So I would like to be able to have a print button for entries in our database so users can print an entry via a print friendly "form".
My thought was to create a separate page, add labels and have those labels pull the relevant information.
I know I can add the open widget information via this code:
app.datasources.ModelName.selectKey(widget.datasource.item._key);
app.showPage(app.pages.TestPrint);
But I'm running into a few problems:
I can't get the page to open in a new window. Is this possible?
window.open(app.pages.TestPrint);
Just gives me a blank page. Does the browser lose the widget source once the new window opens?
I can't get the print option (either onClick or onDataLoad) to print JUST the image (or widget). I run
window.print();
And it includes headers + scroll bars. Do I need to be running a client side script instead?
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!
To get exactly what you'd want you'd have to do a lot of work.
Here is my suggested, simpler answer:
Don't open up a new tab. If you use showPage like you mention, and provide a "back" button on the page to go back to where you were, you'll get pretty much everything you need. If you don't want the back to show up when you print, then you can setVisibility(false) on the button before you print, then print, then setVisibility(true).
I'll give a quick summary of how you could do this with a new tab, but it's pretty involved so I can't go into details without trying it myself. The basic idea, is you want to open the page with a full URL, just like a user was navigating to it.
You can use #TestPrint to indicate which page you want to load. You also need the URL of your application, which as far as I can remember is only available in a server-side script using the Apps Script method: ScriptApp.getService().getUrl(). On top of this, you'll probably need to pass in the key so that your page knows what data to load.
So given this, you need to assemble a url by calling a server script, then appending the key property to it. In the end you want a url something like:
https://www.script.google.com/yourappaddress#TestPage?key=keyOfYourModel.
Then on TestPage you need to read the key, and load data for that key. (You can read the key using google.script.url).
Alternatively, I think there are some tricks you can play by opening a blank window and then writing directly to its DOM, but I've never tried that, and since Apps Script runs inside an iframe I'm not sure if it's possible. If I get a chance I'll play with it and update this answer, but for your own reference you could look here: create html page and print to new tab in javascript
I'm imagining something like that, except that your page an write it's html content. Something like:
var winPrint = window.open('', '_blank', 'left=0,top=0,width=800,height=600,toolbar=0,scrollbars=0,status=0');
winPrint.document.write(app.pages.TestPage.getElement().innerHTML);
winPrint.document.close();
winPrint.focus();
winPrint.print();
winPrint.close();
Hope one of those three options helps :)
So here is what I ended up doing. It isn't elegant, but it works.
I added a Print Button to a Page Fragment that pops up when a user edits a database entry.
Database Edit Button code:
app.datasources.ModelName.selectKey(widget.datasource.item._key);
app.showDialog(app.pageFragments.FragmentName);
That Print Button goes to a different (full) Page and closes the Fragment.
Print Button Code:
app.datasources.ModelName.selectKey(widget.datasource.item._key);
app.showPage(app.pages.ModelName_Print);
app.closeDialog();
I made sure to make the new Print Page was small enough so that Chrome fits it properly into a 8.5 x 11" page (728x975).
I then created a Panel that fills the page and populated the page with Labels
#datasource.item.FieldName
I then put the following into the onDataLoad for the Panel
window.print();
So now when the user presses the Print Button in the Fragment they are taken to this new page and after the data loads they automatically get a print dialog.
The only downside is that after printing the user has to use a back button I added to return to the database page.
1.
As far as I know, you cannot combine window.open with app.pages.*, because
window.open would require url parameter at least, while app.pages.* is essentially an internal routing mechanism provided by App Maker, and it returns page object back, suitable for for switching between pages, or opening dialogs.
2.
You would probably need to style your page first, so like it includes things you would like to have printed out. To do so please use #media print
ex: We have a button on the page and would like to hide it from print page
#media print {
.app-NewPage-Button1 {
display : none;
}
}
Hope it helps.
1. Here is how it is done, in a pop up window, without messing up the current page (client script):
function print(widget, title){
var content=widget.getElement().innerHTML;
var win = window.open('', 'printWindow', 'height=600,width=800');
win.document.write('<head><title>'+title+'/title></head>');
win.document.write('<body>'+content+'</body>');
win.document.close();
win.focus();
win.print();
win.close();
}
and the onclick handler for the button is:
print(widget.root.descendants.PageFragment1, 'test');
In this example, PageFragment1 is a page fragment on the current page, hidden by adding a style with namehidden with definition .hidden{display:none;} (this is different than visible which in App Maker seems to remove the item from the DOM). Works perfectly...
2. You cannot open pages from the app in another tab. In principle something like this would do it:
var w=window.parent.parent;
w.open(w.location.protocol+'//'+w.location.host+w.location.pathname+'#PrintPage', '_blank');
But since the app is running in frame nested two deep from the launching page, and with a different origin, you will not be able to access the url that you need (the above code results in a cross origin frame access error). So you would have to hard code the URL, which changes at deployment, so it gets ugly very fast. Not that you want to anyway, the load time of an app should discourage you from wanting to do that anyway.
I am using GWT FormPanel to submit a POST request to a servlet which renders a pdf. The screen I am using to post have got a pop up with yes, no and preview button. yes and preview would open a pdf in new tab in browser.
The problem is when I use IE11 and clicks on preview it opens up a pdf well, I dont close the tab go back to previous screen and clicks yes, again request reaches to servlet but this time all the request parameters are null.
If the pdf tab is closed and then I click on yes it again works fine. This is an issue with IE11, works fine with Chrome. Any Ideas ?
If I change it to GET it works fine but I have a huge data that needs to be passed to servlet.
here is a code snippet :
formPanel.setBodyBorder(false);
formPanel.setBorders(false);
formPanel.setHeaderVisible(true);
formPanel.setAction(someURL+ "/someServlet");
formPanel.setMethod(Method.POST);
formPanel.setTarget("somePDF");
formPanel.setId("report");
HiddenField<String> hddnF = new HiddenField<String>();
hddnF.setName("Yogi");
hddnF.setValue("Value is set...");
formPanel.add(hddnF);
formPanel.submit();
Have overridden setTarget to show result(pdf) into new popup/tab
public native void setTarget(String target)/*-{
this.#com.extjs.gxt.ui.client.widget.form.FormPanel::setTarget(Ljava/lang/String;)(target);
}-*/;
I'm using Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager. I'm on Chrome and checking tags using Google Tag Assistant.
I've noticed that for many, if not most of the events I have tagged, the parameters will not pass through unless the link or key webpage they are clicking on opens in a new tab.
In HttpFox the result is a NS_BINDING_ERROR or something along those lines.
For example, if you visit this site, you can see there are two means of navigating to the "submit report" page - the CTA on the top right and in the main nav. I'd like to understand how the CTA performs compared to the main nav so have set up events, but the event only fires if I open the links in new tabs.
What does this error mean and what should I do about it?
To get rid of the ns binding error, have the onclick return false - Documentation Here.
In regards to the event not getting passed, I'm seeing in httpfox that the tid (on the event) is UA-34035531-[1-6]. That doesn't look quite right. How are you setting the account id?
I'm working in ASP.NET (2.0) and we have a page where a user is able to select and download a series of files as a zip. I got this to work without undo difficulty by using the DotNetZip library (which is probably not relevant to the problem, but included for completeness.)
After the user checks which files they want to download, the page does a postback, and in the button click event handler, I use the following code:
Response.Clear();
Response.BufferOutput = false; // false = stream immediately
Response.ContentType = "application/zip";
Response.AddHeader("content-disposition", "filename=FileRequest.zip");
using (ZipFile zip = new ZipFile())
{
zip.AddFile(MapPath("/datafiles/fileToZip.pdf"), "");
zip.Save(Response.OutputStream);
}
Response.Close();
And this all seems to work great. The user clicks the button, a download window pops up, the user downloads the zip. All is good...
...until they decide they want to do something else on the page. The buttons in the form are no longer responsive. For instance, if I click the download button again, it does nothing. If I reload the page, I can repeat this behavior...it works once, then does nothing.
I'm not understanding why the browser doesn't send the new request. It's not "spinning" or otherwise acting busy. I thought that this might be a browser issue, but I've repeated it in both IE and Firefox, so it seems likely that it's something I'm not understanding. Strangely, it's only form submission elements that seem to be non-responsive. Javascript still works, and so do regular links.
So why is this happening, and how do I get around it?
The problem is likely down to you returning;
Response.ContentType = "application/zip";
Once this has been sent (along with the actual content), the browser would assume it has nothing left to do (I believe).
You probably should create a new window specifically for downloading the files by saving the file selection in a session parameter (or equivalent) and opening a popup window that has your download code in.
This will leave the parent page in a suitable state.
Content-disposition header seems to be a discouraged solution. But the same effect of ASP.NET forms not being responsive occurs if you use standard Redirect to a zip file.
I solved very similar problem (returning *.csv files by the server for download) using Tančev Saša's code in "Response.Redirect to new window" Q&A and it works great. Perhaps it might produce some popup warnings in some browsers, but I think this is how it's often done in download sites.
Is it possible to get up to date contents from an iframe? Lemme explain the problem I am encountering:
function modify_iframe(url){
my_iframe.src = url;
iframe_content = my_iframe.contentDocument;
//....code to modify the content goes here,,,,
}
The first time I call modify_iframe(url_a) it sets the source as I would expect but the iframe_content is a blank document.
The second time I run modify_iframe(url_b) it sets the source as I would expect but the iframe_content is actually that of url_a.
So it seems that contentDocument is not returning the contents of the new source, but rather the source before it was changed. Anyone know why that is and if there is a way around it?
Additional background info: We have been adding an event listener to fire off on the iframe load event which occurs when the src is changed. This was giving us the contents when calling contentDocument; however, users were being prompted that our site had unauthenticated content even though we use https for everything including the src. After removing the event listener we no longer receive the unauthenticated content warning, but the contentDocument of our iframe is always one step behind as described above.
Um, first try using a setTimeout to wait for the page content to load. But that's not a nice solution. What browser are you testing on? If it were me I would try to get to the bottom of the "unauthenticated content" error prompt.