I am working on Maximo Anywhere 7.5.2 (Work Execution app). I have added a new status in existing status domain. I am able to see that in Maximo Asset Management but the same domainwostatus is not showing in Anywhere. It always shows the default status options. How to solve this issue ?
If this is a site-specific or org-specific domain value, this is a known bug that you can request an iFix for.
If not, make sure you Refresh System Data to redownload the newest Status Domain values to your app after adding the new domain value. This option is available under the Settings page in the overflow menu on the right.
Make sure your new status is a synonym of INPRG or COMP as these rules are used to determine which statuses will show in our lookup.
Related
I am getting this error message, and don't understand what I need to do to fix. How do I verify ownership of a Firebase deep link?
Deep links not working
Users will not go directly to your app from links associated with this path, but will see the app picker or be directed to the web browser. Once you have fixed these issues and published a new version, users need to update their app before the links will work.
FIX DOMAIN ISSUES
error
1 domain failed validation
brightness_1
Fix domain issues by verifying ownership of web links associated with this path
Get SHA256 Hash from release key file. You can also find sha256_cert_fingerprints from above assetlinks.json.
Go to the firebase console, select your project, add the SHA 256 key.
Open your dynamics link domain - https://xxxx.page.link/.well-known/assetlinks.json
Upload new version. It will work.
I am trying to create a Wordpress app using the official WordPress resource from the market place.
I fill out all of my settings as usual, like the website name, resource group and also, the ClearDB database I made.
Everything shows up correctly. My website name is valid, the resource group is correct etc.
But when I hit create, My app name is labelled as "not available" for about 1 second. This then goes away and the "create" button greys out, and now says validating. When this is done, I am taken to a page with an icon of a cloud with a drop of rain. Chrome then prompts me that my unsaved changes will be discarded. I click cancel and it appears again in an instant. If I click 'okay', then everything is cleared, and I ha ve to enter it all over again, only for the whole problem to occur once again.
Please Help!!!!
Thanks, Sean.
Currently facing some interesting behaviour of update preview functionality with XPM.
Post adding components to page XPM service/oData service pushed the data to db n respond back session based filter response.
Updated content is available at page source however update preview is not reflecting changes on page.
Looking for pointers to resolved thus issue.
We are using only one staging website which is enabled with XPM.
Session preview is in place.
Just thought, may be silly, same page getting edited with same credentials from different browser session break update preview?(Two or more Session Preview ID is getting created for same user is trying to edit the page from different machine (laptops) hence we are facing inconsistent behavior and session is getting locked e.t.)
Thanks ! Hiren Mistry
Can someone please tell me if the URLID in URL Maintenance under
people tools-->utilities-->administration-->url
is updated, will it change the navigation to the updated page?
This URL definitions can be accessed in peoplecode by
GetUrl(URL.MY_URL_ID);
If a definition is updated the version number is increased, see table:
select * from psurldefn
After updating an url definition close existing sessions and logon again because this mechanism doesn't work properly.
Be aware of language dependencies:
select * from psurldefnlang
I'm using collective.sendaspdf for pdf download of plone pages, but it asks users to login whene they download a public content.
This appears strange as it happens just in the production server, not in the development server (the only difference seems that the latter is started in foreground mode).
Of course I can't assign particular permissions on objects to anonymous users, so I guess the problem is somewhere else
thanks to Jean's suggestion, i enabled the verbose security and the error is "Unauthorized: You are not allowed to access '##at_base_edit_view' in this context"
This looks strange to me as the page is the view of my content-type archetype-based, and it is published so it is visible to anonymous users. I repeat also that I have the development server with the same software installed where the authorization is correctly given, i.e. the page can be downloaded by anyone without login...what changes is the network configuration (I have an apache that performs some url rewriting in front of my zope server, but this just affects the path of the plone site to be hidden)
I wonder if I can manage to correct this just through the sendaspdf configuration. I don't know which additional info I could provide about the environment/configuration. I'm running Plone 4.0.4 + collective.sendaspdf 2.0
Ok, the problem was due to a bug in how collective.sendaspdf handles archetype-based content types, it's possible to workaround it by replacing the code:
view_name = context_type.getProperty('immediate_view')
with
view_name = context_type.getProperty('default_view')
in the method get_page_source of base.py, or by waiting the next release of the product.