I have a dropdown in which I am having
"-- Select--"
as the first item. I want to check if user has choosen something else from the dropdown instead of Select.
So is there a way around to match if
!-- Select --.
I have done this till now.
"regex": /^[!-- Select --]$/,
Where "!" means when not Select.
I am achieving this client side.
You can try this regex:
/^(!?--\s*[Ss]elect\s*--)$/
You should also find SelectedIndex property to evaluate this item.
It doesn't work because you're using a big character class; instead of trying to match the opposite, try to match what you don't want and then logically reverse that.
/^[-]{2} Select [-]{2}$/
function selectavalue() {
var selectBox = document.getElementById('selectboxid');
var user_input = selectBox.options[selectBox.selectedIndex].innerHTML;
var str = user_input;
if((str.match(/--Select--/i)) )
{
alert("Please select a value");
}
else
{
alert("The value u selected is"+str);
}
}
call this function from your selectbox.onchange="return selectavalue();"
You can use jQuery
if($("#id of your select box").attr("selectedIndex") == 0)
{
alert("You haven't selected anything!");
}
You have to make first value as default value.
Related
After adding logic about creating price for object in grid it's always created "one line more" which is empty.
So, if there is need to be created two lines, it will be created 3 lines and that one addition will be empty.
Is there something what I missing in code?
[Control("CommandButton")]
class AreaActionPaneNew
{
void clicked()
{
PMCParameters contractParameters = PMCParameters::find();
PMETmpRentalObjectArea groupedAreaList; // Group by area_type and cost_type
PMERentalObjectPrice priceList;
date workingDate = currWorkingDate.dateValue();
;
super();
// Get grouped area values. Values are summed up by area_type and ancost_type
groupedAreaList = PMERentalObjectAreaCl::getRentalAreaPrCostType(pmeRentalobject.RentalObjectId, userSetting.validFrom(), userSetting.validTo() , workingDate);
ttsbegin;
while select groupedAreaList
{
select forupdate firstonly priceList
where priceList.RentalObjectId == pmeRentalObject.RentalObjectId &&
priceList.RentalCostType == groupedAreaList.RentalCostTypeId &&
priceList.AreaType == groupedAreaList.Areatype && priceList.ValidFrom == pmeRentalObject.ValidFrom;
if (!priceList)
priceList.initValue();
priceList.RentalObjectId = pmeRentalObject.RentalObjectId;
priceList.RentalCostType = groupedAreaList.RentalCostTypeId;
priceList.ValidFrom = pmeRentalobject.ValidFrom;
priceList.AreaType = groupedAreaList.Areatype;
priceList.Amount = groupedAreaList.Price;
priceList.Area = groupedAreaList.AreaValue;
priceList.Quantity = groupedAreaList.RentalQty;
if (!priceList)
priceList.Period = contractParameters.ReportPeriod;
if (priceList)
priceList.update();
else
priceList.insert();
}
ttscommit;
pmeRentalObjectPrice_ds.research();
}
}
The code looks like it only updates/inserts without creating a blank line.
From your attribute, you are using a Command Button (see here), which may have an associated command, such as New, which effectively pushes Ctrl+N, and would explain why you have a blank line.
The simplest way to check is just create a regular Button and override the clicked method, then copy/paste your code and push both buttons and see if they have different behavior.
Check the Command property on the button and see if there's something there. Try commenting out the super(); call.
You should perhaps consider just a Button or a Menu Item Button with an associated object.
I have a code for RETURN / CURSOR-DOWN for all widgets in a window which basically makes it as if TAB is pressed. It works just fine but I want the default functionality of RETURN (Break current line into two lines) / CURSOR-DOWN for EDITOR widgets.
I have tried to add
APPLY "ENTER" TO SELF.
or
APPLY "RETURN" TO SELF.
or
APPLY "CTRL-J" TO SELF. /*Ctrl-Enter*/
for EDITOR widgets but when pressed RETURN / CURSOR-DOWN in an EDITOR it just does not do anything. It stays as if RETURN / CURSOR-DOWN is not pressed.
ON RETURN OF {&WINDOW-NAME} ANYWHERE
DO:
IF SELF:TYPE="EDITOR" THEN
DO:
APPLY "ENTER" TO SELF. /*Does NOT Work*/
END.
ELSE IF SELF:TYPE = "BUTTON" THEN
DO:
APPLY "Choose".
END.
ELSE
DO:
APPLY "Tab".
RETURN NO-APPLY.
END.
END.
ON CURSOR-DOWN OF {&WINDOW-NAME} ANYWHERE
DO:
IF SELF:TYPE="EDITOR" THEN
DO:
APPLY "CURSOR-DOWN" TO SELF. /*Does NOT Work*/
END.
ELSE
DO:
APPLY "Tab".
RETURN NO-APPLY.
END.
END.
Is there a way to do it?
I've tested this in 10.2B08. Here's the main anywhere trigger:
ON RETURN OF {&WINDOW-NAME} ANYWHERE DO:
IF SELF:TYPE = "BUTTON" THEN DO:
APPLY "Choose".
END.
else do:
apply 'tab'.
return no-apply.
end.
end.
ON CURSOR-DOWN OF {&WINDOW-NAME} ANYWHERE DO:
if self:type ne 'EDITOR' then DO:
APPLY "Tab".
RETURN NO-APPLY.
END.
END.
Not much different from what you had.
Now in the editor, add a trigger to RETURN and one to CURSOR-DOWN.
Here's your editor's RETURN trigger:
self:insert-string(chr(13)).
And here's the editor's CURSOR-DOWN trigger:
DEFINE VARIABLE iOffset AS INTEGER NO-UNDO.
assign iOffset = self:cursor-char
self:cursor-line = self:cursor-line + 1
self:cursor-char = ioffset no-error.
do while error-status:get-message(1) begins '**Unable to set attribute CURSOR-CHAR':
assign iOffset = iOffset - 1
self:cursor-char = ioffset no-error.
if iOffset = 1 then leave.
end.
Let me know if this works for you. Seems to be ok for me here.
I have a step in my test that goes into several html pages and looks for an element on the screen. That element can have 2 different CSS class names while looking the same in the website (visually speaking) , I have to use an if statement with a logical 'or' to identify them
if (Status == driver.findElement(By.cssSelector(".inlineblock.redClockBigIcon.middle.isOpenExchBig-2")) || Status == driver.findElement(By.cssSelector(".inlineblock.redClockBigIcon.middle.isOpenExchBig-1")));
System.out.println("Stock is closed");)
I expected that if one of the 2 elements would appear, the Eclipse would
recognize it. Well - The second element out of the 2 appeared - and for some reason I've got an exception error. The if statement gave attention only to the first condition in the if, and ignored the second.
org.openqa.selenium.NoSuchElementException: no such element:
locate element: {"method":"css
selector","selector":".inlineblock.redClockBigIcon.middle.isOpenExchBig-2"}Unable to
How can I make the || to work in this 'if' statement?
Thanks
Screenshots of the elements
In your above logic, you have Status which is an already existing WebElement that you're comparing against another Webelement that you're looking up. I don't think this is what your intention was so I'm going to make some assumptions in a solution.
First: Find all of the elements that might exist with your desired selector (Note I'm using findElements instead of findElement)
List<WebElement> clockIconThingies = driver.findElements(By.cssSelector(".inlineblock.redClockBigIcon.middle.isOpenExchBig-2, .inlineblock.redClockBigIcon.middle.isOpenExchBig-1"));
Second: Check if that found anything
if(clockIconThingies.size() > 0)
{
System.out.println("Stock is closed");
}
Alternatively for your css selector, from the image it looks like you might not need to do an or at all and just look for the class redClockBigIcon like this:
List<WebElement> clockIconThingies = driver.findElements(By.cssSelector(".redClockBigIcon"));
You can try using try catch block:
boolean isFirstElemPresent = true;
try{
driver.findElement(By.cssSelector(".inlineblock.redClockBigIcon.middle.isOpenExchBig-1"));
}catch (NoSuchElementException e){
isFirstElemPresent = false;
}
if(isFirstElemPresent == false)
driver.findElement(By.cssSelector(".inlineblock.redClockBigIcon.middle.isOpenExchBig-2"));
OrTo avoid try catch block, use below code snap:
List<WebElement> elements = driver.findElements(By.className("redClockBigIcon"));
if (elements.size() == 0) {
System.out.println("Element is not present");
} else {
System.out.println("Element is present");
}
I have 6 dropdown lists (with identical options), and I am manually setting them in my codebehind. All six should have different values. When I log the values I am setting them to, I get the correct assumed values to be set to. However, when the page renders, all six of them are set to the same freaking value.
I have tried setting the values with all of the following:
// set index, find by text
dd1.SelectedIndex = dd1.Items.IndexOf(dd1.Items.FindByText(val1));
// set with selected value
dd2.SelectedValue = val2;
// set index, find by value
dd3.SelectedIndex = dd3.Items.IndexOf(dd3.Items.FindByValue(val3));
// set list item, selected = true
((ListItem)dd4.Items.FindByValue(val4)).Selected = true;
The dropdown lists' set of options are generated prior to me trying to set them:
foreach (Station st in stations) {
ListItem li = new ListItem() { Text = st.fromto, Value = st.fromto};
dd1.Items.Add(li);
dd2.Items.Add(li);
dd3.Items.Add(li);
dd4.Items.Add(li);
dd5.Items.Add(li);
dd6.Items.Add(li);
}
I then look in the database to see if any values exist for a specific reference id in my app. If so, it indicates that I need to set one or more (up to 6) dropdowns:
var existingStations = db.LOGOPS_STATIONs.Where(x => x.XREF_LOGOP_MAIN_ID == logopRefId);
if (existingStations.Count() > 0) {
int i = 1;
foreach (LOGOPS_STATION s in existingStations) {
if (i < 7) {
string text= s.FROM_STATION;
if (i == 1) dd1.SelectedIndex = dd1.Items.IndexOf(dd1.Items.FindByText(text));
// for the heck of it, set the next one manually...
else if (i == 2) dd2.SelectedIndex = 2;
// try and set one with forcing select
else if (i == 3) ((ListItem)dd3.Items.FindByText(text)).Selected = true;
// good ol normal
else if (i == 4) dd4.SelectedValue = text;
... and so on ...
}
}
}
So, the dropdowns are all populated (when I log in the codebehind they're fully populated). And when I log the actual values when they're being set, they're set to the value as expected. However, when the page loads, they're all set to the same thing
At any rate, not sure what else to do. I have turned on and off different event validation hookups. I have disabled all JS to see if that was manipulating values, and it's not. I have tried explicitly setting like this
dd1.SelectedIndex = 2;
dd2.SelectedIndex = 8;
Oddly enough, that doesn't work either. For real, when does setting SelectedIndex to a unique control with a unique id not set the item?
I had to create a separate list item for each dropdown instead of them all sharing the same li in the foreach loop. And then a step further, had to set Selected = false in the constructor of the ListItem
I assumed that you could 'reuse' code for each instance of the dropdown population, but each dropdown needed it's own unique ListItem
Maybe there's a better way, but this solution seems to have solved the problem
in Flex I have something like that:
var dg:DataGrid = new DataGrid();
if (something) dg = dg1 else if (something_2) dg = dg2;
dg.dataProvider.getItemAt(3).id;
and dg is ALWAYS pointing at DataGrid (even if dg1 has name DataGrid_test and dg2 = DataGrid_test2) and finally action is made on my first DataGrid (DataGrid_test).
Why?
How can I pass dg1 or dg2 to dg?
Here is pasted almost full code of this part of application. I edited it to make that more clear.
var dg:DataGrid = null;
if ( currentState == "state1" ) { //if this condition is true then app. go into if and
dg = dataGrid_first; // make dg = DataGrid (1)
test.text = "inco"; // shows "inco" in "test" label
} else if ( currentState == "state2" ) { // if this is true then app. go..
dg = dataGrid_second; //here and set dg as DataGrid (exactly!) (2)
test.text = "outgo"; // and change test label into blank text (earlier text disapears)
}
search(dg);
It is modified with advice of '#splash'
Still not working.
EDIT:
I made this sceond edit to answer for all You who are helping me with that :) I think that it will be the best way. In codeblock above I added comments. (please read now comments and after that come back here :) )
Now I will explain exactly what happens.
I debug it many times and here are results:
dg is pointing at DataGrid (as component in flex, not as my dataGrid_first), I needed to extend DataGrid so now it is ColorColumn component (I don't know if I called it properly), not DataGrid. And dg is pointing at ColorColumn not at dataGrid_first or dataGrid_second. I even tried today the same thing what suggest #splash:
if ( currentState == "state1" ) {
test.text = "inco";
search(dataGrid_first);
} else if ( currentState == "state2" ) {
test.text = "outgo";
search(dataGrid_second);
}
and search still points at ColorColumn :/ My problem is really easy- I just want to pass to search different dataGrid on each state. If You have other ideas how I can do that in right way then I will pleased to hear about it. :)
But still I don't understand why it doesn't work. My search function uses algorhitm Boyer-Moor for searching through dataGrid.dataProvider for some text. If it find something then it is pushed into new array and after passing whole dataProvider I colorize rows with searched word.
If dg is never pointing to dg1 and dg2 then your (something) expressions may be evaluate to false. Check the value of your if-conditions - this should be easy to debug.
This should work:
var dg:DataGrid = null;
if (something)
dg = dg1;
else if (something_2)
dg = dg2;
if (dg)
{
// do something with dg
}
[Update]
I still can't see why your code isn't working, but you could simplify it like this:
if ( currentState == "state1" ) {
test.text = "inco";
search(dataGrid_first);
} else if ( currentState == "state2" ) {
test.text = "outgo";
search(dataGrid_second);
}
I'd propose to write this - since I guess either dg1 or dg2 should be assigned:
if (something) {
dg = dg1;
} else {
dg = dg2;
}
There may be cases, where if () {} else () {} neither executes the first or the second conditional block.
Finally a small hint, which structurally eliminates unwanted assignments in if conditions: Always write the literal left of the comparison operation: if ( "state1" == currentState ). If you accidentally typed = instead of ==, the flex compiler emits an error. The other notation silently assigns a value.
Additionally: Did you single-stepped through your code and watched the variables dg1, dg2 and dg? If not, set a breakpoint a few line before the if-statement and run the code step by step from there on. What do you see?
Here's a another tip: Use assertions to check for inconistencies:
package my.company.utilities {
public function assert(expression:Boolean):void {
// probably conditionally compile this statement
if (!expression) {
throw new Error("Assertion failed!");
}
} // assert
}
Use it e.g. at the beginning of a method like this:
public function doTransaction( fromAccount:int, toAccount:int ) {
assert( 0 < fromAccount );
assert( 0 < toAccount );
}
A typically good use of assert is to check variables regarding their range. As of the above example, fromAccount and toAccount should always be positive. Due to a bug, bad values might get passed to doTransaction(). In this case, the assertion fires an error.