Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I have Mikrotik router with Wifi connected to:
WAN/internet on port ether1.
Other ports are for LAN 10.0.1.*.
Only port ether8 is connected to another simple POE switch. Four IP cameras with static IP are connected. This is LAN2 192.168.50.*. Port is not included in bridge or switch.
From main LAN I can access internet and other PC on same LAN, but can't access IP cameras on LAN2.
So, what is wrong/missing in my Mikrotik configuration:
/ip address
add address=10.0.1.1/24 comment="default configuration" interface= ether2-master-local network=10.0.1.0
add address=10.0.0.18/30 interface=ether1-gateway network=10.0.0.16
add address=192.168.50.253/24 interface=ether8-master-local-SUBNET network=
192.168.50.0
/ip route
add distance=2 gateway=10.0.0.17
No ping or trace route can reach LAN2 from main LAN.
If I connect to POE switch with my laptop and configure static IP in range 192.168.50.* than I can access all cameras OK.
If try ping IP camera directly from Mikrotik via ether8 than I get random mix of timeouts and success which is really strange.
Any help is appreciated.
did you set 192.168.50.253 as gateway in your IP cameras ? So they know how to reply to 10.0.1.0/24 when they receive a ping.
As for the random success ping problem, this is weird indeed, maybe an IP conflict (did you try with only 1 camera plugged?)
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to enable my eth0 network which is configured with a static IP with the network manager. I have also multiple VM's and all that in one machine. I need to test one Server VM which is also configured with a static IP.
Now I want to connect to this VM's with the host machine. But the host machine don't enables the eth0 because there is no cable plugged in. Furthermore I don't have the possibility to use a cable or any kind of physical network, because it will be a live demo.
The VM's are Virtualbox Machines which are "connected" with as a network bridge on eth0.
If your host machine has wifi feature built in, you can use the bridged network mode :
Turn on wifi hotspot feature on your smartphone
Connect host machine to your smartphone's hotspot network
In the VM's settings, use bridged network and choose the host's wireless adapter as the source
And done.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 7 years ago.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Improve this question
So I'm trying to host a server. I feel like this should be straight forward but maybe I'm missing something because it's not working. I'm hosting a server that runs on port 7777 and 27015. I've reserved an ip address of ex: 192.168.0.50 in my router settings along with ports forwarded with that address. So my pc is now 192.168.0.50 with both ports added (tcp/udp enabled).
My layout is : pc > router > voip router > modem. Since I have the router finished, I moved on to the voip router. In my voip router I forwarded both ports under my router's gateway 192.168.0.1. Is this correct or should it still be my computer's ip? My voip router does have a WAN ip assigned.
Am I missing something or did I use the wrong ip for my voip, since my ports still aren't accessible
first check if your modem is a router-modem by checking what is the WAN IP on your voip router (if the WAN IP of the router looks like 192.168.x.x then most likely your modem is acting as a router also and need some configuration done to have the port forward in place. When you have figured this out
make sure you forward the port from your VOIP router to the WAN address on your router. Try testing step by step to figure out where it's failing, First test by connecting a laptop straight into the VOIP router to test if the port forward to your new laptop IP is working good. Then temporarely remove the VOIP router from the equation for a few minute and test with only pc > router > modem to see if port forward works.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
On my home network there is printer I want to print from. I know the the local IP of my printer at home, and I know the IP address of my home router.
From a different location, is there any way I can access the printer with these pieces of information?
From inside the network (while you're connected to your router at home) that would be enough information. However from outside the network, the firewall on the router would have to be set up. The place you would want to set up would be the Port Forwarding feature of your router.
While at home:
1) Login to your router
2) Look for something like "Port Forwarding/Port Triggering", "WAN", "Firewall" or something like that. It will be different on different routers.
3) Most of the time the default port for network printers is 9100 so you can set up traffic coming into the router on port 9100 to be forwarded to the printer's IP address. This is why it's called "Port Forwarding" because you're forwarding traffic on that port.
4) Once that's set up you'll have to set up a printer on your computer and use the public IP address of your home router. For example, it will be something other than "192.168.x.x".
There you have it!
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
When my PC is connected to Network, I will be getting couple of IP address.
1.) Modem Private IP address (will be like 192.168.1.3)
2.) ISP address (by searching "My ip address" in google it gives me my global IP address)
My roommate who is connected to same modem is able to ping my global IP address but not other person who is connected to different network, why??
Is there anyway that in ISP they block ICMP Packets?? So that no one be able to ping other machine ?? or do they use different routing instances for different sectors??
If we want a global IP address for my PC so that anyone can login/ping what should I enable??
Your router/modem gets a dynamic IP from ISP whenever you connect it to Internet. This address as name says is changing. If you want a constant public IP from ISP, you must request ISP for the same. This comes at a very high cost and not recommended unless you are serving a high revenue generating data on that machine.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a Windows 2008R2.
On a NIC, I have 3 ip aliases :
- two have the same subnet and it works well
- the third is on a different subnet
I can ping the third ip.
I can see the packets who are coming on this ip with Wireshark.
I have a service who list on the 0.0.0.0 address.
When I try to connect to this service, it is like the packet are not going to the service.
I tried with netcat also in listen mode and I had the same problem (If I connect via the loopback ip, netcat receive my datas...)
Is the ip aliases have to be on the same subnet on the same nic ?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
This will never work. I tried with an additionnal nic and it worked