I have a VERY basic plot in R, and I'd like to solve two issues. Here is the code which produces the plot:
plot(o,n,bty="n",pch=21,cex=1.5,bg="gray",xlab="y",ylab="x",lwd=2)
And, here's the plot
There are two unwanted behaviors of this plot that I'm trying to fix. And I don't know how to do either one (nor do I understand why R doesn't do these things already...)
The X and Y axes do not meet. There is a gap near the origin in this plot. I want to remove that. The axes should touch, just like any other graph.
The data extends past the axis is both the X and Y direction. This clearly is unwanted. How can I fix this without having to manually make my own axis. Seems like there should be something more intuitive here.
bty="l".
You may also want to use something like:
xlim=c(0.02, 0.24), ylim=c(0.02, 0.24)
if you don't like the default limits of your two axes.
In general, check out ?par for guidance on both of these and many other options.
Try leaving out bty="n" or replacing it by bty="L" if you really do not want a box with edges above or on the right
Related
I'm trying to create a dot chart in Stata, splitting it into two categories
Running a chunk of code:
sysuse nlsw88, clear
drop if race == 3
graph dot (mean) wage, over(occ) by(race)
Creates such output:
So far so good but I'd like to remove labels of Y axis from the right graph to give the data some more space.
The only way I've been able to do that was to manually edit graph and hide the axis label object:
Is there a way to do it programmatically? I do know I could use one more over() but in some graphs of mine that is already taken.
I believe the solution is buried in help bystyle and help by_option. However, I can't get it to work with your example (I'm on Stata 12). But the description is clear. For example:
A bystyle determines the overall look of the combined graphs,
including
whether the individual graphs have their own axes and labels or if instead the axes and labels are shared across graphs arrayed in the
same row and/or in the same column;
...
There are options that let you control each of the above attributes --
see [G-3] by_option --
And also
iyaxes and ixaxes (and noiyaxes and noixaxes) specify whether the y axes and x axes are
to be displayed with each graph. The default
with most styles and
schemes is to place y axes on the leftmost graph of each row and to place x axes on
the bottommost graph of each column. The y and
x axes include the
default ticks and labels but exclude the axes titles.
If for some reason that doesn't work out, something like
sysuse nlsw88, clear
drop if race == 3
graph dot (mean) wage, over(occ) by(race)
gr_edit .plotregion1.grpaxis[2].draw_view.setstyle, style(no)
does (but I don't really like the approach). You can mess with at least the axis number [#] to do a bit of customization. I guess recording changes in the graphical editor and then recycling the corresponding code, may be one way out of difficult situations.
A beginner question: I currently have some plots that look like this.
I'm keeping the plots free of other annotation because I have to fit a lot of them onto one page and specific values aren't important, just the general trend that the red line is to the right of the black one. However, I'd like to be able to indicate that the dashed line in my plot actually represents zero, like so:
Is there any way to tell R to only display that value on the x-axis labels? I don't think using text() would be a good idea because it relies on absolute coordinates, but I'm not really sure how to work with axis options to make it do what I want.
Try:
axis(side = 1, at = 0)
See ?axis for details.
I want to plot some data with barplot. Rather, I want to make a bar graph and barplot seemed the logical choice. I am plotting just fine but I was wondering if there is a way to intelligently scale the y axis to round up from the highest count.
For example I set the yaxis in this case to be 30, because I knew that Strand.22 had 27 counts in it: barplot(unlist(d), ylim=c(0,30), xlab="Forward Reverse", ylab="Counts")
In the future, I want this script to run on its own, so it would be optimal for the the Y-axis to choose it's own ylim. Short of pulling the information out of my 'd' variable I can't think of a good way to do this. Is there an easy way to do this with barplot? Would some other plotter work better? I have seen things about ggplots but it seemed super complex and I wasn't sure that it would do anything better.
EDIT: If I do not choose a ylim it picks automatically and this is what it decided was best.
I disagree with it's choice.
If you don't specify ylim, R will come up with something based on the data. (Sounds like you don't like it's choice, which is fair.)
If you specify something based on the data like:
barplot(unlist(d), ylim=c(0,1.1*max(unlist(d)))
R will draw you a plot that reflects the maximum value of data. That example just takes the maximum of your values and multiplies that by 1.1 (this could be any number) to give it a little extra height. R does something similar to this when you make a scatterplot but it handles barplots slightly differently.
I want to plot several lists of points, each list has distance (decimal) and error_no (1-8). So far I am using the following:
plot(b1$dist1, b1$e1, col="blue",type="p", pch=20, cex=.5)
points(b1$dist2, b1$e2, col="blue", pch=22)
to add them both to the same plot. (I will add legends, etc later on).
The problem I have is that points overlap, and even when changing the character using for plotting, it covers up previous points. Since I am planning on plotting a lot more than just 2 this will be a big problem.
I found some ways in:
http://www.rensenieuwenhuis.nl/r-sessions-13-overlapping-data-points/
But I would rather do something that would space the points along the y axis, one way would be to add .1, then .2, and so on, but I was wondering if there was any package to do that for me.
Cheers
M
ps: if I missed something, please let me know.
As noted in the very first point in the link you posted, jitter will slightly move all your points. If you just want to move the points on the y-axis:
plot(b1$dist1, b1$e1, col="blue",type="p", pch=20, cex=.5)
points(b1$dist2, jitter(b1$e2), col="blue", pch=22)
Depends a lot on what information you wish to impart to the reader of your chart. A common solution is to use the transparency quality of R's color specification. Instead of calling a color "blue" for example, set the color to #0000FF44 (Apologies if I just set it to red or green) The final two bytes define the transparency, from 00 to FF, so overlapping data points will appear darker than standalone points.
Look at the spread.labs function in the TeachingDemos package, particularly the example. It may be that you can use that function to create your plot (the examples deal with labels, but could just as easily be applied to the points themselves). The key is that you will need to find the new locations based on the combined data, then plot. If the function as is does not do what you want, you could still look at the code and use the ideas to spread out your points.
Another approach would be to restructure your data and use the ggplot2 package with "dodging". Other approaches rather than using points several times would be the matplot function, using the col argument to plot with a vector, or lattice or ggplot2 plots. You will probably need to restructure the data for any of these.
Is there an function in R that does the same job as Matlab's "bar" function?
R does have a "barplot" function in the library graphics, however, it is not the same.
The Matlab bar(X,Y) (verbatim excerpt from MATLAB documentation) "draws a bar for each element in Y at locations specified in X, where X is a vector defining the x-axis intervals for the vertical bars." (emphasis mine)
However, the R barplot function does not allow one to specify locations.
Perhaps there is a method in ggplot2 that supports this? I am only able to find standard bar charts in ggplot2.
No, barplot is not the same as bar, but you should read the whole help. You can do many things to position the bars. The first is simply their order in Y. You could insert spaces if you wish (additional 0s). If you have X and Y then sort Y on X (Y[order(X)]) and plot it. If you need to change positions use the "space" and "width" arguments. It's not as straightforward as specifying X values I suppose but it's definitely more useful in most situations. Generally what you want to adjust is widths of bars and spaces between bars. Their position on the X-axis should be arbitrary. If the position on the X-axis is really meaningful then you should be using line plots, not bar graphs.
In R:
barplot(rbind(1:10, 2:11), beside=T, names.arg=1:10)
In MATLAB:
>> bar(1:10, [(1:10)' (2:11)'])
Read up on par . Then observe, for example:
x<-c(1,2,4,5,6)
y<-c(3,4,3,4,2)
plot(x,y,type='h',lwd=6)
Edit: yes, I know this doesn't (yet) plot multiple data sets, but I would hope you can see simple ways to make that happen, with spacings, colors, etc. specified to your exact liking :-)
Sounds vaguely like the R stepfun. On the other hand one would need to know what "draws a bar" means before saying it is not the same as barplot(..., horiz=TRUE) One would, of course, need to examine some more detailed evidence such as data and plots before arriving at a conclusion, however. #John Colby should be congratulated for adding some specificity to the discussion. The axis function is probably what Quant Guy needs education regarding.