Android changing order of items run-time in Realm Recyclerview - realm

I need to order the list of items based on a field say starredAt
I am loading the data in the recyclerview from Realm DB using RealmRecyclerView by thorbenprimke
The field changes it value on user's action i.e when user presses star button the item should be moved to top.
For this I am just updating the starredAt field of the object.
The items are already sorted by starredAt so realm loads the updated list but it randomly adds one more item to the recyclerview.
CheatSheet.java
public class CheatSheet extends RealmObject {
#PrimaryKey
private String id;
private RealmList<Item> items;
private String title;
public String getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getTitle() {
return title;
}
public void setTitle(String title) {
this.title = title;
}
public RealmList<Item> getItems() {
return items;
}
public void setItems(RealmList<Item> items) {
this.items = items;
}
}
Item.java
public class Item extends RealmObject {
#PrimaryKey
private String id;
private String description;
private Date starredAt;
public Item() {
}
public String getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(String id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
public Date getStarredAt() {
return starredAt;
}
public void setStarredAt(Date starredAt) {
this.starredAt = starredAt;
}
}
CheatSheetActivity.java
public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {
RealmRecyclerView revItems;
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
setData();
}
private void setData() {
rvItems = (RealmRecyclerView) findViewById(R.id.rev_items);
RealmResults<Item> items = Realm.getDefaultInstance().where(CheatSheet.class)
.equalTo("id", "some-id").findFirst().getItems()
.where()
.findAllSorted("starredAt", Sort.DESCENDING);
ItemRealmListAdapter itemRealmListAdapter =
new ItemRealmListAdapter(this, items,
true, true);
rvItems.setAdapter(itemRealmListAdapter);
}
ItemRealmListAdapter.java
public class ItemRealmListAdapter extends RealmBasedRecyclerViewAdapter<Item,
ItemRealmListAdapter.ItemViewHolder> {
RealmResults<Item> mItems;
public ItemRealmListAdapter(Context context, RealmResults<Item> realmResults,
boolean automaticUpdate, boolean animateResults) {
super(context, realmResults, automaticUpdate, animateResults);
this.mItems = realmResults;
}
#Override
public ItemViewHolder onCreateRealmViewHolder(ViewGroup viewGroup, int i) {
return new ItemViewHolder(LayoutInflater.from(viewGroup.getContext())
.inflate(R.layout.item_layout_cs_text, viewGroup, false));
}
public Item getItem(int position) {
return mItems.get(position);
}
#Override
public void onBindRealmViewHolder(ItemViewHolder itemViewHolder, int position) {
itemViewHolder.txtBody.setText(getItem(position).getDescription());
if (getItem(position).getStarredAt() != null) {
itemViewHolder.imvStar.setImageResource(R.drawable.ic_star_yellow);
}
itemViewHolder.imvStar.setOnClickListener(v -> handleStarClick(v,position));
}
private void handleStarClick(View v, int position) {
if (getItem(position).getStarredAt() != null) {
((ImageView) v).setImageResource(R.drawable.ic_star);
CheatSheetStorage.unStarItem("some-id", getItem(position));
} else {
((ImageView) v).setImageResource(R.drawable.ic_star_yellow);
CheatSheetStorage.starItem("some-id", getItem(position));
}
}
public static class ItemViewHolder extends RealmViewHolder {
#Bind(R.id.txt_cheat_sheet)
TextView txtBody;
#Bind(R.id.img_star)
ImageView imvStar;
public ItemViewHolder(View itemView) {
super(itemView);
ButterKnife.bind(this, itemView);
}
}
}
CheatSheetStorage.java
public class CheatSheetStorage {
public static void unStarItem(String cheatSheetId, Item item) {
Realm realm = Realm.getDefaultInstance();
realm.beginTransaction();
CheatSheet cheatSheet = getCheatSheetById(cheatSheetId);
Item itemDB = cheatSheet.getItems().where().equalTo("id", item.getId()).findFirst();
itemDB.setStarredAt(null);
realm.commitTransaction();
}
public static void starItem(String cheatSheetId, Item item) {
Realm realm = Realm.getDefaultInstance();
realm.beginTransaction();
CheatSheet cheatSheet = getCheatSheetById(cheatSheetId);
Item itemDB = cheatSheet.getItems().where().equalTo("id", item.getId()).findFirst();
itemDB.setStarredAt(new Date());
realm.commitTransaction();
}
}
Please refer following screenshots for clearer idea :
Screenshot before starring
Screenshot after starring the sixth item

#Rohan-Peshkar - You will have to provide a animateExtraColumnName value to the adapter. For the animations, the adapter keeps track of the items and since that item's id doesn't change, the list isn't updated. With an additional column (in your case that should be the starredAt column - as long as it is stored as an Integer), the diffing algorithm will detect a change and the order is updated.
For reference: https://github.com/thorbenprimke/realm-recyclerview/blob/2835a543dce20993d8f98a4f773fa0e67132ce52/library/src/main/java/io/realm/RealmBasedRecyclerViewAdapter.java#L177
You can also check out the MainActivity in the example folder. The example changes a row's text from "ABC" to "Updated ABC" and the list recognizes the change because both the primary key and the quote field are used to basically create a composite key for diffing purposes.

Related

CellValueFactory not populate data with inner object in property (JavaFX )

I populate Employees pojo in TableView colums. Employer contains rate property, that contains doubleDomainObject which not populate in tableView.
Implementation of comboBox i not showing because it good working with CellFactory. It is desirable to focus with CellValueFactory.
DoubleDomainObject
public class DoubleDomainObject extends DomainObject {
private SimpleObjectProperty<Double> doubleValue =new SimpleObjectProperty(this, "doubleValue", null);
public Double getDoubleValue() {return doubleValue.get(); }
public SimpleObjectProperty<Double> doubleValueProperty() {return doubleValue;}
public void setDoubleValue(Double value) {this.doubleValue.set(value);}
}
ColumnDoubleComboBox
public class ColumnDoubleComboBox extends ColumnWrapper{
protected TableColumn<DomainObject, DoubleDomainObject> column;
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public ColumnDoubleComboBox(Bulder builder) {
super(builder);
this.column = new TableColumn<>(columnName);
setCellValueFactory();
setCellFactory();
}
public void setCellValueFactory(){
column.setCellValueFactory(new PropertyValueFactory<>(propertyName));
}
}
Employees
public class Employees extends DomainObject {
private SimpleObjectProperty<DoubleDomainObject> rate =new
SimpleObjectProperty<>(this, "rate", null);
public DoubleDomainObject getRate() {
return rate.get();
}
public SimpleObjectProperty<DoubleDomainObject> rateProperty() {
return rate;
}
public void setRate(RatePerHour rate) {
this.rate.set(rate);
}
}
---Сlient code---
tableViewWrapper = AppNode.NodeBuilder.create()
.<Employees>createTableViewWrapper()
.setDataMapper(this.dataMapperFabric.getEmployeesDataMapper())
.setColums(
columnFabric.createColumnDoubleComboBox(ColumnWrapper.Bulder.create()
.setColumnName("RATE").setColumnSize(0.2).setPropertyName("rate")
.............................etc
);

java.lang.NumberFormatException: Invalid int: "130 PHP"

I dont know how to solve this problem
i cant find my error in codes
pls help me solve it :( thanks!
private void loadListFood() {
cart = new Database(this).getCarts();
adapter = new CartAdapter(cart,this);
recyclerView.setAdapter(adapter);
int total = 0;
for(Order order:cart)
total+=(Integer.parseInt(order.getPrice()))*(Integer.parseInt(order.getQuantity()));
Locale locale = new Locale("en", "US");
NumberFormat fmt = NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance(locale);
txtTotalPrice.setText(fmt.format(total));
}
i am being redirected to
total+=(Integer.parseInt(order.getPrice()))*(Integer.parseInt(order.getQuantity()));
here is my adapter codes
public class CartAdapter extends RecyclerView.Adapter<CartViewHolder>{
private List<Order> listData = new ArrayList<>();
private Context context;
public CartAdapter(List<Order> cart, Cart cart1)
{
}
#Override
public CartViewHolder onCreateViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType) {
LayoutInflater inflater = LayoutInflater.from(context);
View itemView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.cartlayout,parent,false);
return new CartViewHolder(itemView);
}
#Override
public void onBindViewHolder(CartViewHolder holder, int position) {
TextDrawable drawable = TextDrawable.builder()
.buildRound(""+listData.get(position).getQuantity(), Color.RED);
holder.img_cart_count.setImageDrawable(drawable);
int price = (Integer.parseInt(listData.get(position).getPrice()))*(Integer.parseInt(listData.get(position).getQuantity()));
holder.txt_price.setText(price);
holder.txt_cart_name.setText(listData.get(position).getProductName());
}
#Override
public int getItemCount() {
return listData.size();
}
}
From JavaDoc: The method Integer.parseInt(String s) throws a NumberFormatException
if the string does not contain a parsable integer.
That means, method order.getPrice() or order.getQuantity() returns "130 PHP" which is not a valid Integer.
Your real problem might be: Why the method returns a String and not Integer because you have to parse your String now. Pretty error prone and bad practice.
If your GUI element (or whatever) does not fit with Integer, at least remove your "PHP" out of the input field and you might be able to parse your String without manipulate it with some String helper methods.
class CartViewHolder extends RecyclerView.ViewHolder implements View.OnClickListener
, View.OnCreateContextMenuListener {
public TextView txt_cart_name,txt_price;
public ImageView img_cart_count;
private ItemClickListener itemClickListener;
public void setTxt_cart_name(TextView txt_cart_name) {
this.txt_cart_name = txt_cart_name;
}
public CartViewHolder(View itemView) {
super(itemView);
txt_cart_name = (TextView)itemView.findViewById(R.id.cart_item_name);
txt_price = (TextView)itemView.findViewById(R.id.cart_item_Price);
img_cart_count = (ImageView)itemView.findViewById(R.id.cart_item_count);
itemView.setOnCreateContextMenuListener(this);
}
#Override
public void onClick(View view) {
}
#Override
public void onCreateContextMenu(ContextMenu contextMenu, View view, ContextMenu.ContextMenuInfo contextMenuInfo) {
contextMenu.setHeaderTitle("Selecione uma Ação");
contextMenu.add(0,0,getAdapterPosition(),Common.DELETE);
}
}
public class CartAdapter extends RecyclerView.Adapter<CartViewHolder> {
private List<Order> listData = new ArrayList<>();
private Context context;
public CartAdapter(List<Order> listData, Context context) {
this.listData = listData;
this.context = context;
}
#Override
public CartViewHolder onCreateViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType) {
LayoutInflater inflater = LayoutInflater.from(context);
View itemView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.cart_layout,parent,false);
return new CartViewHolder(itemView);
}
#Override
public void onBindViewHolder(CartViewHolder holder, int position) {
TextDrawable drawable = TextDrawable.builder()
.buildRound(""+listData.get(position).getQuantity(), Color.BLUE);
holder.img_cart_count.setImageDrawable(drawable);
Locale locale = new Locale("pt","BR");
NumberFormat fmt = NumberFormat.getCurrencyInstance(locale);
int price = (Integer.parseInt(listData.get(position).getPrice()))*(Integer.parseInt(listData.get(position).getQuantity()));
holder.txt_price.setText(fmt.format(price));
holder.txt_cart_name.setText(listData.get(position).getProductName());
}
#Override
public int getItemCount() {
return listData.size();
}
}

Disable ContextMenu with dependency to TreeTableView selection

I have a TreeTableView which allows multiselection. I got a ContextMenu for editing or deleting that selected items.
Delete and edit should only be enabled if there is at least one selection.
final BooleanBinding isTableSelectionEmpty = Bindings.isEmpty(this.table.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItems());
this.menuItemDelete.disableProperty().bind(isTableSelectionEmpty);
That is working as expected.
But now I have dependencies on different values of the selected rows. Like for example that the row is system-mandatory and should not be deleted.
I tried the following but it is not working
final BooleanBinding invalidSelection = Bindings.and(Bindings.isEmpty(tableSelection),
Bindings.isNotEmpty(tableSelection.filtered(item -> {
this.logger.trace("filtering :" + item);
return item.getValue().getSystemProperty().get();
})));
this.menuItemDelete.disableProperty().bind(invalidSelection);
Not even the debug-trace is printed and the value of the binding is always false (thus enabling the menu item). Now I am a bit lost. Where is my mistake?
FilteredList relies on a correct ListIterator, but currently there is a bug in the ListIterator the selectedItems list in MultipleSelectionModelBase. This prevents the filtering to properly work. To fix this you could create a ObservableList implementation delegating everything but the ListIterator creation to a source ObservableList. Most IDEs have a functionality to generate this kind of methods automatically, reducing the amount of work to a minimum (e.g.in NetBeans: Generate -> Delegate Method).
public class ObservableListIteratorFix<T> implements ObservableList<T> {
private final ObservableList<T> list;
public ObservableListIteratorFix(ObservableList<T> list) {
this.list = list;
}
#Override
public void addListener(ListChangeListener<? super T> listener) {
list.addListener(listener);
}
#Override
public void removeListener(ListChangeListener<? super T> listener) {
list.removeListener(listener);
}
#Override
public boolean addAll(T... elements) {
return list.addAll(elements);
}
...
private class CustomListIterator implements ListIterator<T> {
private final ListIterator<T> iterator;
private int index;
public CustomListIterator(int index) {
this.iterator = list.listIterator(index);
this.index = index;
}
#Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return iterator.hasNext();
}
#Override
public T next() {
T t = iterator.next();
index++;
return t;
}
#Override
public boolean hasPrevious() {
return iterator.hasPrevious();
}
#Override
public T previous() {
T t = iterator.previous();
index--;
return t;
}
#Override
public int nextIndex() {
return index;
}
#Override
public int previousIndex() {
return index-1;
}
#Override
public void remove() {
iterator.remove();
}
#Override
public void set(T e) {
iterator.set(e);
}
#Override
public void add(T e) {
iterator.add(e);
}
#Override
public void forEachRemaining(Consumer<? super T> action) {
iterator.forEachRemaining(action);
}
}
#Override
public ListIterator<T> listIterator() {
return listIterator(0);
}
#Override
public ListIterator<T> listIterator(int index) {
return new CustomListIterator(index);
}
#Override
public FilteredList<T> filtered(Predicate<T> predicate) {
return new FilteredList<>(this, predicate);
}
...
This allows you to use the class as wrapper the selectedItems which should fix the filtering...
new ObservableListIteratorFix<>(tableSelection).filtered(...)

JavaFX - Incompatible parameter type with using TreeView.EditEvent in lambda

In a JavaFX TreeView I'm using 'custom' classes which extend TreeItem. This makes me able to edit the items in the TreeView (I can double click them and edit the contents when running the application) but I can't seem to be able to set the .setOnEditCommit() method properly. I was hoping it'd work similar as the function in a tableview but I didn't have any luck yet.
This is my code in my controller in which I try to set the setOnEditCommit() method. In my TreeView called 'trvDivisies' I display football team divisions / competitions and one level lower I display all the teams that are in a certain division.
private void setUpTreeView() {
trvDivisies.setEditable(true);
trvDivisies.setShowRoot(false);
TreeItem<String> root = new TreeItem<>();
for (Divisie d : divisies) {
TreeItem<String> divisieTreeItem = d;
divisieTreeItem.valueProperty().set(d.getNaam());
for (VoetbalTeam vt : d.getVoetbalTeams()) {
TreeItem<String> voetbalTeamTreeItem = vt;
voetbalTeamTreeItem.valueProperty().setValue(vt.getTeamNaam());
divisieTreeItem.getChildren().add(voetbalTeamTreeItem);
}
root.getChildren().add(divisieTreeItem);
}
trvDivisies.setRoot(root);
trvDivisies.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener() {
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue observable, Object oldValue, Object newValue) {
System.out.println(newValue);
}
});
trvDivisies.setCellFactory(TextFieldTreeCell.forTreeView());
// I get an error at the following line when compiling
trvDivisies.setOnEditCommit((TreeView.EditEvent p) -> {
TreeItem<String> selectedItem = p.getTreeItem();
if (selectedItem instanceof Divisie) {
updateDivisie((Divisie)selectedItem);
} else if (selectedItem instanceof VoetbalTeam) {
updateTeam((VoetbalTeam)selectedItem);
}
});
}
This is what my 'custom' classes look like.
public class Divisie extends TreeItem<String> {
private static int idCount = 0;
private int id;
private String naam;
private List<VoetbalTeam> voetbalTeams;
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public String getNaam() {
return naam;
}
public List<VoetbalTeam> getVoetbalTeams() {
return voetbalTeams;
}
public Divisie(int id, String naam) {
super(naam);
this.id = id;
this.naam = naam;
}
public Divisie(String naam) {
this.id = ++idCount;
this.naam = naam;
}
public void addTeam(VoetbalTeam toBeAdded) {
if (voetbalTeams == null) {
voetbalTeams = new LinkedList<>();
}
voetbalTeams.add(toBeAdded);
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return this.naam;
}
}
Second 'lower level' class
public class VoetbalTeam extends TreeItem<String> {
private static int idCount = 0;
private int id;
private String teamNaam;
private List<Speler> spelers;
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public String getTeamNaam() {
return teamNaam;
}
public List<Speler> getSpelers() {
return this.spelers;
}
public VoetbalTeam(int id, String teamNaam) {
super(teamNaam);
this.id = id;
this.teamNaam = teamNaam;
}
public VoetbalTeam(String teamNaam) {
super(teamNaam);
this.id = ++idCount;
this.teamNaam = teamNaam;
}
public void addSpeler(Speler nieuweSpeler) {
if (spelers == null) {
spelers = new LinkedList<>();
}
this.spelers.add(nieuweSpeler);
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return this.teamNaam;
}
}
When trying to run the application WITH the .setOnEditCommit() method I get an error saying:
Error:(97, 37) java: incompatible types: incompatible parameter types in lambda expression
I was hoping you guys can tell me what I need to change my TreeView.EditEvent lambda to or help me find an easier solution.
For a TreeView<T>, the signature of setOnEditCommit is
void setOnEditCommit(EventHandler<TreeView.EditEvent<T>> value)
Since you have (apparently) a TreeView<String>, you need
trvDivisies.setOnEditCommit((TreeView.EditEvent<String> p) -> {
// ...
});
Or, of course, you can just let the compiler do the work for you:
trvDivisies.setOnEditCommit(p -> {
// ...
});

ListView/adapter throwing IndexOutOfBound

I have a listview with a getCount() of 7. I want all 7 items to be shown regardless if any data from my database is available to populate them. If no data is available then an item should just be blank with predetermined text.
When I have not hardcoded 7 database entries beforehand to go into the 7 views then I get an indexoutofbound exception when running the app due to the 7 items not being able to be populated accordingly. This happens in ListMealsAdapter.java when method Meal currentItem = getItem(position); is called and triggers public Meal getItem(int position).
I am looking for a condition statement that I can use for my listview/adapter that can handle an empty database so that the index does not go out of bounds. Also, is the BaseAdapter suited for what I want to do?
MainActivity.java
public class MainActivity extends BaseActivity {
public static final String TAG = "MainActivity";
private ListView mListviewMeals;
private MealDAO mMealDao;
private List<Meal> mListMeals;
private ListMealsAdapter mAdapter;
private SQLiteDatabase mDatabase;
DatabaseHelper mDbHelper;
#Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
activateToolbar(1);
// initialize views
initViews();
// fill the dailyListView
mMealDao = new MealDAO(this);
mListMeals = mMealDao.getAllMeals();
mAdapter = new ListMealsAdapter(this, mListMeals, MainActivity.this);
mListviewMeals.setAdapter(mAdapter);
}
private void initViews() {
this.mListviewMeals = (ListView) findViewById(R.id.view_daily_list);
}
ListMealsAdapter.java
public class ListMealsAdapter extends BaseAdapter {
public static final String TAG = "ListMealsAdapter";
Activity mActivity;
private List<Meal> mItems;
private LayoutInflater mInflater;
public ListMealsAdapter(Context context, List<Meal> listMeals, Activity activity) {
super();
mActivity = activity;
this.setItems(listMeals);
this.mInflater = LayoutInflater.from(context);
}
#Override
public int getCount() {
return 7;
}
#Override
public Meal getItem(int position) {
return (getItems() != null && !getItems().isEmpty()) ? getItems().get(position) : null;
}
#Override
public long getItemId(int position) {
return (getItems() != null && !getItems().isEmpty()) ? getItems().get(position).getId() : position;
}
#Override
public View getView(int position, final View convertView, final ViewGroup parent) {
View v = convertView;
final ViewHolder holder;
if (v == null) {
v = mInflater.inflate(R.layout.list_item_daily, parent, false);
holder = new ViewHolder();
holder.txtDescription = (TextView) v.findViewById(R.id.txtBreakfast);
v.setTag(holder);
} else {
holder = (ViewHolder) v.getTag();
}
// fill row data
Meal currentItem = getItem(position);
if (currentItem != null) {
holder.txtDescription.setText(currentItem.getDescription());
}
return v;
}
public List<Meal> getItems() {
return mItems;
}
public void setItems(List<Meal> mItems) {
this.mItems = mItems;
}
class ViewHolder {
TextView txtDescription;
}
}
Meal.java
public class Meal implements Serializable {
public static final String TAG = "Meal";
private static final long serialVersionUID = -7406082437623008161L;
private long mId;
private int mType;
private String mDescription;
public Meal() {
}
public Meal(int type, String description) {
this.mType = type;
this.mDescription = description;
}
public long getId() {
return mId;
}
public void setId(long mId) {
this.mId = mId;
}
public int getType() {
return mType;
}
public void setType(int mType) {
this.mType = mType;
}
public String getDescription() {
return mDescription;
}
public void setDescription(String mDescription) {
this.mDescription = mDescription;
}
}
MealDAO.java
public class MealDAO {
public static final String TAG = "MealDAO";
private SQLiteDatabase mDatabase;
private DatabaseHelper mDbHelper;
private Context mContext;
private String[] mAllColumns = { DatabaseHelper.COLUMN_MEAL_ID,
DatabaseHelper.COLUMN_MEAL_TYPE, DatabaseHelper.COLUMN_MEAL_DESCRIPTION};
public MealDAO(Context context) {
this.mContext = context;
mDbHelper = new DatabaseHelper(context);
// open the database
try {
open();
} catch (SQLException e) {
Log.e(TAG, "SQLException on opening database " + e.getMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public void open() throws SQLException {
mDatabase = mDbHelper.getWritableDatabase();
}
public void close() {
mDbHelper.close();
}
public List<Meal> getAllMeals() {
List<Meal> listMeals = new ArrayList<Meal>();
Cursor query = mDatabase.rawQuery("SELECT * from meal", null);
if(query.moveToFirst()) {
do {
// Cycle through all records
Meal meal = cursorToMeal(query);
listMeals.add(meal);
} while(query.moveToNext());
}
return listMeals;
}
public Meal getMealById(long id) {
Cursor cursor = mDatabase.query(DatabaseHelper.TABLE_MEALS, mAllColumns,
DatabaseHelper.COLUMN_MEAL_ID + " = ?",
new String[] { String.valueOf(id) }, null, null, null);
if (cursor != null) {
cursor.moveToFirst();
}
Meal meal = cursorToMeal(cursor);
return meal;
}
protected Meal cursorToMeal(Cursor cursor) {
Meal meal = new Meal();
meal.setId(cursor.getLong(0));
meal.setType(cursor.getInt(1));
meal.setDescription(cursor.getString(2));
return meal;
}
}
After a LOT of trial and error I finally found an acceptable solution to my problem. What I did was to add a default row to my database for the view items that I wanted to have a predetermined database entry when no data had been entered beforehand.
I then made sure to start at index 2, making sure that index 1 would be reserved for my default value. If the index comes out of bounds then the exception is caught and the default database entry will be added to the array.
public Meal getItem(int position) {
Meal result;
try {
result = (getItems() != null && !getItems().isEmpty()) ? getItems().get(position) : null;
} catch (Exception e) {
Meal default = getItem(0);
return default;
}
return result;
}
Meal currentItem = getItem(position + 1);
if (currentItem != null) {
holder.txtDescription.setText(currentItem.getDescription());
}
With that change things have been running smooth ever since. I hope this can help someone else as well.

Resources