Create an Autofac service around a background thread or task - asp.net

I have a WebAPI app that needs to run some tasks every 30 minutes or so. How can I create a service object that encapsulates this processing and starts on application start. I need also to be able to inject this service into some of the controllers. I also need to some of my other Autofac services when the task runs (every 30 min.).

Maybe, you can use NCron (https://code.google.com/p/ncron/). NCron is a light-weight library for building and deploying scheduled background jobs.
Also, you can use Autofac integration to perform dependency injection for your NCron jobs (https://code.google.com/p/ncron/wiki/DependencyInjection).

Related

Windows scheduler API with console application Vs .net scheduler tools with asp.net mvc to execute long running processes inside my asp.net MVC

I am working on an asp.net mvc-5 web application, deployed under windows 2012 & iis-8. my asp.net mvc have many CRUD operations which are implemented as action methods inside my asp.net mvc.
But my asp.net mvc web application will be doing scheduled long running network scan process, the network scan will mainly do the following steps:-
Get the list of our servers and vms from our database.
Get the scanning username and password for each server and vm from a third party tool, using Rest API.
Call some powershell scripts to retrieve the servers & vms info such as network info, memory, name, etc.
Update our ERP system with the scan info using Rest API.
Now I did a pilot project using the following approach:-
I define a Model method inside my asp.net mvc to do the above 4 steps.
Then I install hangfire tool which will be calling the scan method on predefined scheduler.
Also I create a View inside my asp.net mvc which allow users to set the hangfire schedule settings (this require to do an IIS reset on the host server for hangfire to get the new settings).
Now I run a test scan for a round 150 servers which took around 40 minutes to complete , and it worked well. The only thing I noted is that if I set the schedule to run on non-business hours (where no activity is made on IIS) then hangfire will not be able to call the job, and once the first request is made the missed jobs will run. I overcome this limitation by defining a windows task which calls IIS each 15 minutes, to keep application pool live, and it worked well...
Now the other approach I am reading about is doing my above is as follow:-
Instead of defining Model method inside asp.net mvc to do the scan, I can create a separate console application to do the scan.
Then inside my asp.net mvc to create a view which allow users to create and schdule a task inside the windows tasks scheduler. I can do so by integrating with the windows task scheduler API.
Where this windows task will be calling the console application.
Now I am not sure which approach is better and why ? now generally speaking long running/background jobs should not run under iis.. But at the same time defining these long running processes as console app and calling these apps inside windows task scheduler will create extra dependencies on my web application. And will add extra effort when moving the application from move server to another (for example from test to live)..
Beside this I read that tools such as hangfire, quartz and other are designed to allow running long running tasks inside IIS and they eliminate the need to create console applications and scheduling these console applications using task scheduler ..
So can anyone advice on this?
In my opinion, if it is possible to solve the scheduling problem on the web application side, there is no need to create a scheduler task or a new console application for triggering purposes. The problem you will probably face when using scheduling task in a web application is generally common as you might see is that: The scheduler works like a charm during debugging of the web application, but not being able to trigger after publishing it to IIS. At this point the problem is generally related to IIS rather than the schedulers Quartz.NET, Hangfire, etc. Although there are lots of articles or solution methods posted on the web, unfortunately only some of them is working properly. In addition to this, most of them require lots of configuration settings on the web and machine configuration.
However, there are also some kind of solutions for such a kind of scheduling problem and I believe in that it is worthy to give a try Keep Alive Service For IIS 6.0/7.5. Just install it on the server to which you publish your application and enjoy. Then your published application will be alive after application pool recycling, IIS/Application restarting, etc. That is also used in our MVC application in order to send notification mails weekly and has been worked for months without any problem. Here are the sample code that I use in our MVC application. For more information please visit Scheduled Tasks In ASP.NET With Quartz.Net and Quartz.NET CronTrigger.
*Global.asax:*
protected void Application_Start()
{
JobScheduler.Start();
}
*EmailJob.cs:*
using Quartz;
public class EmailJob : IJob
{
public void Execute(IJobExecutionContext context)
{
SendEmail();
}
}
*JobScheduler.cs:*
using Quartz;
using Quartz.Impl;
public class JobScheduler
{
public static void Start()
{
IScheduler scheduler = StdSchedulerFactory.GetDefaultScheduler();
scheduler.Start();
IJobDetail job = JobBuilder.Create<EmailJob>().Build();
ITrigger trigger = TriggerBuilder.Create()
.WithIdentity("trigger1", "group1")
.StartNow()
.WithSchedule(CronScheduleBuilder
.WeeklyOnDayAndHourAndMinute(DayOfWeek.Monday, 10, 00)
//.WithMisfireHandlingInstructionDoNothing() //Do not fire if the firing is missed
.WithMisfireHandlingInstructionFireAndProceed() //MISFIRE_INSTRUCTION_FIRE_NOW
.InTimeZone(TimeZoneInfo.FindSystemTimeZoneById("GTB Standard Time")) //(GMT+02:00)
)
.Build();
scheduler.ScheduleJob(job, trigger);
}
}
Also I create a View inside my asp.net mvc which allow users to set the hangfire schedule settings (this require to do an IIS reset on the host server for hangfire to get the new settings).
You're resetting your webserver to update a task's schedule? That doesn't sound healthy. What you might do is keep track of what the scheduled time should be, and on execution, check if the current time is within a certain range of the scheduled time (or has already been executed), otherwise abort the job.
The only thing I noted is that if I set the schedule to run on non-business hours (where no activity is made on IIS) then hangfire will not be able to call the job, and once the first request is made the missed jobs will run. I overcome this limitation by defining a windows task which calls IIS each 15 minutes, to keep application pool live, and it worked well...
Hangfire's documentation has a page about running delayed tasks that mentions what you need to change to accomodate this.
Using Windows' Task Scheduler doesn't seem like a good idea; it's not meant for the execution of ad-hoc, short-lived tasks. You probably need elevation to create tasks, and you'd probably need to define another scheduled task to clean up the mountain of tasks that would exist after a few dozen background jobs have been executed.
You're also correct that using Windows' Task Scheduler would make it more difficult to move your application around.

How to configure a Rebus endpoint to run as a service

I am trying to use Topshelf to create a Rebus endpoint that will run as a service. How should this be set up and are there any examples?
You can take a look at the Rebus samples repository, where the integration service sample in particular shows what you're after.
As you can see in Program.cs it uses Topshelf to basically just hold on to a Windsor container, which it disposes when the application shuts down.
The Castle Windsor installer syntax causes the installers to be automatically picked up, where the RebusInstaller shows how you'd typically let Rebus inject itself into your container, and the HandlerInstaller shows how you can add handlers to the container.
It should be fairly easy to adapt the sample to use another container - just remember to dispose it when the application shuts down, thus giving Rebus a chance to finish messages currently being handled and stop its worker threads.

Cancel/Stop Workflow in WF4

I have long running workflow which runs for 3-5 minutes; I want to give flexibility to end user to Cancel/Stop/Abort workflow while workflow is in execution. How can I do this ?
Ocean
It depends on your workflow execution environment. If you are using the WorkflowApplication it has methods to control a workflow. If your are using the WorkflowServiceHost there is a Workflow Control Endpoint with a client that will let you do so. See this answer for the WCF option.

WCF Service Applcation remaining idle until hit manually .svc file

I create a WCF Service Application that runs in IIS 7.0 . In its initialization I start an endless loop ( while(true) ) , but after a period of time ,where I didn't call a method from his svc file, the wcf pass in an idle mode, and it doesn't react in the process the loop has to do. It is like it stops working. And then if i call a method to his svc file then starts working again. Is there a solution to avoid the idle mode so it can continue to keep the procedure in the loop alive?
WCF services are designed to "wake up" when requests are made.
If what you want is something like continuous polling, you may want to consider creating a Windows Service instead.
If you're looking for a WCF service that maintains state, you'll have to implement that yourself. One way is to deploy a Workflow Service (using WF 4) with persistence, such as SqlWorkflowInstanceStore. It exposes its interface using WCF. The service will be idle between calls, but instances will remember state.
WCF is meant to be consumed and to fire events, not to host long-running processes. You really want WF (workflow foundation) or BizTalk to host some long-running events. WCF events are typically short lived. You can create a XAMLX which combines the two concepts.

Long-running thread process under ASP.NET + WCF

Duplicate
This is a close duplicate of Dealing with a longer running process in WCF. Please considering posting your answer to that one instead of this.
Original Question
I'm implementing the business layer of an application that must run some background processes at scheduled times. The business layer is made up of several WCF services all running under the same web application.
The idea is defining a set of 'tasks' that must be run at different times (eg. every 5 minutes, everyday at 23:00, etc). That wouldn't be hard to implement as a windows service, but the problem is, the tasks need access to data caches that are living in the services, so this 'scheduler' must run under the IIS context in order to access that data.
What I'm doing currently is using a custom ServiceHostFactory in one of the WCF services which spawns a child thread and returns. The child thread sleeps and wakes up every X minutes to see if there are scheduled tasks and executes them.
But I'm worried about IIS randomly killing my thread when it recycles the application pool or after some inactive time (eg. no activity on any of the WCF services, which listen for requests from the presentation layer). The thread must run uninterrupted regardless of activity on the services. Is this really possible?
I have found an article by someone doing the same thing, but his solution seems to be pinging the server from the child thread itself regularly. Hopefully there is a better solution.
I have at some point implemented a Windows Service that would load a web page on a regular basis. The purpose of that was was that the site was hosting a Workflow Foundation runtime, and we wanted to ensure that the web application was brought back up after IIS recycling the application pool. Perhaps the same approach can be used in this case; have a service (or Scheduled Task in Windows; even simpler) run every x minutes and load a page that will check for tasks.
Is it a possibility to run either a Windows Service or place applications in the Windows Scheduler to execute methods in the WCF at certain times? Maybe use a BackgroundWorker inside the WCF. Another option would be for WCF to spawn other applications to do the business logic, passing the appropriate data, or pointers to the data in memory(unsafe).

Resources