I'm hoping that someone can help me here. With Centos 7 all the install docs I have found said to use MariaDB instead of mysql which is fine, but I can't seem to enable remote access.I have used the "GRANT ALL ON . to user#'address' IDENTIFIED BY 'your-root-password';" and flushed privileges and restarted the service. I still am not able to connect via remote terminal I get ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user username.
So I found another article that said I should go to my my.cnf file and make sure my bind settings are set correctly and such.
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/documentation/getting-started/configuring-mariadb-for-remote-client-access/
Based on what this article shows my my.cnf file is completely different than what it should be. Doesn't contain bind-address or skip-networking or port or anything. It looks like the below.
[mysqld]
datadir=/var/lib/mysql
socket=/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
# Disabling symbolic-links is recommended to prevent assorted security risks
symbolic-links=0
# Settings user and group are ignored when systemd is used.
# If you need to run mysqld under a different user or group,
# customize your systemd unit file for mariadb according to the
# instructions in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd
[mysqld_safe]
log-error=/var/log/mariadb/mariadb.log
pid-file=/var/run/mariadb/mariadb.pid
#
# include all files from the config directory
#
!includedir /etc/my.cnf.d
I was wondering if anyone else might know what's going on with this. Thanks.
You may want to investigate this link:
http://www.versatilewebsolutions.com/blog/2015/05/dealing-with-mariadb-plugin-unixsocket-is-not-loaded.html
Essentially, MariaDB switched to unix_socket authentication as a default authentication plugin. To get around it, connect to your MariaDB server and execute these queries:
USE mysql;
UPDATE user SET plugin='' WHERE User = 'root';
FLUSH PRIVILEGES;
exit
This will disable socket authentication and switch back to standard authentication. I do not think this is recommended for production.
I am trying to deploy Biztalk project to my local Biztalk Server using Biztalk Deployment Framework and i am getting the following error:
Information: Importing bindings
"C:\Users...\PortBindings.xml"
into application "Mdm" in BizTalk configuration database
(server=".", database="BizTalkMgmtDb")... EXEC : error :
Failed to update binding information.
[C:\Users...\Deployment.btdfproj]
Cannot update receive port "ApprovedRequests". Cannot update receive
location "ApprovedRequestsDb". The following items could not be
matched up to hosts due to name and/or trust level mismatches:
Item: 'ApprovedRequestsDb' Host: 'ReceiveHost' Trust level:
'Untrusted' You must do one of the following:
1) Create hosts with
these names and trust levels and try again
2) Re-export the MSI without the binding files and have a post import script apply a
suitable binding file.
I've already had host named 'ReceiveHost', so i decided that theres something wrong with Trust level. I tried to deploy with trust level 'Trusted' and recieved the same error.
Can't figure out what is causing the problem.
Thanks.
According to the error, in your binding file, the ApprovedRequestsDb receive location is configured to use a host (receive handler) called ReceiveHost, which is untrusted, which BizTalk cannot find.
Double-check the spelling of the host on the local BizTalk server into which you are importing the binding file. Also make sure that it is untrusted.
Finally, the host must be configured as a handler for the adapter used by your receive location. So if your receive location should use the WCF-SQL adapter, then go to the adapter configuration in the BizTalk Administration Console and ensure that the ReceiveHost is configured as a receive handler for that adapter.
Check you have a host for this install, in your case called "ReceiveHost". You can create hosts and host instances in BizTalk Server Admin Console.
Check for each adapter (especially the adapter used for "ApprovedRequestsDb") that your bindings use, that "ReceiveHost" host is set up in direction Send/Receive, this will at first likely be only BizTalkServerApplication which is the default. Under Platform Settings -> Adapters look through these and make new ones where needed to use the "SQL" host.
This error will only ocur if your HostName does not exist or incorrectly spelt. Also check the Trust level is set to Untrusted. Once you have verified the following you can re-create your binding file as ther might be some typo that is causing it not to import properly.
1)Is there any monitoring or supervision attribute in the OpenLDAP server which can tell if the running OpenLDAP server is a provider or consumer without doing any operations on the Server like ldapmodify?
2) Is their any option to modify the syncrepl config online if yes then how to do ?
The answer to both is to use the 'online configuration' mode whereby the configuration is held inside the directory. Then you can both look up for (1) and modify for (2).
In the Sitecore (6.6 v130404) log file there are so many "Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters." records being created. I have disabled the performance counters in the server.
<!-- ENABLE COUNTERS
Indicates if performance counters are enabled.
Default value: true
-->
<setting name="Counters.Enabled" value="false"/>
Log extract: (For every 6seconds this keeps updating the log)
Heartbeat 19:07:33 WARN Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters.
Heartbeat 19:07:39 WARN Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters.
Heartbeat 19:07:45 WARN Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters.
Heartbeat 19:07:51 WARN Sitecore has no necessary permissions for reading/creating counters.
I have modified the following webconfig setting and set the value as 1hour, as the above log mentions that it's related to a heartbeat setting.
This solved the problem. I have Googled for any effects with this change in this setting, found no results on this. Is this ok to set this setting to 1hour? What is the purpose of this setting?
A Sitecore application pool user (most probably Network Service user) has to be a member of the system “Performance Monitor Users” group to have access to the mentioned registry key. Adding the user to this group and restarting IIS should solve the problem.
As explained in approved answer you need to add app pool user to performance monitor users and performance log users group.
To add your app pool user add iis apppool\{site name}.
You need to restart your machine again or alternatively restart your iis and log off and log in to make sure your changes got picked up by user group membership
Here are a few screenshots.
Powershell solution (works on Windows 10 Home, where you don't have lusrmgr.msc console).
Run PS console as administrator then:
PS C:\WINDOWS\system32>Add-LocalGroupMember -Group "Performance Monitor Users" -Member "{UserName}"
PS C:\WINDOWS\system32>iisreset
Where the {UserName} is your application pool identity user or Network Service.
Mind that group name may be different (it may be in your local language for non-english Windows version). Then call:
PS C:\WINDOWS\system32>Get-LocalGroup
This will list all groups and you will find correct name there.
I am getting this error while connecting to IBM MQ. I know that this is because of privileges, but is there any way just to check the connection with IBM MQ?
Please suggest.
The 2035 suggests that your connection is getting to the QMgr. If you had the wrong channel name, host or port you would get back a 2059. The 2035 means that the connection made it to the listener, found a channel of the name that was requested and attempted a connection.
If you want to test past this point it will be necessary to either authorize the ID that you are using to connect or to put an authorized ID in the MCAUSER attribute of the channel.
For a detailed explanation of how the WMQ security works on client channels, see the WMQ Base Hardening presentation at http://t-rob.net/links.
If you enable authorization messages then the 2035 will show up in the event queue. Then you can look at the message and see what ID was used to connect and what options were used too. The 2035 might be because you asked for set authority on the queue manager or something else you aren't supposed to have. The authorization messages wil show you that.
You can also resolve this By setting mcauser('mqm') .. i was able to overcome 2035 error.
Define channel (channel1) chltype (svrconn) trptype (tcp) mcauser(‘mqm’)
Esp thanx to my SENIOR Bilal Ahmad (PSE)
You have to check the privileges with an MQ administrator.
You can use dspmqaut to check the grant.
Below is the sample to give user poc access to Queue Manager QM1 and Queue LQ1
# check the access right of user POC to QM1
dspmqaut -m QM1 -n LQ1 -t q -p poc
# if you want to give access, you should use
setmqaut -m QM1 -n LQ1 -t q -p poc <access Types>
# eg (put everything - in the real live scenario, choose only what you want to grant) :
setmqaut -m QM1 -n LQ1 -t q -p poc +put +get +browse +inq +set +crt +dlt +chg +dsp +passid +setid +setall +clr
Then dont forget to restart QM1 with
endmqm -i QM1
strmqm QM1
Finally, you should be able to proceed without error 2035.
I have been struggling with this for ages too. Eventually I found this solution. (If you can call turning off authentication a solution.)
I am using version
- IBM Websphere 9.1.0.201807091223
From IBM's website they advise turning connection authentication off!!!
Resolving the problem Disable channel authentication
You will need to disable connection authentication, at least
temporarily. There are known issues in FTM for Check with regard to
using MQ connection authorization. These problems are actively being
addressed and fixes will appear in a future fix pack. The target is
fixpack 3.0.0.8.
Steps to disable connection authentication: Open MQ command console
and type runmqsc ALTER
AUTHINFO(SYSTEM.DEFAULT.AUTHINFO.IDPWOS) AUTHTYPE(IDPWOS)
CHCKCLNT(NONE) CHCKLOCL(NONE) Restart the queue manager for this
change to take effect.
Source http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21962081
On this topic if you are using MQSeries 9.1 in a test or development environment you can disable channel authentication with the following approach :
. Launch MQ command line utility with the following :
runmqsc (for example runmqsc QM1)
. Disable authentication for all channels with the following command
ALTER QMGR CHLAUTH (DISABLED)
For a Q/Q-manager running on Windows, you may have to create the user on the Q/Q-manager machine [i.e. create a user on the Q-machine to match the user on the Q-client machine], and then add that user to the 'mqm' group on that machine.
Steps:
Ensure that the domain user that is being used to create the Q CLIENT [i.e. the user that the Q-client app is running under] also exists on the box with the Q/Q-manager. You may be able to just create a local user on the Q/Q-manager box [, or you may have to do some more complicated creation of an Active Directory user - I can't help you there].
On the Q/Q-manager box, add the user you have just created [or the existing one, if it already exists] to the mqm group. [On a Windows server box you will need to use the Microsoft Management Console (1. 'mmc' from the command line, 2. File > Add/Remove SnapOn > Local Users & Groups, 3. add user to group)]. The 'mqm' group should already exist on the Q/Q-manager machine.
Error MQRC 2035 basically means that your application has been able to connect to the queue manager, however due to certain absence of permissions/authorizations, it was unable to put/get/publish/subscribe messages.
To resolve this, at first, try these steps in order to disable the authorizations from queue manager and channel. Use this only if it isn't a production queue manager.
Always check the queue manager logs. It tells you exactly where you need to look into, and resolve the issue.
In this case, generally, you can issue the following commands after doing a runmqsc on the queue manager :
ALTER QMGR CHLAUTH(DISABLED)
Then set the chckclnt object(under authinfo) to optional
DISPLAY QMGR CONNAUTH
DISPLAY AUTHINFO(name-from-above) ALL //name from the first commands
ALTER AUTHINFO(name-from-above) AUTHTYPE(IDPWOS) ADOPTCTX(YES)
ALTER AUTHINFO(name-from-above) AUTHTYPE(IDPWOS) CHCKCLNT(OPTIONAL)
REFRESH SECURITY TYPE(CONNAUTH)
SET CHLAUTH('*') TYPE(BLOCKUSER) ACTION(REMOVEALL)
This helps remove any blocks that the channel is creating against any user.
SET CHLAUTH(your channel name) TYPE(ADDRESSMAP) ADDRESS('*') USERSRC(CHANNEL)
This should resolve your issue, since we have disabled every authorization that an application has to pass in order to do anything on a queue manager.
Now, in case you are using a production queue manager, NEVER remove authorizations.
Go, and right click on any QM that you have configured in your MQ explorer. Go to the QM authority, and authority records. Click on create new user, and give the same name as the username your application is using. Select all the checkboxes, then copy from the space below all the commands that are given. Namely, setmqaut. Edit with your queue manager name, and issue them!
----Never give up, the answer is where you have not looked yet--------