responsive sprite background image, how to - css

Hi I have two columns of content within a container, the first column has text and the second is a span with a background sprite image. The problem is when I get to smaller screen resolutions, I want the background sprite image to have a width in percentage to be able to scale it along with the H5 with a percentage width, is there a way to do this?
h5{
float:left;
display:block;
width:800px;
}
.sprite{
background-image: url("assets/img/website_sprite_a.png");
background-position: -60px -60px;
float:left;
display:block;
width:64px;
}
<div class="container">
<h5>Title
</h5>
<span class="sprite">
</span>
</div>

In your case I would go with a single background-image, but in the case you will have a lot of images or you really want to do this you can use the background-size property.
From MDN:
The background-size CSS property specifies the size of the background images. The size of the image can be fully constrained or only partially in order to preserve its intrinsic ratio.
.sprite{
background-image: url("assets/img/website_sprite_a.png");
background-position: -30% -30%; //use % instead pixels
float:left;
display:block;
width:64px;
background-size: 100%; //play with this
}
You also should read this:
Scaling background images
I have played a little bit with this on JSFIddle. Resize the browser to see the effect.

nearly a year too late, but I was trying to figure out the same and wasn't able to come up with or find a direct answer. After a little fooling around with multiple pieces of advice, I figured it out. Haven't had a chance to test this on IE8 yet, and stopped bothering with IE6/7, so please bear that in mind.
The trick I found is to use a combination of background-position (using percentages—of the sprite image—as mentioned before), padding-top (again, using percentages—this is the percentage of the total width of the sprite image), and background-size: cover.
Play around with it at jsfiddle.
#wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
}
.div {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
background-image: url('http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/2e/Sprite_logo.jpg');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 0% 0%;
background-size: cover;
padding: 50% 0 0 0;
width: 40%;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div class="div"></div>
</div>

Related

Chrome shrinking images look sharpen/glitch with background-image but normal with image tag

I found that sometimes when images shrink with Css background, they looks sharpen/blurry/glitch...?
Anyway, they look weird.
Here I have two div with same effect but different approach, the left one use the IMG tag and the right one use a DIV with background image.
with img tag
<div class="left">
<img src="/image.jpg" alt="test"></img>
</div>
.left {
flex: 0 0 $img-w-pc;
height: $img-w-pc * $img-ratio;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
img {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 50%;
left: 0;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
}
with background-image
<div class="right" style="background-image: url(/image.jpg)"></div>
.right{
flex: 0 0 $img-w-pc;
height: $img-w-pc * $img-ratio;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center center;
background-size: cover;
}
The original image size is 1280 x 720 and when it's shrinking with the background-image it'll looks glitch.
However if I use a smaller image or enlarge the div, make the image "not shrink that much", then it'll be fine.
I test it on Chrome and FireFox and only the former with this problem.
What is the cause of it? Is this some special behaviors with Chrome?
Update
I create a codepen here: https://codepen.io/timtnlee/pen/GRjmxVK
Try adding the image-rendering: pixelated; declaration to the styles for your background image.
https://css-tricks.com/almanac/properties/i/image-rendering/

how to achieve blurry parallax background

My objective is to have a full-screen parallax background that is blurred.
The problem is that when you blur an element it no longer spans the full size of the container (because the edges are blurry). I found an example that suggested using transform:scale in order to stretch it just a little bigger than the size required for 'cover', although now this now makes it so that when you scroll down the page the background slowly moves down as well (once again exposing the blurred edges).
HTML
<div class="viewport"></div>
CSS
.viewport {
background-image: url("images/img1.jpg");
background-attachment: fixed;
filter: blur(7px);
position: relative;
transform: scale(1.1);
background-size: cover;
background-position: center;
height: 130vh;
z-index: -1;
}
Consider putting the viewport in a viewport-wrapper with hidden overflow?
HTML
<div class="viewport-wrapper"><div class="viewport"></div></div>
CSS
.viewport-wrapper {
overflow: hidden;
}
Codepen

Choppy scrolling with "background-attachment: fixed"

I'm having issues with background-attachment: fixed. When I apply it to the elements on my page it creates a very choppy scrolling effect. Essentially not something that is not a good experience for the user.
My code is here:
HTML
<div class="con row1">
<p>Some text here just to flesh out example</p>
</div>
<div class="grad-space">
</div>
<div class="con row2">
<p>Some text here just to flesh out example</p>
</div>
CSS
.con {
height: 100vh; }
.grad-space {
height: 50vh; }
.row1 {
background: url('https://s-media-cache- ak0.pinimg.com/736x/3d/88/09/3d880927ac8bfec60a04ca93064569e0.jpg') no-repeat center;
background-size: cover;
background-attachment: fixed; }
.row2 {
background: url('https://d3rt1990lpmkn.cloudfront.net/640/31762579d8fd04a756fb791ac9c3634b5828f0dd') no-repeat center;
background-size: cover;
background-attachment: fixed; }
Here's a link to the codepen showing exactly what I'm talking about:
http://codepen.io/reskk/pen/qaYJwq
Edit: Fullpage Codepen: http://codepen.io/reskk/full/qaYJwq/
Now strangely enough when I resize the browser down to a small width (say 800px) the scrolling actually becomes very smooth - just as you'd want it to appear on a finished project.
When the browser is at its max width (and max height, which you can't quite fully get on codepen due to to the code-input box) that is where the janky, choppy scrolling happens.
I've done extensive searching on this and haven't been able to find a solution.
Does anyone have any ideas on this? It's such a gorgeous effect but is unfortunately made useless by the performance it yields.
Thanks,
Reskk
You know you can see any codepen in full page? Fullpage Codepen
About your choppy effect, what you probably are looking is a scroll animation smoother, not sure if this is the right term. What it does is that delays the mouse scroll effect, or reduces "line jumps" height, making the movement look better.
CSS Parallax by davidwalsh
Edit removed frameworks/libraries references (offtopic)
I was stressing with the same problem, and found a lovely solution here: https://medium.com/vehikl-news/fixed-background-image-performance-issue-6b7d9e2dbc55
Essentially, you need to remove the background image from your .rows and move it to a :before element for each. That way you're not using background-position: fixed, but rather position: fixed on your pseudo element.
.hero {
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
&::before {
background-image: url('background-image.png');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center top;
background-size: cover;
content: '';
height: 100%;
left: 0;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
will-change: transform;
z-index: -1;
}

Button out of 3 graphic parts with fluid mid-part

I have an image:
with 3 parts:
, and
I want a button with a repeating part2, so the button text (centered) is variable.
But the button text should range 50% into the other pieces.
Part1 and part3 need a min width I think, unfortunately I have no useful example.
:before and :after didn't work very well (with position:absolute or similar), because the repeat part have to be fluid between the outer parts.
Any ideas? Greetz.
A modern posibility would be using border-image.
But if you want a wider support, do it with backgrounds.
The problem is that a repeating bkg is difficult to size . So, it's best to handle it in a pseudo element
.test {
min-width: 200px;
text-align: center;
line-height: 90px;
display: inline-block;
margin: 20px;
height: 100px;
padding: 0px 20px;
font-size: 30px;
color: white;
background-image: url('//i.stack.imgur.com/mYxcX.png'), url('//i.stack.imgur.com/TlpN0.png');
background-size: auto 100%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: left top, right top;
position: relative;
}
.test:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
background-image: url('//i.stack.imgur.com/GMhMi.png');
background-size: auto 100%;
left: 90px;
right: 100px;
top: 0px;
bottom: 0px;
z-index: -1;
}
<div class="test">TEST</div>
<div class="test">long test</div>
<div class="test">much longer test</div>
And the same, using border image. Using this image
we will get this: (note the trick about height:0px to allow for a single image in all the left and right sides.)
.test {
display: inline-block;
margin: 20px;
height: 0px;
font-size: 30px;
border-width: 50px;
border-image-source: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/oXiA6.png);
border-image-slice: 50% 49% 50% 50% fill;
border-image-repeat: repeat repeat;
}
<div class="test">TEST</div>
<div class="test">long test</div>
<div class="test">much longer test</div>
UPDATED and totally Changed:
Thanks to #vals comment below which let me had the "idea bulb" above my head, hence the "unless.." part in the comment.
This new solution is much cleaner in CSS and HTML, less code, no need to worry about position:absolute, no need for extra mess, just simply uses "multiple backgrounds" (1) as well as calc()(2) function with min-width too techniques. but first here's the code and comments will explain:
JS Fiddle
.test-class {
/* so that div can expand to contain the text as well as the padding */
width:auto;
/* min width = 173px left image width + 199px right image width */
/* without this it'll collapse */
min-width:372px;
padding:0 20px 0 10px; /* just to give it breathign space on sides */
line-height: 148px;
color: white;
font-size:24px;
/* no color background because the images are PNGs with alpha */
background-color: transparent;
/* setting multiple images having the middle "extendable" one as third background */
background-image: url('//i.stack.imgur.com/mYxcX.png'),
url('//i.stack.imgur.com/TlpN0.png'),
url('//i.stack.imgur.com/GMhMi.png');
/* set no repeat to all, even the extendable otherwise it'll appear behind the
other two images, instead we don't repeat it but control its size later */
background-repeat: no-repeat, no-repeat, no-repeat;
/* position each image to its corresponding position, the 46.5% for the middle
image is because the left-side image has less width than the one on the right */
background-position:left center, right center, 46.5% 50%;
/* finally giving the images on the sides their exact-pixel size, while for the
one on the middle we make use of calc() function, so the width size of the middle
image = full div size (100%) - the width values of the left and right image (173+199) */
background-size: 173px 148px, 199px 148px, calc(100% - 372px) 148px;
display: inline-block;
text-align:center;
}
<div class="test-class">Home</div>
<div class="test-class" style="margin-left:200px;">about company</div>
<div class="test-class">example dummy text for demo only</div>
Alternatively, as I commented, you can use the CSS Sliding Door technique which was so practical and used a lot before CSS border-radius and CSS shadow presented and simplified interfaces. another example perfect CSS sprite sliding doors button
This JS Fiddle 2 shows how to implement the sliding door method for achieving such task, while it looks kind too much wide for this images set, since the right side image has 199px width, it could be used for images with less width values.
And this JS Fiddle 3 is similar to sliding door but with :before and :after but with one issue that it has to have display:block which make it not workign for horizontal alignment but could be fixed with javascript after settign it's display to inline-block.
Also there's another way, using SVG as background image which is better first because it is scale-able especially for non linear images like the blue ink circle used in the great example by #vals .
Second benefit of using SVG is using inline SVG and because SVG is made of groups and element could be targeted with CSS just like targeting other DOM elements.
https://css-tricks.com/using-svg/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1). Resources:
caniuse - Multiple backgrounds
MDN - Using CSS multiple backgrounds
(2). Resources:
caniuse CSS calc()
MDN - calc()
CSS-Tricks - A couple of use cases for calc

Background images: how to fill whole div if image is small and vice versa

I have three problems:
When I tried to use a background image in a smaller size div, the div shows only part of image. How can I show the full or a specific part of image?
I have a smaller image and I want to use in a bigger div. But don't want to use repeat function.
Is there any way in CSS to manipulate the opacity of an image?
Resize the image to fit the div size.
With CSS3 you can do this:
/* with CSS 3 */
#yourdiv {
background: url('bgimage.jpg') no-repeat;
background-size: 100%;
}
How Do you Stretch a Background Image in a Web Page:
About opacity
#yourdiv {
opacity: 0.4;
filter: alpha(opacity=40); /* For IE8 and earlier */
}
Or look at CSS Image Opacity / Transparency
To automatically enlarge the image and cover the entire div section without leaving any part of it unfilled, use:
background-size: cover;
This worked perfectly for me
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: 100% 100%;
Try below code segment, I've tried it myself before :
#your-div {
background: url("your-image-link") no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
background-clip: border-box;
}
Rather than giving background-size:100%;
We can give background-size:contain;
Check out this for different options avaliable: http://www.css3.info/preview/background-size/
This will work like a charm.
background-image:url("http://assets.toptal.io/uploads/blog/category/logo/4/php.png");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain;
I agree with yossi's example, stretch the image to fit the div but in a slightly different way (without background-image as this is a little inflexible in css 2.1). Show full image:
<div id="yourdiv">
<img id="theimage" src="image.jpg" alt="" />
</div>
#yourdiv img {
width:100%;
/*height will be automatic to remain aspect ratio*/
}
Show part of the image using background-position:
#yourdiv
{
background-image: url(image.jpg);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: 10px 25px;
}
Same as the first part of (1) the image will scale to the div so bigger or smaller will both work
Same as yossi's.

Resources