In Stylus it's as easy as split('1/2', '/')[0] (which will split a string value at a certain delimiter, in the example it would return 1), in Sass I needed a huge function to do it. I don't see a way to natively do this in LESS or a function for doing this anywhere.
Anyone know of a way to do this?
It's silly more of these functions aren't built into preprocessors.
You should possible also explain why you need the split function.
Since Less version 2 you can easily add your own functions, see How to exend the Less compiler with a custom function leveraging a plugin
You should be able to add a split function which returns a list. As already explained by #Amadan you can use this list with loops and the built-in list functions.
Related
I'm trying to declare an array in R, something logically equivalent to the following Java code:
Object[][] array = new Object[6][32]
After I declare this array, I plan to loop over the indices and assign values to them.
I am not familiar with what you are planning on doing in R, but loops are generally not recommended. I would say this is especially true when you don't know the length of the output.
You might want to find a "vectorized" solution first and if not, then using something in the apply family might also be helpful
Disclaimer: I am certain there is more nuance to this discussion based on what I have read, so I don't want to claim to be an expert on this subject.
Help files call attributes() a function. Its syntax looks like a function call. Even class(attributes) calls it a function.
But I see I can assign something to attributes(myobject), which seems unusual. For example, I cannot assign anything to log(myobject).
So what is the proper name for "functions" like attributes()? Are there any other examples of it? How do you tell them apart from regular functions? (Other than trying supposedfunction(x)<-0, that is.)
Finally, I guess attributes() implementation overrides the assignment operator, in order to become a destination for assignments. Am I right? Is there any usable guide on how to do it?
Very good observation Indeed. It's an example of replacement function, if you see closely and type apropos('attributes') in your R console, It will return
"attributes"
"attributes<-"
along with other outputs.
So, basically the place where you are able to assign on the left sign of assignment operator, you are not calling attributes, you are actually calling attributes<- , There are many functions in R like that for example: names(), colnames(), length() etc. In your example log doesn't have any replacement counterpart hence it doesn't work the way you anticipated.
Definiton(from advanced R book link given below):
Replacement functions act like they modify their arguments in place,
and have the special name xxx<-. They typically have two arguments (x
and value), although they can have more, and they must return the
modified object
If you want to see the list of these functions you can do :
apropos('<-$') and you can check out similar functions, which has similar kind of properties.
You can read about it here and here
I am hopeful that this solves your problem.
Every time I miss spell this at(#) character while writing R code so what is the usage as it has a special colour so I supposed it was meant to do something useful. Any comments on that?
The "at"-sign is used to access S4 slots. It is the equivalent of the "dollar"-sign used to access lists (of which data.frames are but one example.)
On the other hand you might be talking about its special use in certain external packages? But I'm guessing that's not going to be the case here, because that would imply that you knew quite about about R.
I know that while and if functions in R are not vectorised. while and if functions help us selectively work on some rows based on some condition. I also know that the apply function in R is used to apply over the columns and hence it operates on all rows of columns that we wish to put apply on. Can I use apply() along with user defined functions and/or with while/if loop to conditionally use it over some rows rather than all rows as apply function usually does.
Note :- This core issue here is to bypass the drawback on non-vectorization of while/if loops in R.
You can supply user defined functions to apply using an argument FUN = function(x) user_defined_function(x) {}. And apply is "vectorized" in sense that as argument it accept vectors, not scalars (but its implementation is heavily using for and if loops, type apply without arguments in your console). So for and apply are of the same perfomance.
However you can break the execution of user defined function throwing exception with stop and wrapping in tryCatch it is a non-recommended technique (it influences environements, call stacks, scopes etc., make debugging difficult and lead to errors which are difficult to identify).
Better to use for and if and very often it is the most easiest and effective way (to write a recursive function, taking in consideration that (tail) recursion is not really optimized for R, or fully refactor your algorithm quite difficult and time consuming).
I am trying to manage multiple files in R but am having a difficult time of it. I want to take the data in each of these files and manipulate them through a series of steps (all files receiving the same treatment). I think that I am going about it in a very silly manner though. Is there a way to manage many files (each the same a before) without using 900 apply statements? For example, when is it recommended you merge all the data frames rather that treat each separately? Is there a way to merge more than two, or an uncertain number, as with the way the files are input here? Or is there a better way to handle so many files?
I take files in a standard way:
chosen<-(tk_choose.files(default="", caption="Files:", multi=TRUE, filters=NULL, index=1))
But after that I would like to do several things with the data. As of now I am just apply different things but it is getting confusing. See:
ytrim<-lapply(chosen, function(x) strtrim(y, width=11))
chRead<-lapply(chosen,read.table,header=TRUE)
tmp<-lapply(inputFiles, function(x) stack(fnctn))
etc, etc. This surely can't be the recommended way to go about it. Is there a better way to handle a multitude of files?
You can write one function with all operations, and apply it to all your files like this:
doSomethingWithFile <- function(filename) {
ytrim <- strtrim(filename, width=11))
chRead<- read.table(filename,header=TRUE)
# Return some result
chRead
}
result<-lapply(chosen, doSomethingWithFile)
You will only need to think about how to return the results, as lapply needs to return a list with the same length as the input (chosen, in this case). You could also look at one of the apply functions of the plyr packages for more flexibility.
(BTW: this code is not without errors, but neither is your example... I'll update mine if you give a proper example)