Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
For private usage I am looking for a simple document management system (NOT a Web CMS). The requirements are relatively simple :
Web based
Free, prefer open-source
Able to store electronic documents (Word, PDF, ...) and scanned paper documents (in PDF/jpeg/whatever image format)
OCR support
Along with some metadata : name of the doc, project/department to which it belongs, author, date, place, some identifiying code, a short description,...
Using different storage (NAS, Dropbox, WebDAV)
Optional but nice
Versioning
Indexing/search inside the word/pdf/text/... documents
I've tried doo for my mac, but it's still to buggy ...
Any suggestions?
You could run Alfresco or Nuxeo locally. Nuxeo has an OCR module that uses the tesseract OCR engine https://github.com/nuxeo/nuxeo-platform-ocr. They both support all of your list including the optional part.
However, these two systems are complex, and require a fair degree of configuration – hence, perhaps couldn't be described as 'simple'.
If you want something simple for Mac OS X, you could try the commercial offering called Paperless https://www.marinersoftware.com/products/paperless/. I haven't used the latest version, but it looks like they've added OCR support. This doesn't meet the free preference though!
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an ASP.Net application and I want to learn which lines of code are covered by unit tests. (Test team is testing in the system all the time, but I do not know which parts of the system are being tested)
Do you know of any tools for this purpose? It should be able to work on web applications and also show me the code coverage rates, with function or class names.
You can use Visual Studio 2012, if your version permits.
To do this go to the Test > Analyze Code Coverage > All Tests it will output your 'Code Coverage Results' like this:
Selecting 'Show Code Coverage Coloring' (circled in red above) results in the following:
Which highlights that Method2 is not covered.
See here for more detailed info:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd537628.aspx
There is also a paid for tool from jet brains, dotcover.
http://www.jetbrains.com/dotcover/
I have not used that but I'm sure someone else reading has and will be able to advise you.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have searched google and this site but was unable to find any tutorials on the Rdata format.
Can someone point me to one?
What I would like to know is basically how to use it and what its advantages/disadvantages are.
Can I store any type of data structure in Rdata? Can I save an Rdata file and update it with new entries? etc.
An Rdata file is a binary file, whereas csv files, for example, are text files. Advantages of Rdata format is that it is more compact, faster to read, and can store any type of R data structure. Furthermore, you can store several objects into one Rdata file.
On the other hand, it is a format which is incompatible with other statistical systems or software. So you won't be able to send data in this format to someone who is not using R. Furthermore, it may become incompatible from one R version to another (even if the compatibility is maintained since version 1.4).
You can find more informations in the ?save help page.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking to download the trial version for Adobe After Effects CS6. I am trying to learn how to use the software, but i can't seem to find the trial version for CS6. Is there a trial version available for this software?
The problem with this request is that Adobe has moved on to a newer software version than CS6 namely Adobe Creative Cloud (cc). Any trial downloads that you find on the adobe site will now be for After Effects cc.
AEcc seems to be pretty similar to AEcs6. CC has some updates from cs6 that may lead to faster workflow. Here's a pretty good explanation of the improvements:
http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/features.html
If you still want to try to find AEcs6, here are some links from Adobe that may or may not allow you to download AEcs6 as a trial.
This link may not have any trial option. It is for customers who have lost their DVD of AE to re-download it:
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cs6-product-downloads.html
This link may just be an update and not the full file:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/thankyou.jsp?ftpID=5387&fileID=5012
There are other methods of finding AEcs6 if you need that specific version, but many of them are improper to list on SO.
I hope this helps.
Go here: https://creative.adobe.com/products/aftereffects and click the download button. You will download it through their creative cloud solution and will get 30 days of trial use.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 8 years ago.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Improve this question
I'm looking to (programmatically) convert a repository of Adobe Indesign template files (.indd) to something more easily manipulated by humans (ie, CSS/HTML files).
I'm more interested in an accurate conversion, than a fully readable one - the resulting files will be read by humans, and eventually made more readable.
Is there a tool or library I can use for this purpose?
Actually the only viable solution to convert from InDesign to html5 seems to be the "In5" plugin developed by Ajar Productions. I doubt it'll allow for bulk conversion but it seems to make a good job as regards accuracy.
Product and a detailed list of its features here: http://www.ajarproductions.com/pages/products/in5/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I need something that takes a directory's contents and then proceeds to generate an RSS based on what is IN the files in the directory, meaning:
/myDir -ls
.
..
a.xml
b.xml
c.xml
d.txt
The mechanism I'm looking for would only look through the files with extension .xml, and would assemble their contents into one larger .xml (or .rss) file that it would spit back out, via HTTP.
You might like to have a look into ROME. It is a great utility to let you create, consume and manipulate ALL types of feeds be they RSS or ATOM of any version.
A quick article to get you started is ROME in a Day: Parse and Publish Feeds in Java.