This is a page that uses a carousel (I believe flexslider). The images in this carrousel are NOT background images. I need to add a gradient to the image, going from the bottom up, and from dark to zero opacity, so that I can make the text more legible. Is this possible?
http://hungersolutionsny.magadev.net
Personally I am not a big fan of adding markup just for styling. I would go for a pseudo element :before or :after
The code would look something like this:
HTML
<div class='slideshow-wrapper'>
<img src='http://www.placekitten.com/800/300'/>
<h2 class='title'>Some title</h2>
</div>
CSS
.slideshow-wrapper {
position:relative;
float: left;
}
.title {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 0;
text-align: center;
z-index: 2;
}
.slideshow-wrapper:before {
content: '';
position:absolute;
top:0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
background: linear-gradient(to bottom, rgba(0,0,0,0) 0%,rgba(0,0,0,1) 100%);
z-index: 1;
}
And an example: http://jsfiddle.net/VrGeM/
Overlay the image with an absolutely positioned <div> that's the same size as the slider. Give that <div> the gradient. Ensure that it's above the images but below the text on top of the images.
It's also pretty easy to create a transparent PNG to use rather than a CSS gradient, which will have the advantage of working in older versions of IE.
The way I ususally do this is via an absolutely-positioned DIV which sits on top of the images and contains the text. Then I give that an opacity like so:
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.56);
If you want a gradient with opacity, this is a good tool which makes that easy: http://www.colorzilla.com/gradient-editor/
There are a number of ways to tackle this. Mainly targeting the background CSS property. If you're looking to target the text that is overlapping the image you could use something simple like this:
body.front #region-content #flexslider-1 ul.slides .views-field-field-banner-statement {
background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
}
It doesn't apply a gradient but it does supply a black background with 50% opacity.
I usually don't use a gradient in this way... when faced with this problem in the past I have always used an inset box-shadow on a div wrapped around the image. Something like this...
<div class="img-wrap">
<img src="" />
</div>
And then in CSS apply the box-shadow to a pseudo selector...
.img-wrap {
display: block;
position: relative;
}
.img-wrap:before {
display: block;
content: '';
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
-webkit-box-shadow: inset 0 -100px 80px 0px rgba(0,0,0,0.4);
}
img {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
Check out this CodePen if you want to see it live... http://cdpn.io/qGwLe
Related
I'm trying to get this cloud-like/gaussian blue effect, but I can't quite get it. I've tried using drop shadows with the same background color but it's not exactly right. Anyone know how to do it?
The given image doesn’t look so much like a CSS drop shadow as mentioned in the question, more like an image put in an element on top of which is a div with something like a linear gradient, or even multiples of these, semi transparent.
This sort of thing
background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom right, rgba(0,0,0,0.5),rgba(255,255,255,0.5));
But more sophisticated. Playing around with tones and opacities and positioning is probably the only way to get exactly what is wanted, the good thing about linear gradients being they let you do that.
I'm using a pseudo-element of the .splash container, makes it smaller than it's parent. On that pseudo-element, I have a partially transparent background and a box-shadow.
I do need to place all children of said container on top of the pseudo-class.
As you can see, the background begin to fade before the edge of the parent element that contains all text.
section {
height: 200px;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background-color: #121212
}
.splash {
--splash-background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
--splash-background-size-decrement: 60px;
position: relative;
z-index: 2;
}
.splash > * {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
.splash::before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
left: var(--splash-background-size-decrement);
right: var(--splash-background-size-decrement);
top: var(--splash-background-size-decrement);
bottom: var(--splash-background-size-decrement);
background-color: var(--splash-background-color);
box-shadow: 0px 0px 50px 60px var(--splash-background-color);
}
<section>
<div class="splash">
<h1>Some text here</h1>
<p>Some text here. Some text here</p>
<p>Some text here. Some text here</p>
</div>
<section>
You can achieve this using the SVG image. You can add SVG image in CSS file or you can add SVG code in HTML file. I am not able to attach SVG file here.
This is the final output.
<style>
body{
/*background-image: url("#"); Add background Image*/
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: 100%;
display: flex;
height: 100vh;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
margin: 0 auto;
max-width: 800px;
max-height: 800px;
}
.container{
width: 800px;
height: 800px;
/*background-image: url(".svg");*/
/*or .svg code in html file*/
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
</style>
<body>
<div class="container"></div>
</body>
I've been trying to use the mix-blend-mode on a page that has contains instances of css opacity transitions. What appears to be happening is that the div containing the mix-blend-mode displays as it would without the blend mode during the transition, or rather, while the animation is in progress. I've only found it to be an issue in Chrome.
In my example, while the div is transforming the blend-mode displays correctly over the image but not over the page background. Once the transition is complete it goes back to display as it should. In other words the blended div appears as solid yellow on the black background while the animation is ongoing but since it is set to darken it should be invisible over the black background. Once the animation is finished it appears as it should. It appears normal over the image.
I've tried this is Firefox and Safari and there seems to be no issue.
Pen: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/QGGVOX
Edit - I've found another instance where this occurring that doesn't involve any animation. Weirdly it happens when the position of one div is set to fixed while the other is absolute, see here: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/wooRME If the position of the div .image is changed to absolute then the blend-mode appears normal.
body {
background: #000;
}
.blend {
height: 650px;
width: 50%;
background-color: yellow;
mix-blend-mode: darken;
position: absolute;
opacity: 1;
left: 0;
top: 0px;
z-index: 100;
}
img {
position: relative;
z-index: 0;
}
So, I think I figured the problem. During the animation, it seems like the body doesn't count as an element, thus making the yellow appear at 1 opacity. I tested with other blend mode and it always appears yellow. (when set to 'difference the expected result would be white instead of yellow)
So the fix? just add a div with 100% sizes and a black background! Then, the yellow has something to blend in and doesn't show up.
Here's the code that worked in your pen:
html - added the bg div:
<div class="bg"></div>
<div class="blend"></div>
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/500/500/">
it's css:
.bg{
background: #000;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
body {
background: #000;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
I also changed the body to fill the window so the margin weren't yellow too. Alternatively, the blend div could be sized in function of the body.
tagging #chrscblls since they wanted to know if you found anything.
EDIT :
For the other codepen the problem wasn't the same tho. They were trying to darken an image and a yellow rectangle onto a gray background.
If they didn't want the yellow to show on their gray background, the solution was simply to put the image inside a div and use ::after to blend in a color. Or even just make an empty div, give it the image as background and use the ::after.
this:
<div/>
with:
body {
background: #333;
}
div{
position:fixed;
width: 500px;
height: 500px;
top:50px;
left: 50px;
mix-blend-mode: darken;
background-image: url("http://lorempixel.com/500/500/");
}
div::after {
content: "";
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
mix-blend-mode: darken;
position:absolute;
opacity: 1;
left: 0;
top: 0;
}
or this:
<div><img src="http://lorempixel.com/500/500/"></div>
without the 'background-image' in the div css.
This question already has answers here:
How do I reduce the opacity of an element's background using CSS?
(29 answers)
Closed 8 years ago.
Simple as it may look I need to create a background for a website with a container that would be semi-transparent. If I add opacity: 0.5; inside of the #content I will end up having the entire container, with all the widgets and letters going ghost. What should I do to apply transparency only to the background image? One answer would be to add transparency to the picture inside of PS but still I am curious.
#content .container {
background:url(images/menu_bar.png) left top repeat-y !important;
}
Give this a try:
#content .container {
width: 500px;
height: 100px;
background: url(../images/menu_bar.png) left top repeat-y rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5) !important;
}
The 'a' in rgba sets the opacity of the color which is 'rgb'. Of course you can set the values to your liking though. If this helps, click the checkmark ;)
Also, don't forget to set the width and height of the image.
One way around the issue is using the position attribute and the z-index attribute. The element you want to be transparent will be the one underneath and then the opaque content will be positioned on top of it.
example:
#transparent-box {
position: absolute; top: 10px; left: 10px;
z-index: 1;
}
#opaque-content {
position: absolute; top: 20px; left: 20px;
z-index: 2;
}
caveat:
When you use this method, you have to bear in mind the indentation/padding you want your content to have and then position it appropriately.
Hope that helps.
You have an interesting problem - the likes of which always have interesting solutions. I'm a big fan of CSS myself and I've tried to mimic the behaviour you need with a few CSS properties here : http://jsfiddle.net/Tax4w/
However, you can always tweak it to suit your needs if this is not exactly what you'd need.
Note: It does look the first time that the text is transparent as well but if you notice carefully it is not
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="inner-container">
<p>I am a big cat</p>
<p>I am a big cat</p>
<p>I am a big cat</p>
<p>I am a big cat</p>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.container{
width:500px;
height:500px;
background-color:#eeeeee;
position:relative;
}
.inner-container:after{
content:"";
background: url('http://placekitten.com/500/500') left top no-repeat;
width:500px;
height:500px;
opacity:0.5;
position:absolute;
left:0px;
top:0px;
}
.inner-container{
width:500px;
height:500px;
}
p{
font-size:20px;
}
You can do something like this:
HTML
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="transparent"></div>
<div class="content">Text goes here</div>
</div>
CSS
.wrapper {
position: relative
}
.transparent {
opacity: 0.5;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
background: #000;
z-index: 1;
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 2;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
}
That will separate out the background opacity and the content opacity. The absolute positioning will ensure that the transparent div covers the entire parent div. Hope this helps!
I have a background image set up through CSS.
html {
background-image: url('../img/cello.jpg');
background-attachment: fixed;
background-size: 100%;
}
I plan on having a different background image for different pages of the website: so it's important that text is legible over it. Right now I've got a translucent black background to my #main content box in the middle like this in order to ensure legibility:
#main {
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);
}
What I really want to do, though, is to have that kind of translucent background over the entire background image, because the black box looks a bit clunky. I've tried making a <div id=#tint> which includes the whole HTML document and giving rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5) to #tint, but that doesn't work at all--I can either get nothing to change or I can get the entire background to become a simple grey with no background image visible at all. Is this simply not possible?
Use background-blend-mode for a simple tint
You can use the background-blend-mode css property:
.box {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background-size: cover;
background-image: url('https://placehold.co/300');
}
.background-tint {
background-color: rgba(200,100,0,.5);
background-blend-mode: multiply;
}
<div class="box background-tint"></div>
Place it on any element with a background image and you're good to go.
The property is well supported in modern browsers NOT including IE 11. For non supporting browsers you can use a polyfill.
Working demo
Other Options
Use filter for a complex tint
You can use the filter css property:
.box {
width: 300px; height: 300px;
background-size: cover;
background-image: url('https://placehold.co/300');
}
.background-tint {
filter: sepia(100%) saturate(200%) brightness(70%) hue-rotate(330deg);
}
<div class="box background-tint"></div>
Place it on any element with a background image and you're good to go.
In order to change the color change the hue-rotate value.
The property is well supported in modern browsers NOT including IE 11.
Working demo
Use a flat linear-gradient and a multiple background overlay
.background-tint {
background-image:
linear-gradient( rgba(0,0,0,.5), rgba(0,0,0,.5) ),
url('http://placehold.it/420')
}
I think this is the most widely used technique but it has the downside of being hardcoded i.e. you can't just take a class, stick it on an element and make a tint.
You could make this into a less or sass mixin, something like:
less
.background-tint(#tint-color, #image-url) {
background-image:
linear-gradient( #tint-color, #tint-color ),
url( #image-url )
}
sass
#mixin background-tint($tint_color, $image_url) {
background-image:
linear-gradient( $tint_color, $tint_color ),
url( $image_url )
}
Working demo
Use a transparent background
This method has the advantage of working on most browsers and is just a nice class you add to any element.
The downside is that if you have anything else inside of that element you will have to wrap it in a div with some kind of positioning position: relative would work best.
Example:
.box {
width: 300px; height: 300px;
background-size: cover;
background-image: url('http://placehold.it/300');
color: #facebc;
}
.background-tint { position: relative; }
.background-tint::after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: rgba(0,0,0,.5);
margin: auto;
}
.u-relative { position: relative; z-index: 1; }
<div class="box background-tint">
<div class="u-relative">300 x 300</div>
</div>
Working Demo
I think you need to create an overlay element (potentially div) which has the sought translucent background. Something like:
.overlay {
z-index: 1;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: fixed;
overflow: auto;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.7); /*can be anything, of course*/
}
And of course, a little demo: little link.
This worked great for me:
https://css-tricks.com/tinted-images-multiple-backgrounds/
.tinted-image {
background:
/* top, transparent red, faked with gradient */
linear-gradient(
rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.45),
rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.45)
),
/* bottom, image */
url(image.jpg);
}
And building on another answer, you can do this with existing colors in less like:
linear-gradient(
fade(#brand-primary, 50%),
fade(#brand-primary, 50%)
),
It would be the overlay property
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html#blendingoverlay
But it's a draft. Don't rely on it
Try opacity:
opacity:0.4;
filter:alpha(opacity=40); /* For IE8 and earlier */
This is the simplest solution to the problem in my opinion.
.parent-div{
background-color : desired-color
}
#image-id{
opacity: dersired_value%
}
To increase readibity background-color: black and opacity percentages of range 50 to 60% seem to work nicely.
What's the best way (if any) to make the inside box transparent so the image can be seen with no opacity (clear image) and the rest of the outer box opaque. So far this is what I'm doing:
<style>
#a {
background-color: black;
float: left;
} #b {
opacity : 0.4;
filter: alpha(opacity=40);
} #div {
position: absolute;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
top: 90px;
left: 90px;
border: 1px solid #FFF;
background: transparent;
}
</style>
<div id="a">
<div id="b">
<img src="http://clagnut.com/images/ithaka.jpg" />
</div>
</div>
<div id="div"></div>
Any ideas? thx
The maximum opacity of an element is the opacity of its parent element. So if div#b has an opacity of 40%, if his children have 100% opacity in style they will also be 40% absolute opacity.
To accomplish what you're describing (at least what I think you're describing), one way could be to have both the transparent wrapper and the image children of a parent div with relative positioning. You can absolutely position both of the children inside of that wrapper so that the image shows up on top of the transparent box.
Edit: Here is the code for the effect you are describing. My example has a 480 x 320 image, and a 30-pixel border:
<style>
#back {background-image:url(mypicture.jpg);
width:480px;
height:320px;
position:relative;}
#middle {position:absolute;
width:480px;
height:320px;
background-color:#000;
opacity:0.4;
filter:alpha(opacity=40);
top:0;
left:0;}
#front {position:absolute;
width:420px; /* 30px border on left & right */
height:260px; /* 30px border on top & bottom */
background-image:url(mypicture.jpg);
background-position:-30px -30px; /* compensate for the border */
top:30px;
left:30px;}
</style>
<div id="back">
<div id="middle">
</div>
<div id="front">
</div>
</div>
If I understand you correctly, try using just one div (i.e. get rid of the outer one with ID "a") and setting a colored border around it. Or you could get more flexibility by "faking" a border using 4 divs for the left, right, top, and bottom edges and 4 more for the corners.
It's kind of hard to know what you mean without an example page, or screenshots of what you expect and what you're actually getting.
EDIT: I was about to edit in basically the same thing Rex M wrote. Here's another (although idealistically inferior) way to do it:
<style>
#a {
float: left;
position: relative;
}
div.overlay {
opacity: 0.4;
background-color: black;
position: absolute;
}
#t {
left: 0; top: 0; height: 90px; width: 450px;
}
#b {
left: 0; top: 120px; height: 218px; width: 450px;
}
#l {
left: 0; top: 90px; height: 30px; width: 90px;
}
#r {
left: 120px; top: 90px; height: 30px; width: 330px;
}
</style>
<div id="a">
<div id="t" class="overlay"></div>
<div id="b" class="overlay"></div>
<div id="l" class="overlay"></div>
<div id="r" class="overlay"></div>
<img src="http://clagnut.com/images/ithaka.jpg">
</div>
If you want to be sure that the images have a certain color for a background, you could just as well stick a background to all IMG-elements in your stylesheet:
div#a img { background: #FFF; }
Anyhow, the filter-property in CSS should not be relied upon, as it is not part of the official specifications for CSS 2.1.
I might have misunderstood the question, though. Could you rephrase it or provide pictures of expected results?
To follow on what Rex M said, you'll need to change things so that the non-transparent elements aren't children of the transparent elements.
You can use absolute or relative positioning to line up your "border" with the picture, although this can often have inconsistencies between browsers.
The most painless way off the top of my head is to use javascript to get the top and left pixel locations of the image and set the top/left css properties of the border to match (and set the size of the border to that of the image).
UPDATE:
The asker showed an example of what he is trying to recreate. In the example linked, the shaded areas (the "not selected" area) of the picture is created by 4 divs.
The top and bottom divs are the full width of the image, and are set to have a height that is the difference between the top/bottom of the selection box and the top/bottom of the image respectively.
The side divs have height and width modified so that they fill in the "side areas" of the image.
The sizes are updated via a mousemove event.