I am not able to get a hold of customizing the un-installation process, though I could succeed to some extent customizing the installation process. When I register for the signals “installationFinished” my functions in the installscript.qs gets called, but surprisingly the signals “uninstallationStarted and uninstallationFinished” never gets called if I register some functions. Not sure why? Also in qinstaller.h we have the below code for identifying different state/stages of installation, but how can I get similar information for un-installation?
enum Status {
InstallerUnfinished,
InstallerCanceledByUser,
InstallerRunning,
InstallerFailed,
InstallerSucceeded,
};
int status() const;
enum WizardPage {
Introduction = 0x1000,
TargetDirectory = 0x2000,
ComponentSelection = 0x3000,
LicenseCheck = 0x4000,
StartMenuSelection = 0x5000,
ReadyForInstallation = 0x6000,
PerformInstallation = 0x7000,
InstallationFinished = 0x8000,
End = 0xffff
};
Did you try this?
function Controller()
{
installer.uninstallationStarted.connect(this, Controller.prototype.runMyFunc);
}
Controller.prototype.runMyFunc = function()
{
// your code here
}
Related
I want the progress of the function to be displayed on progressBar. Following the guides, I wrote the code below. But during the execution of the function, the program freezes, then progress bar's value becomes equal to one.
The program itself will not produce errors. The result of the function is correct.
I think my problem is that I don’t know how to connect the value of the progress of a function with the value of a progress bar.
(Form.h)
public:
MyObject object;
QFutureWatcher<QBitArray> FutureWatcher;
QFuture<QBitArray> future;
(Form.cpp) Form constructor body:
ui->setupUi(this);
ui->progressBar->setMinimum(0);
ui->progressBar->setMaximum(100);
connect(&this->FutureWatcher, SIGNAL(progressValueChanged(int)), ui->progressBar, SLOT(setValue(int)));
(Form.cpp) Function on_button_clicked():
void Form::on_button_clicked()
{
QString message = ui->textEdit->toPlainText();
future = QtConcurrent::run(&this->object, &MyObject::longFunction, message);
this->FutureWatcher.setFuture(future);
QBitArray bitresult = future.result();
}
The problem is that you're immediately calling future.result(). The problem with this is that result() will wait until the QFuture has finished.
The Qt documentation says (https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qfuture.html#result):
If the result is not immediately available, this function will block and wait for the result to become available.
The solution is to connect a slot to QFutureWatcher::finished():
auto *watcher = new QFutureWatcher<QBitArray>(this);
connect(watcher, &QFutureWatcher::finished, this, [=]() {
auto result = watcher->result();
// do something with the result
// important: delete watcher again
watcher->deleteLater();
});
// now start the task
QString message = ui->textEdit->toPlainText();
watcher->setFuture(QtConcurrent::run(myObject, &MyObject::longFunction, message));
I have a xamarin forms app. When I compile and test on my Pixel3, everything seems to be working properly. When I load it up in my iOS device running iOS13.something, I get the following error when I try to make my second call to a web service in my app. The error is shown below.
Assertion at /Users/builder/jenkins/workspace/archive-mono/2019-08/ios/release/mono/mini/interp/interp.c:2160, condition `is_ok (error)' not met, function:do_jit_call, Attempting to JIT compile method '(wrapper other) void object:gsharedvt_out_sig (object&,single&,int&,intptr)' while running in aot-only mode. See https://learn.microsoft.com/xamarin/ios/internals/limitations for more information. assembly: type: member:(null)
The code is a bit of a mess, but has been working in the past.
var uri = String.Format("{0}//{1}/{2}?PlayerToken={3}", protocol, servername, tournamentsInClubUrl, userToken);
var httpC = new HttpClient();
HttpRequestMessage requestMessage = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, uri);
requestMessage.Headers.Add("AppKey", AppKey);
var body = await httpC.SendAsync(requestMessage); <-- Error happens here.
var str = await body.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
var res = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<PicVideoApp.Models.TournamentInfo>>(str);
httpC.Dispose();
httpC = null;
return res;
I assume that I am doing something wrong, but danged if I can see it. Any ideas are appreciated.
It runs properly in the iOS Simulator.
TIA.
From shared error info , you need to use C# delegate to call native functions .
To call a native function through a C# delegate, the delegate's declaration must be decorated with one of the following attributes:
UnmanagedFunctionPointerAttribute (preferred, since it is cross-platform and compatible with .NET Standard 1.1+)
MonoNativeFunctionWrapperAttribute
For example :
[MonoNativeFunctionWrapper]
delegate void SomeDelegate (int a, int b);
//
// the ptrToFunc points to an unmanaged C function with the signature (int a, int b)
void Callback (IntPtr ptrToFunc)
{
var del = (SomeDelegate) Marshal.GetDelegateForFunctionPointer (ptrToFunc, typeof (SomeDelegate));
// invoke it
del (1, 2);
A similar error was thrown at me in iOS when I used dynamic types in my code. I was able to solve it by enabling the 'Mono Interpreter' in iOS build settings. Hope that helps in your case.
I have a subclass of QTextDocument that overrides QTextDocument::loadResource(int type, const QUrl &name).
I want to clone it.
Ideas ?
You can't use QTextDocument::clone for that. Neither can you reimplement it because it's not virtual. You should create another clone method (you can name it clone but I'd give it another name to avoid confusion) and implement cloning yourself. You can use toHtml and setHtml to copy content from one object to another:
MyTextDocument* MyTextDocument::my_clone(QObject * parent = 0) {
MyTextDocument* other = new MyTextDocument(parent);
other->setHtml(toHtml());
return other;
}
There are however many other properties that should be copied. See how QTextDocument::clone method is implemented:
QTextDocument *QTextDocument::clone(QObject *parent) const
{
Q_D(const QTextDocument);
QTextDocument *doc = new QTextDocument(parent);
QTextCursor(doc).insertFragment(QTextDocumentFragment(this));
doc->rootFrame()->setFrameFormat(rootFrame()->frameFormat());
QTextDocumentPrivate *priv = doc->d_func();
priv->title = d->title;
priv->url = d->url;
priv->pageSize = d->pageSize;
priv->indentWidth = d->indentWidth;
priv->defaultTextOption = d->defaultTextOption;
priv->setDefaultFont(d->defaultFont());
priv->resources = d->resources;
priv->cachedResources.clear();
#ifndef QT_NO_CSSPARSER
priv->defaultStyleSheet = d->defaultStyleSheet;
priv->parsedDefaultStyleSheet = d->parsedDefaultStyleSheet;
#endif
return doc;
}
If these properties are important to you, you need to copy them manually in your my_clone implementation. You can're use QTextDocumentPrivate class because it's internal. So you can't just copy default implementation. But there is a normal way to set each of listed properties in the API.
Be aware of forward compability issues. If new properties appeared in newer Qt versions, your implementation will not copy them in opposite to default clone implementation. That could be a problem so this approach is not perfect.
I'm currently trying to implement an automated bug reporter for a Flex application, and would like to return error messages to a server along with the function/line number that caused the error. Essentially, I'm trying to get the getStackTrace() information without going into debug mode, because most users of the app aren't likely to have the debug version of flash player.
My current method is using the UncaughtErrorEvent handler to catch errors that occur within the app, but the error message only returns the type of error that has occurred, and not the location (which means it's useless). I have tried implementing getStackTrace() myself using a function name-grabber such as
private function getFunctionName (callee:Function, parent:Object):String {
for each ( var m:XML in describeType(parent)..method) {
if ( this[m.#name] == callee) return m.#name;
}
return "private function!";
}
but that will only work because of arguments.callee, and so won't go through multiple levels of function calls (it would never get above my error event listener).
So! Anyone have any ideas on how to get informative error messages through the global
error event handler?
EDIT: There seems to be some misunderstanding. I'm explicitly avoiding getStackTrace() because it returns 'null' when not in debug mode. Any solution that uses this function is what I'm specifically trying to avoid.
Just noticed the part about "I don't want to use debug." Well, that's not an option, as the non-debug version of Flash does not have any concept of a stack trace at all. Sucks, don't it?
Not relevant but still cool.
The rest is just for with the debug player.
This is part of my personal debug class (strangely enough, it is added to every single project I work on). It returns a String which represents the index in the stack passed -- class and method name. Once you have those, line number is trivial.
/**
* Returns the function name of whatever called this function (and whatever called that)...
*/
public static function getCaller( index:int = 0 ):String
{
try
{
throw new Error('pass');
}
catch (e:Error)
{
var arr:Array = String(e.getStackTrace()).split("\t");
var value:String = arr[3 + index];
// This pattern matches a standard function.
var re:RegExp = /^at (.*?)\/(.*?)\(\)/ ;
var owner:Array = re.exec(value);
try
{
var cref:Array = owner[1].split('::');
return cref[ 1 ] + "." + owner[2];
}
catch( e:Error )
{
try
{
re = /^at (.*?)\(\)/; // constructor.
owner = re.exec(value);
var tmp:Array = owner[1].split('::');
var cName:String = tmp.join('.');
return cName;
}
catch( error:Error )
{
}
}
}
return "No caller could be found.";
}
As a side note: this is not set up properly to handle an event model -- sometimes events present themselves as either not having callers or as some very weird alternate syntax.
You don't have to throw an error to get the stack trace.
var myError:Error = new Error();
var theStack:String = myError.getStackTrace();
good reference on the Error class
[EDIT]
Nope after reading my own reference getStackTrace() is only available in debug versions of the flash player.
So it looks like you are stuck with what you are doing now.
I have an BLL that does validation on user input then inserts a parent(PorEO) and then inserts children(PorBoxEO). So there are two calls to the same InsertJCDC. One like this=>InsertJCDC(fakePor) and another like this=>InsertJCDC(fakeBox).
When I stub out the parent I want to return fakePor. But when I run the code it returns null instead. Here is the unit test.
[Test]
public void PorBLL_InsertByPorInsertCV_DoingGoodCase()
{
// Startup object mapper
_Bootstrapper.Bootstrap();
// create the mock for generic Crud
IGenericCrud mockGenericCrud = MockRepository.GenerateMock<IGenericCrud>();
PorInsertCV fakePor = new PorInsertCV();
PorBoxInsertCV fakeBox = new PorBoxInsertCV();
// build fake return
PorEO fakePorNewRow = new PorEO();
fakePorNewRow.PorId = 22;
// stub parent and child insert routines.
mockGenericCrud.Stub(c => c.InsertJCDC<PorEO, PorInsertCV>(fakePor)).Return(fakePorNewRow);
mockGenericCrud.Stub(c => c.InsertJCDC<PorBoxEO, PorBoxInsertCV>(fakeBox)).Return(null);
ObjectFactory.Inject(typeof(IGenericCrud), mockGenericCrud);
IPorBLL localWithMock = ObjectFactory.GetInstance<IPorBLL>();
// build user args to csll bll with and use for insert
PorInsertCV userArgs = new PorInsertCV();
userArgs.AccessionNbr = "364-80-0007";
userArgs.NbrBoxes = 11;
userArgs.RegId = 20;
userArgs.TransmitedDt = Convert.ToDateTime("1/30/1980");
// call the bll using the stub
localWithMock.InsertByPorInsertCV(userArgs);
}
Any help is greatly appreciated
I can't really follow your code that well, but I'll give it a shot.
From my skills of deduction, this line here is the one giving you issues:
mockGenericCrud.Stub(c => c.InsertJCDC<PorEO, PorInsertCV>(fakePor)).Return(fakePorNewRow);
Because you're expecting fakePorNewRow to be returned when you call localWithMock.InsertByPorInsertCV(userArgs); - yeah?
If that's your case, what your problem is, is that it will only return fakePorNewRow when it is given fakePor ... not userArgs as you have given it.
Tell me if I'm completely off track.
HTHs,
Charles
Ps. You might want to add the tag of which mocking framework you are using to the question.