Have a real puzzler here. I'm using Atalasoft DotImage to allow the user to add some annotations to an image. When I add two annotations of the same type that contain text that have the same name, I get a javascript permission denied error in the Atalasoft's compressed js. The error is accessing the style member of a rule:
In the debugger (Visual Studio 2010 .Net 4.0) I can access
h._rule
but not
h._rule.style
What in javascript would cause permission denied when accessing a membere of an object?
Just wondering if anyone else has encountered this. I see several people using Atalasoft on SO and I even saw a response from someone with Atalasoft. And yes, I'm talking to them, but it never hurts to throw it out to the crowd. This only happens in IE8, not FireFox.
Thanks, Brian
Updates: Yes, using latest version: 9.0.2.43666
By same name (see comment below) I mean, I created default annotations and they are named so they can be added with javascript later.
// create a default annotation
TextData text = new TextData();
text.Name = "DefaultTextAnnotation";
text.Text = "Default Text Annotation:\n double-click to edit";
//text.Font = new AnnotationFont("Arial", 12f);
text.Font = new AnnotationFont(_strAnnotationFontName, _fltAnnotationFontSize);
text.Font.Bold = true;
text.FontBrush = new AnnotationBrush(Color.Black);
text.Fill = new AnnotationBrush(Color.Ivory);
text.Outline = new AnnotationPen(new AnnotationBrush(Color.White), 2);
WebAnnotationViewer1.Annotations.DefaultAnnotations.Add(text);
In javascript:
CreateAnnotation('TextData', 'DefaultTextAnnotation');
function CreateAnnotation(type, name) {
SetAnnotationModified(true);
WebAnnotationViewer1.DeselectAll();
var ann = WebAnnotationViewer1.CreateAnnotation(type, name);
WebThumbnailViewer1.Update();
}
There was a bug in an earlier version that allowed annotations to be saved with the same unique id's. This generally doesn't cause problems for any annotations except for TextAnnotations, since they use the unique id to create a CSS class for the text editor. CSS doesn't like having two or more classes defined by the same name, this is what causes the "Permission denied" error.
You can remove the unique id's from the annotations without it causing problems. I have provided a few code snippets below that demonstrate how this can be done. Calling ResetUniques() after you load the annotation data (on the server side) should make everything run smoothly.
-Dave C. from Atalasoft
protected void ResetUniques()
{
foreach (LayerAnnotation layerAnn in WebAnnotationViewer1.Annotations.Layers)
{
ResetLayer(layerAnn.Data as LayerData);
}
}
protected void ResetLayer(LayerData layer)
{
ResetUniqueID(layer);
foreach (AnnotationData data in layer.Items)
{
LayerData group = data as LayerData;
if (group != null)
{
ResetLayer(data as LayerData);
}
else
{
ResetUniqueID(data);
}
}
}
protected void ResetUniqueID(AnnotationData data)
{
data.SetExtraProperty("_atalaUniqueIndex", null);
}
Related
Based on the project tracker I have integrated a changelog into my app that relates my UserSettings model to a UserHistory model. The latter contains the fields FieldName, CreatedBy, CreatedDate, OldValue, NewValue.
The relation between both models works fine. Whenever a record is modified, I can see the changes in a changelog table. I now want add an "undo"-button to the table that allows the admin to undo a change he clicks on. I have therefore created a method that is handled by the widget that holds the changelog record:
function undoChangesToUserRecord(changelog) {
if (!isAdmin()) {
return;
}
var fieldName = changelog.datasource.item.FieldName;
var record = changelog.datasource.item.UserSettings;
record[fieldName] = changelog.datasource.item.OldValue;
}
In theory method goes the connection between UserHistory and UserSettings up to the field and rewrites its value. But when I click on the button, I get a "Failed due to circular reference" error. What am I doing wrong?
I was able to repro the issue with this bit of code:
google.script.run.ServerFunction(app.currentPage.descendants.SomeWidget);
It is kinda expected behavior, because all App Maker objects are pretty much complex and Apps Script RPC has some limitations.
App Maker way to implement it would look like this:
// Server side script
function undoChangesToUserRecord(key) {
if (!isAdmin()) {
return;
}
var history = app.models.UserHistory.getRecord(key);
if (history !== null) {
var fieldName = history.FieldName;
var settings = history.UserSettings;
settings[fieldName] = history.OldValue;
}
}
// Client side script
function onUndoClick(button) {
var history = widget.datasource.item;
google.script.run
.undoChangesToUserRecord(history._key);
}
I have run into a road block developing my Codename One app. One of my classes in my project parses 3 specific html "td" elements from a website and saves the text to a string where I then input that text data into a Codename One multibutton. I originally used jSoup for this operation but soon realized that Codename One doesn't support 3rd party jar files so I used this method as shown below.
public void showOilPrice() {
if (current != null) {
current.show();
return;
}
WebBrowser b = new WebBrowser() {
#Override
public void onLoad(String url) {
BrowserComponent c = (BrowserComponent) this.getInternal();
JavascriptContext ctx = new JavascriptContext(c);
String wtiLast = (String) ctx.get("document.getElementById('pair_8849').childNodes[4].innerText");
String wtiPrev = (String) ctx.get("document.getElementById('pair_8849').childNodes[5].innerText");
String wtiChange = (String) ctx.get("document.getElementById('pair_8849').childNodes[8].innerText");
Form op = new Form("Oil Prices", new BoxLayout(BoxLayout.Y_AXIS));
MultiButton wti = new MultiButton("West Texas Intermediate");
Image icon = null;
Image emblem = null;
wti.setEmblem(emblem);
wti.setTextLine2("Current Price: " + wtiLast);
wti.setTextLine3("Previous: " + wtiPrev);
wti.setTextLine4("Change: " + wtiChange);
op.add(wti);
op.show();
}
};
b.setURL("https://sslcomrates.forexprostools.com/index.php?force_lang=1&pairs_ids=8833;8849;954867;8988;8861;8862;&header-text-color=%23FFFFFF&curr-name-color=%230059b0&inner-text-color=%23000000&green-text-color=%232A8215&green-background=%23B7F4C2&red-text-color=%23DC0001&red-background=%23FFE2E2&inner-border-color=%23CBCBCB&border-color=%23cbcbcb&bg1=%23F6F6F6&bg2=%23ffffff&open=show&last_update=show");
}
This method works in the simulator (and gives a "depreciated API" warning), but does not run when I submit my build online after signing. I have imported the parse4cn1 and cn1JSON libraries and have gone through a series of obstacles but I still receive a build error when I submit. I want to start fresh and use an alternative method if one exists. Is there a way that I can rewrite this segment of code without having to use these libraries? Maybe by using the XMLParser class?
The deprecation is for the WebBrowser class. You can use BrowserComponent directly so WebBrowser is redundant in this case.
I used XMLParser for this use case in the past. It should work with HTML as it was originally designed to show HTML.
It might also be possible to port JSoup to Codename One although I'm not sure about the scope of effort involved.
It's very possible that onLoad isn't invoked for a site you don't actually see rendered so the question is what specifically failed on the device?
I am trying to accomplish two things:
Localize the “built-in” error messages for “FieldMustBeDate” and "FieldMustBeNumeric".
Localize some of the other error messages you would encounter, for example, "PropertyValueRequired".
By using http://forums.asp.net/t/1862672.aspx/1 for problem 1 and MVC 4 ignores DefaultModelBinder.ResourceClassKey for problem 2 I have managed to get both working locally.
However as soon as I publish to a website, the “built-in” error messages defaults back to English while the other error messages stay localized.
I have read several places that using the App_GlobalResources should be avoided, however I am unable to accomplish problem 1 without using this.
I have created a .resx file with the name “WebResources.resx”, set the Build Action to “Embedded”, set the Copy to Output Directory to “Do no Copy”, set the Custom Tool to “PublicResXFileCodeGenerator” and set the Custom Tool Namespace to “Resources”.
The Project itself is set to only Publish files that are needed.
My Global.asax.cs contains the following (relevant) code:
ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider.ResourceClassKey = "WebResources";
DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider.RegisterAdapter(
typeof(RequiredAttribute),
typeof(MyRequiredAttributeAdapter));
And the class MyRequiredAttributeAdapter contains the following code:
public class MyRequiredAttributeAdapter : RequiredAttributeAdapter
{
public MyRequiredAttributeAdapter(
ModelMetadata metadata,
ControllerContext context,
RequiredAttribute attribute
)
: base(metadata, context, attribute)
{
if (attribute.ErrorMessageResourceType == null)
{
attribute.ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(Resources.WebResources);
}
if (attribute.ErrorMessageResourceName == null)
{
attribute.ErrorMessageResourceName = "PropertyValueRequired";
}
}
}
This is working locally however does anyone have any idea on how to get the "built in" messages to work after this is published?
Thank you for your help!
Best regards,
Andreas
I figured this one out myself. If you are trying to accomplish the above you must separate the localized error messages.
Create a *.resx file for the other error messages fx "PropertyValueRequired" and set the Build Action to “Embedded”, set the Copy to Output Directory to “Do no Copy”, set the Custom Tool to “PublicResXFileCodeGenerator” and set the Custom Tool Namespace to “Resources”.
In my case I have moved "PropertyValueRequired" to a file called LocalDanish.resx (still in the App_GlobalResources folder) and changed the line in my "MyRequiredAttributeAdapter" from
attribute.ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(Resources.WebResources);
to
attribute.ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(Resources.LocalDanish);
In order to get the "built in" error messages to work, you must create two *.resx files. I have created WebResources.resx and WebResources.da.resx. Do NOT change anything, leave the settings on them on default (Build Action to "Content", etc.). I guess the website automatically looks for the *.da.resx files in my case because I have set the globalization in my WebConfig:
<globalization uiCulture="da-DK" culture="da-DK"/>
Hope this helps anybody.
Best regards,
Andreas
I have made some minor additions to the original post, which didn't translate all messages in my case.
(String length and invalid property values)
Follow the above steps, to create the *.resx files, set their properties, and then set the locale in web.config, as described by Andreas.
Then create a couple of adapters:
// As described in original post:
public class LocalizedRequiredAttributeAdapter : RequiredAttributeAdapter
{
public LocalizedRequiredAttributeAdapter(
ModelMetadata metadata,
ControllerContext context,
RequiredAttribute attribute
)
: base(metadata, context, attribute)
{
if (attribute.ErrorMessageResourceType == null)
attribute.ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(Resources.Resources);
if (attribute.ErrorMessageResourceName == null)
attribute.ErrorMessageResourceName = "PropertyValueRequired";
}
}
// Addition to original post:
public class LocalizedStringLengthAttributeAdapter : StringLengthAttributeAdapter
{
public LocalizedStringLengthAttributeAdapter(
ModelMetadata metadata,
ControllerContext context,
StringLengthAttribute attribute
)
: base(metadata, context, attribute)
{
if (attribute.ErrorMessageResourceType == null)
attribute.ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(Resources.Resources);
if (attribute.ErrorMessageResourceName == null)
attribute.ErrorMessageResourceName = "StringLengthAttribute_ValidationError";
}
}
And in Global.asax.cx:
// Addition to original post: (Used for "PropertyValueInvalid")
DefaultModelBinder.ResourceClassKey = "Resources";
// As described in original post:
ClientDataTypeModelValidatorProvider.ResourceClassKey = "Resources";
DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider.RegisterAdapter(typeof(RequiredAttribute), typeof(LocalizedRequiredAttributeAdapter));
DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider.RegisterAdapter(typeof(StringLengthAttribute), typeof(LocalizedStringLengthAttributeAdapter));
We are rying to use WF with multiple tracking participants which essentially listen to different queries - one for activity states, one for custom tracknig records which are a subclass of CustomTrackingRecord.
The problem is that we can use both TrackingParticipants indivisually, but not together - we never get our subclass from CustomTrackingRecord but A CustomTrackingRecord.
If I put bopth queries into one TrackingParticipant and then handle everythign in one, both work perfectly (which indicates teh error is not where we throw them).
The code in question for the combined one is:
public WorkflowServiceTrackingParticipant ()
{
this.TrackingProfile = new TrackingProfile()
{
ActivityDefinitionId = "*",
ImplementationVisibility = ImplementationVisibility.All,
Name = "WorkflowServiceTrackingProfile",
Queries = {
new CustomTrackingQuery() { Name = "*", ActivityName = "*" },
new ActivityStateQuery() {
States = {
ActivityStates.Canceled,
ActivityStates.Closed,
ActivityStates.Executing,
ActivityStates.Faulted
}
},
}
};
}
When using two TrackingParticipants we have two TrackingProfile (with different names) that each have one of the queries.
in the track method, when using both separate, the lines:
protected override void Track(TrackingRecord record, TimeSpan timeout)
{
Console.WriteLine("*** ActivityTracking: " + record.GetType());
if (record is ActivityBasedTrackingRecord)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Break();
}
never result in the debugger hitting, when using only the one to track our CustomTrackingRecord subclass (ActivityBasedTrackingRecord) then it works.
Anyone else knows about this? For now we have combined both TrackingParticipants into one, but this has the bad side effect that we can not dynamically expand the logging possibilities, which we would love to. Is this a known issue with WWF somewhere?
Version used: 4.0 Sp1 Feature Update 1.
I guess I encounterad the exact same problem.
This problem occurs due to the restrictions of the extension mechanism. There can be only one instance per extension type per workflow instance (according to Microsoft's documentation). Interesting enough though, one can add multiple instances of the same type to one workflow's extensions which - in case of TrackingParticipant derivates - causes weird behavior, because only one of their tracking profiles is used for all participants of the respective type, but all their overrides of the Track method are getting invoked.
There is a (imho) ugly workaround to this: derive a new participant class from TrackingParticipant for each task (task1, task2, logging ...)
Regards,
Jacob
I think that this problem isn't caused by extension mechanism, since DerivedParticipant 1 and DerivedParticipant 2 are not the same type(WF internals just use polymorphism on the base class).
I was running on the same issue, my Derived1 was tracking records that weren't described in its profile.
Derived1.TrackingProfile.Name was "Foo" and Derived2.TrackingProfile.Name was null
I changed the name from null to "Bar" and it worked as expected.
Here is a WF internal reference code, describing how is the Profile selected
// System.Activities.Tracking.RuntimeTrackingProfile.RuntimeTrackingProfileCache
public RuntimeTrackingProfile GetRuntimeTrackingProfile(TrackingProfile profile, Activity rootElement)
{
RuntimeTrackingProfile runtimeTrackingProfile = null;
HybridCollection<RuntimeTrackingProfile> hybridCollection = null;
lock (this.cache)
{
if (!this.cache.TryGetValue(rootElement, out hybridCollection))
{
runtimeTrackingProfile = new RuntimeTrackingProfile(profile, rootElement);
hybridCollection = new HybridCollection<RuntimeTrackingProfile>();
hybridCollection.Add(runtimeTrackingProfile);
this.cache.Add(rootElement, hybridCollection);
}
else
{
ReadOnlyCollection<RuntimeTrackingProfile> readOnlyCollection = hybridCollection.AsReadOnly();
foreach (RuntimeTrackingProfile current in readOnlyCollection)
{
if (string.CompareOrdinal(profile.Name, current.associatedProfile.Name) == 0 && string.CompareOrdinal(profile.ActivityDefinitionId, current.associatedProfile.ActivityDefinitionId) == 0)
{
runtimeTrackingProfile = current;
break;
}
}
if (runtimeTrackingProfile == null)
{
runtimeTrackingProfile = new RuntimeTrackingProfile(profile, rootElement);
hybridCollection.Add(runtimeTrackingProfile);
}
}
}
return runtimeTrackingProfile;
}
I'm currently trying to implement an automated bug reporter for a Flex application, and would like to return error messages to a server along with the function/line number that caused the error. Essentially, I'm trying to get the getStackTrace() information without going into debug mode, because most users of the app aren't likely to have the debug version of flash player.
My current method is using the UncaughtErrorEvent handler to catch errors that occur within the app, but the error message only returns the type of error that has occurred, and not the location (which means it's useless). I have tried implementing getStackTrace() myself using a function name-grabber such as
private function getFunctionName (callee:Function, parent:Object):String {
for each ( var m:XML in describeType(parent)..method) {
if ( this[m.#name] == callee) return m.#name;
}
return "private function!";
}
but that will only work because of arguments.callee, and so won't go through multiple levels of function calls (it would never get above my error event listener).
So! Anyone have any ideas on how to get informative error messages through the global
error event handler?
EDIT: There seems to be some misunderstanding. I'm explicitly avoiding getStackTrace() because it returns 'null' when not in debug mode. Any solution that uses this function is what I'm specifically trying to avoid.
Just noticed the part about "I don't want to use debug." Well, that's not an option, as the non-debug version of Flash does not have any concept of a stack trace at all. Sucks, don't it?
Not relevant but still cool.
The rest is just for with the debug player.
This is part of my personal debug class (strangely enough, it is added to every single project I work on). It returns a String which represents the index in the stack passed -- class and method name. Once you have those, line number is trivial.
/**
* Returns the function name of whatever called this function (and whatever called that)...
*/
public static function getCaller( index:int = 0 ):String
{
try
{
throw new Error('pass');
}
catch (e:Error)
{
var arr:Array = String(e.getStackTrace()).split("\t");
var value:String = arr[3 + index];
// This pattern matches a standard function.
var re:RegExp = /^at (.*?)\/(.*?)\(\)/ ;
var owner:Array = re.exec(value);
try
{
var cref:Array = owner[1].split('::');
return cref[ 1 ] + "." + owner[2];
}
catch( e:Error )
{
try
{
re = /^at (.*?)\(\)/; // constructor.
owner = re.exec(value);
var tmp:Array = owner[1].split('::');
var cName:String = tmp.join('.');
return cName;
}
catch( error:Error )
{
}
}
}
return "No caller could be found.";
}
As a side note: this is not set up properly to handle an event model -- sometimes events present themselves as either not having callers or as some very weird alternate syntax.
You don't have to throw an error to get the stack trace.
var myError:Error = new Error();
var theStack:String = myError.getStackTrace();
good reference on the Error class
[EDIT]
Nope after reading my own reference getStackTrace() is only available in debug versions of the flash player.
So it looks like you are stuck with what you are doing now.