I want to show real server time on the page, not from user pc. Also would be great to use incrementing for seconds, to show day of the week in my language and month in my language.
DateTime.Now on the backend C# or VB code will give you the server time.
If I understand right, your incrementing clock is a live updating clock of the server time. What you can do is use the DateTime.Now value that will give you the server side time and then use client-side javascript to show the value.
This link here will show you how to create client javascript clock: http://www.ricocheting.com/code/javascript/html-generator/digital-clock
One problem may arise from this solution is the time difference between the call on the server time and when the javascript starts running the digital clock. This could be in milliseconds or off by 1-2 seconds which I don't see any issue unless you are running time sensitive application (which I recommend not using this solution anyway)
DateTime.Now is the thing you want
I think Steven had given some suggestion regarding to DateTime.
Since you had mentioned Multilingual in your page you can use Resource files. This will provide multilingual functionality and you can add translations without needing to recompile.
You can Find details Here
Related
I didn't see a situation quite like mine, so here goes:
Scenario highlights: The user wants a system that includes custom SMS alerts. A component of the functionality is to have a way to identify a start based on user input, then send SMS with personalized message according to a pre-defined interval after the trigger. I've never used Twilio before and am noodling around with the implementation.
First Pass Solution: Using Twilio account, I designated the .aspx that will receive the inbound triggering alert/SMS via GET. The receiving page declares and instantiates my SMSAlerter object within page load, which responds immediately with a first SMS and kicks off the System.Timer.Timer. Elementary, and functional to a point.
Problem: The alerts continue to be sent if the interval for the timer is a short time span. I tested it at a minute interval and was successful. When I went to 10 minutes, the immediate SMS is sent and the first message 10 minutes later is sent, but nothing after that.
My Observation: Since there is no interaction with the resource after the inbound text, the Session times out if left at default 20 minutes. Increasing Session timeout doesn't work, and even if it did does not seem correct since the interval will be on the order of hours, not minutes.
Using Cache to store each new SMSAlerter might be the way to go. For any SMSAlerter that is created, the schedule is used for roughly 12 hours and is replaced with a new SMSAlerter object when the same user notifies the system the following day. Is there a better way? Am I over/under-simplifying? I am not anticipating heavy traffic now (tens of users), but the user is thinking big.
Thank you for comments, suggestions. I didn't include the code, because the question is about design, not syntax.
I think your timer is going out of scope about 20 minutes after the original request, killing the timer. I have a feeling that if you keep refreshing the aspx page it won't happen - but obviously that doesn't help much.
You could launch a new thread that has the System.Timers.Timer object so it stays alive, and doesn't go out of scope when there are no follow up requests to the server. But this isn't a great idea to be honest - although it might help with understanding the issue.
Ultimately, you'll need some sort of continuously running service - as you don't want to depend on the app pool for this, so I'd suggest a Windows Service running in the background to handle it, which is going to be suitable for a long term solution.
Hope this helps!
(Edited slightly to make the windows service aspect clearer)
I need some information from you.I have used session.TimeOut=540 in application.Is that effects on my Application performance after some time.When number of users increases its getting very slow. response time nearly more that 2 minutes for a button click also.This is hosted in server in Application pool .I don't know about Application pool much.If Session Timeout is the problem i will remove it.Please suggest me the way to for more users.
Job Numbers,CustomerID,Tasks will come from one database.when the user click start Button then the data saved in another Database.I need this need to be faster for more Users
I think that you have some page(s) that make some work that takes time, or for some reason or a bug is keep open for more time than the usual.
This page is keep lock the session and hold the rest page from response because the session holds all the pages.
Now, together with the increase of the timeout this page is lock everything and here is you response time near to 2 minutes.
The solution is to locate the page that have the long running problem and fix it or make it faster by optimize the process, or if this page must keep the long time running, then disable the session for that one.
relative:
Web app blocked while processing another web app on sharing same session
What perfmon counters are useful for identifying ASP.NET bottlenecks?
Replacing ASP.Net's session entirely
Trying to make Web Method Asynchronous
Does ASP.NET Web Forms prevent a double click submission?
About server
Now from the other hand, if your server suffer from hardware, or bad setup then here is one other answer with points that you need to check to make it faster.
Find out where the time is spent
add the StopWatch in the method which you said "more that 2 minutes for a button click". you can find which statment spent the most time.
If it is a query on DB that cost time. Check your sql statement.
are you using "SELECT Count(*)" instead of "SELECT Count(Id)"? the * is always slower. also, don't try "SELECT * FROM...."
Use cache.
there are many ways to do cache. both in ASPX pages and your biz layer.
the OutputCache is the most easy way.
and also, cache the page (for example a blog post) on the first time when a user visit it.
Did you use memory paging?
be careful when doing paging on gridview or other list. If you just call DataSource=xxx and DataBind(), even with PagedDataSource, this is likely a memory paging. It cost a lot of performance. Please use stored procedures to do paging.
Check your server environment
where did you deploy the website? many ISP will limit brandwide and IIS connection count and also CPU time to your account.
if you have RD access to your server. you can watch CPU and memory usage to see if they are high when many user comes to your site. If the site is slow and neither CPU nor memory useage is high, it may be a network brandwide problem.
Here are some simple steps to narrow down the issue -
1) Get HTTPWatch (theres a free Basic version) available and check whats really taking time from an end user perspective. Look at number of requests, number of resources downloaded, and the payload. If there is nothing to worry move on to next
2) If its not client, then its usually the processing time on the server. Jump on to DB first - since this is quite easier to eliminate quickly. Look at how many DB calls are made (run profiler in staging or dev) and see if there are any long running queries, missing indexes or statistics, and note the IO. If all is well, move on
3) Check your app code. You could get on with VS.NET in build profiler or professional tools such as Ants. If code is fine then its your network or external calls that you make, check your network bandwidth. If you still cannot narrow down, check your environment/hardware
The best way to get to it is to apply load - You could use simple tools such as ab.exe (that comes as part of Apache Web server) to have concurrent hits on your server and run the App, DB profilers in the background to get to the issue.
Hope this helps!
I have a website set up with in IIS 7 with HTTPS, and every time a user access it for the first time the load time is about 15 sec.
THIS IS NOT the compile/warm up "problem" described for instance her: Slow first page load on asp.net site
I know about that "problem" and I also have that, but that is of course expected and not the issue here.
Since it's not when the application loads first time since recycle/start. If I open another browser and access it after doing it first in another browser then it takes the same amount of time. So it seems every time a session is started, that's when the delay happens. All following requests from the same user/browser is as quick as expected.
This is for an admin interface site I have and I use asp.net membership. Although the delay happens even before the user have logged in. So I'm not sure if that is the culprit.
I am a bit unsure where to look for killing the delay. I am running session state in process. With cookies.
Any ideas?
You need to get a little more information. Enable trace and track how long each step takes. You could also use Wireshark and have a look at the traffic between the client/server. If there is a big gap in traffic you can see something is hanging at the servers end. If you see constant traffic perhaps you have to much going on with your landing page. Other simple things to do would be to enable dynamic caching/compression on the server to speed things up.
Warm it up...
http://learn.iis.net/page.aspx/688/using-the-iis-application-warm-up-module/
Instead of asking a client timezone in registration form (to correctly format datetime, all server dates in UTC) I thought about fetching a time from client computer and calculating time offset between client and server.
Anyone tried this? How often clients have something insane on their system clocks?
Cheers!
Well, I think it's a nice idea, and if your application does not depend on that I would implement it.
After all, if the user has the wrong time in their machine (for who knows what reason) it is probably because he wants to, and its only hurting himself if the times in your app are a little off.
But of course, if you're application for some reason depends on knowing the exact time zone of the user, you should ask for it (even with suggestions) with a big sign telling the user that your application depends on the correct setting, so the user knows its important.
I am developing the online bidding system using SP.NET where I need to close the auction if the auction time is get closed without any bid.
As on this website (archived link)
Any ideas on how to implement that?
I can think of 4 ways to do this:
1: A bit hackish, but you can try to use the "cache expiration technique" described here
In short, you rely on the ASP.NET cache expiration mechanism to run some code at a set time. In your case you could set this time to the expiration time of the auction the moment the auction gets created. However, this is unreliable, what if you get a server restart? You can say bye to your cache. But if you use a shared service where you don't have access to the server, this could be your solution.
2: A little better, you can write an .aspx page and call it from the Windows task scheduler every X minutes to run your code. The issue here is that you would have to execute a public page. Could be a security concern.
3: Much better, you can write a Windows Service. But this may be too much work if you lack the time.
4: Have a look at Quartz.NET, this is a .NET port of the industry-standard Java project of the same name. I haven't tried it but it looks promising.