EDIT #1 : I'm under the limit that all arguments are enclosed in two quotes, so that shell do not expand any argument with * to the corresponding path.
EDIT #2 : In order to retrieve directories such as */*, ../*, and dirA/*/file.out, How should I use iteration loop or recursive call?
I have just learned about the function fnmatch(). But I don't know start place.
There are many possible cases. I'm confused dealing with these all cases.
For example, Let me assume that executable program is a.out.
$./a.out -l */*
$./a.out -l ../*
$./a.out -l [file_name] [directory_name]
/* Since I also have to implement ls command with no wildcard. */
What should I do? Any advice would be awesome.
Thank you in advance.
Your problem is : shell replaces wildcard caracter * with all of the filenames matching the pattern.
Solution:
If you do not want to use this feature of bash, just put quotation marks around your command line arguments.
Calling your program that way will have the original arguments, containing wildcards.
After this, you can list all the filenames with their paths. For example using some recursive algorithm. Then you can apply some matching to these path string. (when visiting it)
If you want to be a good unix citizen, the rule is Don't do filename globbing unless you are writing a shell.
You want to write an ls-like program? Don't do any wildcard expansion. Don't treat "*" specially. Just treat your argv as a list of filenames. If your program handles these cases:
./a.out file1
./a.out file1 file2 file3
Then it will also handle
./a.out file*
correctly because the shell will do the expansion and your program won't need to know about it. And besides that, it will handle this:
zsh% ./a.out **/file<40-185>~file<90-100>(.mm-30OL[1,2])
which in zsh expanded glob syntax means: expand file40 through file185, except for file90 through file100, include only the ones that have been modified in the last 30 minutes, and use only the largest 2 files in the resulting set.
fnmatch is never going to do anything like that. But these fancy globs can be used with any command that just takes a filename list and doesn't care where it came from.
When you're in a situation where you can't take a list of filenames from the command line, then consider using fnmatch. ls isn't one of those situations.
Related
I could not find the proper place to look up for the parameter explanation for the below command.
echo *(*ocNY1)
After some tests, I discovered that *(*oc) prints executable files(file with x permission) from the current directory. And NY1 prints the first item of such. But I cannot find the manual for such options. Where can I find the definition/manual for the parameters of such?
Where can I lookup to see the explanation for each parameters for the pattern matching?
Is this glob pattern or regex that echo is using?
Sometimes it is really hard to take the first step if you do not know where you are heading.
*(*ocNY1) is a zsh glob pattern - see man zshexpn.
* is a glob operator that matches any string, including the null string.
The trailing (...) contains glob qualifiers:
* to match executable plain files
oc sort by time of last inode change, youngest first
N sets the nullglob option for the current pattern
Yn expand to at most n filenames
I would like to list all plain files that are not python scripts in zsh.
Why does the following "code" not work and what is the proper solution?
ls -l *(.)~*.py
UPDATE:
I have setopt extended_glob in my .zshrc.
And
ls -ld *~*.py``
works as expected.
(I added the -d in the command to prevent directories from getting expanded).
The problem is that ~ is a glob operator (that also requires EXTENDED_GLOB be set), while (.) is a glob qualifier, which means it must be added to the end of the entire pattern, not used in the middle. Use
ls *~*.py(.)
instead. That is, *~*.py is your pattern (all files not ending in .py), and (.) is applied to the results. (Perhaps yet another way to put it is to say that glob operators can only work on unqualified patterns.)
I've been using this utility successfully for many years, in many environemnts. But I'm noticing that on one particular environment, it produces very unexpected results.
grep -r 'search-term1' . | grep 'search-term2'
The above code greps recursively for all instances of search-term1, in the current-dir. The results are then piped to another grep, which selects only those lines that also contain search-term2. This works exactly as I would expect.
grep -r 'search-term1' . | grep -r 'search-term2'
The only difference in the above code is that the -r recursive flag in specified in both grep commands. I would expect the behavior to not change for this particular case. After all, the input to the 2nd grep is a pipe-input, and there's nothing further to be found recursively.
I have been using the command successfully, for many years, in many different environments (both unix and mac-os). However, the most recent environment that I started working in (unix), breaks the above behavior. The second piped grep searches for all instances of search-term2, not only in the piped-input, but also all files in my current directory. Because of this, instead of getting only results that contain both search-terms, I get all results in current-dir that contain the 2nd search term.
Is there any reason why this one particular environment produces this odd behavior? Is there any way I can avoid this, while still preserving the -r flag?
FAQ:
Q: Why am I using the -r flag on a piped input?
Ans: I actually have grep saved as an alias, with many different options and flags that I always want to use as a default. The recursive flag is one of them. I would like to always use this alias, instead of having to type out all the flags every time.
Q: If you want to search for all instances matching both search terms, why not do (insert-superior-method-here) instead?
Ans: You're probably right. I'm sure there are things I can change in my usual habits that would workaround this issue. However, as intellectual curiosity, I would like to find out why recursive-greps-on-pipes work as intended on most environments, but not all, and if that can somehow be resolved.
The -r flag to grep changed in grep version 2.11 (release notes to implicitly use the working directory as the input if no file arguments are given.
If no file operand is given, and a command-line -r or equivalent
option is given, grep now searches the working directory.
You aren't giving the second grep any file arguments so it defaults to the current directory despite there being pipe input.
Try grep -r 'search-term1' . | grep -r 'search-term2' - as a workaround.
grep -r 'search-term1' . | grep -r -d skip 'search-term2' may also work around the problem.
In a Linux or Mac environment, Vim’s glob() function doesn’t match dot files such as .vimrc or .hiddenfile. Is there a way to get it to match all files including hidden ones?
The command I’m using:
let s:BackupFiles = glob("~/.vimbackup/*")
I’ve even tried setting the mysterious {flag} parameter to 1, and yet it still doesn’t return the hidden files.
Update: Thanks ib! Here’s the result of what I’ve been working on: delete-old-backups.vim.
That is due to how the glob() function works: A single-star pattern
does not match hidden files by design. In most shells, the default
globbing style can be changed to do so (e.g., via shopt -s dotglob
in Bash), but it is not possible in Vim, unfortunately.
However, one has several possibilities to solve the problem still.
First and most obvious is to glob hidden and not hidden files
separately and then concatenate the results:
:let backupfiles = glob(&backupdir..'/*').."\n"..glob(&backupdir..'/.[^.]*')
(Be careful not to fetch the . and .. entries along with hidden files.)
Another, perhaps more convenient but less portable way is to use
the backtick expansion within the glob() call:
:let backupfiles = glob('`find '..&backupdir..' -maxdepth 1 -type f`')
This forces Vim to execute the command inside backticks to obtain
the list of files. The find shell command lists all files (-type f)
including the hidden ones, in the specified directory (-maxdepth 1
forbids recursion).
I have a text file (more correctly, a “German style“ CSV file, i.e. semicolon-separated, decimal comma) which has a date and the value of a measurement on each line.
There are stretches of faulty values which I want to remove before further work. I'd like to store these cuts in some script so that my corrections are documented and I can replay those corrections if necessary.
The lines look like this:
28.01.2005 14:48:38;5,166
28.01.2005 14:50:38;2,916
28.01.2005 14:52:38;0,000
28.01.2005 14:54:38;0,000
(long stretch of values that should be removed; could also be something else beside 0)
01.02.2005 00:11:43;0,000
01.02.2005 00:13:43;1,333
01.02.2005 00:15:43;3,250
Now I'd like to store a list of begin and end patterns like 28.01.2005 14:52:38 + 01.02.2005 00:11:43, and the script would cut the lines matching these begin/end pairs and everything that's between them.
I'm thinking about hacking an awk script, but perhaps I'm missing an already existing tool.
Have a look at sed:
sed '/start_pat/,/end_pat/d'
will delete lines between start_pat and end_pat (inclusive).
To delete multiple such pairs, you can combine them with multiple -e options:
sed -e '/s1/,/e1/d' -e '/s2/,/e2/d' -e '/s3/,/e3/d' ...
Firstly, why do you need to keep a record of what you have done? Why not keep a backup of the original file, or take a diff between the old & new files, or put it under source control?
For the actual changes I suggest using Vim.
The Vim :global command (abbreviated to :g) can be used to run :ex commands on lines that match a regex. This is in many ways more powerful than awk since the commands can then refer to ranges relative to the matching line, plus you have the full text processing power of Vim at your disposal.
For example, this will do something close to what you want (untested, so caveat emptor):
:g!/^\d\d\.\d\d\.\d\d\d\d/ -1 write tmp.txt >> | delete
This matches lines that do NOT start with a date (the ! negates the match), appends the previous line to the file tmp.txt, then deletes the current line.
You will probably end up with duplicate lines in tmp.txt, but they can be removed by running the file through uniq.
you are also use awk
awk '/start/,/end/' file
I would seriously suggest learning the basics of perl (i.e. not the OO stuff). It will repay you in bucket-loads.
It is fast and simple to write a bit of perl to do this (and many other such tasks) once you have grasped the fundamentals, which if you are used to using awk, sed, grep etc are pretty simple.
You won't have to remember how to use lots of different tools and where you would previously have used multiple tools piped together to solve a problem, you can just use a single perl script (usually much faster to execute).
And, perl is installed on virtually every unix/linux distro now.
(that sed is neat though :-)
use grep -L (print none matching lines)
Sorry - thought you just wanted lines without 0,000 at the end