In Tumblr, searches are set up so that the query is a method/parameter of the search controller. Basically it looks like this: /search/:query.
I've been playing around from the client side trying to edit it so that it posts in this format:
/search/example?q=example
I'm doing this because GA looks for a parameter in searches. My problem is is that from the JavaScript to the form methods and actions, I cannot get the thing to spit out a query parameter at the end.
Is there anyway to tell Google to look for /search/:query instead of looking for a parameter in the URI?
Yes, you can do this by creating an advanced filter.
Go to your account Admin and then either click on the Account > All filters button on the left, or else the View > Filters button the right. Which one you use depends on whether you want this to be applied to all properties/views of the account, or only to an individual view.
Then, click the + New Filter button.
Enter in a name for your Filter Name such as "search string"
For filter type, select Custom filter radio button.
Then select the Advanced radio button.
Then from the Field A->Extract A dropdown, select Request URI. In the input field to the right of this, enter in ^\/search\/(.*)
Then from the Output To->Construtor dropdown, select Search Term. In the input field to the right of this, enter in $A1
Then save the filter and you should be good to go.
Related
Right now I'm trying to create a custom confirmation page to be displayed to the user after they finish filling out one of my forms. This custom confirmation page will use some of the data that they entered into the form. Right now I only have 3 fields: name, phone number, and a logo image.
So I went into the Settings->Confirmations section of my form and set Confirmation Type to Page, chose the page, and checked off 'Pass Field Data Via Query String'. Then I entered in the string 'gym_name={Gym/Program Name:2}&gym_phone={Gym/Program website and/or phone number:3}&logo={Logo:4}'. The logo parameter is passed as the image src url.
I ran through a quick test of my form and after filling it out, all of the data was successfully sent to the confirmation page, with one problem. For some reason, Gravity Form appends '|:||:||:||:|2372' (it's not always 2372, it's different every time) to the end of the logo section of the url. This happens no matter where in the query string I put logo, and it does not get appended if I don't include the logo.
Does anyone know what the cause of this is, and how to stop it? Thank you in advance.
I'm assuming the Logo field is a Post Image field. If so, you'll need to use the :url modifier to retrieve only the URL.
&logo={Logo:4:url}
More details here: https://docs.gravityforms.com/post-image-merge-tags/
I have an AppMaker app that has a from based off of one address table/datasource. I can get a form with next/prev buttons, but replaced the key field (name) with a dropdown list of all names (a user can start typing names to jump there, with the dropdown showing).
My hope is that when a user selects from the dropdown, the entire form updates and the next/prev buttons work properly as well (there too many records to page thru with next/prev only). I don't have to have next/prev functionality if it complicates things too much.
Currently the dropdown is working, but I cannot get the index for the next/prev buttons set or the rest of the form to reflect the selected dropdown record.
I've tried to set the "onValueEdit" event to something like this...
var selected = widget.value;
var idx = widget.options.indexOf(selected);
console.log("Selected: "+selected+", index = "+idx+"\n");
if(idx < 0) { //...this error is never hit
console.log("Index error - setting to zero!\n");
idx = 0;
}
widget.datasource.loadPage(idx); //...update form?
Two observations via console logging:
The "idx" var is never set to the selected dropdown index reliably, and is
often "0" (tho no error msg ever shows), so the "indexOf()" function
isn't working as expected.
The "selected" var (name) is always correct.
If I call widget.datasource.loadPage(...) with a fixed value (say 5) it has no effect on what is shows in the form either (previous loaded data remains) - obviously not the way to do it :v/
Can you steer a noob in the right direction?
If you are using default App Maker form, then you can see that so-called pager, doesn't actually paginate. It triggers prevItem/nextItem datasource methods, in other words it navigates through datasource items, not pages. Here is a quote from App Maker docs:
nextItem: Selects the next item. For Query Datasources, if the current item is the last item on the page, then this loads the next page and selects the first item on the newly loaded page.
So, if you already have all your items loaded(you set query page size for your datasource to 0), then you need just to change selected item within datasource:
// onValueEdit dropdown event
// assuming, that form and dropdown share same datasource
widget.datasource.selectKey(newValue._key);
If you really have lots of items and it is not feasible to load all of them in one call... then it will be all another story...
UPDATE:
It's important that Options and Value are set as shown in the image below!
However, I had trouble setting them that way (read: wasted hours!) until I wiped them both completely using More options in the binding picklist, and tried again (I had even tried on a brand new app!). I was being forced to choose ..projections.. and then a final field before the OK button would be available.
Not sure if AppMaker is buggy here or there is something simple I'm not understanding!
None of the coding in my original question is required.
Once set this way, binding just works as you would expect it!!
All other fields are set as #datasource.item. and are bound to whatever item is chosen. No Events settings are necessary for the dropdown either, as I thought they might be.
I deleted this page and started again, and replaced the default business name data field with a drop down, I set the dropdown as:
Options: #datasources.Addresses.items
Value: #datasources.Addresses.item
It works fine?! Not sure what happend in my original page!
UPDATE:
So it seems you need to delete both the Value and Options and then re-enter these. The OK will light up when you do.
Also, my original take on App Maker was to build the UI and attach data. That was my first mistake. You build the data then have App Maker build edit/add pages for you.
I'm observing very similar behavior for both {$taxonomy}_add_form_fields and {$taxonomy}_add_form is there a diference and what it is? I understand the semantic difference of form and form field, but I'm wondering how WP sees it.
There is no record of it in the Wordpress Codex and Developer part of the Wordpress website is giving almost same description.
See for yourself:
https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/hooks/taxonomy_add_form_fields/
https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/hooks/taxonomy_add_form/
Taking a look into /wp-admin/edit-tags.php, we can see the do_action( "{$taxonomy}_add_form", $taxonomy ); is used to replace to preceding deprecated filters. That's why it was added.
Getting to the "difference" between them, you could see in the code that the filter {$taxonomy}_add_form_fields is used to add data to the form just before the submit button has been created, while the other filter {$taxonomy}_add_form is used after the submit button (but still before the closing tag </form>.
Usually, you could think about putting visible fields before the submit button and then adding hidden fields right after it. But it's not a sort of great difference between them.
Both of actions is in the form tag.
But, {$taxonomy}_add_form_fields action is before submit button and "{$taxonomy}_add_form" action is after submit button and add_tag_form action.
in my drupal 7 I have 2 content-types like these:
ContentA
ContentB (with a field Entity Reference to ContentA)
In the front-end detail page of ContentA, I would love to show a block/view with a list of ContentB whose Entity Reference field is set to the current ContentA.
I made a view of type Block and added it correctly to the page, but I cannot filter ContentB based on the current ContentA.
Could you help me?
Thanks
You should add a contextual filter for the value you will use for filtering to the block View of ContentB.
Then in your contextual filter in the "When the filter value is NOT in the URL" area select "Provide default value" and Type "PHP code" (You should have enable php filter for this). In your php code area you should have the following code
$node=menu_get_object();
return $node->field_your_machine_field_name['und'][0]['target_id']; // this is the field you will use for fitlering
Hope it helps
UPDATE
The above code will work if you need to show in your block similar results with the same selection (for example similar results of ContentB with the same selection in the referencing field of ContentA ).I will not delete because you might need it also in your project.I misunderstood. Actually the solution is simpler. You should add the contextual filter to the field and in "When the filter value is NOT in the URL" area select "Provide default value" and "Provide id from url"
I had a requirement to create a report based on individual user whom having SR waiting for approval, On click on Ticket id the URL's should redirect to SR detailed page where he can check request approve or disapprove.
using hyper link in birt properties unable to pass the ticketid by using below url's
http://google.com/maximo/ui/maximo.jsp?event=loadapp&value=asset&additionaleventvalue=Ticketid
Could you anybody help in this regards.
If the cell you made clickable contains the ticketId, go to Properties -> Hyperlink -> Edit...
Select hyperlink type URI, and click the dropdown to the right of 'Location' to go to the Javascript window.
If you're going to use it more than once, I would make the static part of your hyperlink a variable. Then add the ticketId by clicking "column bindings" in the left-lower column in the JavaScript window and selecting the appropriate cells in the middle and right columns. You'd get something like
vars["staticPartOfHyperlink"] + row[TICKETID]
If you'd rather not use a variable, you can hard-code the static part (don't do this, it's ugly and asking for trouble):
"http://google.com/maximo/ui/maximo.jsp?event=loadapp&value=asset&additionaleventvalue=" + row[TICKETID]