On load I'd like to load the topsection div with a bg image and have it take up the entire screen, but then I have content below it which you can scroll down to. The div should size itself to the window screen only on load and not remain like that on scrolldown. I cannot give the div a position:absolute; either.
I'm banging my head on this one. I've tried a ton of different things
Here is my html:
<div id="topsection" class="row bgimage ">
<div id="logomain" class="mainlogo ">
<div class=" floorplanbuttoncontainer helvetical">
<ul>
<li>Residence A - Duplex</li>
<li>
Residence D - Simplex</li>
</ul>
</div><!-- end floorplanbuttoncontainer -->
</div><!-- end logomain -->
Here is my css for the background image:
.bgimage {
background: url(images/image.jpg) no-repeat center center fixed;
background-size: cover;
.mainlogo {
margin:0 auto;text-align:center;width:100%;height:488px; /*I think this height is messing things up */
background-image:url(images/picture.png);background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-position: center;
}
In order to set a div to take up the entire screen you need to set the height of the body and html element to 100%. You also have to remove the padding and margin from them. Then you create a wrapper class to encase your content and assign it your background-image. Then all ya' gotta do is create the content below your full screen image to scroll into!
Fiddle
Edit
If you run the snippet below and hit full page you can see how it works.
body, html {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
background: red;
}
.full {
width: 100%;
}
.footerThing {
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
background: blue;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="full">
asd
</div>
</div>
<div class="footerThing">
</div>
Modern browsers: a simple way is to use vh units to get the Viewport Height
Just to simplify: jsBin demo
<div id="home" class="container full">
<h1>HOME</h1>
</div>
<div id="about" class="container">
<h1>About us</h1>
<p>Content</p>
</div>
CSS:
.container { min-height:400px; }
.full { height:100vh; }
Crossbrowser: use % instead of vh and simply add html, body{height:100%;} jsBin demo
Related
I have a small Problem. I am trying to make the structure from image. I have the CSS and HTML
.mask-skew {
transform: skewX(-10deg);
/*width: 300px;*/
height: 390px;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 5px;
/*border: 2px solid orange;*/
}
.art-skew {
transform: skewX(10deg);
position: relative;
left: -50%;
}
<div class="row flex--row advertising-row">
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-4 mask-skew">
<img class="art-skew" src="templates/Stordeur/themes/stordeur/images/BarbourSS18Banner_1140x392px.jpg" alt="">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-4 mask-skew">
<img class="art-skew" src="templates/Stordeur/themes/stordeur/images/TeaserWellensteynKopie.jpg" alt="">
</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 col-sm-4 mask-skew">
<img class="art-skew" src="templates/Stordeur/themes/stordeur/images/template_teaser_images_fjallraven.jpg" alt="">
</div>
</div>
But the result is from this Image
How can I obtain the result from first image. The left and right image has straight edge.
You could basicly, skew links and then unskew img.
overflow:hidden will need to be used to cover the whole screen/link.
example
body {margin:0;}
div {
overflow:hidden;
}
nav {
display:flex;
height:100vh;
margin:0 -10vw
}
nav a {
flex:1;
height:100%;
transform:skew(-15deg);
overflow:hidden;
}
nav a + a {
margin-left:3vh;
}
nav a img {
width:140%;
height:100%;
display:block;
/* optionnal */
/*object-fit: cover;
object-position:center center;*/
transform:skew(15deg);
margin:0 -20%; /* in relation with width */
}
<div>
<nav>
<img src="http://www.intrawallpaper.com/static/images/desktop-backgrounds-8656-8993-hd-wallpapers_js7gwWA.jpg">
<img src="https://images.wallpaperscraft.com/image/pool_skyscraper_hotel_124522_1600x1200.jpg">
<img src="https://wallpaperscraft.com/image/dark_background_colorful_paint_47176_300x188.jpg">
</nav>
</div>
object-fit can also help to make sure image fills entire link. it will be clipped.
For the text, it can be added aside img. and centered via flex. pen to play with : https://codepen.io/gc-nomade/pen/vaJzaM
if you want to use background-image and a link on top of it, you may inspire yourself from https://codepen.io/gc-nomade/pen/vGvRPZ/ (turn titles into links)
Both example skew the container, then apply the opposite skew value to unskew content.
Straight edges are made from letting content overflowing but hidden outside edges.
I am having an issue with my divs moving when the page is resized. If you look at the plunker you will see a Header with boxes below. If you resize the workspace by dragging the scroll bar to the left you will see how the page should be. I tried wrapping all items in 1 div named wrapper and tried both relative and absolute positioning with a min-width. I also did the same for body. After inspecting the page with firebug looks like the html tag should have sizing or positioning. That didn't work either (see below). I would like to be able to minimize my screen to 50% and maximize to 250% and keep the same initial layout as if my screen is at 95% based on the wrapper. Any ideas?
Here's plnkr
<html>
body, html{margin:0px; padding:0px; width:100%; min-width: 900px; position:relative}
div.wrapper{ width:95%; min-width: 900px; padding-left: 6px; padding-top:5px; position: relative; }
<body>
<div class="wrapper" >
<div id="header">
<img align="left" style="padding-left:10px; padding-top:5px; width: 80px; height: 65px"><h1> Header</h1>
</div>
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
</div> <!--end wrapper -->
</body>
</html>
you could use percentage and fix min-wheight + set overflow to auto (looks like frameset .. not so nice actually)
Or you could try to relay on box-sizing and use vertical padding on percentage value(it will use parent's width as reference).
floatting pseudo can then, be used and will allow divs to grow taller instead showing a scrollbar.
. {
box-sizing:border-box;
}
.wrapper {
max-width:1300px;
margin:auto; /* ?*/
}
.wrapper #header ~ div {
border:double;
margin:0.4% 0.2%;
padding:5px;
}
#header, .right, .rightbottom {
overflow:hidden;
}
.left {
float:left;
width:30%;
}
.left:before {
content:'';
float:left;
padding-top:204.5%;
}
.right:before, .rightbottom:before {
content:'';
padding-top:30%;
float:left;
}
.wrapper #header ~ div.rightbottom {
border:solid 1px;
}
.rightbottom:before {
padding-top:60%;
}
<div class="wrapper" >
<div id="header">
<img align="left" style="padding-left:10px; padding-top:5px; width: 80px; height: 65px"><h1> Header</h1>
</div>
<div class="left">
</div>
<div class="right" >
<div class="gridStyle" data-ng-grid="gridOptions1">grid</div>
</div>
<div class="rightbottom">right bottom</div>
</div>
http://plnkr.co/edit/K1yOpBOfX3ukqHX7f2oa?p=preview
I'm not too sure of what kind of behavior you look for once there is real stuff in your pages.
If you want the header and the two divs to always have their own row, perhaps you could contain them each in divs that are set to width: 100%?
I saw there are many similar questions, but I can't find one solution working for me.
My page has this structure:
<body>
<div id="whole_page">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="main">
<div id="img_container"></div>
<div id="img_container"></div>
<div id="img_container"></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
My css is:
html,body{
height:100%; width:100%;
padding-top:50px;
}
#whole_page{
height:calc(100%-50px); width:100%;
}
#header{
position:fixed;
height:50px; // header
}
#image_container{
width:100%;
height:30%;
}
I want to set "main" 's height to 100% (window height) minus header height (50px).
Further, I want each div with id "image_container" to be 30% of the "main" div and large 100% of widonws width. So that I have approximately 3 of those div in the page, before needing to scroll.
The problem is that % seem to not work at all. As I didn't write them (tried with Chrome's dev tools).
Actually I am using bootstrap to fill content of header/main but as far as I know this shouldn't give problems with height.
Any clue?
Thanks in advance
Your key problem is that you did not change the height of #main. You also had a miss type between your CSS and HTML, in your CSS you referred to #image_container while in your HTML you used 'id="img_container"'. I change both CSS and HTML to '.img_container' and 'class="img_container"' respectively. I also noticed that you had twice the amount of space at the top than the size needed for your #header since 'padding-top: 50px;' was applied to html and body.
Here is the code:
<div id="whole_page">
<div id="header" style="background-color: yellow;"></div>
<div id="main">
<div class="img_container" style="background-color: red;"></div>
<div class="img_container" style="background-color: blue;"></div>
<div class="img_container" style="background-color: green;"></div>
</div>
</div>
and
html, body {
height:100%;
width:100%;
}
body {
margin: 0;
padding-top:50px;
}
#whole_page {
height: calc(100% - 50px);
width: 100%;
}
#header {
position: fixed;
height: 50px;
width: 100%;
top: 0;
}
#main {
height: 100%;
}
.img_container {
width: 100%;
height: 30%;
}
PS - add color to some of the tags so I could see them. You can just delete the style attribute from the '#header' and '.img_container' tags.
EDIT - Here is a jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/xiondark2008/DJJ2d/
EDIT2 - Just side thought, 'height: calc(100%-50px);' is an invalid property, at least in chrome, however 'height: calc(100% - 50px);' is a valid property, again, at least in chrome.
You can use box-sizing: border-box and padding..
http://jsfiddle.net/jVkL6/
I warned you, I can be a little vague
Anyway, what I am after are those pages that fill the whole screen, but if you scroll down and you come to a different section ( some specific content or just a footer), it breaks away from the previous content by having a different background.
Sorry, if I sleep on it, I can maybe come up whith a better explanation and/or an example page.
Does that style have a name and how is it done? If it needs to be responsive?
thanks
Yes. It's simple to do. Setup like so, and customize to your heart's content.
<div id="header" class="container">
<div class="wrapper">
[...]
</div>
</div>
<div id="feature_area" class="container">
<div class="wrapper">
[...]
</div>
</div>
<div id="content" class="container">
<div class="wrapper">
[...]
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer" class="container">
<div class="wrapper">
[...]
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
}
.wrapper {
margin: 0px auto;
width: 70%;
text-align: left;
}
The parent (container) <div>s will stretch to 100% page width. The child (wrapper) <div>s will stretch to 70% of their parents (or, you can set this to fixed pixel dimensions and change based upon screen dimensions) and will be centered. You apply decorative backgrounds to the parent .container like:
#header {
background: #ff0000;
}
#footer {
background: #000;
}
#content {
background: url(img/bg_pattern.gif);
}
#feature_area {
background: url(img/hero_feature_img.jpg) top center no-repeat;
}
I am working on getting the layout sorted for a pretty simple gallery webapp, but when I use an HTML5 doctype declaration, the height of some of my divs (which were 100%) get shrunk right down, and I can't seem to plump them back up using CSS.
My HTML is at https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16178847/eyewitness/b/index.html and css is at https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16178847/eyewitness/b/style.css
If I remove the HTML5 doctype declaration, all is as I want it to be,
but I really want to use the proper HTML5 doctype declaration.
If I set the doctype to HTML5 and make no changes, the div with the photo and the footer divs are not visible, presumably because they are 0px high.
If I set the doctype to HTML5 and make the body { height: 100px } and .container { height: 100px } or .container { height: 100% }, it becomes visible, but what I need is it to be is full height rather than a height in pixels.
If I try to do the same as above, but with the body { height: 100% } the photo and footer divs are not visible again.
What do I need to do to get it 100% in height so that my photo and footer divs are full height?
Only if the parent element has a defined height, i..e not a value of auto. If that has 100% height, the parent's parent height must be defined, too. This could go until to the html root element.
So set the height of the html and the body element to 100%, as well as every single ancestor element of that element that you wish to have the 100% height in the first place.
See this example, to make it clearer:
html, body, .outer, .inner, .content {
height: 100%;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0;
background-color: rgba(255,0,0,.1);
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner">
<div class="content">
Content
</div>
</div>
</div>
This wouldn't work, if I didn't give 100% height to—say html element:
body, .outer, .inner, .content {
height: 100%;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0;
background-color: rgba(255,0,0,.1);
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner">
<div class="content">
Content
</div>
</div>
</div>
… or .inner
html, body, .outer, .content {
height: 100%;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0;
background-color: rgba(255,0,0,.1);
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner">
<div class="content">
Content
</div>
</div>
</div>
Indeed, to make it work do as follow:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Vertical Scrolling Demo</title>
<style>
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: white;
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
.page {
min-height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="nav" class="page">
<ul>
<li>About</li>
<li>Portfolio</li>
<li>Contact</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="page1" class="page">
<h1><a name="about">about</a></h1>
About page content goes here.
</div>
<div id="page2" class="page">
<h1><a name="portfolio">portfolio</a></h1>
Portfolio page content goes here.
</div>
<div id="page3" class="page">
<h1><a name="contact">contact</a></h1>
Contact page content goes here.
</div>
</body>
</html>
I got stuck into a similar problema to size a canvas, so here is what i did and worked perfectly.
Besides doing the:
body{ width: 100%; height: 100%;}
Set the desired element like this:
.desired-element{ width: 100vw; height: 100vh}
In that way you are assured to have 100% of the view port in width and height.
vw stands for viewwidth
and
vh stands for viewheight
I hope this helps someone