I'm currently working on a system that will export all the nodes from my AX 2009 AOT to individual XPO files, for the purpose of tracking changes in a central version control repository. I'm having a fair amount of luck, but for some reason I cannot get the Forms or Data Sets node to export at all.
This is my current code set:
private void export(str parentNode)
{
TreeNode node, parent;
str folderName;
Set permissions = new Set(Types::Class);
;
folderName = exportBaseDir + parentNode;
permissions.add(new FileIoPermission(folderName, "r"));
permissions.add(new InteropPermission(InteropKind::ClrInterop));
CodeAccessPermission::assertMultiple(permissions);
//Create Filesystem Folder if needed
if (!WinApiServer::pathExists(folderName))
System.IO.Directory::CreateDirectory(folderName);
CodeAccessPermission::revertAssert();
parent = TreeNode::findNode(parentNode);
if (parent)
node = parent.AOTfirstChild();
else
warning(strfmt("Could not parse node: %1", parentNode));
while (node)
{
this.exportNode(node);
node = node.AOTnextSibling();
}
}
When I call export(#"\Forms"); or export(#"\Data Sets"); I get a "Could not parse node" message, meaning the TreeNode::findNode() didn't resolve correctly. Running it on any other node (such as Classes) does not have this issue. This also only happens when it is run in a Batch -- running it with the client (with the CodeAccessPermission parts removed) will export all nodes as expected.
Is there something that would prohibit Forms and Data Sets from being accessed from within a Batch? If so, what can I do to access those nodes?
As far as I can tell it's a server/client issue/bug. The easy solution would be to create this method on your class:
client static TreeNode clientTreeNode(str _path)
{
return TreeNode::findNode(_path);
}
Then in your code, below the parent = TreeNode::findNode(parentNode); line, put:
parent = parent ? parent : YourClassHere::clientTreeNode(parentNode);
And that should solve your issue. You'll have a bit of digging to do in order to find out why it doesn't work on the server tier if you just must know.
Related
I had posting in alfresco hub , couldnt get solution yet.
I was trying to convert javascript API code to java API which move files to different content store(' storeB'). We have storeB defined in - 'content-store-selector-context.xml'. We are using Enterrprises version of Alfresco 5.2.
java script code as follows , - Works perfectly fine . its working code.
for each (var n in node.children) {
if (n.isDocument) {
//Apply script for moving files to DMS Store 01
n.removeAspect("cm:versionable");
n.addAspect("cm:storeSelector");
n.properties['cm:storeName'] = "storeB";
n.save();
}
}
Below is Java API Code - But this code is not moving files to 'storeB'. Is there anything i am missing ?
Is there any similiar method available in java APIs.
List<ChildAssociationRef> children = nodeService.getChildAssocs(dayFolderRef);
Map<QName, Serializable> aspectsProps = new HashMap<QName, Serializable>(1);
aspectsProps.put(ContentModel.PROP_STORE_NAME, "storeB");
LOG.info("Folder::" + dayFolderRef.getId());
LOG.info("Number of Subfolder to be moved is ::" + children.size());
for (ChildAssociationRef childAssoc : children) {
NodeRef childNodeRef = childAssoc.getChildRef();
if (ContentModel.TYPE_CONTENT.equals(nodeService.getType(childNodeRef))) {
LOG.info("Moving the file to secondary storae "+childNodeRef.getId());
nodeService.removeAspect(childNodeRef, ContentModel.ASPECT_VERSIONABLE);
nodeService.addAspect(childNodeRef, ContentModel.ASPECT_STORE_SELECTOR, aspectsProps);
}
}
I can see a save method is java script API. based on response recieved Alfresco forum , there is no save method in javascript API. Java API run in transactions , so will commit eventually . But i can see from DB using the below SQL -
SELECT count(*)
FROM alf_content_url
WHERE orphan_time IS NOT NULL;
the above SQL returns same count after executing the code , so no DB updates happening. Anything wrong ?
Any help , appreciated
Regards
Brijesh
I don't see why that would not work, are you positive you're even entering that method? Try adding the content store selector aspect with no properties map, then add the content store name property with setProperty method separately.
Here is a scenario: I have a Page which have Component A. Component A have few linked components B and C. If Editor modifies component B and want to publish to staging target while component still in the workflow so Reviewer can view the changes on staging server before approve component B. When editor preview component he can see the changes, but when he publish to staging target it will grab the last checked in version of the Component A, which still linked to the unmodified version of Component B. How to pragmatically overwrite the default behavior to allow Editor publish his changes to staging environment before completing activity for the item?
Also, when component B inserted directly on the second page I was able to publish from VBScript from workflow automated activity using the following:
Dim strItemURI
strItemURI = CurrentWorkItem.GetItem(2).ID
Dim oComp
Set oComp = TDSE.GetObject(strItemURI, 1)
Call oComp.Publish("tcm:0-13-65537", True, True, False)
Set oComp = Nothing
FinishActivity "Automatic Activity ""Publish to Staging"" Finished"
Do I need to write custom resolver to accomplish above scenario to allow modified version of linked components published to staging environment while in workflow?
Any idea or samples will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Updated:
I'm trying to create TBB, which will replace modified version of the item in the package. Any idea on this? Here is some code:
public void Transform(Engine engine, Package package)
{
try
{
_publicationID = engine.PublishingContext.ResolvedItem.Item.Id.PublicationId;
string stagingTarget = Settings.GetSetting("StagingTargetUri");
PublicationTarget target = new PublicationTarget(new TcmUri(stagingTarget), engine.GetSession());
if(engine.PublishingContext.ResolvedItem.PublicationTarget!=null){
if (stagingTarget.Contains(engine.PublishingContext.ResolvedItem.PublicationTarget.Id.ToString()))
{
foreach (Item item in package.GetAllByType(ContentType.Component))
{
VersionedItem versionedItem = (VersionedItem)engine.GetObject(item);
if (versionedItem.LockType.HasFlag(LockType.InWorkflow))
{
Component componentInWorkflow =
(Component)engine.GetObject(new TcmUri(versionedItem.Id.ItemId, versionedItem.Id.ItemType, versionedItem.Id.PublicationId, 0));
package.Remove(item);
Item mainComponent= package.CreateTridionItem(ContentType.Component,componentInWorkflow);
package.PushItem(mainComponent);
}
}
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw ex;
}
}
According to documentation:
You can publish an item in Workflow if it meets the minimum approval
status set for the Publishing Target. If the item is in Workflow and
does not meet the minimum approval status, the Content Manager
publishes the last checked-in version of the item.
This means that you need to:
Set the Minimum Approval Status on your Publication target as something like "Staging"
As a first step on your Workflow set the Approval Status for your component to "Staging"
I googled but didn't find a post for Flex mobile..
All I want for now is display an user agreement popup from TabbedViewNavigatorApplication when the user uses the app for the first time
var agreementView: UserAgreement = new UserAgreement();
PopUpManager.addPopUp(agreementView, this,true);
PopUpManager.centerPopUp(agreementView);
but maybe more later.
Please help..
What i did in my desktop air app;
I guess this will work at a mobile app also.
Make sure you have write access;
open yourproject-app.mxml scroll down to the end of the document. In the section, uncomment the following permission:
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE"/>
Now you can create files like for example an sqlite database.
At the applicationcomplete call the function checkFirstRun:
// functions to check if the application is run for the first time (also after updates)
// so important structural changes can be made here.
public var file:File;
public var currentVersion:Number;
private function checkFirstRun():void
{
//get the current application version.
currentVersion=getApplicationVersion();
//get versionfile
file = File.applicationStorageDirectory;
file= file.resolvePath("Preferences/version.txt");
if(file.exists)
{
checkVersion();
}
else
{
firstRun(); // create the version file.
}
}
public function getApplicationVersion():Number
{
var appXML:XML = NativeApplication.nativeApplication.applicationDescriptor;
var ns:Namespace = appXML.namespace();
var versionnumber:Number =Number(appXML.ns::versionNumber);
return versionnumber;
}
private function checkVersion():void
{
var stream:FileStream= new FileStream();
stream.open(file,FileMode.READ);
var prevVersion:String = stream.readUTFBytes(stream.bytesAvailable);
stream.close();
if(Number(prevVersion)<currentVersion)
{
// if the versionnumber inside the file is older than the current version we go and run important code.
// like alternating the structure of tables inside the sqlite database file.
runImportantCode();
//after running the important code, we set the version to the currentversion.
saveFile(currentVersion);
}
}
private function firstRun():void
{
// at the first time, we set the file version to 0, so the important code will be executed.
var firstVersion:Number=0;
saveFile(firstVersion);
// we also run the checkversion so important code is run right after installing an update
//(and the version file doesn't exist before the update).
checkFirstRun();
}
private function saveFile(currentVersion:Number):void
{
var stream:FileStream=new FileStream();
stream.open(file,FileMode.WRITE);
stream.writeUTFBytes(String(currentVersion));
stream.close();
}
private function runImportantCode():void
{
// here goes important code.
// make sure you check if the important change previously has been made or not, because this code is run after each update.
}
Hope this helps.
Greets, J.
Some you need to store whether the user has agreed to the agreement or not. IF they haven't agreed, then show it.
One way to do this would be to store a value in a shared object. Another way to do this would be to use a remote service and store such data in a central repository. I assume you'll want the second; so you can do some form of tracking against the number of users using your app.
Have a real puzzler here. I'm using Atalasoft DotImage to allow the user to add some annotations to an image. When I add two annotations of the same type that contain text that have the same name, I get a javascript permission denied error in the Atalasoft's compressed js. The error is accessing the style member of a rule:
In the debugger (Visual Studio 2010 .Net 4.0) I can access
h._rule
but not
h._rule.style
What in javascript would cause permission denied when accessing a membere of an object?
Just wondering if anyone else has encountered this. I see several people using Atalasoft on SO and I even saw a response from someone with Atalasoft. And yes, I'm talking to them, but it never hurts to throw it out to the crowd. This only happens in IE8, not FireFox.
Thanks, Brian
Updates: Yes, using latest version: 9.0.2.43666
By same name (see comment below) I mean, I created default annotations and they are named so they can be added with javascript later.
// create a default annotation
TextData text = new TextData();
text.Name = "DefaultTextAnnotation";
text.Text = "Default Text Annotation:\n double-click to edit";
//text.Font = new AnnotationFont("Arial", 12f);
text.Font = new AnnotationFont(_strAnnotationFontName, _fltAnnotationFontSize);
text.Font.Bold = true;
text.FontBrush = new AnnotationBrush(Color.Black);
text.Fill = new AnnotationBrush(Color.Ivory);
text.Outline = new AnnotationPen(new AnnotationBrush(Color.White), 2);
WebAnnotationViewer1.Annotations.DefaultAnnotations.Add(text);
In javascript:
CreateAnnotation('TextData', 'DefaultTextAnnotation');
function CreateAnnotation(type, name) {
SetAnnotationModified(true);
WebAnnotationViewer1.DeselectAll();
var ann = WebAnnotationViewer1.CreateAnnotation(type, name);
WebThumbnailViewer1.Update();
}
There was a bug in an earlier version that allowed annotations to be saved with the same unique id's. This generally doesn't cause problems for any annotations except for TextAnnotations, since they use the unique id to create a CSS class for the text editor. CSS doesn't like having two or more classes defined by the same name, this is what causes the "Permission denied" error.
You can remove the unique id's from the annotations without it causing problems. I have provided a few code snippets below that demonstrate how this can be done. Calling ResetUniques() after you load the annotation data (on the server side) should make everything run smoothly.
-Dave C. from Atalasoft
protected void ResetUniques()
{
foreach (LayerAnnotation layerAnn in WebAnnotationViewer1.Annotations.Layers)
{
ResetLayer(layerAnn.Data as LayerData);
}
}
protected void ResetLayer(LayerData layer)
{
ResetUniqueID(layer);
foreach (AnnotationData data in layer.Items)
{
LayerData group = data as LayerData;
if (group != null)
{
ResetLayer(data as LayerData);
}
else
{
ResetUniqueID(data);
}
}
}
protected void ResetUniqueID(AnnotationData data)
{
data.SetExtraProperty("_atalaUniqueIndex", null);
}
Is it possbile to move aotnode in axapta through code(I want to achive the same movement as done via alt-up, alt-down)
Dynamics AX 2009 has AOTmove method, but when I try
#AOT
ProjectNode root;
//SysContextMenuAOT ctx = new SysContextMenuAOT();
ProjectGroupNode firstChild;
ProjectGroupNode secondChild;
;
//root=ctx.first();
root = infolog.projectRootNode().AOTfindChild("Private").AOTfindChild("TestProject");
root = root.getRunNode();
firstChild = root.AOTfirstChild();
secondChild = firstChild.AOTnextSibling();
secondChild = firstChild.AOTnextSibling();
secondChild.AOTMove(secondChild.AOTparent());
and then call it on whole project it successfully moves secondChildNode, BUT it deletes every subnode inside of secondChild.
It does not seem to work (with project nodes).
AOTmove is used exclusively in form SysFavoritesAddFavorite and SysFavoritesOrganizeFavorites.
You may get some information looking there.