listv
model: ListModel {
id: modeltwo;
}
delegate: Text { text: name }
}
}
Button {
anchors.left: parent.left
anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
text: "Add to Grid"
onClicked: gridv.model.append({name: "grid"})
}
Button {
anchors.right: parent.right
anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
text: "Add to List"
onClicked: listv.model.append({name: "list"})
}
}
I tried it with Qt 5.3.1