I want to create 3 graphs in ggplot2 as follows:
ggplot(observbest,aes(x=factor(iteration),y=bottles,colour=Team ,group=Team)) + geom_line() + scale_colour_gradientn(colours=rainbow(16))
ggplot(observmedium,aes(x=factor(iteration),y=bottles,colour=Team ,group=Team)) + geom_line() + scale_colour_gradientn(colours=rainbow(16))
ggplot(observweak,aes(x=factor(iteration),y=bottles,colour=Team ,group=Team)) + geom_line() + scale_colour_gradientn(colours=rainbow(16))
That is, three graphs displaying the same thing but for difference dataset each time. I want to compare between them, therefore I want their y axis to be fixed to the same scale with the same margins on all graphs, something the currently doesn't happen automatically.
Any suggestion?
Thanks
It sounds like a facet_wrap on all the observations, combined into a single dataframe, might be what you're looking for. E.g.
library(plyr)
library(ggplot2)
observ <- rbind(
mutate(observbest, category = "best"),
mutate(observmedium, category = "medium"),
mutate(observweak, category = "weak")
)
qplot(iteration, bottles, data = observ, geom = "line") + facet_wrap(~category)
Add + ylim(min_value,max_value) to each graph.
Another option would be to merge the three datasets with an id variable identifying which value is in which dataset, and then plot the three of them together, differentiating them by linetype for instance.
Use scale_y_continuous to define the y axis for each graph and make them all easily comparable.
Related
So I'm self-teaching myself R right now using this online resource: "https://r4ds.had.co.nz/data-visualisation.html#facets"
This particular section is going over the use of facet_wrap and facet_grid. It's clear to me that facet_grid is primarily used when wanting to visualize a plot along two additional dimensions, rather than just one. What I don't understand is why you can use facet_grid(.~variable) or facet_grid(variable~.) to basically achieve the same result as facet_wrap. Putting a "." in place of a variable results in just not faceting along the row or column dimension, or in other words showing 1 additional variable just as facet_wrap would do.
If anyone can shed some light on this, thank you!
If you use facet_grid, the facets will always be in one row/column. They will never wrap to make a rectangle. But really if you just have one variable with few levels, it doesn't much matter.
You can also see that facet_grid(.~variable) and facet_grid(variable~.) will put the facet labels in different places (row headings vs column headings)
mg <- ggplot(mtcars, aes(x = mpg, y = wt)) + geom_point()
mg + facet_grid(vs~ .) + labs(title="facet_grid(vs~ .)"),
mg + facet_grid(.~ vs) + labs(title="facet_grid(.~ vs)")
So in the most simple of cases, there's nothing that different between them. The main reason to use facet_grid is to have a single, common axis for all facets so you can easily scan across all panels to make a direct comparison of data.
Actually, the same result is not produced all the time...
The number of facets which appear across the graphs pane is fixed with facet_grid (always the number of unique values in the variable) where as facet_wrap, like its name suggests, wraps the facets around the graphics pane. In this way the functions only result in the same graph when the number of facets produced is small.
Both facet_grid and facet_wrap take their arguments in the form row~columns, and nowdays we don't need to use the dot with facet_grid.
In order to compare their differences let's add a new variable with 8 unqiue values to the mtcars data set:
library(tidyverse)
mtcars$example <- rep(1:8, length.out = 32)
ggplot()+
geom_point(data = mtcars, aes(x = mpg, y = wt))+
facet_grid(~example, labeller = label_both)
Which results in a cluttered plot:
Compared to:
ggplot()+
geom_point(data = mtcars, aes(x = mpg, y = wt))+
facet_wrap(~example, labeller = label_both)
Which results in:
I'm trying to create a stacked barchart with gene sequencing data, where for each gene there is a tRF.type and Amino.Acid value. An example data set looks like this:
tRF <- c('tRF-26-OB1690PQR3E', 'tRF-27-OB1690PQR3P', 'tRF-30-MIF91SS2P46I')
tRF.type <- c('5-tRF', 'i-tRF', '3-tRF')
Amino.Acid <- c('Ser', 'Lys', 'Ser')
tRF.data <- data.frame(tRF, tRF.type, Amino.Acid)
I would like the x-axis to represent the amino acid type, the y-axis the number of counts of each tRF type and the the fill of the bars to represent each tRF type.
My code is:
ggplot(chart_data, aes(x = Amino.Acid, y = tRF.type, fill = tRF.type)) +
geom_bar(stat="identity") +
ggtitle("LAN5 - 4 days post CNTF treatment") +
xlab("Amino Acid") +
ylab("tRF type")
However, it generates this graph, where the y-axis is labelled with the categories of tRF type. How can I change my code so that the y-axis scale is numerical and represents the counts of each tRF type?
Barchart
OP and Welcome to SO. In future questions, please, be sure to provide a minimal reproducible example - meaning provide code, an image (if possible), and at least a representative dataset that can demonstrate your question or problem clearly.
TL;DR - don't use stat="identity", just use geom_bar() without providing a stat, since default is to use the counts. This should work:
ggplot(chart_data, aes(x = Amino.Acid, fill = tRF.type)) + geom_bar()
The dataset provided doesn't adequately demonstrate your issue, so here's one that can work. The example data herein consists of 100 observations and two columns: one called Capitals for randomly-selected uppercase letters and one Lowercase for randomly-selected lowercase letters.
library(ggplot2)
set.seed(1234)
df <- data.frame(
Capitals=sample(LETTERS, 100, replace=TRUE),
Lowercase=sample(letters, 100, replace=TRUE)
)
If I plot similar to your code, you can see the result:
ggplot(df, aes(x=Capitals, y=Lowercase, fill=Lowercase)) +
geom_bar(stat="identity")
You can see, the bars are stacked, but the y axis is all smooshed down. The reason is related to understanding the difference between geom_bar() and geom_col(). Checking the documentation for these functions, you can see that the main difference is that geom_col() will plot bars with heights equal to the y aesthetic, whereas geom_bar() plots by default according to stat="count". In fact, using geom_bar(stat="identity") is really just a complicated way of saying geom_col().
Since your y aesthetic is not numeric, ggplot still tries to treat the discrete levels numerically. It doesn't really work out well, and it's the reason why your axis gets smooshed down like that. What you want, is geom_bar(stat="count").... which is the same as just using geom_bar() without providing a stat=.
The one problem is that geom_bar() only accepts an x or a y aesthetic. This means you should only give it one of them. This fixes the issue and now you get the proper chart:
ggplot(df, aes(x=Capitals, fill=Lowercase)) + geom_bar()
You want your y-axis to be a count, not tRF.type. This code should give you the correct plot: I've removed the y = tRF.type from ggplot(), and stat = "identity from geom_bar() (it is using the default value of stat = "count instead).
ggplot(tRF.data, aes(x = Amino.Acid, fill = tRF.type)) +
geom_bar() +
ggtitle("LAN5 - 4 days post CNTF treatment") +
xlab("Amino Acid") +
ylab("tRF type")
I would like to make a graph in R, which I managed to make in excel. It is a bargraph with species on the x-axis and the log number of observations on the y-axis. My current data structure in R is not suitable (I think) to make this graph, but I do not know how to change this (in a smart way).
I have (amongst others) a column 'camera_site' (site 1, site2..), 'species' (agouti, paca..), 'count'(1, 2..), with about 50.000 observations.
I tried making a dataframe with a column 'species" (with 18 species) and a column with 'log(total observation)' for each species (see dataframe) But then I can only make a point graph.
this is how I would like the graph to look:
desired graph made in excel
Your data seems to be in the correct format from what I can tell from your screenshot.
The minimum amount of code you would need to get a plot like that would be the following, assuming your data.frame is called df:
ggplot(df, aes(VRM_species, log_obs_count_vrm)) +
geom_col()
Many people intuitively try geom_bar(), but geom_col() is equivalent to geom_bar(stat = "identity"), which you would use if you've pre-computed observations and don't need ggplot to do the counting for you.
But you could probably decorate the plot a bit better with some additions:
ggplot(df, aes(VRM_species, log_obs_count_vrm)) +
geom_col() +
scale_x_discrete(name = "Species") +
scale_y_continuous(name = expression("Log"[10]*" Observations"),
expand = c(0,0,0.1,0)) +
theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 90))
Of course, you could customize the theme anyway you would like.
Groetjes
I want to compare the distribution of several variables (here X1 and X2) with a single value (here bm). The issue is that these variables are too many (about a dozen) to use a single boxplot.
Additionaly the levels are too different to use one plot. I need to use facets to make things more organised:
However with this plot my benchmark category (bm), which is a single value in X1 and X2, does not appear in X1 and seems to have several values in X2. I want it to be only this green line, which it is in the first plot. Any ideas why it changes? Is there any good workaround? I tried the options of facet_wrap/facet_grid, but nothing there delivered the right result.
I also tried combining a bar plot with bm and three empty categories with the boxplot. But firstly it looked terrible and secondly it got similarly screwed up in the facetting. Basically any work around would help.
Below the code to create the minimal example displayed here:
# Creating some sample data & loading libraries
library(ggplot2)
library(RColorBrewer)
set.seed(10111)
x=matrix(rnorm(40),20,2)
y=rep(c(-1,1),c(10,10))
x[y==1,]=x[y==1,]+1
x[,2]=x[,2]+20
df=data.frame(x,y)
# creating a benchmark point
benchmark=data.frame(y=rep("bm",2),key=c("X1","X2"),value=c(-0.216936,20.526312))
# melting the data frame, rbinding it with the benchmark
test_dat=rbind(tidyr::gather(df,key,value,-y),benchmark)
# Creating a plot
p_box <- ggplot(data = test_dat, aes(x=key, y=value,color=as.factor(test_dat$y))) +
geom_boxplot() + scale_color_manual(name="Cluster",values=brewer.pal(8,"Set1"))
# The first line delivers the first plot, the second line the second plot
p_box
p_box + facet_wrap(~key,scales = "free",drop = FALSE) + theme(legend.position = "bottom")
The problem only lies int the use of test_dat$y inside the color aes. Never use $ in aes, ggplot will mess up.
Anyway, I think you plot would improve if you use a geom_hline for the benchmark, instead of hacking in a single value boxplot:
library(ggplot2)
library(RColorBrewer)
ggplot(tidyr::gather(df,key,value,-y)) +
geom_boxplot(aes(x=key, y=value, color=as.factor(y))) +
geom_hline(data = benchmark, aes(yintercept = value), color = '#4DAF4A', size = 1) +
scale_color_manual(name="Cluster",values=brewer.pal(8,"Set1")) +
facet_wrap(~key,scales = "free",drop = FALSE) +
theme(legend.position = "bottom")
Using ggplot2 I have made facetted histograms using the following code.
library(ggplot2)
library(plyr)
df1 <- data.frame(monthNo = rep(month.abb[1:5],20),
classifier = c(rep("a",50),rep("b",50)),
values = c(seq(1,10,length.out=50),seq(11,20,length.out=50))
)
means <- ddply (df1,
c(.(monthNo),.(classifier)),
summarize,
Mean=mean(values)
)
ggplot(df1,
aes(x=values, colour=as.factor(classifier))) +
geom_histogram() +
facet_wrap(~monthNo,ncol=1) +
geom_vline(data=means, aes(xintercept=Mean, colour=as.factor(classifier)),
linetype="dashed", size=1)
The vertical line showing means per month is to stay.
But I want to also add text over these vertical lines displaying the mean values for each month. These means are from the 'means' data frame.
I have looked at geom_text and I can add text to plots. But it appears my circumstance is a little different and not so easy. It's a lot simpler to add text in some cases where you just add values of the plotted data points. But cases like this when you want to add the mean and not the value of the histograms I just can't find the solution.
Please help. Thanks.
Having noted the possible duplicate (another answer of mine), the solution here might not be as (initially/intuitively) obvious. You can do what you need if you split the geom_text call into two (for each classifier):
ggplot(df1, aes(x=values, fill=as.factor(classifier))) +
geom_histogram() +
facet_wrap(~monthNo, ncol=1) +
geom_vline(data=means, aes(xintercept=Mean, colour=as.factor(classifier)),
linetype="dashed", size=1) +
geom_text(y=0.5, aes(x=Mean, label=Mean),
data=means[means$classifier=="a",]) +
geom_text(y=0.5, aes(x=Mean, label=Mean),
data=means[means$classifier=="b",])
I'm assuming you can format the numbers to the appropriate precision and place them on the y-axis where you need to with this code.