I have this HTML:
<div id="graphic">lorem ipsum</div>
with this CSS:
#graphic { background-image: url(image.jpg); width: 200px; height: 100px;}
The background image I'm applying is 200x100 px, but I only want to display a cropped portion of the background image of 200x50 px.
background-clip does not appear to be the right CSS property for this. What can I use instead?
background-position should not be used, because I'm using the above CSS in a sprite context where the image part I want to show is smaller than the element on which the CSS is defined.
You can put the graphic in a pseudo-element with its own dimensional context:
#graphic {
position: relative;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
#graphic::before {
position: absolute;
content: '';
z-index: -1;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
background-image: url(image.jpg);
}
#graphic {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
position: relative;
}
#graphic::before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
z-index: -1;
background-image: url(http://placehold.it/500x500/); /* Image is 500px by 500px, but only 200px by 50px is showing. */
}
<div id="graphic">lorem ipsum</div>
Browser support is good, but if you need to support IE8, use a single colon :before. IE has no support for either syntax in versions prior to that.
may be you can write like this:
#graphic {
background-image: url(image.jpg);
background-position: 0 -50px;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
Another option is to use linear-gradient() to cover up the edges of your image. Note that this is a stupid solution, so I'm not going to put much effort into explaining it...
.flair {
min-width: 50px; /* width larger than sprite */
text-indent: 60px;
height: 25px;
display: inline-block;
background:
linear-gradient(#F00, #F00) 50px 0/999px 1px repeat-y,
url('https://championmains.github.io/dynamicflairs/riven/spritesheet.png') #F00;
}
.flair-classic {
background-position: 50px 0, 0 -25px;
}
.flair-r2 {
background-position: 50px 0, -50px -175px;
}
.flair-smite {
text-indent: 35px;
background-position: 25px 0, -50px -25px;
}
<img src="https://championmains.github.io/dynamicflairs/riven/spritesheet.png" alt="spritesheet" /><br />
<br />
<span class="flair flair-classic">classic sprite</span><br /><br />
<span class="flair flair-r2">r2 sprite</span><br /><br />
<span class="flair flair-smite">smite sprite</span><br /><br />
I'm using this method on this page: https://championmains.github.io/dynamicflairs/riven/ and can't use ::before or ::after elements because I'm already using them for another hack.
Related
The image below is what I am intending to do:
Here is my situation right now:
My problem is I am not quite sure what to do with the z-index in order to have the image go inside the background but still over it.
Classes:
<img class="background" src="">
<img class="bubble_img" src="">
CSS:
.background {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
z-index: 2;
display: block;
}
.bubble_img {
bottom: 0;
max-height: 110%;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
transition: all 1s;
z-index: 1;
}
If I switch the z-index around (2 and 1) the image of the person just goes on the and it goes over the background borders:
Would appreciate any help, thank you.
Instead of using the yellow background as an image, you can make it as a div element with a border-radius. Then add a overflow: hidden to partly hide the image:
div {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
border-radius: 20% 45% 45% 5%;
background: #f5e511;
overflow: hidden;
}
div img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
<div>
<img src="https://www.pngkey.com/png/full/889-8891004_calling-girl-png-call-center-girl-png.png" />
</div>
That can be done with the CSS mask, as in the example below (the mask image here is base64 encoded because of CORS issues when using i.stack.imgur.com):
.background {
width: 100vw;
height: 100vh;
background: url(https://i.stack.imgur.com/WI6mO.png) #FE0 no-repeat;
mask: var(--mask);
-webkit-mask: var(--mask);
--mask: no-repeat url();
}
<div class="background"></div>
I know that it is impossible to actually modify an image with CSS, which is why I put crop in quotes.
What I'd like to do is take rectangular images and use CSS to make them appear square without distorting the image at all.
I'd basically like to turn this:
Into this:
A pure CSS solution with no wrapper div or other useless code:
img {
object-fit: cover;
width: 230px;
height: 230px;
}
Assuming they do not have to be in IMG tags...
HTML:
<div class="thumb1">
</div>
CSS:
.thumb1 {
background: url(blah.jpg) 50% 50% no-repeat; /* 50% 50% centers image in div */
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1:hover { YOUR HOVER STYLES HERE }
EDIT: If the div needs to link somewhere just adjust HTML and Styles like so:
HTML:
<div class="thumb1">
Link
</div>
CSS:
.thumb1 {
background: url(blah.jpg) 50% 50% no-repeat; /* 50% 50% centers image in div */
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1 a {
display: block;
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1 a:hover { YOUR HOVER STYLES HERE }
Note this could also be modified to be responsive, for example % widths and heights etc.
If the image is in a container with a responsive width:
.rect-img-container {
position: relative;
}
.rect-img-container::after {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.rect-img {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
<div class="rect-img-container">
<img class="rect-img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267" alt="">
</div>
(edit: updated from sass to plain css)
(edit: Added dummy image for reference)
Place your image in a div.
Give your div explicit square dimensions.
Set the CSS overflow property on the div to hidden (overflow:hidden).
Put your imagine inside the div.
Profit.
For example:
<div style="width:200px;height:200px;overflow:hidden">
<img src="foo.png" />
</div>
Using background-size:cover - http://codepen.io/anon/pen/RNyKzB
CSS:
.image-container {
background-image: url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png');
background-size:cover;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:250px;
height:250px;
}
Markup:
<div class="image-container"></div>
I actually came across this same problem recently and ended up with a slightly different approach (I wasn't able to use background images). It does require a tiny bit of jQuery though to determine the orientation of the images (I' sure you could use plain JS instead though).
I wrote a blog post about it if you are interested in more explaination but the code is pretty simple:
HTML:
<ul class="cropped-images">
<li><img src="http://fredparke.com/sites/default/files/cat-portrait.jpg" /></li>
<li><img src="http://fredparke.com/sites/default/files/cat-landscape.jpg" /></li>
</ul>
CSS:
li {
width: 150px; // Or whatever you want.
height: 150px; // Or whatever you want.
overflow: hidden;
margin: 10px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
}
li img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
width: auto;
}
li img.landscape {
max-width: none;
max-height: 100%;
}
jQuery:
$( document ).ready(function() {
$('.cropped-images img').each(function() {
if ($(this).width() > $(this).height()) {
$(this).addClass('landscape');
}
});
});
Check out CSS aspect-ratio
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/aspect-ratio
.square-image{
width: 50%;
background-image: url('https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267');
background-size: cover;
background-position: center;
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
}
<div class="square-image"></div>
You can also do this with a regular img tag as follows
.square-image{
width: 50%;
object-fit: cover; /* Required to prevent the image from stretching, use the object-position property to adjust the visible area */
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
}
<img src="https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267" class="square-image"/>
Today you can use aspect-ratio:
img {
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
}
It has wide support amongst modern browsers as well:
https://caniuse.com/mdn-css_properties_aspect-ratio
object-fit: cover will do exactly what you need.
But it might not work on IE/Edge. Follow as shown below to fix it with just CSS to work on all browsers.
The approach I took was to position the image inside the container with absolute and then place it right at the centre using the combination:
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
Once it is in the centre, I give to the image,
// For vertical blocks (i.e., where height is greater than width)
height: 100%;
width: auto;
// For Horizontal blocks (i.e., where width is greater than height)
height: auto;
width: 100%;
This makes the image get the effect of Object-fit:cover.
Here is a demonstration of the above logic.
https://jsfiddle.net/furqan_694/s3xLe1gp/
This logic works in all browsers.
Original Image
Vertically Cropped
Horizontally Cropped
Square Container
I had a similar issue and could not "compromise" with background images.
I came up with this.
<div class="container">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/800x600/nature">
</div>
.container {
position: relative;
width: 25%; /* whatever width you want. I was implementing this in a 4 tile grid pattern. I used javascript to set height equal to width */
border: 2px solid #fff; /* just to separate the images */
overflow: hidden; /* "crop" the image */
background: #000; /* incase the image is wider than tall/taller than wide */
}
.container img {
position: absolute;
display: block;
height: 100%; /* all images at least fill the height */
top: 50%; /* top, left, transform trick to vertically and horizontally center image */
left: 50%;
transform: translate3d(-50%,-50%,0);
}
//assuming you're using jQuery
var h = $('.container').outerWidth();
$('.container').css({height: h + 'px'});
Hope this helps!
Example:
https://jsfiddle.net/cfbuwxmr/1/
Use CSS: overflow:
.thumb {
width:230px;
height:230px;
overflow:hidden
}
Either use a div with square dimensions with the image inside with the .testimg class:
.test {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
overflow:hidden
}
.testimg {
margin-left: -76px
}
or a square div with a background of the image.
.test2 {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
background: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png) 50% 50%
}
Here's some examples: http://jsfiddle.net/QqCLC/1/
UPDATED SO THE IMAGE CENTRES
.test {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
overflow: hidden
}
.testimg {
margin-left: -76px
}
.test2 {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
background: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png) 50% 50%
}
<div class="test"><img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png" width="460" height="307" class="testimg" /></div>
<div class="test2"></div>
I came with a different approach. You basically have to crop the rectangular image to fit it inside the square is all there is to it. Best approach is if the image width is greater than the height, then you crop the image alittle from left and right side of the image. If the image height is greater than the image width then you crop the bottom of the image. Here is my solution. I needed a little help from PHP though.
<div style="position: relative; width: 154px; height: 154px; overflow: hidden;">
<?php
//get image dimmensions whichever way you like. I used imgaick
$image = new Imagick("myimage.png");
$width = $image->getImageWidth();
$height = $image->getImageHeight();
if($width > $height){
?>
<img src="myimage.png" style="display: block; position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 50%; transform: translateX(-50%); -ms-transform: translateX(-50%); -webkit-transform: translateX(-50%); height: 100%; " />
<?php
}else{
?>
<img src="myimage.png" style="display: block; position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 100%; " />
<?php
}
?>
</div>
How could I achieve a background that looked similar to this image:
Only 3 colors, angled from the top corner out like a sunray.
Maybe sticking with a simple PNG or SVG background image would be a better approach.
The effect can be achieved with CSS using pseudo-elements and transforms and the below is a sample snippet. But I don't think using CSS is the correct option for this. It would be better to use a PNG image.
The snippet uses a couple of pseudo-elements with different background colors skewed at required angles to produce the three-color effect.
.bg {
position: relative;
height: 200px;
width: 400px;
padding: 4px;
background: orange;
overflow: hidden;
}
.bg:after,
.bg:before {
position: absolute;
content: '';
left: 0px;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
transform-origin: right top;
}
.bg:before {
top: 0px;
background: red;
transform: skewY(-45deg);
}
.bg:after {
top: -100%;
background: yellow;
transform: skewY(-15deg);
}
span {
position: relative;
z-index: 2;
}
/* Just for demo */
.bg:hover {
height: 200px;
width: 500px;
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prefixfree/1.0.7/prefixfree.min.js"></script>
<div class="bg">
<span>Some content inside</span>
</div>
Angled linear-gradients also could be used but I don't think they are good for dynamic sized container elements as the angles need to be modified as the dimensions change to keep the appearance the same.
Below is a snippet using linear-gradient. Hover on the shape to see how a change of width and/or height affects it.
.bg {
position: relative;
height: 200px;
width: 400px;
background: linear-gradient(310deg, red 30%, transparent 30%), linear-gradient(340deg, transparent 58%, yellow 58%), orange;
overflow: hidden;
}
.bg:hover {
height: 200px;
width: 500px;
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prefixfree/1.0.7/prefixfree.min.js"></script>
<div class="bg">
<span>Some content inside</span>
</div>
SVG
This can be done with SVG.
I used three polygon shapes. This can be set to a background-image.
Or alternatively can be used inline so you can use css properties on it.
html, body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.triple {
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.triple:hover {
width: 500px;
height: 100px;
}
<svg class="triple" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none">
<polygon fill="#dd2" points="0,0 100,0 0,60" />
<polygon fill="#bb2" points="0,60 100,0 30,100 0,100 " />
<polygon fill="#992" points="30,100 100,0 100,100" />
</svg>
Yes, it can be done with gradients, in a responsive way.
That is asuming that when the aspect ratio changes, you don't want to keep the angles, but the relative positions
The trick is to use simbolic names in the gradient direction, and then playing with the size and the position of the background-image
.test {
display: inline-block;
border: solid 1px black;
background-image: linear-gradient(to top left, tomato 50%, transparent 50%),
linear-gradient(to bottom right, lightgreen 50%, transparent 50%);
background-size: 60% 100%, 100% 50%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: bottom right, top left;
}
#test1 {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
#test2 {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
#test3 {
width: 70px;
height: 100px;
}
<div class="test" id="test1"></div>
<div class="test" id="test2"></div>
<div class="test" id="test3"></div>
Use a 4-color GIF image. This will give you both cross-browser/platform compatibility as well as backward compatibility, and the size will be small with this type of image. If the colors are subtle as shown the "jaggies" will be camouflaged somewhat (or provide a larger size).
A good option is to use SVG which has good support in modern up-to-date browsers.
I am trying to code the attached layout (needs to be responsive and not use JavaScript if possible). I want to support IE8, or if not, a gracefully degrading solution would be great.
I found ways to make the semicircle cutout using pseudo-elements and border-radius, but the background image of the previous div needs to show through and I can't figure out how to do it. Please help!! I have highlighted the area covered by the background image, in case it is not clear. Here is the layout
I got this far: https://jsfiddle.net/dcwoLb7f/
HTML:
<div id="first"><p>IMAGE CREDIT: WIKIPEDIA</p></div>
<div id="second"></div>
CSS:
#first {
background-image: url('http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/VirtuellesStudio_Greenbox.jpg');
background-size: cover;
position: relative;
}
p {
color: white;
text-align: center;
margin: auto;
font-size: 40px;
}
#first, #second {
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
}
#second {
background-color: blue;
}
#first:after {
content: '';
background-color: white;
height: 40px;
width: 40px;
border-radius: 100%;
position: absolute;
bottom: -20px;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, 0);
}
Lets assume I have a div with a Gradient applied as a background-property.
I now want to overlay a black PNG (of smaller size) and set the PNG to have a background-blend-mode of overlay. Unfortunately I have no idea on how to achieve this.
I know I can have a working background-blend-mode when I render the Gradient into the CSS of the Div with the PNG image like:
background: url(../img/plus.png), linear-gradient(to bottom, #24cae4 0%, #1f81e3 100%);
background-blend-mode: overlay;
This however results in the Gradient being as small as the actual PNG, which is not a desired effect, like this:
What I want to achieve is this with pure CSS (if possible):
Here a Codepen to illustrate what I'm trying to do: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/zxOXGP
Notice the Black Icon. I wanna overlay this.
Try using mix-blend-mode instead of background-blend-mode and switch to simple text for the plus-sign or a webfont for more custom figures.
Example Codepen of the below:
.placeholder {
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 300px;
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(#ff0000, #0000ff);
background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(#ff0000, #0000ff);
background-image: linear-gradient(#ff0000, #0000ff);
}
.center {
position: absolute;
top: 25%;
width: 100%;
font-size: 120px;
}
.center span {
display: block;
text-align: center;
color: red;
mix-blend-mode: screen;
}
<div class="placeholder">
<div class="center"><span>+</span>
</div>
</div>
The gradient sandwich
Ingredients
The :before forms the bottom z-layer with z-index: 1, it is full opacity
The .content div forms the filling, central z-layer, with z-index: 2. It needs position: relative to take its z-index.
The :after forms the top z-layer with z-index: 3 and completes our lunch item. It is half opacity.
This is the tasty result:
Full Example
I have removed all but the standard CSS3 gradient for simplicity. View in a supporting browser.
.gradient {
position: relative;
height: 200px;
padding: 20px;
}
.gradient:before,
.gradient:after {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
content: '';
display: block;
background-size: 100%;
background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom, #24cae4 0%, #1f81e3 100%);
opacity: 0.5;
}
.gradient:before {
opacity: 1;
z-index: 1;
}
.gradient:after {
z-index: 3;
}
.overlayed_image {
position: relative;
width: 64px;
height: 64px;
display: block;
margin: auto;
background-size: contain;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 50% 50%;
background-image: url(http://cdn.flaticon.com/png/256/9029.png);
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 2;
}
<div class="gradient">
<div class="content">
You can see me!
<div class="overlayed_image"></div>
</div>
</div>