In recent docs, like the Discover Meteor book and the Iron Router guide on github use Router.route for each route. But it's pretty common to see routes defined in Router.map() using this.route. Is there any real difference or a reason to choose one way over the other?
Router.map is part of the pre-1.0 API. While is still works at the time of this writing, it may be deprecated in the future. I'd strongly recommend following whatever is in the current version of the official docs.
Related
official github page of react-router-redux says that the project is no longer maintained and is now deprecated. They recommend to use connected-react-router instead.
react-router-redux has:
31k stars
884 watch
6k forks
while connected-react-router has only:
1053 stars
28 watch
108 forks
I am starting developing a complete Q/A social networking website using react v4, will it be worthy or smart idea to use connected-react-router here?
while posting the question I just noticed that the stackoverflow doesn't even have connected-react-router tag.
If you are going to use Redux to manage your application state, use react router for routing, and want to synchronize your route history with your app state and manage routing through redux, then this will be fine to use. While I've only begun using it recently myself it's made been pretty straight forward for managing routing, including route data.
You also pointed out that:
react-router-redux says that the project is no longer maintained
For this reason alone I would not use react-router-redux, unless you plan to maintain it yourself. Disregarding features and bugs, you'd also have to be concerned with any potential security issues that come up. Please also see this dicussion they're having about it's deprecation in their GitHub issues https://github.com/ReactTraining/react-router/issues/6358
Just to reiterate, if you need, or think you'll need, to synchronize your router state with your redux store then this is not a bad tool to use. If you don't think you'll need this then don't use it so your project doesn't become bloated.
That being said, I've also seen this alternative https://github.com/salvoravida/redux-first-history which looks interesting. It looks to offer a more decoupled approach to history, routing, and state than the connected-react-router, but I haven't used it yet.
We are building a marketplace using angular and we want to integrate Adyen payments. Googling for 'Adyen angular' or 'Adyen SPA' or even 'Adyen react' doesn't bring any useful results. NO results whatsoever.
Therefore I am left wondering, why the whole world (including Adyen docs) is not talking about integrating Adyen into a SPA.
It doesn't seem to be more vulnerable to network security attacks to me. At least I can't think of any reasons for that.
Please help me to understand, what I am missing out.
As madesch mentioned, integrating in a SPA shouldn't be too far from other kinds of integrations. Are you having issues with something in particular?
Here can see an integration with Vue, one with React and even one with React Hooks.
The card fields are not being loaded because I'm not using a real originKey, but it should give you an idea about how to do the integration.
I hope it helps!
It seems that I overestimated Adyen popularity and in reality, the truth is that it is just not popular enough to have gotten attention from SPA community. :(
it seems like originKey is deprecated, the current recommendation is to use Web DropIn. But this requires using a server component, as you don't want to expose your API key, right?
So if you don't want to use a deprecated API, you must always add a server component to your stack. A pure SPA does not seem to be possible using current APIs, it seems.
There are now few options available:
Angular support
Vue support
React support
All examples are based on the Web Drop-in approach which renders a checkout component with the supported/requested payment methods.
A basic explanation of the workflow is provided here.
Just started to discover meteor. created app with DiscoverMeteor book, but misunderstood many moments. then read Your first meteor application and Your first meteor application books. Realized that Todos example is really too simple to cover many important things. And only after that I found the official guide on Meteor.com! now reading about all these complex (for my opinion) things. and have 2 questions:
What router should I prefer to use? I want to create fast app with lots of data loading from the server. Found information that Iron router is deprecated, and Flow router is recommended nowadays, but also found that flow router can not route on server, only on client. And that exactly client routing is the reason why for example soundcloud is really slow. So that is the question - I know nothing about server/client routing, but want to make right decision for the future project.
What ui-framework to use? I read that blaze is easy to start, but react js is really powerful. So: is Blaze enough for serious project (like a popular blog)? Or do I have to learn react js in order not to rewrite code in the future?
I am working with Meteor 1.3.2.4, which is latest in market and believe, you don't have to do anything out of the box to go with experimental UI-Frameworks and stuff.
Blaze template which is handlebars based implementation is best.
Blaze template is very well glued with Socket.io, futures and DDP implementation for cutting edge implementation for asynchronous and reactive behaviour on UI.
Blaze is really good for cumbersome, heavy data websites as well. If you have any doubt, i can skype and show you what i have implemented in just 2 days on development using everything given by Meteor.
React.js, Koa.js (re-written Express framework), express etc are very good and powerful, but I think implementing it at initial level of your grasp is overkill. Go with Blaze first.
There are hundered sitting and developing Meteor.js just for you to be comfortable. I am not at all biased, I am giving you my open opinion.
I worked with Laravel 5.2, Play framework, MEAN.io, DJango in past, but believe there is nothing like pure Meteor js with there own packages. There are many videos on youtube like Meteor nights and stuff where you can find the developers from all around the world developing huge stuff just using stuff given by Meteor js.
For routing flow-router is good, even iron:router is awesome and easily gettable.
This video can guide you very well.
Flow Router is the recommended router by the official Meteor Guide. It's also the popular choice these days, and for a reason: it's a high quality router implementation.
As for MVC, it's really like choosing a religion. React has a huge community, possibly a bright future, and it's not Meteor-only unlike Blaze. But some folks find Blaze templates nicer than JSX files. I think it's easier to get help on StackOverflow if you pick React, but Blaze might be easier to get started.
Maybe this post helps a bit: How to set up React with Meteor?
I want to create a multi-page Meteor web and mobile application. I am therefore looking for routing services.
From research, I gathered Iron Router is what I am looking for. But many tutorials also mention Meteor.Router
What are the differences (if any) between Iron Router and `Meteor.Router`?
iron:router has been the de facto standard routing solution for Meteor for over a year now, you should definitely use it, it's probably the most downloaded atmosphere package.
Please note however that the project has not been updated for several months and another router (FlowRouter) package emerged, focusing only on client-side routing and managing subscriptions, it takes a different approach than iron:router by making the routing code non-reactive by default.
Meteor.Router is a deprecated package that used to be maintained by one of the two main contributors to iron:router, tutorials mentioning this are clearly outdated.
The iron:router guide is a recommended reading to understand some advanced concepts like server-side and client-side routing.
From the question here, There are two external libraries to use for http operation. It seems that dispatch has more visibility while scalaj-http is easy to use as stated there. Thus, I am more inclined toward scalaj-http. I want to use the http library in google app engine, where there are restraints. For standard Java, there is a work around for it from here. I would like to get advice on what would be the best approach to use Scala in Google app engine(this is not for Lift framework).
I personally am very happy with Dispatch. There are several executors, including one for App Engine, dispatch-gae.