CSS Border with a botton - css

Can I achieve a custom CSS border with a button at one end which looks like this
Without url(some image link)?
Note: I want so because when I want to change color, I have to manipulate image.
I have achieved using image JS Fiddle
#stretch {
border-image: url(http://akitech.org/img/border.png) 30 30 stretch;
}

The easiest way is to use CSS pseudo-elements to create the decoration (the circle at the left) and to mask the chamfer at the right of the border (the angle at which the border-right would otherwise meet):
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
width: 250px;
padding: 10px 20px;
position: relative;
/* this property has to be set to change the border-color: */
border-bottom-color: #f90;
}
/* common shared styles: */
div::before,
div::after {
/* to ensure the pseudo-elements are rendered: */
content: '';
/* for positioning: */
position: absolute;
/* positioning the element with its uppermost edge
against the bottom of the element, against the
upper side of the bottom-border: */
top: 100%;
/* again, set to change the color of the ends: */
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
/* position against the left edge: */
left: 0;
/* move the pseudo element 10px up, and
10px left: */
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
/* making the pseudo-element a circle: */
border-radius: 50%;
}
/* masking the chamfer of the border-bottom's
right-most edge: */
div::after {
left: 100%;
/* making the height/width the same width
as the border itself: */
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
width: 250px;
padding: 10px 20px;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
}
div::before,
div::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
left: 0;
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
div::after {
left: 100%;
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
<div id="stretch">Here, the image is stretched to fill the area.</div>
In order to have these borders adapt to the length of the text, either the elements you want to have custom-bordered must themselves be able to contract to the width of the text, either using float:
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
/* forces the element to take up only that space required by
its (non-floated) contents: */
float: left;
/* forces the floated elements to the next line: */
clear: left;
}
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
float: left;
clear: left;
}
div::before,
div::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
left: 0;
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
div::after {
left: 100%;
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
<div>text</div>
<div>longer text</div>
<div>much longer text</div>
<div>much much much longer text</div>
Or, possibly more simply, use display: inline-block:
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
display: inline-block;
}
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
display: inline-block;
}
div::before,
div::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
left: 0;
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
div::after {
left: 100%;
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
<div>text</div>
<div>longer text</div>
<div>much longer text</div>
<div>much much much longer text</div>
Or display: inline (these don't automatically force new-lines between elements, obviously):
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
display: inline;
}
div {
border: 10px solid transparent;
position: relative;
border-bottom-color: #f90;
padding-left: 20px;
display: inline;
}
div::before,
div::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
background-color: #f90;
}
div::before {
left: 0;
margin: -10px 0 0 -10px;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
div::after {
left: 100%;
height: 10px;
width: 10px;
}
<div>text</div>
<div>longer text</div>
<div>much longer text</div>
<div>much much much longer text</div>

summary:
for simplist way to this question, should not using svg, pure css can draw the shape author expected very well cause it's a combination of cycle(border radius)+rect(thicker line), let's refer to the David's answer should be the easiest and most clean way to draw that shape under text.
//below is my debugging history and tries (i searched out many ways to approach it);
//though not good answers
I use background css attribute (not OP wanted) Op used border-image also valid.
<div class="custom-border" >SOME TEXT HERE</div>
<style>
.custom-border{
padding-left:20px;
width:200px;
background:url(http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140224040010/shantae/images/b/bc/HGH_border_bottom.png) 0px 5px no-repeat;
background-size:contain;
height:150px;
}
</style>
later I realized OP might dislike using image traditional way, I re understand the
question is asking how to draw that shape in pure css and place it under the text and the responsive should be as flexible as the traditional way the svg shape will auto strech with the text placed on it.
after that, I've find some way to generate svg and place under text
see if it works for no image solution or you can get it improved based on fiddle
http://jsfiddle.net/hahatey/hsfxS/1464/
during the process, i've found this useful tool of generating svg from below reference url: http://svg-edit.googlecode.com/svn/branches/2.6/editor/svg-editor.html
But the flaw is it's still a fixed width solution, the line svg won't auto stretch.
Have found a unclean way to improve auto stretch though not in pure css responsive way.
but auto strech can be done by dynamically change below line
<rect stroke="#ff0000" id="svg_2" height="8" width="100%" y="27" x="40" stroke-width="5" fill="#FF0000"/>
where width="100%" or fixed value => width="function return value"; //
// during this try, i found a little bug, jquery seems unable to select svg or element inside svg? however svg element tag attribute can be written in backend languge so still valid.
//3.44
Another way without touching the inner "rect' element below "svg" tag, is to add a container to the whole thing, and using function to dynamically
assign width for the container;
like my attempt in this
fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/hahatey/hsfxS/1468/
so at least the width can be dynamically calculated out by a function to calculate the text length of the upper text so the line will be able to strech if the calculation is accurate enough. There could be other ways to do svg auto strech with the text using pure css if other ppl find it.
Thanks.
5.02// since the author didn't say how complex the content is inside the container,
I've created a demo in pure css triggered effct --- auto strech the shape along with the text above it in below fiddle. but i said it sure has many limitations though looks similar.
http://jsfiddle.net/hahatey/a9z1kyx7/
my upper fiddle is only able to align correctly for singleline auto strech
I'm wondering if complex content (more than one line, there maybe a lot of block,inline mixed tag element inside which increases complexity for alignment) can also use css to do such decoration width auto adjustment without touching javascript or backend language.

Related

IE Workaround? border-radius + background-color + border = bleeding background [closed]

Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
It seems something like this has been addressed before, but most of what I'm finding is for the more generic issue that doesn't pertain to most browsers today. I'm encountering the known IE issue where using border-radius with a border and a background (a color in my case) results in the background bleeding beyond the border.
I'm wondering if there is a workaround that actually can mask this issue... Some of the things I've tried:
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=10" />
overflow:hidden on the parent
background-clip:border-box
adding .1 to the border-radius
None of these have worked. Is there another workaround (other than "use images") while I wait for yon IE team to fix things?
I've created a fiddle that illustrates this well and documents what I've found in more detail.
I have experienced this before.
I recommend instead styling the border with CSS generated content, in a manner such as this:
.redcircle::after {
content:'';
display:block;
left:0;
top:0;
right:0;
bottom:0;
border-radius:100px;
border:10px solid yellow;
position:absolute;
pointer-events: none; //ensures no clicks propogate if this is desired
}
You can crate an ::before or ::after CSS Pseudo and make your background: red; on them. Set your width, height and border-radius on 100% and for example don't change z-index to -1, you can see his get the inside width and hight and don't bleeding out.
Screenshot from Explorer 9 on Vista
And now for example (how its look without z-index play):
body {
background: white;
}
.bluebox {
background: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
.redcircle {
position: absolute;
left: 140px;
top: 40px;
text-align: center;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border-radius: 100px;
font-size: 100px;
line-height: 100px;
color: black;
border: 10px solid yellow;
}
.redcircle::before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 100%;
background: red;
}
<div class="bluebox">
<div class="redcircle">
!
</div>
</div>
And this one for using:
body {
background: white;
}
.bluebox {
background: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
.redcircle {
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
left: 140px;
top: 40px;
text-align: center;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border-radius: 100px;
font-size: 100px;
line-height: 100px;
color: black;
border: 10px solid yellow;
}
.redcircle::before {
z-index: -1;
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 100%;
background: red;
}
<div class="bluebox">
<div class="redcircle">
!
</div>
</div>
Fiddle Demo
Borrowing from Zeev's answer, which moves the background-color to a :before or :after (which only substitutes a subpixel gap for a subpixel bleed, and across more browsers), and Phil's answer, which moves the border to an :after (which didn't really fix the problem).
Move the background-color to a :before as suggested by Zeev, but give it padding equal to the border-width minus two (or use calc()). Then give it negative top and left positioning with that same amount.
Then move the border to the :after but give it negative top and left positioning equal to the border-width.
This creates an oversized background and recenters it below the content. Then it creates an oversized border and centers it around the content. You could probably oversize the background to other degrees and get the same result. The point is to make it bigger than the hole inside the border, but smaller than the outside of the border. This, naturally, would fail with thin borders, though.
body {
background: white;
}
.bluebox {
background: blue;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
.redcircle {
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
left: 150px;
top: 50px;
text-align: center;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
border-radius: 100px;
font-size: 100px;
line-height: 100px;
color: black;
}
.redcircle::before,
.redcircle::after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 100%;
}
.redcircle::before {
z-index: -1;
background: red;
top: -8px;
left: -8px;
padding: 8px;
}
.redcircle::after {
top: -10px;
left: -10px;
border: 10px solid yellow;
}
<div class="bluebox">
<div class="redcircle">
!
</div>
</div>
background-clip fixes this issue:
.bluebox {
background-clip: padding-box;
}

Sub-Pixels calculated and rendered differently among browsers

The purpose:
I am working on a code similar to this to create a component where an input field has an embedded button:
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/pgwbWG?editors=110
As you can see, the button is positioned absolutely with top and bottom set to 0, to achieve a 100% height element.
Also to note is that the border of the text-input must stay visible and also wrap the button.
To achieve this I added a margin: 1px to the button so that there is (should be) space to display the surrounding text-input red border (usually when the input field content is invalid).
The problem:
is that on Firefox it is (mostly) rendered correctly, while on Chrome (and apparently on the newest Safari) it will have a 1px gap at the bottom of the button.
CSS seems ok but it appears to be a calculation/rounding problem in the rendering, where the bottom or the top margin of the button are not really 1px (can see it inspecting the element).
And also the padding of the input seems to influence in that.
At different zoom-rates it will add or remove 1px of margin to the top or the bottom of the button, resulting in a 1px-gap or in a covered-border.
As I set the button margin to 0px then the bottom margin is fixed but I loose the 1px margin on the top, finishing to cover the red border of the text-input.
The examples:
Probably I am not clear or too verbose in explaining it, so here are some screenshots of the bug, from different zooms on Chrome (note the CSS is always the same):
The solution:
I was not able to find a cross-browser solution.
How to deal with it and get a consistent component?
(no Javascript please)
As you already know, the problem arises from a different approach to subpixel calculus between browsers
In Chrome, for instance, borders can have a fractional size, but margins are handled different (as integers).
I don't have documentation about it from the Chrome team, but it's what can be seen in dev tools:
AFAIK, there is not a way to change that.
Instead, you can transfer the use of the margin in the button to a border.
Since you need to get space for the 1px border of the input, do the same in the button, set a 1px border (instead of a margin), and set it transparent.
The remaining trick is to set the background-clip property to padding box, so that this transparency is not affected by the background
There is another bug in Chrome, the padding expressed in em is not reliable at this level of precision when the browser is zoomed. I changed this in the snippet.
Since we are using the border button to get the dimension ok, we can style the border using instead a inset shadow.
* {
margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box;
}
button, input, wrapper {
display: inline-block; border-radius: 3px;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 60%;
margin: 1em;
background-color: #ccc;
}
input {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 100%;
background-color: limegreen;
line-height: 3em;
/* padding: 0.75em; */
padding: 10px;
}
button {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
border: 1px solid transparent;
width: 7em;
margin: 0px;
background-clip: padding-box;
box-shadow: inset 0px 0px 0px 2px black;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<input type="text">
<button>Test</button>
</div>
Another example, where the button has a border. But we need a wrapper around it to get the dimensions ok.
* {
margin: 0; padding: 0; box-sizing: border-box;
}
button, input, wrapper {
display: inline-block; border-radius: 3px;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 60%;
margin: 1em;
background-color: #ccc;
}
input {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 100%;
background-color: limegreen;
line-height: 3em;
/* padding: 0.75em; */
padding: 10px;
}
.buttonwrap {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
border: 1px solid transparent;
width: 7em;
margin: 0px;
background-clip: padding-box;
}
button {
position: absolute;
right: 0px;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
border: 2px solid blue;
margin: 0px;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<input type="text">
<div class="buttonwrap">
<button>Test</button>
</div>
</div>
Use http://autoprefixer.github.io/ to get the cross browser support you need for display: flex;
button, input, wrapper {
display: inline-block; <----- Remove "display: inline-block;"
border-radius: 3px;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
display: -webkit-box;<----- Add "display: flex;"
display: -webkit-flex;<----- Add "display: flex;"
display: -ms-flexbox;<----- Add "display: flex;"
display: flex;<----- Add "display: flex;"
width: 60%;
margin: 1em;
background-color: #ccc;
}
Extra reading and learning material:
https://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
http://flexbox.io/#/
https://philipwalton.github.io/solved-by-flexbox/demos/holy-grail/
http://www.sketchingwithcss.com/samplechapter/cheatsheet.html
Note: to overide a flex rule you will need to use flex shorthand rather than specific over-ride due to current browser shortfalls eg.
.item {
flex: 0 0 300px;
}
/* overide for some reason */
.item {
flex: 1 0 300px;
}
/* NOT */
.item {
flex-grow: 1;
}
You MAY need to do an over-ride for ie11:
.ie11std .wrapper {
display:table;
}
.ie11std .item {
display:table-cell;
}
although this won't be responsive.

CSS - using css object instead of background-image

I have a button class styled in css, in which background image is used, like this:
.button {
display: block;
background-position: center;
background-size: 30px 28px;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-color: transparent;
border: 0;
width: 100%;
background-image: url('foo.png');
}
The shape in .png is really simple - it's just an orange circle. So I want to draw it in css instead, to avoid using external asset. So I thought of using the following css object (which draws an orange circle):
#circle {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: orange;
-moz-border-radius: 50px;
-webkit-border-radius: 50px;
border-radius: 50px;
}
Is there some way to use that in such a way, that it would behave exactly as the background-image .png? (I know I could just make another button class in which I would have drawn the button differently but I want to reuse the button class already available).
This can be achieved using a pseudo element, I made a fiddle. You can play with the dimensions of course.
.button {
display: block;
border: 0;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
position: relative;
background: transparent;
/* just to show where the button is */
border:1px solid #000;
}
.button:before {
content: '';
display: block;
background: orange;
border-radius: 50%;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
/* make sure background is behind text */
z-index: -1;
/* center circle in button, negative margins = half of circle dimensions */
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
margin: -50px 0 0 -50px;
}
How about using SVG in a data URI? Here's a fiddle showing the example and the code used to generate it (the link is just 194 characters long):
var svg = '<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="30" height="28">'
+ '<ellipse cx="15" cy="14" rx="15" ry="14" fill="orange"/></svg>';
location.href = 'data:image/svg+xml;base64,' + btoa(svg);

Div/Button with a circle shaped container to the left of it

Can I ask a little help about creating that shape with CSS?
The button needs a circle for the icon, and the simple box for the text.
Here is a possible version using the :before pseudo element. The pseudo element is converted into a circle by using border-radius: 50% and is then positioned before the rectangular div#menu as required.
You can add a image (like the one in question) to the pseudo element by using the content property like shown below:
content: url(http://yoursite.com/yourimage.png);
or using the background-image property also:
background-image: url(http://yoursite.com/yourimage.png);
#menu {
position: relative;
width: 100px;
height: 24px;
line-height: 24px;
color: white;
background-color: peru;
border: 1px solid peru;
border-radius: 2px;
padding-left: 24px;
}
#menu:before {
position: absolute;
content: '';
height: 40px;
width: 40px;
top: -9px; /* (height of parent - height of pseudo) / 2 - border-top of parent for vertical mid */
/* top: -17px; (height of parent - height of pseudo) - border-top of parent for bottom align */
left: -24px; /* some value less than width - depends on amount of overlap needed */
border: 1px solid transparent;
background-image: url(http://lorempixel.com/40/40/people/1);
background-color: peru;
border-radius: 50%;
}
/* Just for demo */
* {
font-family: Calibri;
letter-spacing: 2px;
}
#menu {
margin: 25px;
}
<div id='menu'>Menu Text</div>
Note: This is in essence a different version of the answer posted by Jason Gennaro. If you need support for IE lower versions, use his answer because they don't support :before.
Here's a quick and dirty version:
HTML
<div id="circle"></div>
<div id="rectangle">Header Text</div>
CSS
#circle{
border-radius: 50%;
width: 85px;
height: 85px;
background: brown;
float:left;
}
#rectangle{
width:300px;
height:40px;
background:brown;
color:white;
float:left;
margin-top:20px;
margin-left:-40px;
position:relative;
z-index:-1;
padding-left:60px;
padding-top:6px;
font-family:arial;
font-size:2em;
}
DEMO
http://jsfiddle.net/H6Lkk/
Explanation
use border-radius:50% and any width to create a circle.
float the two divs to allow for the overlap
use position and z-index to place the rectangle under the circle
add the logo image as necessary in the #circle

Align text inside a div that is a semi-circle

I have this code of my div. I want to alight some text inside. The text has to be aligned to the left curv of the div. How can this be possible?
Thank you!
Here is the code of the div:
#cv {
position: absolute;
top: 10%;
left: 30%;
width: 300px;
height: 600px;
background-color: #ffffff;
border: 1px solid #ff0000;
border-radius:300px 0px 0px 300px;
padding: 10px;
}
I believe you want the text to follow the semi circle, and not just have an ordinary align left along a straight edge. This is not (yet) possible with a simple css property. There are some hacky techniques like this however:
http://www.torylawson.com/mw_index.php?title=CSS_-_Wrapping_text_around_non-rectangular_shapes
There are even a tools to help you, like this one:
http://www.csstextwrap.com/
Adobe is pushing a new css property to wrap text:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/html5/articles/css3-regions.html
It should be already available in Chrome Canary, but I suppose that is of little use for you today. I think you will have to do with a hack today...
Working example: http://jsfiddle.net/mQFK6/4/
You want to add a <p> to hold the text, and then move it down 50% to the middle of the circle, and float it left
#cv {
position: relative;
top: 10%;
left: 30%;
width: 300px;
height: 600px;
background-color: #ffffff;
border: 1px solid #ff0000;
border-radius:300px 0px 0px 300px;
padding: 10px;
}
p{
top: 50%;
position: relative;
float: left;
margin-left: 5px;
}

Resources