i 've tried using
string path= "\\abc\wof\TY044-12";
bool exist=System.IO.Directory.Exists(path);
but 'bool' return true on localhost but return false on server side.
Also, i've searched some answers, but it is difficult reconfigure permission of IIS.
can i use FileWebrequest/httpWebRequest command? not understand about this
FileWebRequest request = (FileWebRequest)System.Net.WebRequest.Create("\\abc\wof\TY044-12");
FileWebResponse response = (FileWebResponse)request.GetResponse();
Ihope someone can help me. THANKS!!!
That looks more like a UNC.
To me it seems the appool account on iis which is hosting your application doesn't have permissions to access that UNC folder. Please refer link below to set it:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771170(v=ws.10).aspx
The link below says you can access files over the network using pre-registered reserved types like http, https, file, etc.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bw00b1dc(v=vs.110).aspx
...And if you pass unc paths to the Uri class during construction, you can get the required uri scheme:
var uri = new Uri(#"\\abc\folder\file.jpg");
Console.WriteLine(uri.ToString()); //outputs - file://abc/folder/file.jpg
However the recommended approach is using classes in the System.IO namespace like you originally started out with.
Related
Below issue was posted by me on https://github.com/XiaoFaye/WooCommerce.NET/issues/414 but since this may not be related at all to WooCommerce.Net but on a lowerlevel to Apache/Word/WooCommerc itself I am posting the same question here
I am really stuck with the famous error:
WebException: {"code":"woocommerce_rest_authentication_error","message":"Invalid signature - provided signature does not match.","data":{"status":401}}
FYI:
I have two wordpress instance running. One on my local machine and one on a remote server. The remote server is, as my local machine, in our company's LAN
I am running WAMP on both machines to run Apache and host Wordpress on port 80
The error ONLY occurs when trying to call the Rest api on the remote server. Connecting to the local rest api, the Rest Api/WooCommerceNet is working like a charm :-)
From my local browser I can login to the remote WooCommerce instance without any problem
On the remote server I have defined WP_SITEURL as 'http://[ip address]/webshop/ and WP_HOME as 'http://[ip address]/webshopin wp-config.php
Calling the api url (http://[ip address]/webshop/wp-json/wc/v3/) from my local browser works OK. I get the normal JSON response
Authentication is done through the WooCommerce.Net wrapper which only requires a consumer key, consumer secret and the api url. I am sure I am using the right consumer key and secret and the proper api url http://[ip address]/webshop/wp-json/wc/v3/ (see previous bullet)
I already played around with the authorizedHeader variable (true/false) when instantiating a WooCommerce RestApi but this has no effect
Is there anybody that can point me into the direction of a solution?
Your help will be much appreciated!
In my case, the problem was in my url adress. The URL Adress had two // begin wp-json
Url Before the solution: http://localhost:8080/wordpress//wp-json/wc/v3/
URL Now, and works ok: http://localhost:8080/wordpress/wp-json/wc/v3/
I use with this sentence.
RestAPI rest = new RestAPI(cUrlApi, Funciones.CK, Funciones.CS,false);
WCObject wc = new WCObject(rest);
var lstWooCategorias = await wc.Category.GetAll();
I hope my answer helps you.
Had the same issue. My fault was to define my url incorrect: http:// instead of https://.
I'm trying to set up a cloudfront for my s3 bucket that will only allow users to read or write with the signed URLs.(read the file, upload, and download)
The S3 doesn't have public read/write permissions.
CloudFront is:
Http and HTTPS.
It has Trusted Signer as self.
It has Restricted View access.
It has a origin domain name as origin-domain-name/public.
Lastly, it has a origin access identity as origin-access-identity/cloudfront/XXXXXXX.
I have my cloudfront pem file and aws private key id.
My c# code to generate signed url is:
StreamReader sr = new StreamReader("../../keys/CloudFront-PrivateKey.pem");
var url = AmazonCloudFrontUrlSigner.GetCannedSignedURL(
AmazonCloudFrontUrlSigner.Protocol.http,
"http://xxxxxxxxxx.cloudfront.net",
sr,
"public/AddinJudgeIssue.png",
"<AWS Private Key ID>",
DateTime.Now.AddDays(2));
Each time when I execute the code, it generates the URL. However, when I copy and paste it to URL, it says "access denied".
First of all, does anyone have any idea about why this happening?
Secondly, this works somehow, can I use this same technique to upload assets to the bucket?
Thank you and apologize for my ignorance. I digged the aws whitepapers, but failed to find a straightforward guidance.
A look at the documentation suggests two problems:
"http://xxxxxxxxxx.cloudfront.net" should not include http:// because the field is distributionDomain and expects the domain name, not the base URL.
"public/AddinJudgeIssue.png" should have a leading / because this field is resourcePath. Paths begin with a / even though object keys don't.
After doing some experiment, I got it working. Although I used root credentials and pem keys to generate the signed URL, I still had to give public read/write access to my S3 bucket. That was the reason why I was getting access denied error. On Cloudfront setup, "restrict bucket access" option gives restriction to my bucket anyway.
I am trying to send activation mail to the currently registered user.In mail body,I need to send a link like http://example.com/account/activation?username=d&email=g.Now, for debugging on local machine, I manually write it as localhost:30995/account/activation?username=d&email=g. But, when my port number changes, I need to rewrite it.
I tried another question
on this website,but, compiler gives error like url.action doesnot exist.
Please give me fresh solution as I am confused with that solution.
Use a Url.Action overload that takes a protocol parameter to generate your URLs:
Url.Action("Activation", "Account", new { username = "d", email = "g" }, "http")
This generates an absolute URL rather than a relative one. The protocol can be either "http" or "https". So this will return http://localhost:XXXXX/account/activation?username=d&email=g on your local machine, and http://example.com/account/activation?username=d&email=g on production.
In short, this will stick whatever domain you're hosting your app on in front of your URL; you can then change your hostname/port number/domain name as many times as you want. Your links will always point to the host they originated from. That should solve the problem you're facing.
Try using IIS / IIS-Express instead of Casinni web server that comes with visual studio.
You could add bindings to have the right URL (with host entries of course).
This will avoid the port numbers in your links.
I would like to have my application running exclusively with SSL turned on.
I am using the Spring Security core plugin.
This is how I attempt to do it in Config.groovy:
grails.plugins.springsecurity.portMapper.httpPort = 8080
grails.plugins.springsecurity.portMapper.httpsPort = 8443
grails.plugins.springsecurity.secureChannel.definition = [ '/**' : 'REQUIRES_SECURE_CHANNEL']
I was expecting this to cause redirects every time I would try to access a Url using HTTP.
However, I am never redirected, and can navigate through both HTTP and HTTPS. I may add I am starting my application using grails run-app -https
Am I getting this all wrong ?
Any suggestion is most welcome.
Do you have a custom filterchain declared in your config?
you might need to add 'channelProcessingFilter' to your chain in that case
http://static.springsource.org/spring-security/site/docs/3.0.x/reference/security-filter-chain.html
You can also try using the forceHttps option
grails.plugins.springsecurity.auth.forceHttps = true
You don't have any wildcards, so the definition is literally matching the root URL (/), but nothing below it (/foo). What you want is:
grails.plugins.springsecurity.secureChannel.definition = [ '/**' : 'REQUIRES_SECURE_CHANNEL']
^^
(You can clearly see the wildcards in the documentation :-)
Finally, if your server is behind a load balancer or other firewall that hides the protocol, check that same page for instructions on checking the header.
I have a remote RSS feed which has to be transformed into Notes documents using LotusScript.
I've looked through the documentation, but I can't find how to open a remote URL in order to retrieve its contents. In other words, some sort of wget- or curl-like functionality. Can anyone shed some light on how to do this? Using Java is not an option.
Thanks.
Check out the NotesDOMParser class - available in LotusScript - which lets you (indirectly) pull XML from a remote URL and process in a an XML DOM object.
You can pull the XML into a string using the MSXMLHTTP COM object, then use NotesStream to send the XML to the NotesDOMParser.
I have not tested, but the code would look something like this:
...
Set objXML = CreateObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")
objXML.open "GET", sURL, False, "", ""
objXML.send("")
sXMLAsText = Trim$(objXML.responseText)
Set inputStream = session.CreateStream
inputStream.Open (sXMLAsText)
Set domParser=session.CreateDOMParser(inputStream, outputStream)
domParser.Process
...
Documentation: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/domhelp/v8r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.designer.domino.main.doc/H_NOTESDOMPARSER_CLASS.html
You can't open a remote URL (whether it's HTTP or some other protocol) using native Lotusscript: the object library simply doesn't support it. If you're running on a Windows server, you should be able to use the MS XMLHttp DLLs to get a handle on your remote file via a URL, as specified by the previous answer. (Alternatively, this link specifies how to parse and open a UNC path with Lotusscript—again, Windows only).
All that said, if I understand you correctly, you're not using HTTP to access the remote file at all. If the RSS file is just on a simple path, why can't you open the file for parsing in the normal way with Lotusscript?