Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking to download the trial version for Adobe After Effects CS6. I am trying to learn how to use the software, but i can't seem to find the trial version for CS6. Is there a trial version available for this software?
The problem with this request is that Adobe has moved on to a newer software version than CS6 namely Adobe Creative Cloud (cc). Any trial downloads that you find on the adobe site will now be for After Effects cc.
AEcc seems to be pretty similar to AEcs6. CC has some updates from cs6 that may lead to faster workflow. Here's a pretty good explanation of the improvements:
http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/features.html
If you still want to try to find AEcs6, here are some links from Adobe that may or may not allow you to download AEcs6 as a trial.
This link may not have any trial option. It is for customers who have lost their DVD of AE to re-download it:
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cs6-product-downloads.html
This link may just be an update and not the full file:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/thankyou.jsp?ftpID=5387&fileID=5012
There are other methods of finding AEcs6 if you need that specific version, but many of them are improper to list on SO.
I hope this helps.
Go here: https://creative.adobe.com/products/aftereffects and click the download button. You will download it through their creative cloud solution and will get 30 days of trial use.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an ASP.Net application and I want to learn which lines of code are covered by unit tests. (Test team is testing in the system all the time, but I do not know which parts of the system are being tested)
Do you know of any tools for this purpose? It should be able to work on web applications and also show me the code coverage rates, with function or class names.
You can use Visual Studio 2012, if your version permits.
To do this go to the Test > Analyze Code Coverage > All Tests it will output your 'Code Coverage Results' like this:
Selecting 'Show Code Coverage Coloring' (circled in red above) results in the following:
Which highlights that Method2 is not covered.
See here for more detailed info:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd537628.aspx
There is also a paid for tool from jet brains, dotcover.
http://www.jetbrains.com/dotcover/
I have not used that but I'm sure someone else reading has and will be able to advise you.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
For private usage I am looking for a simple document management system (NOT a Web CMS). The requirements are relatively simple :
Web based
Free, prefer open-source
Able to store electronic documents (Word, PDF, ...) and scanned paper documents (in PDF/jpeg/whatever image format)
OCR support
Along with some metadata : name of the doc, project/department to which it belongs, author, date, place, some identifiying code, a short description,...
Using different storage (NAS, Dropbox, WebDAV)
Optional but nice
Versioning
Indexing/search inside the word/pdf/text/... documents
I've tried doo for my mac, but it's still to buggy ...
Any suggestions?
You could run Alfresco or Nuxeo locally. Nuxeo has an OCR module that uses the tesseract OCR engine https://github.com/nuxeo/nuxeo-platform-ocr. They both support all of your list including the optional part.
However, these two systems are complex, and require a fair degree of configuration – hence, perhaps couldn't be described as 'simple'.
If you want something simple for Mac OS X, you could try the commercial offering called Paperless https://www.marinersoftware.com/products/paperless/. I haven't used the latest version, but it looks like they've added OCR support. This doesn't meet the free preference though!
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 8 years ago.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Improve this question
I'm looking to (programmatically) convert a repository of Adobe Indesign template files (.indd) to something more easily manipulated by humans (ie, CSS/HTML files).
I'm more interested in an accurate conversion, than a fully readable one - the resulting files will be read by humans, and eventually made more readable.
Is there a tool or library I can use for this purpose?
Actually the only viable solution to convert from InDesign to html5 seems to be the "In5" plugin developed by Ajar Productions. I doubt it'll allow for bulk conversion but it seems to make a good job as regards accuracy.
Product and a detailed list of its features here: http://www.ajarproductions.com/pages/products/in5/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm a first year Computer Science student looking to get started with development for micro-controllers. I'd like to use the 8051, as it's common as dirt, and is used frequently in the real world.
During my junior or senior year, I'll be taking a PIC micro-controller based embedded design class, so I'd rather not do PIC now; otherwise, I'll be fairly bored during that course.
Most commercial kits I see are for the AVR or PIC series of microprocessors. I'm just looking for something with decent development tools, documentation, and enough add-ons to keep my novice self occupied for the summer.
Any recommendations for an 8051 family kit? Thanks!
Check out the MCUniversity ToolStick development kit from Silicon Labs:
http://www.silabs.com/products/mcu/Pages/MCUniversity.aspx
Disclaimer: I work for Silicon Labs.
The kit and documentation are designed for people who are new to the 8051 and microcontrollers in general.
I asked pretty much the same question on a microcontroller forum. The original post is here. The recommendation is for the F340DK from silabs.com. I was looking at silabs because I had heard they had good kits. This runs about $70-$100 depending on where you get it.
Mikroelektronika make some pretty cool boards...
Pretty feature-packed. Been using the PIC flavour and I love it.
The MikroC IDE is good, board has plenty of addons and features
What else could you need :D
Check out their 8051 devboard here
http://www.mikroe.com/eng/products/view/329/easy8051-v6-development-system/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Questions asking us to recommend or find a tool, library or favorite off-site resource are off-topic for Stack Overflow as they tend to attract opinionated answers and spam. Instead, describe the problem and what has been done so far to solve it.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
It's very difficult to find this kind of document online.
I found one in JAVAWORLD, but this one does not cover the jjTree and visitor one.
Does anybody happen to have some links to the tutorials?
Its been a while, but I found this tutorial very helpful
on a previous project. I was able to create a query language
for our application in a few days with basically no previous
experience with javacc.
I've not read it but while looking for the other tutorial I
also found this one.
You can find a bunch of blog posts I've made regarding various JavaCC/JJTree topics on my JavaCC book's web site. There's a bunch of stuff there - using JavaCC to parse binary data, a JavaCC-based syntax highlighter, parsing fixed-width data with JavaCC, etc.
I found an awesome tutorial!!! It starts you off making a simple adder, then calculator. It definitely helps you understand the structure and syntax of JavaCC!
http://www.engr.mun.ca/~theo/JavaCC-Tutorial
There is a list of books, articles and tutorials in the FAQ.
This is the main reason why I didn't end up liking a class that used javacc, even the staff couldn't figure some of the bugs/messages out. It seems anyone would be much better off using something more standard, like flex & bison.