I have 4 images in a row. I want the third image to be overlayed on top of the second image but have not been able to successfully get it to work. Here is my fiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/AndroidDev/Asu7V/4/
<div style="width:1000px">
<div class="x">
<img src="http://25.media.tumblr.com/avatar_dae559818d30_128.png" />
</div>
<div class="x">
<img src="http://scottsdalepethotel.com/wp-content/uploads/et_temp/cat-648150_128x128.jpg" />
</div>
<div class="x">
<img src="http://playgo.ro/wp-content/themes/play3.0/play.png" />
</div>
<div class="x">
<img src="http://blog.sureflap.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Maru.jpg" />
</div>
</div>
Add the play image in second div and use position absolute and relative to make it one above the another.
.x{
border:1px solid #000000;
display:inline-block;
height:128px;
position:relative
}
.overlay_img{
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:0
}
DEMO
If you just want it to be over 2nd image then wrap those 2 images in 1 div and give it position:relative then give your Image2 and image 3 position:absolute and z-index:0 & z-index:1 respectively. And position them to top:0; & left:0; that should do it :)
If you can use modern CSS and only need the third image to overlay the second (as in, you don't need to repeat this pattern in a lot of places), you can use the nth-child selector:
.x:nth-child(3) {
margin-left: -136px;
}
This will select the third item with the x class and move it to the left.
if you use margin or position property,you can achieve the overlayed view,
Take a look at http://jsfiddle.net/manojmcet/Z7Y88/
I have a page where there are two images on top which are floated to left and right as below :
.floatLeft{ float:left;}
.floatRight{ float:right; }
<div>
<img src="firstImage" class="floatLeft"/>
<img src="secondImage" class="floatRight"/>
<!-- wright here -->
</div>
Issue is when i write anything after images (be it in div or a plain text ) and if it goes beyong page width ,
the text after maximum width shifts downwords entirely after images . That is text doesn't wrap inbetween two images
What i understand about float is text should "FLOW" in between two images (unless we use clear which "clears" area around images ) , but its not working like that.
I want to have a text in between two images.
Any help is higly appreciated as a I have done a lot of efforts but it is not working.
Logically, you have 3 blocks of data here, so I suggest using 3 floating divs with set width:
.floatLeft{ float:left}
.div1{width:X%}
.div2{width:Y%}
.div3{width:Z%}
.overflow{overflow: hidden} /* this is optional */
<div class="overflow">
<div class="floatLeft div1">
<img src="firstImage"/>
</div">
<div class="floatLeft div2">
<!-- text here -->
</div">
<div class="floatLeft div3"><!-- or make it float right if you want -->
<img src="secondImage"/>
</div">
</div>
If you want your images a fixed width, try using CSS calc:
.div1{width:100px}
.div2{width:-moz-calc(100%-300px);-webkit-calc(100%-300px);calc(100%-300px);} /* not supported in some browsers */
.div3{width:200px}
But honestly I recommend to go classic way and use a table here:
.table {width:100%;border-collapse:collapse}
.table td {padding:0;margin:0}
.block1 {width:X%} /* or width:Xpx */
.block3 {width:Z%} /* or width:Zpx */
/* do not touch block2 here */
<table class='table'>
<tr>
<td class='block1'>
<img src="firstImage"/>
</td>
<td class='block2'>
<!-- text here -->
</td>
<td class='block3'>
<img src="secondImage"/>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Remember to wrap your content in "blocks", it always helps when you mark up.
I guess this is the answer that you need jsfiddle
I will explain a little about.
in your div add a class of imgcontainer
in your css, add the following
.imgcontainer{
position:relative;
}
you can add the width of the div, in jsfiddle I set it as 150px. and each of the image is 50px. there you add paragraph with some text
Try this way
<div>
<img src="firstImage" class="floatLeft"/>
<p class="floatLeft">Some textgoes here</p>
<img src="secondImage" class="floatRight"/>
</div>
but give proper width
Another variation is using a CSS version of the table approach proposed by igorpavlov. You have to replace the table/tr/td by divs and to adapt the CSS as proposed here :
.table {width:100%; display: table;}
div{ display: table-cell; vertical-align: top;}
.block1 {width:33%} /* or width:Xpx */
.block3 {width:33%} /* or width:Zpx */
img {width: 100%; height: auto;}
<div class='table'>
<div class='block1'>
<img src="firstImage"/>
</div>
<div class='block2'>
<!-- text here -->
</div>
<div class='block3'>
<img src="secondImage"/>
</div>
</div>
It provides better semantics and works IE8+!
This would be the main markup:
<div class="mancha">
<div class="logo"></div>
<div id="content-area" class="espacio">
<div class="eltitular">HEADER</div>
<div class="lacarta">LEFT CONTENT</div>
<div id="sidebar">RIGHT CONTENT</div>
</div>
</div>
Where (allthough there are many more rules wich can be seen in the link this are the widths)
.espacio{
margin-left: 192px;
background: transparent;
width:808px !important
}
.lacarta{
width:595px;
float:left;
}
#sidebar{
width:210px;
float:right
}
The problem is that .lacarta and #sidebar are not floating one next to other (this only happens in IE8 or lower)
It can be tested here: http://goo.gl/ksFQI (if you compare to firefox/chrome you will se that the sidebar is not in the right side of the container..)
I checked with the IE8 developer tools that the container seems to be big enough for both elements..
Any idea what I missed?
-EDIT-
Current IE:
Wanted (like in Firefox):
Actually, there is a bug in IE8 where right-floated elements seem to clear:left.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/askie/archive/2009/03/23/right-floated-element-in-internet-explorer-8-is-positioned-differently-than-internet-explorer-7.aspx
If you don't want to add anything to your HTML at all, you can slightly restructure it for a quick fix. Put the right-floated sidebar first, ie:
<div id="content-area" class="espacio">
<div class="eltitular">HEADER</div>
<div id="sidebar">RIGHT CONTENT</div>
<div class="lacarta">LEFT CONTENT</div>
</div>
Add parent container:
<div class="mancha">
<div class="logo"></div>
<div id="content-area" class="espacio">
<div class="eltitular">HEADER</div>
<div>
<div class="lacarta">LEFT CONTENT</div>
<div id="sidebar">RIGHT CONTENT</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Does this jsfiddle fix it: http://jsfiddle.net/hgrHq/
.lacarta{
width:590px;
float:left;
}
Just reduced the width of .lacarta a bit.
As an aside, you might want to consider a responsive grid system for laying out your coulmns like this. For example:
http://cssgrid.net/
http://semantic.gs/
Then you won't have lining up issues like this ... and it'll respond to all screen sizes.
What exactly the Prob is...?? I just Tested the link and found those menu were not aligned .. and here the solution is .menu li{ float:left} .. for more jus put a screen shot if Possible :)
I want to create alternating 100% colored blocks. An "ideal" situation is illustrated as an attachment, as well as the current situation.
Desired setup:
Currently:
My first idea was to create an div class, give it a background color, and give it 100% width.
.block {
width: 100%;
background: #fff;
}
However, you can see that this obviously doesn't work. It's confined to a container area. I tried to close the container and that didn't work either.
The container class is intentionally not 100% width. It is different fixed widths depending on the width of the viewport.
If you want to work with the full width of the screen, use .container-fluid:
Bootstrap 3:
<body>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8"></div>
<div class="col-lg-4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12"></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Bootstrap 2:
<body>
<div class="row">
<div class="span6"></div>
<div class="span6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span8"></div>
<div class="span4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span12"></div>
</div>
</body>
QUICK ANSWER
Use multiple NOT NESTED .containers
Wrap those .containers you want to have a full-width background in a div
Add a CSS background to the wrapping div
Fiddles: Simple: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/ , Container borders: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/1/
HTML:
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 1</h2>
</div>
<div class="specialBackground">
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 2</h2>
</div>
</div>
CSS: .specialBackground{ background-color: gold; /*replace with own background settings*/ }
FURTHER INFO
DON'T USE NESTED CONTAINERS
Many people will (wrongly) suggest, that you should use nested containers. Well, you should NOT.
They are not ment to be nested. (See to "Containers" section in the docs)
HOW IT WORKS
div is a block element, which by default spans to the full width of a document body - there is the full-width feature. It also has a height of it's content (if you don't specify otherwise).
The bootstrap containers are not required to be direct children of a body, they are just containers with some padding and possibly some screen-width-variable fixed widths.
If a basic grid .container has some fixed width it is also auto-centered horizontally.
So there is no difference whether you put it as a:
Direct child of a body
Direct child of a basic div that is a direct child of a body.
By "basic" div I mean div that does not have a CSS altering his border, padding, dimensions, position or content size. Really just a HTML element with display: block; CSS and possibly background.
But of course setting vertical-like CSS (height, padding-top, ...) should not break the bootstrap grid :-)
Bootstrap itself is using the same approach
...All over it's own website and in it's "JUMBOTRON" example:
http://getbootstrap.com/examples/jumbotron/
This is how you can achieve your desired setup with Bootstrap 3:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row"> <!-- Give this div your desired background color -->
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
... your content here ...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The container-fluid part makes sure that you can change the background over the full width. The container part makes sure that your content is still wrapped in a fixed width.
This approach works, but personally I don't like all the nesting. However, I haven't found a better solution so far.
There is a workaround using vw. Is useful when you can't create a new fluid container.
This, inside a classic 'container' div will be full size.
.row-full{
width: 100vw;
position: relative;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
After this there is the sidebar problem (thanks to #Typhlosaurus), solved with this js function, calling it on document load and resize:
function full_row_resize(){
var body_width = $('body').width();
$('.row-full').css('width', (body_width));
$('.row-full').css('margin-left', ('-'+(body_width/2)+'px'));
return false;
}
In bootstrap 4, you can use 'w-100' class (w as width, and 100 as 100%)
You can find documentation here:
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/utilities/sizing/
If you can't change the HTML layout:
.full-width {
width: 100vw;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">a</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">b</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 full-width">c</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">d</div>
</div>
</div>
Demo: http://www.bootply.com/tVkNyWJxA6
Sometimes it's not possible to close the content container.
The solution we are using is a bit different but prevent a overflow because of the
firefox scrollbar size!
.full-width {
margin-top: 15px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
position: relative;
width: calc(100vw - 10px);
margin-left: calc(-50vw + 5px);
left: 50%;
}
Here is a example: https://jsfiddle.net/RubbelDeKatz/wvt9253q
Instead of
style="width:100%"
try using
class="col-xs-12"
it will save you 1 character :)
Sorry, should have asked for your css as well. As is, basically what you need to look at is giving your container div the style .container { width: 100%; } in your css and then the enclosed divs will inherit this as long as you don't give them their own width. You were also missing a few closing tags, and the </center> closes a <center> without it ever being open, at least in this section of code. I wasn't sure if you wanted the image in the same div that contains your content or separate, so I created two examples. I changed the width of the img to 100px simply because jsfiddle offers a small viewing area. Let me know if it's not what you're looking for.
content and image separate: http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/2/
content and image in same div (img floated left): http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/3/
I would use two separate 'container' div as below:
<div class="container">
/* normal*/
</div>
<div class="container-fluid">
/*full width container*/
</div>
Bare in mind that container-fluid does not follow your breakpoints and it is a full width container.
I'd wonder why someone would try to "override" the container width, since its purpose is to keep its content with some padding, but I had a similar situation (that's why I wanted to share my solution, even though there're answers).
In my situation, I wanted to have all content (of all pages) rendered inside a container, so this was the piece of code from my _Layout.cshtml:
<div id="body">
#RenderSection("featured", required: false)
<section class="content-wrapper main-content clear-fix">
<div class="container">
#RenderBody()
</div>
</section>
</div>
In my Home Index page, I had a background header image I'd like to fill the whole screen width, so the solution was to make the Index.cshtml like this:
#section featured {
<!-- This content will be rendered outside the "container div" -->
<div class="intro-header">
<div class="container">SOME CONTENT WITH A NICE BACKGROUND</div>
</div>
}
<!-- The content below will be rendered INSIDE the "container div" -->
<div class="content-section-b">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
MORE CONTENT
</div>
</div>
</div>
I think this is better than trying to make workarounds, since sections are made with the purpose of allowing (or forcing) views to dynamically replace some content in the layout.
Though people have mentioned that you will need to use .container-fluid in this case but you will also have to remove the padding from bootstrap.
The following answer is not exactly optimal by any measure, but I needed something that maintains its position within the container whilst it stretches the inner div fully.
https://jsfiddle.net/fah5axm5/
$(function() {
$(window).on('load resize', ppaFullWidth);
function ppaFullWidth() {
var $elements = $('[data-ppa-full-width="true"]');
$.each( $elements, function( key, item ) {
var $el = $(this);
var $container = $el.closest('.container');
var margin = parseInt($container.css('margin-left'), 10);
var padding = parseInt($container.css('padding-left'), 10)
var offset = margin + padding;
$el.css({
position: "relative",
left: -offset,
"box-sizing": "border-box",
width: $(window).width(),
"padding-left": offset + "px",
"padding-right": offset + "px"
});
});
}
});
This must work (Mobile phone as well as Desktop screen):
class: alignfull and class: img-fluid will do the magic.
<div class="alignfull">
<img class="img-fluid" style="background-size: cover;
background-position: center ;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: auto;
min-width: 100%;
width: -moz-available; "
src="{{ $image->image }}" alt="An image">
</div>
I'm trying to update some code to use CSS sprites. In some situations it works fine, in others it screws up the page layout, and I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.
Here's a fragment of the html ....
<div id="footer"><!-- footer -->
<div class="footer-top">
<div class="footer-left">
<div class="footer-right">
<img src="footer-logo.gif" />
<br /><br />
<div>
<p>blah blah blah</p>
<div class="clearfloat"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
... and the CSS:
.footer-left {
background: url(/images//footer-left_.gif) no-repeat left top;
}
I've created my sprite, and tried changing the CSS to:
.footer-left {
background:url('/images/sprites.gif') -66px -2px no-repeat;
width:20px;
height:99px;
}
The dimensions and offsets are correct, but the result isn't pretty. The sprite region shows in roughly the right place, but footer-logo.gif and the text are messed up.
Any ideas please?
The only things that have any effect on the logo and the text, are the dimensions you added; you set the width of the footer to 20px and if that wasn´t there before, that definitely has an effect on your bla bla bla text and .footer_right.
Note that .footer_right and the text are both located inside your 20px wide footer_left.
Are you sure your nested div structure is correct?