I find a way to catch an event/message which notify the "application loaded" event, to be able to close a splashscreen. Maybe Poco implements it directly but i haven't found any clue in the Application class documentation or code.
Have you tried to use the application member function bool initialized()?
I'm using the Mitk framework, and i will have to modify some code there ; the used CommonTk framework can manage a callback dedicated for splashscreen closing. Thus, there is no event published by Poco to allow this feature.
i using POCO Thread for splash screen (where i can catch / handle status of thread). My application is programmed in WinAPI (Win32, VS C++ 2008 EE), so i using WinAPI timmers; the main message pump is also in separated thread...
Here is my WinApi32 example full code & VS90 project: WLEZLEY_SPLASH_POCO_EXAMPLE.ZIP
PS: It works since version 1.4.5 of POCO, but also works with POCO v1.7.2 (actual version is included). You can try study my code and you try it yourself.
Related
I'm following this example for a queued hosted service to add this to an ASP.NET Core application, and it's not clear to me where StartMonitorLoop should be called. I ended up modifying it to be EnsureMonitorLoop, added a check so that it's the call to Task.Run is only made once, added a MonitorLoop parameter to constructor for my API controller, and called EnsureMonitorLoop from there. It smells kind of funny to me that the API controller constructor should be kicking off monitoring the queue. The example Program.cs seems is very different from the one generated for me by Visual Studio. Mine uses the WebHost.CreateDefaultBuilder(args).UseStartup<Startup> approach. That is where they call StartMonitorLoop.
Where is the correct place to call StartMonitorLoop, and why? Thanks!
The docs aren't super clear here, but MonitorLoop is not actually part of this. It's an example service for use in a console app, simply to demonstrate how the queued background worker works. You can take some inspiration from this class for your app, but the concept of StartMonitorLoop doesn't apply to ASP.NET Core at all.
Just to be a bit more clear: in actual practice you would inject IBackgroundTaskQueue into a controller class, for example, and then add some task to that, just like MonitorLoop does (without all the key input jazz). You wouldn't actually have MonitorLoop or anything like it though.
I'm working through some tutorials online learning Caliburn.Micro for the first time. Some of the tutorials are using the older 1.3.0 version, I'm using the newer 2.0.0.6 version which was the latest Nuget package which is likely the source of this discrepancy:
When trying to publish the following message:
public void Red()
{
_events.Publish(new ColorEvent(new SolidColorBrush(Colors.Red)));
}
The compiler throws an error saying that the overload wasn't found. The only overload for Publish that is available has the following signature:
void Publish(object message, Action marshal)
I got this to work by using the background worker thread method shown below but in my case it seems like overkill. Was the single parameter overload really removed from Caliburn.Micro?
Also, the documentation is here:
https://caliburnmicro.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=The%20Event%20Aggregator
still show examples using the more basic, single parameter example where you simply pass a message. Is the documentation at this link the latest that correctly describes 2.0.0.6?
public void Red()
{
_events.Publish(new ColorEvent(new SolidColorBrush(Colors.Red)),
action => Task.Factory.StartNew(action));
}
Finally, for bonus points:
What is this 2nd parameter good for other than publishing the message on a background thread? Can someone give some other example(s) of what this overload can be used for?
In Caliburn Micro version 2.0, the EventAggregator.Publish method also takes an action to marshal the event. To maintain the pre-2.0 behavior, you should switch to the EventAggregator.PublishOnUIThread method instead. See the migration instructions here for information on incompatibilities between 1.5 and 2.0.
In general, I believe that the Codeplex documentation is a little bit outdated. Please refer to the new dedicated web site for most up-to-date documentation.
I've got two questions here. The first one is just specific and another one is more general, but is a source of the first one.
So, my specific problem: I want to use Encryption (actually, Hashing) algorithms with using System.Security.Cryptography namespace (for instance, SHA256Managed class).
I found out that (happily) Xamarin has implemented those in System.dll.
But it is not portable and obviously can not be used from Core application directly.
But I've also found another great project -- PclContrib -- which allows you to do that. But, unfortunately, they don't have the implementation for Touch and Android. (However, that still works great for Desktop (Web) and Windows Phone, plus, still can be included into Core (as it uses portable project)).
Anyway, to solve that nicely, I've decided to create some base class for the encryption methods and then override core methods which require the custom dll (for any custom system).
The way I did it (at least, trying to do) was:
Defining virtual method in Core App base class:
public virtual IEncryptionProvider CreateEncryptionProvider()
Overriding Core App class in Touch project with overriding CreateEncryptionProvider (which creates an instance of TouchEncryptionProvider class instance).
Core:
public class App : MvxApplication
Touch:
public class AppTouch : App
Launching it in Touch setup.cs:
protected override Cirrious.MvvmCross.ViewModels.IMvxApplication CreateApp (
{
return new AppTouch();
}
But, that does not work for me. On startup I've got this exception message in log:
"Exception masked KeyNotFoundException: Could not find view for Mynamespace.Etc.LoginViewModel", which works fine when I do new App() instead. I am not sure if that message shows actual problem (as before it was saying the same even that was a problem with some third-party dll, unrelated to views at all). But speaking shortly, that's just a primitive inheritance of App : MvxApplication, but placed not in Core but Touch project.
So, does it requeire some more custom initialization for such situations or do I miss something else?
And, actually, more general question is how should I build such Multiplatform approaches? Actually, now I've got similar problem with HttpUtility.UrlEncode, which I would want to use in my Core project.
What is the MvvmCross "philosophy" to handle such situations?
Thank you.
For the 'viewmodel not found' problem, this is caused because mvvmcross by default only looks for viewmodels in the Assembly containing your app.
If you want it to look in other assemblies, override ViewModelAssemblies in Setup.cs - see how this done in, for example, MvvmCross - structuring shared View Models and Views
For general multplatform approach, please read questions and answers like:
Platform-specific IoC in MVVMCross
Instantiation of ViewModels and Service classes
Please also remember you don't have to use PCLs - if you prefer to use file-linking between multiple platform-specific core projects, then you can of course use this approach.
Finally, please also try to ask one question per question - I find it makes stackoverflow work better for users and with search engines too. If you need to link questions, then you can just add a hyperlink reference - stackoverflow then marks them as related.
I'm coding an app that runs both in the web and on AIR, to avoid copying code arround, I figured I should do 3 kinds of projects on flex builder: Library, Web and AIR projects.
So all my code is on the Library project.
I have accessData.as that extends EventDispatcher to fetch web services and return them as an event. I plan on using this class to also fetch SQLite data for the desktop version, but to do so I need it to decide from wich source to get the data depending on if its Web or AIR.
Anyone know how to do this?
Please refer to this link Detect AIR versus Flash Player from an actionscript library Its more detailed.
You really should have two build targets, one for Web and one for AIR. And your code should be designed in a way that the rest of the system doesnt care what the implementing part is doing, only that it conforms to a certain interface. This way, each build simply replaces the implementing code for each desired platform.
You may find something useful under System or Capabilities in the docs.
Create 2 projects Air and Standalone and create 2 conditional compilation variables for example "standalone" and "air". (more here).
Go to Project->Properties->Flex Compiler and add
For air project:
-define=CONFIG::standalone,false -define=CONFIG::air,true
and for stanalone:
-define=CONFIG::debugging,true -define=CONFIG::air,false
In your code set:
CONFIG::standalone {
trace("this code will be compiled only when air=false and standalone=true");
}
CONFIG::air {
trace("this code will be compiled only when air=true and standalone=false");
}
umm... I just found out a way
var appName:String = Application.application.name;
this works since the web version is called "" and the desktop version is called " desktop"
but if anyone has a better way please go ahead.
thanks.
Hey I am coding using Visual Studio 2003. My program worked fine until I introduced a dll I made using CreateObject.
Code:
Set docs2 = server.CreateObject("DocGetter.Form1")
docs2.GetDocument oXMLDom,numID
It appears to be getting stuck at this code. I've already used regasm to register the dll.
What else could be wrong?
Add a reference to the dll in your project and instantiate the object like this:
Dim docs2 As New DocGetter.Form1()
If that doesn't make sense, then fix it so it does. There's no good reason to use CreateObject in .Net code. (Okay, that's hyperbole. But the principal is sound).
Can you clarify - is this a web app or a client (winform) app? Form1 sounds like a winform. ASP.NET runs at the server, so showing a form would be inappropriate - it would happen at the server, not the client. In short, don't do this!
I also can't see where "stored procedures" figures in this, so I've removed the tag.
What are you trying to do? Options for showing something more complex at the client include:
dhtml
flash
silverlight
clickonce [requires windows client]
ocx [not recommended]
I'd bet money that this function isn't defined with this name and/or parameters.
docs2.GetDocument oXMLDom,numID
But because of the way you're instantiating the object, the compiler has no way of knowing this... I think.