I want to run simple go code directly from terminal/command line. For example:
go run "
package main
func main() {
println("hello")
}
"
hello
However golang allows code execution only from file. So maybe there are some ways how to emulate it? Like this:
go run file.go < echo "...."
But there should be no files after actions above.
In command-line, only a project like go-repl would compile/run a multi-line go source code without leaving any .go file behind.
An alternative: gore:
$ gore
Enter one or more lines and hit ctrl-D
func test() string {return "hello"}
println(test())
^D
---------------------------------
hello
(Other repl-like solution are listed in "Does Go provide REPL?")
Or you would need to develop a go wrapper which would internally create a source code and go run it, before deleting it.
Ubuntu has a gorun tool which works well for small scripts. It compiles scripts on the fly, caching the binaries in /tmp.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/gorun
Although it's intended for scripting and not as a REPL, you could use it in various ways.
Although gorun has come from the Ubuntu community, it should work on any Linux distro because it uses vanilla Go source code via
$ go get launchpad.net/gorun
Related
I am attempting to design a front end GUI for a CLI program by the name of eac3to.exe. The problem as I see it is that this program sends all of it's output to a cmd window. This is giving me no end of trouble because I need to get a lot of this output into a GUI window. This sounds easy enough, but I am begining to wonder whether I have found one of AutoIt's limitations?
I can use the Run() function with a windows internal command such as Dir and then get the output into a variable with the AutoIt StdoutRead() function, but I just can't get the output from an external program such as eac3to.exe - it just doesn't seem to work whatever I do! Just for testing purposesI I don't even need to get the output to a a GUI window: just printing it with ConsoleWrite() is good enough as this proves that I was able to read it into a variable. So at this stage that's all I need to do - get the text (usually about 10 lines) that has been output to a cmd window by my external CLI program into a variable. Once I can do this the rest will be a lot easier. This is what I have been trying, but it never works:
Global $iPID = Run("C:\VIDEO_EDITING\eac3to\eac3to.exe","", #SW_SHOW)
Global $ScreenOutput = StdoutRead($iPID)
ConsoleWrite($ScreenOutput & #CRLF)
After running this script all I get from the consolWrite() is a blank line - not the text data that was output as a result of running eac3to.exe (running eac3to without any arguments just lists a screen of help text relating to all the commandline options), and that's what I am trying to get into a variable so that I can put it to use later in the program.
Before I suggest a solution let me just tell you that Autoit has one
of the best help files out there. Use it.
You are missing $STDOUT_CHILD = Provide a handle to the child's STDOUT stream.
Also, you can't just do RUN and immediately call stdoutRead. At what point did you give the app some time to do anything and actually print something back to the console?
You need to either use ProcessWaitClose and read the stream then or, you should read the stream in a loop. Simplest check would be to set a sleep between RUN and READ and see what happens.
#include <AutoItConstants.au3>
Global $iPID = Run("C:\VIDEO_EDITING\eac3to\eac3to.exe","", #SW_SHOW, $STDOUT_CHILD)
; Wait until the process has closed using the PID returned by Run.
ProcessWaitClose($iPID)
; Read the Stdout stream of the PID returned by Run. This can also be done in a while loop. Look at the example for StderrRead.
; If the proccess doesnt end when finished you need to put this inside of a loop.
Local $ScreenOutput = StdoutRead($iPID)
ConsoleWrite($ScreenOutput & #CRLF)
I am working on a PHP/Javascript project where I've nicely set up a build workflow. It involves testing, minifying, compressing into the final zip deliverable, and a whole lot of other nice stuff.
I want to build a task that fails when there are certain patterns in the source code. I would like to look for any print_r(), error_log(), var_dump(), etc functions, and halt the build process if there are any. Perhaps later I would like to check for things in Javascript or CSS so this is not only a PHP question.
I know it can be done with grunt-shell and grep but I'd like to know the following:
Are there any grunt plugins specific to this task? Ideally I would like to be able to specify a list of regexes per file type, and to set whether to continue or fail the build on pattern match.
How do others tackle the problem of double-checking the packaged source for the most common debug statements or other patterns?
Not a complete answer to my question, but I've recently come across this grunt plugin which is somewhat related. It removes console.log statements from JavaScript. Haven't tried it yet. Looks good. I still would like to know if there's something similar for PHP though.
http://grunt-tasks.com/grunt-remove-logging-calls/
Edit: Seeing as there's only tumbleweeds rolling in the wind here, I'm posting my workaround that's based on grunt-shell. However this is not what I was looking for. It's not perfect because it doesn't do proper syntax parsing:
shell: {
check_debug_prints: {
command: '(! (egrep -r "var_dump|print_r|error_log" --include=*.php src || egrep -r "console\.\w+|debugger;" --include=*.js src) ) || (echo "Debug prints in source - build aborted" && false )'
}
},
and
grunt.loadNpmTasks( 'grunt-shell' );
Edit 2: I finally found the exact grunt plugin I was looking for. It is grunt-search. There is a failOnMatch boolean option that lets you indicate if a particular regex pattern should cause the build to fail when found.
I'm writing am openembedded/bitbake recipe for openembedded-classic. My recipe RDEPENDS on keyutils, and everything seems to work, except one thing:
I want to append a single line to the /etc/request-key.conf file installed by the keyutils package. So I added the following to my recipe:
pkg_postinst_${PN} () {
echo 'create ... more stuff ..' >> ${sysconfdir}/request-key.conf
}
However, the intended added line is missing in my resulting image.
My recipe inherits update-rc.d if that makes any difference.
My main question is: How do i debug this? Currently I am constructing an entire rootfs image, and then poke-around in that to see, if the changes show up. Surely there is a better way?
UPDATE:
Changed recipe to:
pkg_postinst_${PN} () {
echo 'create ... more stuff ...' >> ${D}${sysconfdir}/request-key.conf
}
But still no luck.
As far as I know, postinst runs at rootfs creation, and only at first boot if rootfs fails.
So there is a easy way to execute something only first boot. Just check for $D, like this:
pkg_postinst_stuff() {
#!/bin/sh -e
if [ x"$D" = "x" ]; then
# do something at first boot here
else
exit 1
fi
}
postinst scripts are ran at roots time, so ${sysconfdir} is /etc on your host. Use $D${sysconfdir} to write to the file inside the rootfs being generated.
OE-Classic is pretty ancient so you really should update to oe-core.
That said, Do postinst's run at first boot? I'm not sure. Also look in the recipes work directory in the temp directory and read the log and run files to see if there are any clues there.
One more thing. If foo RDEPENDS on bar that just means "when foo is installed, bar is also installed". I'm not sure it makes assertions about what is installed during the install phase, when your postinst is running.
If using $D doesn't fix the problem try editing your postinst to copy the existing file you're trying to edit somewhere else, so you can verify that it exists in the first place. Its possible that you're appending to a file that doesn't exist yet, and the the package that installs the file replaces it.
This is really a newbie question - but basically, how do I enable a template for certain filetypes.
Basically, I just want the template to insert a header of sorts, that is with some functions that I find useful, and libraries loaded etc.
I interpret
:help template
the way that I should place this in my vimrc
au BufNewFile,BufRead ~/.vim/skeleton.R
Running a R script then shows that something could happen, but apparently does not:
--- Auto-Commands ---
This may be because a template consists of commands (and there are no such in skeleton.R) - and in this case I just want it to insert a text header (which skelton.R consist of).
Sorry if this question is mind boggeling stupid ;-/
The command that you've suggested is not going to work: what this will do is run no Vim command whenever you open ~/.vim/skeleton.R
A crude way of achieving what you want would be to use:
:au BufNewFile *.R r ~/.vim/skeleton.R
This will read (:r) your file whenever a new *.R file is created. You want to avoid having BufRead in the autocmd, or it will read the skeleton file into your working file every time you open the file!
There are many plugins that add a lot more control to this process. Being the author and therefore completely biased, I'd recommend this one, but there are plenty of others listed here.
Shameless plug:
They all work in a relatively similar way, but to explain my script:
You install the plugin as described on the linked page and then create some templates in ~/.vim/templates. These templates should have the same extension as the 'target' file, so if it's a template for .R files, call it something like skeleton.R. In your .vimrc, add something like this:
let g:file_template_default = {}
let g:file_template_default['R'] = 'skeleton'
Then create your new .R file (with a filename, so save it if it's new) and enter:
:LoadFileTemplate
You can also skip the .vimrc editing and just do:
:LoadFileTemplate skeleton
See the website for more details.
Assume that your skeletons are in your ~/.vim/templates/ directory, you can put this
snippet in your vimrc file.
augroup templates
au!
" read in templates files
autocmd BufNewFile *.* silent! execute '0r ~/.vim/templates/skeleton.'.expand("<afile>:e")
augroup END
Some explanation,
BufNewFile . = each time we edit a new file
silent! execute = execute silently, no error messages if failed
0r = read file and insert content at top (0) in the new file
expand(":e") = get extension of current filename
see also http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Use_eval_to_create_dynamic_templates
*fixed missing dot in file path
Create a templates subdirectory in your ~/.vim folder
$ mkdir -p ~/.vim/templates
Create a new file in subdirectory called R.skeleton and put in the header and/or other stuff you want to automagically load upon creating a new ".R " file.
$ vim ~/.vim/templates/R.skeleton
Then, add the following to your ~/.vimrc file, which may have been suggested in a way by "guest"
autocmd BufNewFile * silent! 0r $HOME/.vim/templates/%:e.skeleton
Have a look at my github repository for some more details and other options.
It's just a trick I used to use .
It's cheap but If you ain't know nothing about vim and it's commands it's easy to handle.
make a directory like this :
~/.vim/templates/barney.cpp
and as you konw barney.cpp should be your template code .
then add a function like ForUncleBarney() to end of your .vimrc file located in ~/.vimrc
it should be like
function ForBarneyStinson()
:read ~/.vim/templates/barney.cpp
endfunction
then just use this command in vim
:call ForBarneyStinson()
then you see your template
as an example I already have two templates for .cpp files
:call ForBarney()
:call ACM()
sorry said too much,
Coding's awesome ! :)
Also take a look at https://github.com/aperezdc/vim-template.git.
I use it and have contributed some patches to it and would argue its relatively full featured.
What about using the snipmate plugin? See here
There exist many template-file expanders -- you'll also find there explanations on how to implement a rudimentary template-file expander.
For my part, I'm maintaining the fork of muTemplate. For a simple start, just drop a {ft}.template file into {rtp}/template/. If you want to use any (viml) variable or expression, just do. You can even put vim code (and now even functions) into the template-file if you wish. Several smart decisions are already implemented for C++ and vim files.
I have a compressed CSS file (all whitespace removed) that I want to inspect, but it's a huge pain inspecting it as-is. Is there any utility (preferably linux command line) that I can run the file through to format it nicely?
The online service that Dave Newman mentioned has been converted into a Node.js script, which you can run on the command-line. If you have NPM installed you can just do:
npm install -g cssunminifier
And it’s pretty versatile how you can use it. Here are 3 different examples:
cssunminifier style.min.css style.css
cssunminifier --width=8 style.min.css
curl http://cdn.sstatic.net/stackoverflow/all.css | cssunminifier - | less
Here’s more info on the command-line css unminifier
Try this online service.
You can also inspect any compressed file in Firebug.
I wrote a little formatter in Ruby for you. Save it as some .rb file and use it via CLI like ruby format.rb input.css input-clean.css:
#Formats CSS
input, output = ARGV
#Input
if input == nil or output == nil
puts "Syntax: #{$0} [input] [output]"
exit
end
#Opens file
unless File.exist? input
puts "File #{input} doesn't exist."
exit
end
#Reads file
input = File.read input
#Creates output file
output = File.new output, "w+"
#Processes input
input = input.gsub("{", "\n{\n\t")
.gsub(",", ", ")
.gsub(";", ";\n\t")
.gsub(/\t?}/, "}\n\n\n")
.gsub(/\t([^:]+):/, "\t" + '\1: ')
#Writes output
output.write input
#Closes output
output.close
These programs are called 'beautifiers'. You should be able to google one that fits for you.
If you're looking for a locally-executable utility, as opposed to a web service, you want CSS Tidy.
This also indents: styleneat
Here's a free windows app to "beautify" your file. I haven't used it so I don't know how well it works.
http://www.blumentals.net/csstool/
It is specific, but Visual Studio does this on that file type. (by no means a generic solution to which you alude)
take a look at the vkBeautify plugin
http://www.eslinstructor.net/vkbeautify/
It can beautify (pretty print) CSS, XML and JSON text,
written in plain javascript, small, simple and fast