After adding logic about creating price for object in grid it's always created "one line more" which is empty.
So, if there is need to be created two lines, it will be created 3 lines and that one addition will be empty.
Is there something what I missing in code?
[Control("CommandButton")]
class AreaActionPaneNew
{
void clicked()
{
PMCParameters contractParameters = PMCParameters::find();
PMETmpRentalObjectArea groupedAreaList; // Group by area_type and cost_type
PMERentalObjectPrice priceList;
date workingDate = currWorkingDate.dateValue();
;
super();
// Get grouped area values. Values are summed up by area_type and ancost_type
groupedAreaList = PMERentalObjectAreaCl::getRentalAreaPrCostType(pmeRentalobject.RentalObjectId, userSetting.validFrom(), userSetting.validTo() , workingDate);
ttsbegin;
while select groupedAreaList
{
select forupdate firstonly priceList
where priceList.RentalObjectId == pmeRentalObject.RentalObjectId &&
priceList.RentalCostType == groupedAreaList.RentalCostTypeId &&
priceList.AreaType == groupedAreaList.Areatype && priceList.ValidFrom == pmeRentalObject.ValidFrom;
if (!priceList)
priceList.initValue();
priceList.RentalObjectId = pmeRentalObject.RentalObjectId;
priceList.RentalCostType = groupedAreaList.RentalCostTypeId;
priceList.ValidFrom = pmeRentalobject.ValidFrom;
priceList.AreaType = groupedAreaList.Areatype;
priceList.Amount = groupedAreaList.Price;
priceList.Area = groupedAreaList.AreaValue;
priceList.Quantity = groupedAreaList.RentalQty;
if (!priceList)
priceList.Period = contractParameters.ReportPeriod;
if (priceList)
priceList.update();
else
priceList.insert();
}
ttscommit;
pmeRentalObjectPrice_ds.research();
}
}
The code looks like it only updates/inserts without creating a blank line.
From your attribute, you are using a Command Button (see here), which may have an associated command, such as New, which effectively pushes Ctrl+N, and would explain why you have a blank line.
The simplest way to check is just create a regular Button and override the clicked method, then copy/paste your code and push both buttons and see if they have different behavior.
Check the Command property on the button and see if there's something there. Try commenting out the super(); call.
You should perhaps consider just a Button or a Menu Item Button with an associated object.
Related
I am trying to pull the Enum chosen from a dialog and assign the label to a table's column.
For example: Dialog opens and allows you to choose from:
Surface
OutOfSpec
Other
These are 0,1,2 respectively.
The user chooses OutOfSpec (the label for this is Out Of Spec), I want to put this enum's Name, or the label, into a table. The column I'm inserting into is set to be a str.
Here's the code I've tried, without success:
SysDictEnum dictEnum = new SysDictEnum(enumNum(SDILF_ScrapReasons));
reason = dialog.addField(enumStr(SDILF_ScrapReasons),"Scrap Reason");
dialog.run();
if (!dialog.closedOk())
{
info(reason.value());
return;
}
ttsBegin;
// For now, this will strip off the order ID from the summary fields.
// No longer removing the Order ID
batchAttr = PdsBatchAttributes::find(itemId, invDim.inventBatchId, "OrderId");
orders = SDILF_BreakdownOrders::find(batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue, true);
if (orders)
{
orders.BoxProduced -= 1;
orders.update();
}
// Adding a batch attribute that will include the reason for scrapping
select forUpdate batchAttr;
batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribId = "ScrapReason";
//batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue = any2str(dictEnum.index2Value(reason.value()));
batchAttr.PdsBatchAttribValue = enum2str(reason.value());
batchAttr.InventBatchId = invDim.inventBatchId;
batchAttr.ItemId = itemId;
batchAttr.insert();
Obviously this is not the whole code, but it should be enough to give the issue that I'm trying to solve.
I'm sure there is a way to get the int value and use that to assign the label, I've just not been able to figure it out yet.
EDIT
To add some more information about what I am trying to accomplish. We make our finished goods, sometimes they are out of spec or damaged when this happens we then have to scrap that finished good. When we do this we want to keep track of why it is being scrapped, but we don't want just a bunch of random reasons. I used an enum to limit the reasons. When the operator clicks the button to scrap something they will get a dialog screen pop-up that allows them to select a reason for scrapping. The code will then, eventually, put that assigned reason on that finished items batch attributes so that we can track it later in a report and have a list of all the finished goods that were scrapped and why they were scrapped.
I'm not entirely sure of your question, but I think you're just missing one of the index2[...] calls or you're not getting the return value from your dialog correctly. Just create the below as a new job, run it, make a selection of Open Order and click ok.
I don't know the difference between index2Label and index2Name.
static void Job67(Args _args)
{
Dialog dialog = new dialog();
SysDictEnum dictEnum = new SysDictEnum(enumNum(SalesStatus));
DialogField reason;
SalesStatus salesStatusUserSelection;
str label, name, symbol;
int value;
reason = dialog.addField(enumStr(SalesStatus), "SalesStatus");
dialog.run();
if (dialog.closedOk())
{
salesStatusUserSelection = reason.value();
// Label
label = dictEnum.index2Label(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Name
name = dictEnum.index2Name(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Symbol
symbol = dictEnum.index2Symbol(salesStatusUserSelection);
// Value
value = dictEnum.index2Value(salesStatusUserSelection);
info(strFmt("Label: %1; Name: %2; Symbol: %3; Value: %4", label, name, symbol, value));
}
}
I want to set a default value based on curUserid() in PurchCreateOrder. How can I put data in my field on form extension ?
Is there any better option of doing this ? Fields are bound to datasource and I have different fields with differentdatasources.
My code is giving me abnormal termination error with nullreferences. XPPCompiler
[ExtensionOf(tableStr(PurchTable))]
final class PurchCreateOrderGetDefAdress_Extension
{
void initvalue(PurchaseType _purchaseType)
{
next initvalue(_purchaseType);
PurchTable purchtable;
LogisticsPostalAddress logpostadress;
UserInfoSz usrsz;
str user = curUserId();
select firstonly logpostadress where logpostadress.city == 'lub';
// select firstonly InventSiteId, InventLocationId from purchtable join usrsz where purchtable.InventSiteId == usrsz.InventSiteId && usrsz.IsDefault == true;
select firstonly InventSiteId from usrsz where usrsz.UserId == user && usrsz.IsDefault == true;
purchtable.initValue();
purchtable.deliveryname = 'asasasasas' ;//logpostadress.Address;
purchtable.inventsiteid = usrsz.InventSiteId;
purchtable.inventlocationid = usrsz.InventSiteId;
info(strFmt("%1, %2, %3", logpostadress.Address, usrsz.InventSiteId));
}
}
The error is straight forward.
Error The augmented class 'PurchTable' provides a method by this name, but this method cannot be used as a chain of command method since the parameter profile does not match the original method.
Take a look at the highlighted parameter profile and compare to yours.
Edit: Take a look at these links for more info on Chain of Command (CoC):
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/extensibility/method-wrapping-coc
https://channel9.msdn.com/Blogs/mfp/X-Chain-Of-Command (This video is excellent)
This is likely embarrassingly easy but I'm new and I've been beating my head against the wall on this for a while now. What I am attempting to do is basically a modified version of the "Hello App Maker!" If else test.
The necessary info I have the following widgets attached to the appropriate data sources:
Dropdown widget called source_name (string - list)
Label widget I've called name (string)
Text Box widget called qty_duration (number)
Label widget I've called hours (number)
I have a dropdown widget called source_name with 5 options. On selection I have the value appear in a label widget I've called name. If the option selected from the drop down widget is ever LABOUR I am trying to then have the value of a Text Box widget called qty_duration appear in a label widget I've called hours
On the source_name dropdown event - onValueChange I have the following code:
// Define variables for the input and output widgets
var nameWidget = app.pages.Apex_job_details.descendants.name;
var outputWidget = app.pages.Apex_job_details.descendants.hours;
var techhours = app.pages.Apex_job_details.descendants.qty_duration;
var nothing = 0;
// If a name is LABOUR, add the qty to the output widget Else output 0.
if (nameWidget == 'LABOUR') {
outputWidget.text = techhours;
} else {
outputWidget = nothing;
}
It's not giving me any errors, but it's also not outputting to the hours label. If I edit the code as follows just to muck with it:
// Define variables for the input and output widgets
var nameWidget = app.pages.Apex_job_details.descendants.name;
var outputWidget = app.pages.Apex_job_details.descendants.hours;
var techhours = app.pages.Apex_job_details.descendants.qty_duration;
var nothing = 0;
// If a name is LABOUR, add the qty to the output widget Else output 0.
if (nameWidget == 'LABOUR') {
outputWidget.text = techhours;
} else {
outputWidget.text = nothing;
}
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.
Assuming all labels and input widgets are inside a table row you will want to adjust your code as follows:
var tablerow = widget.parent;
var nameWidget = tablerow.descendants.name.text;
var outputWidget = tablerow.descendants.hours;
var techhours = tablerow.descendants.qty_duration.value;
if(nameWidget === 'LABOUR') {
outputWidget.text = techhours;
} else {
outputWidget.text = null;
}
By using widget.parent in the onValueChange event of the dropdown you will automatically reference the table row and then by using descendants you are referencing only the descendants of that table row. This will bridge the error by using an absolute reference when using table rows. If it still doesn't work let me know.
I have 6 dropdown lists (with identical options), and I am manually setting them in my codebehind. All six should have different values. When I log the values I am setting them to, I get the correct assumed values to be set to. However, when the page renders, all six of them are set to the same freaking value.
I have tried setting the values with all of the following:
// set index, find by text
dd1.SelectedIndex = dd1.Items.IndexOf(dd1.Items.FindByText(val1));
// set with selected value
dd2.SelectedValue = val2;
// set index, find by value
dd3.SelectedIndex = dd3.Items.IndexOf(dd3.Items.FindByValue(val3));
// set list item, selected = true
((ListItem)dd4.Items.FindByValue(val4)).Selected = true;
The dropdown lists' set of options are generated prior to me trying to set them:
foreach (Station st in stations) {
ListItem li = new ListItem() { Text = st.fromto, Value = st.fromto};
dd1.Items.Add(li);
dd2.Items.Add(li);
dd3.Items.Add(li);
dd4.Items.Add(li);
dd5.Items.Add(li);
dd6.Items.Add(li);
}
I then look in the database to see if any values exist for a specific reference id in my app. If so, it indicates that I need to set one or more (up to 6) dropdowns:
var existingStations = db.LOGOPS_STATIONs.Where(x => x.XREF_LOGOP_MAIN_ID == logopRefId);
if (existingStations.Count() > 0) {
int i = 1;
foreach (LOGOPS_STATION s in existingStations) {
if (i < 7) {
string text= s.FROM_STATION;
if (i == 1) dd1.SelectedIndex = dd1.Items.IndexOf(dd1.Items.FindByText(text));
// for the heck of it, set the next one manually...
else if (i == 2) dd2.SelectedIndex = 2;
// try and set one with forcing select
else if (i == 3) ((ListItem)dd3.Items.FindByText(text)).Selected = true;
// good ol normal
else if (i == 4) dd4.SelectedValue = text;
... and so on ...
}
}
}
So, the dropdowns are all populated (when I log in the codebehind they're fully populated). And when I log the actual values when they're being set, they're set to the value as expected. However, when the page loads, they're all set to the same thing
At any rate, not sure what else to do. I have turned on and off different event validation hookups. I have disabled all JS to see if that was manipulating values, and it's not. I have tried explicitly setting like this
dd1.SelectedIndex = 2;
dd2.SelectedIndex = 8;
Oddly enough, that doesn't work either. For real, when does setting SelectedIndex to a unique control with a unique id not set the item?
I had to create a separate list item for each dropdown instead of them all sharing the same li in the foreach loop. And then a step further, had to set Selected = false in the constructor of the ListItem
I assumed that you could 'reuse' code for each instance of the dropdown population, but each dropdown needed it's own unique ListItem
Maybe there's a better way, but this solution seems to have solved the problem
When the first cell of an excel sheet to import using ExcelStorage.ExtractRecords is empty, the process fail. Ie. If the data starts at col 1, row 2, if the cell (2,1) has an empty value, the method fails.
Does anybody know how to work-around this? I've tried adding a FieldNullValue attribute to the mapping class with no luck.
Here is a sample project that show the code with problems
Hope somebody can help me or point in some direction.
Thank you!
It looks like you have stumbled upon an issue in FileHelpers.
What is happening is that the ExcelStorage.ExtractRecords method uses an empty cell check to see if it has reached the end of the sheet. This can be seen in the ExcelStorage.cs source code:
while (CellAsString(cRow, mStartColumn) != String.Empty)
{
try
{
recordNumber++;
Notify(mNotifyHandler, mProgressMode, recordNumber, -1);
colValues = RowValues(cRow, mStartColumn, RecordFieldCount);
object record = ValuesToRecord(colValues);
res.Add(record);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Code removed for this example
}
}
So if the start column of any row is empty then it assumes that the file is done.
Some options to get around this:
Don't put any empty cells in the first column position.
Don't use excel as your file format -- convert to CSV first.
See if you can get a patch from the developer or patch the source yourself.
The first two are workarounds (and not really good ones). The third option might be the best but what is the end of file condition? Probably an entire row that is empty would be a good enough check (but even that might not work in all cases all of the time).
Thanks to the help of Tuzo, I could figure out a way of working this around.
I added a method to ExcelStorage class to change the while end condition. Instead of looking at the first cell for empty value, I look at all cells in the current row to be empty. If that's the case, return false to the while. This is the change to the while part of ExtractRecords:
while (!IsEof(cRow, mStartColumn, RecordFieldCount))
instead of
while (CellAsString(cRow, mStartColumn) != String.Empty)
IsEof is a method to check the whole row to be empty:
private bool IsEof(int row, int startCol, int numberOfCols)
{
bool isEmpty = true;
string cellValue = string.Empty;
for (int i = startCol; i <= numberOfCols; i++)
{
cellValue = CellAsString(row, i);
if (cellValue != string.Empty)
{
isEmpty = false;
break;
}
}
return isEmpty;
}
Of course if the user leaves an empty row between two data rows the rows after that one will not be processed, but I think is a good thing to keep working on this.
Thanks
I needed to be able to skip blank lines, so I've added the following code to the FileHelpers library. I've taken Sebastian's IsEof code and renamed the method to IsRowEmpty and changed the loop in ExtractRecords from ...
while (CellAsString(cRow, mStartColumn) != String.Empty)
to ...
while (!IsRowEmpty(cRow, mStartColumn, RecordFieldCount) || !IsRowEmpty(cRow+1, mStartColumn, RecordFieldCount))
I then changed this ...
colValues = RowValues(cRow, mStartColumn, RecordFieldCount);
object record = ValuesToRecord(colValues);
res.Add(record);
to this ...
bool addRow = true;
if (Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(RecordType, typeof(IgnoreEmptyLinesAttribute)) != null && IsRowEmpty(cRow, mStartColumn, RecordFieldCount))
{
addRow = false;
}
if (addRow)
{
colValues = RowValues(cRow, mStartColumn, RecordFieldCount);
object record = ValuesToRecord(colValues);
res.Add(record);
}
What this gives me is the ability to skip single empty rows. The file will be read until two successive empty rows are found