I am a newbie to Apache Chemistry openCMIS.
I am trying to pull a PDF document from the Alfresco repository using its Id.
The id is something similar to workspace://SpacesStore/b91dc42c-1644-4246-b3x9-bxx6f0be4wf3
CmisObject object = getSession().getObject(Id);
I am getting the below exception while execute the above line.
org.apache.chemistry.opencmis.commons.exceptions.CmisConnectionException: Parsing exception!
The Exception object does not contain the stackTrace and it contains the cause as below.
org.apache.chemistry.opencmis.commons.exceptions.CmisInvalidArgumentException: Extensions tree too wide!
But, I dont understand what I am missing. I have another drupal application, that pulls the same PDF without any issue. But this issue happens when I do it thru my java program.
Can anyone please help me out find what I am doing wrong?
UPDATE (ATTACHING THE CODE)
SessionFactory sessionFactory = SessionFactoryImpl.newInstance();
Map<String, String> parameter = new HashMap<String, String>();
parameter.put(SessionParameter.USER, "admin");
parameter.put(SessionParameter.PASSWORD, "admin");
parameter.put(SessionParameter.ATOMPUB_URL, "http://192.168.64.130:8080/alfresco/service/cmis");
parameter.put(SessionParameter.BINDING_TYPE, BindingType.ATOMPUB.value());
parameter.put(SessionParameter.LOCALE_ISO3166_COUNTRY, "us");
parameter.put(SessionParameter.LOCALE_ISO639_LANGUAGE, "en");
parameter.put(SessionParameter.LOCALE_VARIANT, "");
Repository soleRepository = (Repository)sessionFactory.getRepositories(parameter).get(0);
Session session = soleRepository.createSession();
String Id = "workspace://SpacesStore/c271a8b1-9fe6-4c43-8b9d-c09935248d18";
CmisObject object = session.getObject(Id);
System.out.println(object);
Look at the following discussion: jeff potts on alfresco forum
Related
I am trying to program a MODULE for the Ignition SDK but I am running into problems with the paths of the strings in the .properties file not working properly.
I have a file called
ProfileSettings.properties
and one called
ProfileSettings.java
In .properties file, I have the following strings:
Category.Settings=Connection
ConnectionString.Name=Connection String
ConnectionString.Desc=Connection String for the IoT Hub device
MaxTime.Name=Maximum time
MaxTime.Desc=The time spent
MaxMessages.Name=Maximum to collect
MaxMessages.Desc=will be collected
and in the .java file, I have reference to the strings by using
public static final StringField connectionString = new StringField(META, "ConnectionString");
public static final IntField maxTime = new IntField(META, "MaxTime");
public static final IntField maxMessages = new IntField(META, "MaxMessages");
Category CONNECTION_CATEGORY = new Category("ProfileSettings.Category.Connection", 1001)
.include(connectionString, maxTime, maxMessages);
but when I load the module into the gateway and look at the configuration page, I get ¿ProfileSettings.ConnectionString.Name? where it shows question marks
around the path and not the actual text needed for all the strings
Maybe try using the complete field names?
public static final StringField connectionString = new StringField(META, "ConnectionString.Name");
Or possibly
public static final StringField connectionStringName = new StringField(META, "ConnectionString.Name");
It would be helpful to have more information about what and where those files are from. Is the .properties file or properties.java something you wrote or is that something that comes as part of the SDK?
We're trying to send a signed, partially encrypted SOAP message to the IRS using CXF. We think we're following all their instructions but there are ambiguities. Some of the Signature and Encryption properties could be set in several ways, but none of the permutations I've tried get us past the dreaded "TPE1122" error (WS Security Header invalid). If anyone has done this successfully, is there some property we're failing to set? I'm especially unsure about the encryption algorithm setting and whether the whole element should be encrypted or just the 3 header elements within it. Thanks.
BulkRequestTransmitterService ss = new BulkRequestTransmitterService(wsdlURL, SERVICE_NAME);
BulkRequestTransmitterPortType port = ss.getBulkRequestTransmitterPort();
org.apache.cxf.endpoint.Client client = ClientProxy.getClient(port);
// set up MTOM
Binding binding = ((BindingProvider)port).getBinding();
((SOAPBinding)binding).setMTOMEnabled(true);
// set output properties
Map<String, Object> outProps = new HashMap<String, Object>();
outProps.put("action", "Timestamp Signature Encrypt");
outProps.put("passwordType", "PasswordDigest");
outProps.put("signatureUser", "[REDACTED]";
outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.SIG_KEY_ID, "X509KeyIdentifier");
outProps.put("passwordCallbackClass", "UTPasswordCallback");
outProps.put("encryptionUser", "irs");
outProps.put("encryptionPropFile", "encryption.properties");
outProps.put("encryptionKeyIdentifier", "DirectReference");
outProps.put("encryptionKeyTransportAlgorithm", "http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#rsa-oaep-mgf1p");
// ENC_SYM_ALGO: what is the default? what should correct value be? and are these two lines equivalent?
outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.ENC_SYM_ALGO, WSConstants.TRIPLE_DES);
outProps.put("encryptionSymAlgorithm", "http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#tripledes-cbc");
// do we encrypt each of the three signed headers, or entire Signature element? have tried it both ways
outProps.put("encryptionParts",
//"{Element}{" + WSU_NS + "}Timestamp;"
//+"{Element}{urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0}ACATransmitterManifestReqDtl;"
//+"{Element}{urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0}ACABusinessHeader;");
"{Element}{http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#}Signature;");
outProps.put("signaturePropFile", "signature.properties");
outProps.put("signatureAlgorithm", "http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1");
outProps.put("signatureParts",
"{Element}{" + WSU_NS + "}Timestamp;"
+ "{Element}{urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0}ACATransmitterManifestReqDtl;"
+ "{Element}{urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0}ACABusinessHeader;");
outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.SIG_C14N_ALGO, "http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments");
// is "Direct Reference" preferable? have tried it both ways
outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.ENC_KEY_ID, "X509KeyIdentifier");
outProps.put("timeToLive", "600"); // = 10 min
outProps.put(WSHandlerConstants.MUST_UNDERSTAND, "false");
WSS4JOutInterceptor wssOut = new WSS4JOutInterceptor(outProps);
client.getOutInterceptors().add(wssOut);
// add gzip interceptor
GZIPOutInterceptor gz = new GZIPOutInterceptor();
gz.setForce(true);
client.getOutInterceptors().add(gz);
[ create & populate Manifest Detail here]
Header detailHeader = new Header(new QName("urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0", "ACATransmitterManifestReqDtl"), aCATrnsmtManifestReqDtlType,
new JAXBDataBinding(ACATrnsmtManifestReqDtlType.class));
headers.add(detailHeader);
Header businessHeader = new Header(new QName("urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0", "ACABusinessHeader"), aCABulkBusinessHeaderRequestType,
new JAXBDataBinding(ACABulkBusinessHeaderRequestType.class));
headers.add(businessHeader);
// add headers to Request
client.getRequestContext().put(Header.HEADER_LIST, headers);
// add namespaces:
Map<String, String> nsMap = new HashMap<>();
nsMap.put("soapenv", "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/");
nsMap.put("urn", "urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:ext:aca:air:7.0");
nsMap.put("urn1", "urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:common");
nsMap.put("urn2", "urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:msg:acabusinessheader");
nsMap.put("urn3", "urn:us:gov:treasury:irs:msg:irsacabulkrequesttransmitter");
nsMap.put("urn4", "http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd");
client.getRequestContext().put("soap.env.ns.map", nsMap);
// then transmit, get TPE1122 error in Response
Bulit in CXF security will not work in IRS submission. You need to code your interceptors for matching IRS requirements.
I have a sample project ready, which can do submission and status requests. This is by no means a production code, but can be a starting point
https://github.com/sangramjadhav/irsclient
Please see application.yml file. You need to provide keystore and other configuration for submission to IRS
Thanks to both responders for your feedback. We have it working now and the main problem was that we were not supposed to use encryption. Everything in the sample I posted worked (including using CXF to sign certain parts of the header), but the encryption had to be removed.
It is indeed quite difficult to get everything right when transmitting to the IRS AIR system. The next hurdle was solved by changing a namespace in one of the wsdl-generated files, and then it went through, but their Linux system's value for the file size was 2 chars smaller than our Windows system's value - the culprit was the trailing CRLF.
I would be happy to answer specific questions if anyone is trying to do this as we did, using Java, Apache-CXF, and Windows.
Using Alfresco 5.0 community edition.
When trying to deploy the custom model provided in the answer to another question,
but using the dynamic deployment approach as specified at [http://docs.alfresco.com/5.0/tasks/deploy-dynamic.html]
Although the GUI says the model is "activated", I get the following WARN in the alfresco.log:
21:24:30,587 WARN [org.alfresco.repo.dictionary.DictionaryDAO] [ajp-apr-8009-exec-4]
org.alfresco.service.cmr.dictionary.DictionaryException:
00140008 Model '{custom.model}custommodel' does not exist
When I try to use it with CMIS 1.1, I'm getting an error back from the web service:
Type 'P:cmod:customDoc' is unknown!
Here is the relevant bit of the code which uses opencmis java api:
Map<String, Object> props = new HashMap<String, Object>();
props.put("cmis:objectTypeId", "cmis:document");
props.put("cmis:secondaryObjectTypeIds", Arrays.asList(new String[] {"P:cm:titled", "P:cmod:customDoc"}));
props.put("cmis:name", "myName");
props.put("cmod:property1", "value1");
ObjectId id = folder.createDocument(props, contentStream, VersioningState.MAJOR);
Am I specifying the namespace and aspect correctly (P:cmod:customDoc)? I've also tried cmod:aspectBase and other combinations, getting the same error.
My goal is to make a simple model where I can add a few extra fields to document objects (extending the default ContentModel).
It seems the warning is just that, it can be ignored.
But using CMIS 1.1, I have to do two steps to add in the extra properties from the custom aspect. (Trying to do it in one step gives the error "Type 'P:cmod:customDoc' is unknown!")
First createDocument() with the cmis:secondaryObjectTypeIds including the custom namespace, BUT don't add any custom properties.
Second, add the custom properties to the resulting document, and then updateProperties(). This will add in the custom property values to the document.
Map<String, Object> props = new HashMap<String, Object>();
props.put("cmis:objectTypeId", "cmis:document");
props.put("cmis:secondaryObjectTypeIds",
Arrays.asList(new String[] {"P:cm:titled", "P:cmod:customDoc"}));
props.put("cmis:name", "myName");
Document document = folder.createDocument(props, contentStream, VersioningState.MAJOR);
props = new HashMap<String, Object>();
props.put("cmod:property1", "value1"); //here is where you add the custom properties
document = (Document) document.updateProperties(properties);
(note: you need to reassign the document from the updateProperties result, otherwise it will be missing some information, such as parents)
I am invoking the Tridion 2011 SP1 core service via the shipped client assembly. When I attempt to list the contents of a publication, I get an exception.
The code (simplified) looks like this:
ItemsFilterData filter = new Tridion.ContentManager.CoreService
.Client.RepositoryItemsFilterData.RepositoryItemsFilterData();
filter.ItemTypes = new ItemType[] {
ItemType.Folder,
ItemType.StructureGroup
};
filter.Recursive = false;
IEnumerable<IdentifiableObjectData> childItems = core.GetList("tcm:0-15-1", filter);
Note: the variable "core" refers to an ISessionAwareCoreService which I can successfully use to call, for example core.GetSystemWideList()
When .GetList is invoked, I get the following exception:
System.ServiceModel.FaultException`1 was unhandled
Message=Unexpected list type:
Tridion.ContentManager.Data.ContentManagement.RepositoryItemsFilterData.
What are the possible causes of this problem? Can you suggest a good general approach for interpreting this kind of message?
You can't get the direct children of a Publication using GetList. Instead you should just load the PublicationData with a client.Read and then access the RootFolder and RootStructureGroup on that.
PublicationData pub = (PublicationData)core.Read("tcm:0-1-1", new ReadOptions());
string rootFolder = pub.RootFolder.IdRef;
string rootSG = pub.RootStructureGroup.IdRef;
Alternatively you can call GetListXml with your RepositoryItemsFilterData and extract the items from the XML yourself.
XElement listResult = core.GetListXml(parent.ID, filter);
I am making an app that runs in the background, and starts on device boot.
I have read the docs, and have the SQLiteDemo files from RIM, and I am using them to try create a database on my SD Card in the simulator.
Unfortunately, I am getting this error:
DatabasePathException:Invalid path name. Path does not contains a proper root list. See FileSystemRegistry class for details.
Here's my code:
public static Database storeDB;
public static final String DATABASE_NAME = "testDB";
private String DATABASE_LOCATION = "file:///SDCard/Databases/MyDBFolder/";
public static URI dbURI;
dbURI = URI.create(DATABASE_LOCATION+DATABASE_NAME);
storeDB = DatabaseFactory.openOrCreate(dbURI);
I took out a try/catch for URI.create and DatabaseFactory.openOrCreate for the purposes of this post.
So, can anyone tell me why I can't create a database on my simulator?
If I load it up and go into media, I can create a folder manually. The SD card is pointing to a folder on my hard drive, and if I create a folder in there, it is shown on the simulator too, so I can create folders, just not programatically.
Also, I have tried this from the developer docs:
// Determine if an SDCard is present
boolean sdCardPresent = false;
String root = null;
Enumeration enum = FileSystemRegistry.listRoots();
while (enum.hasMoreElements())
{
root = (String)enum.nextElement();
System.err.println("root="+root);
if(root.equalsIgnoreCase("sdcard/"))
{
sdCardPresent = true;
}
}
But it only picks up store/ and never sdcard/.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
FYI,
I think I resolved this.
The problem was I was trying to write to storage during boot-up, but the storage wasn't ready. Once the device/simulator was loaded, and a few of my listeners were triggered, the DB was created.
See here:
http://www.blackberry.com/knowledgecenterpublic/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/348583/800332/832062/How_To_-_Write_safe_initialization_code.html?nodeid=1487426&vernum=0