I hope you can help me. I was trying to hover an image with "add to cart" like here: https://spacewallet.de/shop
I dont know, what I am doing wrong here, can you help?
.hunderter {
background: url(http://neuronade.com/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/Shop-Produktbild_Bundle_englisch-min-mhvx28jvtfhpc0dhkugvgrvgvg1h17l9ze3zkr118a.jpg);
display: block;
background-size: 100%;
border: transparent !important;
background-color: transparent !important;
}
a.hunderter:hover {
background-color: rgba(100,230,230,0.5);
background-position: 0 0;
content:"⏵ ➡Zum Warenkorb hinzufügen";
}
First, a few notes:
1) Your image should probably be part of the HTML. It will be changing and is part of the page content (vs design).
2) You can't use unicode in CSS the same way you do in HTML. You need a backslash before the number (see Placing Unicode character in CSS content value)
Now, on to the answer to your main question...
Option 1:
If you want the CSS content value to always be the same, you can use CSS pseudo elements ::after and/or ::before to accomplish what you were trying to do (see snippet below). You can't use content in CSS without these, though.
.cart-item-link {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
border: transparent !important;
background-color: transparent !important;
}
.cart-item-link:hover::before {
content: "Add to Cart";
position: absolute;
bottom: 20%;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
bottom: 20%;
padding: 15px;
background-color: rgba(100, 230, 230, 0.5);
min-width: 80%;
text-align: center;
}
<a href="/?preview_id=4212&preview_nonce=a62d30b2b8&preview=true&add-to-cart=5767" class="cart-item-link">
<img src="http://neuronade.com/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/Shop-Produktbild_Bundle_englisch-min-mhvx28jvtfhpc0dhkugvgrvgvg1h17l9ze3zkr118a.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
Option 2:
Of course, there is another possibility, too: The "add to cart" could also be placed into a <span> tag which could then use CSS with a slightly different selector like .cart-item-link:hover > .cart-item-info { ... }. (see snippet below)
.cart-item-link {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
border: transparent !important;
background-color: transparent !important;
}
.cart-item-link > .cart-item-info {
display: none;
position: absolute;
bottom: 20%;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
bottom: 20%;
padding: 15px;
background-color: rgba(100, 230, 230, 0.5);
min-width: 80%;
text-align: center;
}
.cart-item-link:hover > .cart-item-info {
display: block;
}
<a href="/?preview_id=4212&preview_nonce=a62d30b2b8&preview=true&add-to-cart=5767" class="cart-item-link">
<span class="cart-item-info">Add to Cart</span>
<img src="http://neuronade.com/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/Shop-Produktbild_Bundle_englisch-min-mhvx28jvtfhpc0dhkugvgrvgvg1h17l9ze3zkr118a.jpg" alt="" />
</a>
You can solve this problem with adding a <span>, that is only visible on hover:
.hunderter {
position: relative;
background: url(https://unsplash.it/200/300);
display: block;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
background-size: 100%;
}
.hunderter span {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
visibility: hidden;
}
a.hunderter:hover span {
background-color: rgba(100, 230, 230, 0.5);
visibility: visible;
color: white;
}
<a href="#" class="hunderter">
<span>⏵ ➡Zum Warenkorb hinzufügen</span>
</a>
If I understand you correctly..you want a hand on hover?...then you use
cursor:pointer
a.hunderter:hover {
background-color: rgba(100,230,230,0.5);
background-position: 0 0;
content:"⏵ ➡Zum Warenkorb hinzufügen";
cursor:pointer
}
.shop_bar{
background:black;
color:white;
opacity:0;
transition:all 0.5s;
}
.product_img:hover .shop_bar{
opacity:1;
}
Edit: The approach below shows how to add a bar at the bottom of the product...when you hover over the image the bard with some details will show..put whatever details you want in this html tag.
<div class="product_img">
<img src="https://spacewallet.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/businessblack-1-ohne-Rand.jpg">
<div class="shop_bar">
Buy this
</div>
</div>
Related
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
It seems something like this has been addressed before, but most of what I'm finding is for the more generic issue that doesn't pertain to most browsers today. I'm encountering the known IE issue where using border-radius with a border and a background (a color in my case) results in the background bleeding beyond the border.
I'm wondering if there is a workaround that actually can mask this issue... Some of the things I've tried:
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=10" />
overflow:hidden on the parent
background-clip:border-box
adding .1 to the border-radius
None of these have worked. Is there another workaround (other than "use images") while I wait for yon IE team to fix things?
I've created a fiddle that illustrates this well and documents what I've found in more detail.
I have experienced this before.
I recommend instead styling the border with CSS generated content, in a manner such as this:
.redcircle::after {
content:'';
display:block;
left:0;
top:0;
right:0;
bottom:0;
border-radius:100px;
border:10px solid yellow;
position:absolute;
pointer-events: none; //ensures no clicks propogate if this is desired
}
You can crate an ::before or ::after CSS Pseudo and make your background: red; on them. Set your width, height and border-radius on 100% and for example don't change z-index to -1, you can see his get the inside width and hight and don't bleeding out.
Screenshot from Explorer 9 on Vista
And now for example (how its look without z-index play):
body {
background: white;
}
.bluebox {
background: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
.redcircle {
position: absolute;
left: 140px;
top: 40px;
text-align: center;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border-radius: 100px;
font-size: 100px;
line-height: 100px;
color: black;
border: 10px solid yellow;
}
.redcircle::before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 100%;
background: red;
}
<div class="bluebox">
<div class="redcircle">
!
</div>
</div>
And this one for using:
body {
background: white;
}
.bluebox {
background: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
.redcircle {
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
left: 140px;
top: 40px;
text-align: center;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border-radius: 100px;
font-size: 100px;
line-height: 100px;
color: black;
border: 10px solid yellow;
}
.redcircle::before {
z-index: -1;
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 100%;
background: red;
}
<div class="bluebox">
<div class="redcircle">
!
</div>
</div>
Fiddle Demo
Borrowing from Zeev's answer, which moves the background-color to a :before or :after (which only substitutes a subpixel gap for a subpixel bleed, and across more browsers), and Phil's answer, which moves the border to an :after (which didn't really fix the problem).
Move the background-color to a :before as suggested by Zeev, but give it padding equal to the border-width minus two (or use calc()). Then give it negative top and left positioning with that same amount.
Then move the border to the :after but give it negative top and left positioning equal to the border-width.
This creates an oversized background and recenters it below the content. Then it creates an oversized border and centers it around the content. You could probably oversize the background to other degrees and get the same result. The point is to make it bigger than the hole inside the border, but smaller than the outside of the border. This, naturally, would fail with thin borders, though.
body {
background: white;
}
.bluebox {
background: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
.redcircle {
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
left: 150px;
top: 50px;
text-align: center;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border-radius: 100px;
font-size: 100px;
line-height: 100px;
color: black;
}
.redcircle::before,
.redcircle::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 100%;
}
.redcircle::before {
z-index: -1;
background: red;
top: -8px;
left: -8px;
padding: 8px;
}
.redcircle::after {
top: -10px;
left: -10px;
border: 10px solid yellow;
}
<div class="bluebox">
<div class="redcircle">
!
</div>
</div>
background-clip fixes this issue:
.bluebox {
background-clip: padding-box;
}
In the following example, I demonstrate the issue where the colors are perfect, except for portions at different %'s results in some or all of the text being obscured.
What I would like to achieve, is to somehow assign the font color to be the difference of the background. I recall seeing something many years ago in DHTML which allowed for this. The result I am looking for is as follows
In the 50% sample, the '5' would be in white, and the '0' would be in black.
In the 75% sample, the '75' would be in white.
In the 20% sample, the '20' would be in black.
I believe there is a way to do this using CSS/CSS3, but I am unable to locate information on it.
The resulting style information should be contained inside the 'p' style in the CSS file. No 'tricks' like splitting data or altering the HTML using JavaScript / etc. The number inside the <p> element should remain whole and in tact.
body {
background: #000000;
}
p {
background: #ffffff;
background-image: url("");
background-repeat: repeat-y;
background-size: 0% auto;
color: #ffffff;
padding: 5px;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid #3E8096;
display: block;
}
<p style="background-size: 50% auto !important">50</p>
<p style="background-size: 75% auto !important">75</p>
<p style="background-size: 20% auto !important">20</p>
Note:
I was considering a drop-shadow, however this would result in a funny
looking font when it is a white font. I also considered encapsulating
the text in a border, however the ideal result would be for the font
to adjust based on background.
body { background: navy }
div {
background-color: white;
display: inline-block;
border: 1px solid red;
width: 200px;
font-size: 50px;
text-align: center;
position: relative;
color: red;
}
span {
content: '';
position: absolute;
background: cyan;
width: 50%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
display: inline-block;
mix-blend-mode: difference;
}
<div>
0000 <span></span>
</div>
body { background: navy }
div {
background-color: white;
display: inline-block;
border: 1px solid red;
width: 200px;
font-size: 50px;
text-align: center;
position: relative;
color: red;
}
div:after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
background: cyan;
width: 50%;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
display: inline-block;
mix-blend-mode: difference;
}
<div>00000</div>
I need to add a transparent coloured layer over a background image. I tried doing this with rgba but with no result.
What I get now is:
page-heading {
background: rgba(36, 70, 105, 0.74) url("../images/samples/bg3.jpg") no-repeat fixed 50% 0px / cover;
opacity: 0.9;
position: relative;
text-align: center;
padding: 72px 0px;
}
I know that the background color is a fallback for when the image cannot be loaded. How do I add a layer over it in a correct way?
Use a simple box-shadow inset:
.page-heading {
background: url(../images/samples/bg3.jpg) no-repeat fixed 50% 0px / cover;
box-shadow: inset 0 0 0 100px rgba(36, 70, 105, 0.74);
}
JS Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/ghorg12110/q0cLf2s7/
I see that a lot of people here create an extra element or pseudo elements, but you don't need two elements to create this effect. You can simply declare two background-images. One of which is the original image, and the other a linear gradient. See this Fiddle to see the effect working.
background-image: linear-gradient(rgba(36,70,105,.74), rgba(36,70,105,.74)),
url("https://dummyimage.com/1000x1000/3/f.png&text=Background-image");
Note that you first have to declare the gradient and then the image (I always get this wrong the first time I try to make this)
You can do this with a gradient like the fiddle below.
The left is the original image. The right is the one with the gradient applied.
.block {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
display: inline-block;
}
.og {
background: url(http://placehold.it/300x300);
}
.ed {
background: linear-gradient(rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.5), rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.2)), url(http://placehold.it/300x300);
}
<div class="block og"></div>
<div class="block ed"></div>
Use a pseudo element...
.page-heading {
background: url("http://lorempixel.com/400/200") no-repeat fixed 50% 0px / cover;
opacity: 0.9;
position: relative;
text-align: center;
padding: 72px 0px;
}
.page-heading:before {
content: "";
background: rgba(36, 70, 105, 0.74);
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
<div class="page-heading">
</div>
You can use a pseudo-element to place over your . This way you won't use an extra DOM element.
.element {
background: url('http://lorempixel.com/500/500/');
height: 500px;
width: 500px;
position: relative;
}
.element:after {
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.8);
content: "";
display: block;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
JSFiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/volzy/LLfhm0kc/1/
body{
background-color: #ccc;
margin:0px;
}
.page-heading {
background: rgba(36, 70, 105, 0.74);
opacity: 0.4;
margin: 0;
position: relative;
width:100%;
height:100vh;
text-align: center;
padding: 72px 0px;
}
I use body but the element could be something else
Hi, here a fiddle :
http://jsfiddle.net/5f46znzx/
is what you are looking for?
remember that opacity trasform each element with the opacity set.
i suggest to eliminate it if you dont need that internal element takes opacity.
You need another box above the header. Imagine that's your HTML:
<div class="page-heading">
<div class="page-heading-fake">
</div>
</div>
You can have this CSS
.page-heading {
background: url(yourimg.png);
position: relative; /* neccesary to make an anchor in the fake */
}
.page-heading-fake {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
background-color: rgba(36, 70, 105, 0.74) ;
}
I am trying to code the attached layout (needs to be responsive and not use JavaScript if possible). I want to support IE8, or if not, a gracefully degrading solution would be great.
I found ways to make the semicircle cutout using pseudo-elements and border-radius, but the background image of the previous div needs to show through and I can't figure out how to do it. Please help!! I have highlighted the area covered by the background image, in case it is not clear. Here is the layout
I got this far: https://jsfiddle.net/dcwoLb7f/
HTML:
<div id="first"><p>IMAGE CREDIT: WIKIPEDIA</p></div>
<div id="second"></div>
CSS:
#first {
background-image: url('http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/VirtuellesStudio_Greenbox.jpg');
background-size: cover;
position: relative;
}
p {
color: white;
text-align: center;
margin: auto;
font-size: 40px;
}
#first, #second {
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
}
#second {
background-color: blue;
}
#first:after {
content: '';
background-color: white;
height: 40px;
width: 40px;
border-radius: 100%;
position: absolute;
bottom: -20px;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, 0);
}
I have this HTML:
<div id="graphic">lorem ipsum</div>
with this CSS:
#graphic { background-image: url(image.jpg); width: 200px; height: 100px;}
The background image I'm applying is 200x100 px, but I only want to display a cropped portion of the background image of 200x50 px.
background-clip does not appear to be the right CSS property for this. What can I use instead?
background-position should not be used, because I'm using the above CSS in a sprite context where the image part I want to show is smaller than the element on which the CSS is defined.
You can put the graphic in a pseudo-element with its own dimensional context:
#graphic {
position: relative;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
#graphic::before {
position: absolute;
content: '';
z-index: -1;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
background-image: url(image.jpg);
}
#graphic {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
position: relative;
}
#graphic::before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
z-index: -1;
background-image: url(http://placehold.it/500x500/); /* Image is 500px by 500px, but only 200px by 50px is showing. */
}
<div id="graphic">lorem ipsum</div>
Browser support is good, but if you need to support IE8, use a single colon :before. IE has no support for either syntax in versions prior to that.
may be you can write like this:
#graphic {
background-image: url(image.jpg);
background-position: 0 -50px;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
Another option is to use linear-gradient() to cover up the edges of your image. Note that this is a stupid solution, so I'm not going to put much effort into explaining it...
.flair {
min-width: 50px; /* width larger than sprite */
text-indent: 60px;
height: 25px;
display: inline-block;
background:
linear-gradient(#F00, #F00) 50px 0/999px 1px repeat-y,
url('https://championmains.github.io/dynamicflairs/riven/spritesheet.png') #F00;
}
.flair-classic {
background-position: 50px 0, 0 -25px;
}
.flair-r2 {
background-position: 50px 0, -50px -175px;
}
.flair-smite {
text-indent: 35px;
background-position: 25px 0, -50px -25px;
}
<img src="https://championmains.github.io/dynamicflairs/riven/spritesheet.png" alt="spritesheet" /><br />
<br />
<span class="flair flair-classic">classic sprite</span><br /><br />
<span class="flair flair-r2">r2 sprite</span><br /><br />
<span class="flair flair-smite">smite sprite</span><br /><br />
I'm using this method on this page: https://championmains.github.io/dynamicflairs/riven/ and can't use ::before or ::after elements because I'm already using them for another hack.