On my meteor project users can post events and they have to choose (via an autocomplete) in which city it will take place. I have a full list of french cities and it will never be updated.
I want to use a collection and publish-subscribes based on the input of the autocomplete because I don't want the client to download the full database (5MB). Is there a way, for performance, to tell meteor that this collection is "static"? Or does it make no difference?
Could anyone suggest a different approach?
When you "want to tell the server that a collection is static", I am aware of two potential optimizations:
Don't observe the database using a live query because the data will never change
Don't store the results of this query in the merge box because it doesn't need to be tracked and compared with other data (saving memory and CPU)
(1) is something you can do rather easily by constructing your own publish cursor. However, if any client is observing the same query, I believe Meteor will (at least in the future) optimize for that so it's still just one live query for any number of clients. As for (2), I am not aware of any straightforward way to do this because it could potentially mess up the data merging over multiple publications and subscriptions.
To avoid using a live query, you can manually add data to the publish function instead of returning a cursor, which causes the .observe() function to be called to hook up data to the subscription. Here's a simple example:
Meteor.publish(function() {
var sub = this;
var args = {}; // what you're find()ing
Foo.find(args).forEach(function(document) {
sub.added("client_collection_name", document._id, document);
});
sub.ready();
});
This will cause the data to be added to client_collection_name on the client side, which could have the same name as the collection referenced by Foo, or something different. Be aware that you can do many other things with publications (also, see the link above.)
UPDATE: To resolve issues from (2), which can be potentially very problematic depending on the size of the collection, it's necessary to bypass Meteor altogether. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/21835534/586086 for one way to do it. Another way is to just return the collection fetch()ed as a method call, although this doesn't have the benefits of compression.
From Meteor doc :
"Any change to the collection that changes the documents in a cursor will trigger a recomputation. To disable this behavior, pass {reactive: false} as an option to find."
I think this simple option is the best answer
You don't need to publish your whole collection.
1.Show autocomplete options only after user has inputted first 3 letters - this will narrow your search significantly.
2.Provide no more than 5-10 cities as options - this will keep your recordset really small - thus no need to push 5mb of data to each user.
Your publication should look like this:
Meteor.publish('pub-name', function(userInput){
var firstLetters = new RegExp('^' + userInput);
return Cities.find({name:firstLetters},{limit:10,sort:{name:1}});
});
Related
I'm doing my meteor app and it has 1 Collection: Students
In Server I made a Publish that receives 3 params: query, limit and skip; to avoid client to subscribe all data and just show the top 10.
I have also 3 Paths:
student/list -> Bring top 10, based on search input and pagination (using find);
student/:id -> Show the student (using findOne)
student/:id/edit -> Edit the student (using findOne)
Each Template subscribe to the Students collection, but every time the user change between this paths, my Template re-render and re-subscribe.
Should I make just one subscribe, and make the find based on this "global" subscription?
I see a lot of people talking about Template level subscription, but I don't know if it is the better choice.
And about making query on server to publish and not send all data, I saw people talking too, to avoid data traffic...
In this case, when I have just 1 Collection, is better making an "global" subscription?
You're following a normal pattern although it's a bit hard to tell without the code. If there many students then you don't really want to publish them all, only what is really necessary for the current route. What you should do is figure out why your pub-sub is slow. Is it the find() on the server? Do you have very large student objects? (In which case you will probably want to limit what fields are returned). Is the search you're running hitting mongo indexes?
Your publication for a list view can have different fields than for a individual document view, for example:
Meteor.publish('studentList',function(){
let fields = { field1: 1, field2: 1 }; // only include two fields
return Students.find({},fields);
});
Meteor.publish('oneStudent',function(_id){
return Students.find(_id); // here all fields will be included
});
After lots of reading, I'm starting to get a better handle on Meteor's publish/subscribe model. I've removed the autopublish training wheels from my first app and while I have most everything working, I am seeing one issue.
When the app first loads, my publish and subscribe hooks work great. I have a block of code that runs in a Tracker.autorun() block which makes the subscribe calls, I am able to sequentially wait for data from the server using ready() on my subscribe handles, etc.
One feature of my app is that it allows the user to insert new documents into a collection. More specifically, when the user performs a certain action, this triggers an insert. At that point, the client-side JS runs and the insert into MiniMongo completes. The reactive autorun block runs and the client can see the inserted documented. The client updates the DOM with the new inserted data and all is well.
Furthermore, when I peek into the server-side MongoDB, I see the inserted document which means the server-side JS is running fine as well.
Here's where it gets weird. The client-side autorun block runs a second time (I'm not sure why) and this time, the client no longer has the inserted item. When the DOM renders, the newly inserted item is now gone. If I reload the page, all is well again.
Has anyone seen this behavior before? I'm also noticing that the server-side publish call runs once on page load but then it doesn't run again after the insert. This seems wrong because how else will the client get the reconciled data from the server after the insertion (i.e. after Meteor's client-side latency compensation)?
The important functions (ComponentInstances is the collection that is bugging out):
Publish block:
Meteor.publish('allComponentInstances', function (documentId, screenIndex) {
console.log(`documentId: ${documentId} screenIndex: ${screenIndex}`)
const screens = Screens.find({ownerDocumentId: documentId})
const selectedScreen = screens.fetch()[screenIndex]
return ComponentInstances.find({_id: {$in: selectedScreen.allComponentInstanceIds}})
})
Subscription block in autorun:
// ... a bunch of irrelevant code above
const allComponentInstancesHandle = Meteor.subscribe('allComponentInstances', document._id, 0)
if (allComponentInstancesHandle.ready()) {
isReady = true
screens = Screens.find({ownerDocumentId: document._id}).fetch()
const componentInstanceObjects = ComponentInstances.find().fetch()
allComponentInstances = {}
componentInstanceObjects.map((componentInstance) => {
allComponentInstances[componentInstance._id] = componentInstance
})
}
This is most probably you're inserting documents from client side. And you have not set up your permission rules properly. When you remove autopublish and insecure from your app, you are not allowed to insert/update/remove documents into collection unless you have allow/deny rules set up in the server side.
Meteor has a great feature called latency compensation which tries emulate your db operations before it gets the actual write operation in the db. And when the server tries to write in the db, it looks for allow/deny rules.If the permission rules doesn't allow the db operation or Whatever the reason( either allow/deny or authentication) for not actually written in the db, then the server data gets synchronized with your client side db.
This is why i assume you are seeing your document being inserted for the first time and gets disappeared within a second.
check this section of meteor docs.
http://docs.meteor.com/#/full/allow
I ended up solving this a different way. The core issue, I believe, has nothing to do with accept/deny rules. In fact, their role is still hazy to me.
I realize now what I've been reading all along in the Meteor docs: the publish functions return cursors. If the cursor itself doesn't change (e.g. if you're passing specific keys you want to fetch), then it won't really work as a reactive data source in the sense that new documents in a collection will not make the data publish again. You are, after all, still requesting the same keys.
The way forward is to come up with a publish cursor that accurately reflects the reactive data you want to retrieve. This sounds abstract but in practice, it means make sure the cursor is general, not specific to the specific keys you are retrieving.
I have a situation in which I need to subscribe to the same collection twice. The two publish methods in my server-side code are as follows:
Meteor.publish("selected_full_mycollection", function (important_id_list) {
check(important_id_list, Match.Any); // should do better check
// this will return the full doc, including a very long array it contains
return MyCollection.find({
important_id: {$in: important_id_list}
});
});
Meteor.publish("all_brief_mycollection", function() {
// this will return all documents, but only the id and first item in the array
return MyCollection.find({}, {fields: {
important_id: 1,
very_long_array: {$slice: 1}
}});
});
My problem is that I am not seeing the full documents on the client end after I subscribe to them. I think this is because they are being over-written by the method that publishes only the brief versions.
I don't want to clog up my client memory with long arrays when I don't need them, but I do want them available when I do need them.
The brief version is subscribed to on startup. The full version is subscribed to when the user visits a template that drills down for more insight.
How can I properly manage this situation?
TL/DR - skip to the third paragraph.
I'd speculate that this is because the publish function thinks that the very_long_array field has already been sent to the client, so it doesn't send it again. You'd have to fiddle around a bit to confirm this, but sending different data on the same field is bound to cause some problems.
In terms of subscribing on two collections, you're not supposed to be able to do this as the unique mongo collection name needs to be provided to the client and server-side collections object. In practice, you might be able to do something really hacky by making one client subscription a fake remote subscription via DDP and having it populate a totally separate Javascript object. However, this cannot be the best option.
This situation would be resolved by publishing your summary on something other than the same field. Unfortunately, you can't use transforms when returning cursors from a publish function (which would be the easiest way), but you have two options:
Use the low-level publications API as detailed in this answer.
Use collection hooks to populate another field (like very_long_array_summary) with the first item in the array whenever very_long_array changes and publish just the summary field in the former publication.
A third option might be publishing the long version to a different collection that exists for this purpose on the client only. You might want to check the "Advanced Pub/Sub" Chapter of Discover Meteor (last sub chapter).
In Meteor, I got a collection that the client subscribes to. In some cases, instead of publishing the documents that exists in the collection on the server, I want to send down some bogus data. Now that's fine using the this.added function in the publish.
My problem is that I want to treat the bogus doc as if it were a real document, specifically this gets troublesome when I want to update it. For the real docs I run a RealDocs.update but when doing that on the bogus doc it fails since there is no representation of it on the server (and I'd like to keep it that way).
A collection API that allowed me to pass something like local = true this would be fantastic but I have no idea how difficult that would be to implement and I'm not to fond of modifying the core code.
Right now I'm stuck at either creating a BogusDocs = new Meteor.Collection(null) but that makes populating the Collection more difficult since I have to either hard code fixtures in the client code or use a method to get the data from the server and I have to make sure I call BogusDocs.update instead of RealDocs.update as soon as I'm dealing with bogus data.
Maybe I could actually insert the data on the server and make sure it's removed later, but the data really has nothing to do with the server side collection so I'd rather avoid that.
Any thoughts on how to approach this problem?
After some further investigation (the evented mind site) it turns out that one can modify the local collection without making calls to the server. This is done by running the same methods as you usually would, but on MyCollection._collection instead of just on Collection. MyCollection.update() would thus become MyCollection._collection.update(). So, using a simple wrapper one can pass in the usual arguments to a update call to update the collection as usual (which will try to call the server which in turn will trigger your allow/deny rules) or we can add 'local' as the last argument to only perform the update in the client collection. Something like this should do it.
DocsUpdateWrapper = function() {
var lastIndex = arguments.length -1;
if (arguments[lastIndex] === 'local') {
Docs._collection.update(arguments.slice(0, lastIndex);
} else {
Docs.update(arguments)
}
}
(This could of course be extended to a DocsWrapper that allows for insertion and removals too.)(Didnt try this function yet but it should serve well as an example.)
The biggest benefit of this is imo that we can use the exact same calls to retrieve documents from the local collection, regardless of if they are local or living on the server too. By adding a simple boolean to the doc we can keep track of which documents are only local and which are not (An improved DocsWrapper could check for that bool so we could even omit passing the 'local' argument.) so we know how to update them.
There are some people working on local storage in the browser
https://github.com/awwx/meteor-browser-store
You might be able to adapt some of their ideas to provide "fake" documents.
I would use the transform feature on the collection to make an object that knows what to do with itself (on client). Give it the corruct update method (real/bogus), then call .update rather than a general one.
You can put the code from this.added into the transform process.
You can also set up a local minimongo collection. Insert on callback
#FoundAgents = new Meteor.Collection(null, Agent.transformData )
FoundAgents.remove({})
Meteor.call 'Get_agentsCloseToOffer', me, ping, (err, data) ->
if err
console.log JSON.stringify err,null,2
else
_.each data, (item) ->
FoundAgents.insert item
Maybe this interesting for you as well, I created two examples with native Meteor Local Collections at meteorpad. The first pad shows an example with plain reactive recordset: Sample_Publish_to_Local-Collection. The second will use the collection .observe method to listen to data: Collection.observe().
I want to take a list of item names from a collection as a simple array to use for things like autocompleting user input and checking for duplicates. I would like this list to be reactive so that changes in the data will be reflected in the array. I have tried the following based on the Meteor documentation:
setReactiveArray = (objName, Collection, field) ->
update = ->
context = new Meteor.deps.Context()
context.on_invalidate update
context.run ->
list = Collection.find({},{field: 1}).fetch()
myapp[objName] = _(list).pluck field
update()
Meteor.startup ->
if not app.items?
setReactiveArray('items', Items, 'name')
#set autocomplete using the array
Template.myForm.set_typeahead = ->
Meteor.defer ->
$('[name="item"]').typeahead {source: app.items}
This code seems to work, but it kills my app's load time (takes 5-10 seconds to load on dev/localhost vs. ~1 second without this code). Am I doing something wrong? Is there a better way to accomplish this?
You should be able to use Items.find({},{name: 1}).fetch(), which will return an array of items and is reactive, so it will re-run its enclosing function whenever the query results change, as long as it's called in a reactive context.
For the Template.myForm.set_typeahead helper, you might want to call that query inside the helper itself, store the result in a local variable, and then call Meteor.defer with a function that references that variable. Otherwise I'm not sure that the query will be inside a reactive context when it's called.
Edit: I have updated the code below both because it was fragile, and to put it in context so it's easier to test. I have also added a caution - in most cases, you will want to use #zorlak's or #englandpost's methods (see below).
First of all, kudos to #zorlak for digging up my old question that nobody answered. I have since solved this with a couple of insights gleaned from #David Wihl and will post my own solution. I will hold off on selecting the correct answer until others have a chance to weigh in.
#zorlak's answer solves the autocomplete issue for a single field, but as stated in the question, I was looking for an array that would update reactively, and the autocomplete was just one example of what it would be used for. The advantage of having this array is that it can be used anywhere (not just in template helpers) and that it can be used multiple times in the code without having to re-execute the query (and the _.pluck() that reduces the query to an array). In my case, this array ends up in multiple autocomplete fields as well as validation and other places. It's possible that the advantages I'm putting forth are not significant in most Meteor apps (please leave comments), but this seems like an advantage to me.
To make the array reactive, simply build it inside a Meteor.autorun() callback - it will re-execute any time the target collection changes (but only then, avoiding repetitive queries). This was the key insight I was looking for. Also, using the Template.rendered() callback is cleaner and less of a hack than the set_typeahead template helper I used in the question. The code below uses underscore.js's _.pluck() to extract the array from the collection and uses Twitter bootstrap's $.typeahead() to create the autocomplete.
Updated code: I have edited the code so you can try this with a stock meteor created test environment. Your html will need a line <input id="typeahead" /> in the 'hello' template. #Items has the # sign to make Items available as a global on the console (Meteor 0.6.0 added file-level variable scoping). That way you can enter new items in the console, such as Items.insert({name: "joe"}), but the # is not necessary for the code to work. The other necessary change for standalone use is that the typeahead function now sets the source to a function (->) so that it will query items when activated instead of being set at rendering, which allows it to take advantage of changes to items.
#Items = new Meteor.Collection("items")
items = {}
if Meteor.isClient
Meteor.startup ->
Meteor.autorun ->
items = _(Items.find().fetch()).pluck "name"
console.log items #first result will be empty - see caution below
Template.hello.rendered = ->
$('#typeahead').typeahead {source: -> _(Items.find().fetch()).pluck "name"}
Caution! The array we created is not itself a reactive data source. The reason that the typeahead source: needed to be set to a function -> that returned items is that when Meteor first starts, the code runs before Minimongo has gotten its data from the server, and items is set to an empty array. Minimongo then receives its data, and items is updated You can see this process if you run the above code with the console open: console.log items will log twice if you have any data stored.
Template.x.rendered() calls don't don't set a reactivity context and so won't retrigger due to changes in reactive elements (to check this, pause your code in the debugger and examine Deps.currentComputation -- if it's null, you are not in a reactive context and changes to reactive elements will be ignored). But you might be surprised to learn that your templates and helpers will also not react to items changing -- a template using #each to iterate over items will render empty and never rerender. You could make it act as a reactive source (the simplest way being to store the result with Session.set(), or you can do it yourself), but unless you are doing a very expensive calculation that should be run as seldom as possible, you are better off using #zorlak's or #englandpost's methods. It may seem expensive to have your app querying the database repetitively, but Minimongo is caching the data locally, avoiding the network, so it will be quite fast. Thus in most situations, it's better just to use
Template.hello.rendered = ->
$('#typeahead').typeahead {source: -> _(Items.find().fetch()).pluck "name"}
unless you find that your app is really bogging down.
here is my quick solution for bootstrap typeahead
On client side:
Template.items.rendered = ->
$("input#item").typeahead
source: (query, process) ->
subscription = Meteor.subscribe "autocompleteItems", query, ->
process _(Items.find().fetch()).pluck("name")
subscription.stop() # here may be a bit different logic,
# such as keeping all opened subsriptions until autocomplete
# will be successfully completed and so on
items: 5
On server side:
Meteor.publish "autocompleteItems", (query) ->
Items.find
name: new RegExp(query, "i"),
fields: { name: 1 },
limit: 5
I actually ended up approaching the autocompletion problem completely differently, using client-side code instead of querying servers. I think this is superior because Meteor's data model allows for fast multi-rule searching with custom rendered lists.
https://github.com/mizzao/meteor-autocomplete
Autocompleting users with #, where online users are shown in green:
In the same line, autocompleting something else with metadata and bootstrap icons:
Please fork, pull, and improve!