The purpose:
I am working on a code similar to this to create a component where an input field has an embedded button:
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/pgwbWG?editors=110
As you can see, the button is positioned absolutely with top and bottom set to 0, to achieve a 100% height element.
Also to note is that the border of the text-input must stay visible and also wrap the button.
To achieve this I added a margin: 1px to the button so that there is (should be) space to display the surrounding text-input red border (usually when the input field content is invalid).
The problem:
is that on Firefox it is (mostly) rendered correctly, while on Chrome (and apparently on the newest Safari) it will have a 1px gap at the bottom of the button.
CSS seems ok but it appears to be a calculation/rounding problem in the rendering, where the bottom or the top margin of the button are not really 1px (can see it inspecting the element).
And also the padding of the input seems to influence in that.
At different zoom-rates it will add or remove 1px of margin to the top or the bottom of the button, resulting in a 1px-gap or in a covered-border.
As I set the button margin to 0px then the bottom margin is fixed but I loose the 1px margin on the top, finishing to cover the red border of the text-input.
The examples:
Probably I am not clear or too verbose in explaining it, so here are some screenshots of the bug, from different zooms on Chrome (note the CSS is always the same):
The solution:
I was not able to find a cross-browser solution.
How to deal with it and get a consistent component?
(no Javascript please)
As you already know, the problem arises from a different approach to subpixel calculus between browsers
In Chrome, for instance, borders can have a fractional size, but margins are handled different (as integers).
I don't have documentation about it from the Chrome team, but it's what can be seen in dev tools:
AFAIK, there is not a way to change that.
Instead, you can transfer the use of the margin in the button to a border.
Since you need to get space for the 1px border of the input, do the same in the button, set a 1px border (instead of a margin), and set it transparent.
The remaining trick is to set the background-clip property to padding box, so that this transparency is not affected by the background
There is another bug in Chrome, the padding expressed in em is not reliable at this level of precision when the browser is zoomed. I changed this in the snippet.
Since we are using the border button to get the dimension ok, we can style the border using instead a inset shadow.
* {
margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box;
}
button, input, wrapper {
display: inline-block; border-radius: 3px;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 60%;
margin: 1em;
background-color: #ccc;
}
input {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 100%;
background-color: limegreen;
line-height: 3em;
/* padding: 0.75em; */
padding: 10px;
}
button {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
border: 1px solid transparent;
width: 7em;
margin: 0px;
background-clip: padding-box;
box-shadow: inset 0px 0px 0px 2px black;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<input type="text">
<button>Test</button>
</div>
Another example, where the button has a border. But we need a wrapper around it to get the dimensions ok.
* {
margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box;
}
button, input, wrapper {
display: inline-block; border-radius: 3px;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 60%;
margin: 1em;
background-color: #ccc;
}
input {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 100%;
background-color: limegreen;
line-height: 3em;
/* padding: 0.75em; */
padding: 10px;
}
.buttonwrap {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
border: 1px solid transparent;
width: 7em;
margin: 0px;
background-clip: padding-box;
}
button {
position: absolute;
right: 0px;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
border: 2px solid blue;
margin: 0px;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<input type="text">
<div class="buttonwrap">
<button>Test</button>
</div>
</div>
Use http://autoprefixer.github.io/ to get the cross browser support you need for display: flex;
button, input, wrapper {
display: inline-block; <----- Remove "display: inline-block;"
border-radius: 3px;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
display: -webkit-box;<----- Add "display: flex;"
display: -webkit-flex;<----- Add "display: flex;"
display: -ms-flexbox;<----- Add "display: flex;"
display: flex;<----- Add "display: flex;"
width: 60%;
margin: 1em;
background-color: #ccc;
}
Extra reading and learning material:
https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
http://flexbox.io/#/
https://philipwalton.github.io/solved-by-flexbox/demos/holy-grail/
http://www.sketchingwithcss.com/samplechapter/cheatsheet.html
Note: to overide a flex rule you will need to use flex shorthand rather than specific over-ride due to current browser shortfalls eg.
.item {
flex: 0 0 300px;
}
/* overide for some reason */
.item {
flex: 1 0 300px;
}
/* NOT */
.item {
flex-grow: 1;
}
You MAY need to do an over-ride for ie11:
.ie11std .wrapper {
display:table;
}
.ie11std .item {
display:table-cell;
}
although this won't be responsive.
Related
In my code margin-left: is working only in the other browsers. In Firefox it seems I need to double every values i give to the margin-left: that works for the other browers. The element i need to marge is the blue circle.
If I inspect the element and change the css in the inspector and then i give margin-left: 60px (my margin-left: is normally 30px) it works. The same goes for 1em (is i put a 2em it works).
I just strated a formation so i'm not an expert, so if one of you can see where I've made a mistake, thanks in advance for telling me !
Here's my code
.cercle-logo {
height: 65px;
width: 65px;
color: #5CADD3;
border: 2px solid #EBEBEB;
margin-top: 15px;
border-radius: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.cercle-logo:before {
content: "";
border: 5px solid white;
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
border-radius: 100%;
background-color: #5cadd3;
position: absolute;
margin-left: 2em;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<div>
<span class="cercle-logo"><i class="fa fa-chart-pie fa-2x"></i></span>
</div>
Some browser use the parent padding as an offset for the absolute position child elements (chrome does this), because it's obvious that you will move the element using left,right,top,bottom not the margins
Say you have padding-left:20px, on the parent, and you set position absolute on one of it's children, if you won't see much changes, because some browsers uses that 20px and add it as an offset left:20px
One simple solution is to rest the offset, then use margins to push it, which i don't recommend you can use the left property to push it.
.cercle-logo {
height: 65px;
width: 65px;
color: #5CADD3;
border: 2px solid #EBEBEB;
margin-top: 15px;
border-radius: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.cercle-logo:before {
content: "";
border: 5px solid white;
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
border-radius: 100%;
background-color: #5cadd3;
position: absolute;
left: 3.7em;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<div>
<span class="cercle-logo"><i class="fa fa-chart-pie fa-2x"></i></span>
</div>
Thank you for your answer but I might have done something wrong because even though your explanation were clear, and the "code snippet" works well (I test it directly on Firefox), when i write is in Bracket and test it, it moves my blue circle totally on the left but this time on every browsers ...
Is there something I missed ?
Thank you for your time anyway !
I'm trying to create a button that has many layers - consequently I'm having to make use of pseudo elements.
To clarify, my button is actually an anchor <a>.
I've run into an issue with one of the pseudo elements. I'm trying to give it a background while retaining a touchable target outside of the background. In order to do this, I've applied a background-clip over the content.
Everything works apart from the corners, which are applied but just not the shape I was expecting.
Button 2 is the design I'm trying to crack - by ensuring the pseudo perfectly overlays the element.
I now think I know what is happening but don't know why and how to fix it.
The padding is 6px deep, the border radius 10px. The radius is being calculated as 4px deep and 10px wide.
Any advice appreciated.
div {
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
a, a::before {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
a {
background-color: red;
border-radius: 10px;
color: white;
display: inline-block;
height: 36px;
line-height: 36px;
min-width: 100px;
position: relative;
text-align: center;
z-index: 1;
}
a::before {
background-color: rgba(0, 255, 0, 0.5);
border-radius: 10px;
content: "";
display: block;
height: 48px;
padding: 6px 0;
position: absolute;
top: -6px;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
z-index: -1;
}
.button2::before, .button2a::before {
background-clip: content-box;
}
.button2a {
margin-left: 20px;
}
.button2a::before {
background-color: blue;
}
.button3::before {
background-clip: content-box;
border-radius: 50%;
}
<div>
<p>This is a button with no background-clip - border-radius applied as expected<p>
<p><a class="button1">button 1</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>This has same border-radius as above, but background-clip applied on content - overlay doesn't completely disappear - leaves odd shapes at corners as can be seen on blue button. I was expecting 10px corners to mirror center</p>
<p><a class="button2">button 2</a><a class="button2a">button 2</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<p>This has same background-clip applied but uses a percentage for border-radius - seems to work as expected</p>
<p><a class="button3">button 3</a></p>
</div>
I'm trying to create a button that has many layers
What about doing things differently and instead of using pseudo element you can rely on multiple background to have multiple layers:
a.button1 {
background:
linear-gradient(to right,transparent 50%,blue 0),
linear-gradient(to bottom,orange 50%,transparent 0),
red;
border-radius: 10px;
color: white;
display: inline-block;
height: 36px;
line-height: 36px;
min-width: 100px;
text-align: center;
}
<a class="button1">button 1</a>
I'm trying to indicate the active link, using a triangle-shaped CSS "cut-out" (the triangle is cut out of the white header.
http://codepen.io/Goatsy/pen/xVvRmZ
/*
.container {
width: 1200px;
}
*/
How do I "cut out" the red triangle from both the contained header and full-width background (red) block? I need to cut out the triangle to expose underlying photo.
The header works great, but as soon as the full-width red block is applied to the background layer of contained header, it "fills in" the triangle cut-out.
UPDATE:
I created a flexbox within a flexbox. Unfortunately, the contained header is not exactly 1200px, and this will be difficult to apply to the overall layout.
http://codepen.io/Goatsy/pen/xVvRmZ
.wrapper-whole {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
height: 134px;
margin: auto;
}
.flexy {
background: #f00;
flex: 2;
height: 134px;
}
.wrapper { /* wraps contained header navbar */
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
height: 134px;
border-left: 15px solid #fff;
border-right: 15px solid #fff;
max-width: 1200px;
margin: auto;
flex: 6;
}
Instead of cutting it out from a background, you could create the illusion of a background by making red elements on each side of the white header using :before and :after pseudo-elements.
In http://codepen.io/anon/pen/MyNpdX, I added the following CSS:
.wrapper {
/* the stuff that was already here */
position: relative;
}
.wrapper:after, .wrapper:before{
content: "";
background-color: #f00;
width: 4000px;
position: absolute;
height: 134px;
top: 0;
}
.wrapper:before{
margin-right: 15px;
right: 100%;
}
.wrapper:after{
left: 100%;
margin-left: 15px;
}
Too many questions:
let me try to answer the ones I've understood.
I'll keep editing this answer as I go:
to contain something: you can have the following parent div
.parent {
max-width: 1200px;
overflow: hidden;
}
this way a child red div, would not appear outside parents constraint.
you can achieve css-triangles as:
.arrow-up {
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-left: 15px solid transparent;
border-right: 15px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 15px solid black;
}
<div class="arrow-up"></div>
p.s.: you're codepen is so far behind the layout in question, that it's hard to hands-on fix the problem
Place the contained flexbox header, inside of another flexbox.
Place one (red) block on left of header and one (red) block on right.
Create max-width for white header:
#media screen and (min-width: 480px) {
.wrapper { /* wraps contained header navbar */
min-width: 1200px;
}
}
http://codepen.io/Goatsy/pen/xVvdKN
Can I achieve a custom CSS border with a button at one end which looks like this
Without url(some image link)?
Note: I want so because when I want to change color, I have to manipulate image.
I have achieved using image JS Fiddle
#stretch {
border-image: url(http://akitech.org/img/border.png) 30 30 stretch;
}
The easiest way is to use CSS pseudo-elements to create the decoration (the circle at the left) and to mask the chamfer at the right of the border (the angle at which the border-right would otherwise meet):
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
width: 250px;
padding: 10px 20px;
position: relative;
/* this property has to be set to change the border-color: */
border-bottom-color: #f90;
}
/* common shared styles: */
div::before,
div::after {
/* to ensure the pseudo-elements are rendered: */
content: '';
/* for positioning: */
position: absolute;
/* positioning the element with its uppermost edge
against the bottom of the element, against the
upper side of the bottom-border: */
top: 100%;
/* again, set to change the color of the ends: */
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
/* position against the left edge: */
left: 0;
/* move the pseudo element 10px up, and
10px left: */
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
/* making the pseudo-element a circle: */
border-radius: 50%;
}
/* masking the chamfer of the border-bottom's
right-most edge: */
div::after {
left: 100%;
/* making the height/width the same width
as the border itself: */
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
width: 250px;
padding: 10px 20px;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
}
div::before,
div::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
left: 0;
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
div::after {
left: 100%;
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
<div id="stretch">Here, the image is stretched to fill the area.</div>
In order to have these borders adapt to the length of the text, either the elements you want to have custom-bordered must themselves be able to contract to the width of the text, either using float:
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
/* forces the element to take up only that space required by
its (non-floated) contents: */
float: left;
/* forces the floated elements to the next line: */
clear: left;
}
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
float: left;
clear: left;
}
div::before,
div::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
left: 0;
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
div::after {
left: 100%;
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
<div>text</div>
<div>longer text</div>
<div>much longer text</div>
<div>much much much longer text</div>
Or, possibly more simply, use display: inline-block:
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
display: inline-block;
}
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
display: inline-block;
}
div::before,
div::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
left: 0;
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
div::after {
left: 100%;
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
<div>text</div>
<div>longer text</div>
<div>much longer text</div>
<div>much much much longer text</div>
Or display: inline (these don't automatically force new-lines between elements, obviously):
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
display: inline;
}
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
display: inline;
}
div::before,
div::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
left: 0;
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
div::after {
left: 100%;
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
<div>text</div>
<div>longer text</div>
<div>much longer text</div>
<div>much much much longer text</div>
summary:
for simplist way to this question, should not using svg, pure css can draw the shape author expected very well cause it's a combination of cycle(border radius)+rect(thicker line), let's refer to the David's answer should be the easiest and most clean way to draw that shape under text.
//below is my debugging history and tries (i searched out many ways to approach it);
//though not good answers
I use background css attribute (not OP wanted) Op used border-image also valid.
<div class="custom-border" >SOME TEXT HERE</div>
<style>
.custom-border{
padding-left:20px;
width:200px;
background:url(http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140224040010/shantae/images/b/bc/HGH_border_bottom.png) 0px 5px no-repeat;
background-size:contain;
height:150px;
}
</style>
later I realized OP might dislike using image traditional way, I re understand the
question is asking how to draw that shape in pure css and place it under the text and the responsive should be as flexible as the traditional way the svg shape will auto strech with the text placed on it.
after that, I've find some way to generate svg and place under text
see if it works for no image solution or you can get it improved based on fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/hahatey/hsfxS/1464/
during the process, i've found this useful tool of generating svg from below reference url: http://svg-edit.googlecode.com/svn/branches/2.6/editor/svg-editor.html
But the flaw is it's still a fixed width solution, the line svg won't auto stretch.
Have found a unclean way to improve auto stretch though not in pure css responsive way.
but auto strech can be done by dynamically change below line
<rect stroke="#ff0000" id="svg_2" height="8" width="100%" y="27" x="40" stroke-width="5" fill="#FF0000"/>
where width="100%" or fixed value => width="function return value"; //
// during this try, i found a little bug, jquery seems unable to select svg or element inside svg? however svg element tag attribute can be written in backend languge so still valid.
//3.44
Another way without touching the inner "rect' element below "svg" tag, is to add a container to the whole thing, and using function to dynamically
assign width for the container;
like my attempt in this
fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/hahatey/hsfxS/1468/
so at least the width can be dynamically calculated out by a function to calculate the text length of the upper text so the line will be able to strech if the calculation is accurate enough. There could be other ways to do svg auto strech with the text using pure css if other ppl find it.
Thanks.
5.02// since the author didn't say how complex the content is inside the container,
I've created a demo in pure css triggered effct --- auto strech the shape along with the text above it in below fiddle. but i said it sure has many limitations though looks similar.
http://jsfiddle.net/hahatey/a9z1kyx7/
my upper fiddle is only able to align correctly for singleline auto strech
I'm wondering if complex content (more than one line, there maybe a lot of block,inline mixed tag element inside which increases complexity for alignment) can also use css to do such decoration width auto adjustment without touching javascript or backend language.
I need to make the shape below, which will contain some text. Sometimes the text will be longer, sometimes shorter so I can use any fixed widths.
**********
* *
******
This the is code I have - I'm wondering if there's a way I can tag an image on to the beginning and the end of the span. The height won't change so that would probably be the best in terms of cross browser solutions...
<div class="trapizium_holder">
<span id="trapizium"></span>
</div>
One Wrapper Only Needed (IE8+)
This fiddle demonstrates that only a single wrapper is needed. It uses a single pseudo-element to get the angles. The wrapper must either be floated or an inline-block. Here's the code:
HTML
<div class="trapizium">
Test text
</div>
CSS
.trapizium {
position: relative;
float: left; /* wrap the text */
clear: left; /* for demo */
margin: 10px 20px; /* left/right margin will be diagonal width */
/* needs some set height */
font-size: 1em;
line-height: 1em;
padding: .2em 0;
background-color: cyan;
}
.trapizium:before {
content: '';
height: 0;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: -20px; /* stick out into margined area */
z-index: -1; /* make it the background */
border: 20px solid transparent; /* left/right diagonals */
border-top: 1.4em solid cyan;
border-bottom: 0px solid transparent;
}
Fiddle
#trapizium {
border-top: 100px solid blue;
border-left: 50px solid transparent;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
height: 0;
width: 100px;
}
You may have to absolute position your text into your shapes. This uses borders to make the shape, and has no height.