For setting a border line between elements, I use border on one side for each child, except the last one. For example
<div class="parent">
<div>First</div>
<div>Second</div>
<div>Third</div>
<div>Fourth</div>
</div>
with CSS
.parent div{
display:block;
padding:5px;
border-bottom:dashed 1px #000}
.parent div:last-child{
border-bottom:dashed 0 #000
}
Is there a way to set the border between children from parent's CSS style? without using last-child. In other words, in one single statement from parent rule.
No, the border is a property of the child element, and thus can only be specified on them. You can use a single rule for this, but it requires advanced CSS3 selector support:
.parent > div:not(:last-child){
border-bottom: dashed 1px #000;
}
I just know a workaround: use jQuery and iterate through those child elements(each: http://api.jquery.com/each/) and set your css class if next(next: http://api.jquery.com/?s=next) element is also child...
I think another way, just using css does not exist, but I'm not sure, if you find a solution with css only, please post it ;)
Greetings
Related
For example, I want a CSS selector for all div elements which have a CSS overflow:auto; property. Is it possible to have a selector of that kind?
No. There's no way to do this with css. You need to use scripting language.
But if you have defined style in your html like the following then this would be possible like:
div[style="overflow:auto;"]{
background-color: #f00;
}
<div style="overflow:auto;">overflow is auto</div>
Note that style="overflow:auto;" will match divs which has exact that CSS (string). If you want to select divs that contains overflow:auto along with some other css, you can use * selector.
div[style*="overflow:auto;"]{
background-color: #f00;
}
I have following css and display is set to none if there are no records. However, it displays a red line at the top. You can verify it here http://jsfiddle.net/3agn58u4. Any idea what is causing this?
CSS:
<style>
body {
font-family:Calibri;
}
#customTaskNotification {
position:relative;
}
.TasksCount {
position:absolute;
top: -.1px;
right:-.1px;
padding:1px 2px 1px 2px;
background-color:#ff0000; /* orange #ef8913* dark-pink #d06079 */
color:white;
font-weight:bold;
font-size:1.05em;
width:50%;
text-align: center;
border-radius:50%!important;
box-shadow:1px 1px 1px gray;
}
div.TasksCount:empty {
display: none;
}
</style>
The problem is that you're trying to set CSS styling on a property based on it being empty but that div is not actually empty.
You can see in the snippet provided that the :empty selector is not going to apply to a <div> element that isn't actually empty (even if you can't see its contents).
.testDiv {
background-color:#ff0000;
height: 30px;
width: 40px;
margin: 5px;
}
.testDiv:empty {
background-color: blue;
}
<div class="testDiv">
</div>
<div class="testDiv"></div>
<div class="testDiv">
</div>
You may need Javascript to check actual content of a div before applying styles if this case is going to be prevalent in your solution.
You can change the padding of your <div> and yes, that will hide it from your view when the contents of the div aren't visible, but you're also removing the padding from your <div> so it's likely going to look bad (or not as desired) when there are actual links inside the div.
The :empty pseudo selector will select elements that
contain nothing
or every element that has no children (including text nodes).
or matches element that is empty but has only html comments.
Example:
<p></p><!-- empty element -->
<p>A paragraph.</p><!-- contains text,hence not an empty element -->
<p><!-- test --></p><!-- empty element with comment -->
<p>A paragraph.</p><!-- contains text,hence not an empty element -->
<p><a></a></p><!-- element has no text,but has child nodes,hence not empty -->
<p>A paragraph.</p><!-- contains text,hence not an empty element -->
<p> </p><!-- element has space ,hence not empty -->
please see the fiddle:EMPTY ELEMENT
This is the reason why your display none is not working.
According to w3school:
The :empty selector matches every element that has no children
(including text nodes).
TasksCount is not empty because it has a child(a element) so display:none; does not effect. By css, it is not possible to check the child where is empty or not and then select parent.
Solution: use Javascript or Jquery.
if($('.TasksCount').find('a').html() == ''){
//Or you can add class or add style $('.TasksCount').css('display','none');
$('.TasksCount').hide();
}
That's because TasksCount background color is set to red. You can set the padding:0 if you want to keep the same color. Or,
.TasksCount {
background-color: #fff;
box-shadow: none;
}
EDIT
This answer has been downvoted multiple times because it does not answer the real question :
Why the :empty property is not taking effect.
As others pointed out, this CSS property matches only elements that have no children. This is the correct answer to this question.
The OP asked
"However, it displays a red line at the top. You can verify it here
... Any idea what is causing this?"
I missed the point about the empty property and did suggested first to remove the padding which partially solves the 'red line' when the DIV and its children are empty. However, this will also strip the padding from the element when it has content.
If you think you have a more complete answer to this question , please leave a comment below and I will update it accordingly.
i have taken this h1 and i have given it a class and applied border bottom to it so that i can give a nice underline effect.
I can use text-decoration property but giving bold underline effect gives me the ability to have width of underline line.
When i give h1 an underline, the border goes to 100% full width of the container.
please tell me how to fix it.
thanks.
Use display: inline the reason why the H1 is showing the border all the way across is because it is a displaying block by default. Hope this helps!
Because h1 is a block level element and by default this element take a 100% width. so make it a inline element.
here is the CSS to build the h1 as a inline element.
h1{border-bottom:1px solid red;display:inline-block;}
here is the HTML
<h1>My First Heading</h1>
Here is a Demo.. http://jsbin.com/voyuluyo/1/edit
HTML
<h1 class="headings"> hi this is SO </h1>
<h1 class="headings1"> hi this is SO </h1>
CSS
.headings
{
border-bottom:10px solid black;
}
.headings1
{
display:inline-block;
border-bottom:10px solid red;
}
Fiddle
Working Demo
Output:
As RaySinlao said, display:block will make it expand all the way. If you want to make the next element go to the next line, display:inline won't work. Use display:table. Table will shrink-wrap (to fit contents) or expand (to fix weird bugs) or clearfix. Come to think of it, table does a lot of stuff.
In my html page, I have div with id footer. Inside of that are couple of other divs, and last one of them has p-tag inside. How do I apply css style for that p?
#footer div p {
background-color: #000;
}
#footer div {
float: left;
width: 23%;
border-left: solid 1px;
margin: 0;
padding-left: 5px;
}
The first one does not seem to overwrite the second, which works fine. Could someone give me hint where to find information especially about the order of css selectors?
You can use the :last-child selector to target the last div and its containing <p> tags.
footer div:last-child p{color:#f00;}
Here is an example fiddle - http://jsfiddle.net/vuGpt/
And here is some further reading - http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_selectors.asp
There's no real order to CSS selectors, except the order you create. The styles you define will be overridden if you select the same element later in your css. You just have to be aware of how you are selecting your elemnts. A general selector will be overridden by a more specific selector. For example if you defined the following
p{color:#0f0;}
Then this selector will be overridden by your more direct selector as defined above. To overcome this, you can add !important to your rules. That way you can be reasonably sure that that style will be applied regardless of it being overridden later. Unless you accidently use !important again. It can become a mess quite quickly and with well written CSS you chould be able to avoid using !important at all...
Your resulting CSS for the above would become:
footer div:last-child p{color:#f00 !important;}
Hope this helps...
Your CSS is fine. I would suggest checking the structure of your HTML. From the CSS you provided the HTML should look as below:
<div id="footer">
<div></div>
<div>
<p>My paragraph</p>
</div>
</div>
I have tested this and all appears kosher. See fiddle.
I have a bunch of elements that look like..
<div id="hi">
<div class="head">
</div>
<div class="footer">
</div>
</div>
..except some of them don't have the footer element, only a head. I want to give elements without a footer a bottom border. I'm hoping for something like..
#hi:hasno(.footer) {
border-bottom: 1px black dotted;
}
Is there a CSS selector I could use for this, or should I just use a JavaScript equivalent?
You can select elements that contain no other elements using the :empty selector, but what you need won't be available until CSS Selectors Level 4’s :has and :not(selector list) are both implemented in browsers. So no, it can't be done in pure CSS. Now whether or not you should use a JavaScript equivalent depends on what you really want to achieve here. If it's a minor detail, feel free to add it with JavaScript if it's not too much of a problem. If it's a huge, essential feature, consider restructuring so you don't need this kind of selector.
Depending on the situation with your background, you could put the border on #hi permanently, and then overlap that with your footer by giving the footer either margin-bottom: -1px or position: relative; bottom: -1px; and hiding the border when the footer is present.