I'm comming from the java world, and i'd like to know if there's anything that can help me understand the properties of abap development objects.... something like reflection.
Knowing that everything that goes on in ABAP is persisted somewhere inside a database, i'd like to know how would i go about finding out HOW and WHERE an object is saved.
For instance, i'd like to know if there are any functions that enumerate the fields of a structure, or enumerate the properties of an object, or if there's no such thing (but the properties still exist obviously), then what table would be holding those (so that i can create my own functions, or classes)
Also any other discoverability tricks that you know are good... I know this question is a little generic, but since i'm new to abap, i don't really know what to ask :P
Thx, you guys rule.
If you're looking for something like reflection, take a look at RTTI. This cvers the runtime structure of most of the stuff you'll come across. If you want to find out what's going on underneath the surface of the cevelopment tools, just turn on the SQL trace (ST05), open the object in question in an editor and check what tables are accessed...
It is hard to answer your question, maybe it would be easier, if you split it up in multiple questions with some specific task you want.
Some topics I remember (please verify it, I can't check it in the moment if I remember correct):
DDIC-objects are stored in tables with DD*.
Tables (and there properties) are stored in dd02l, dd02t includes the texts. dd03l contains the fields. dd04tl contains the texts of data element.
But it will not help you, if you add something to this tables. The database in background will not get the definitions.
If you want to create some dynmaic magic you may take a look to the field-symbols and assign-command.
Related
So I am doing a private project including a localized database. Since I am not able to host an SQL Server I decided to implement a system for users to syncronize their data (maybe bluetooth, maybe www, not certain yet).
Now in order to send entire sqlite tables between people and for different visualisations I found it useful to get the column names from tables and interact with them, send data refering to them and so on.
Ive seen posts that conclude to use the sqlite_master table to recieve the data Im interested in, Ive tried, it worked, wonderful. Now I got suspicious.
I read about this master property that it could crash the whole databank in horrible ways, make it unreadable and whatsoever. Other than that there might also be some privacy problems or admin privileges that I may lay open for anyone once I send it incripted or not incripted (thats my private concern, I just read master and think of a system jesus XD).
And I research more and more and I cant find a satisfying answer. Evryone describes how to use the sqlite_master but not why or what dangers come with it (Or maybe Im just blind and didnt see the right post :D)
Well thats my question. Should I use it? Is it recommended to leave it alone? Becouse I could, there are other ways to just save up the tables and their columns in a bunch of strings lying arround somewhere. Id like to use it, becouse its handy, I like working with it more than I like working with PRAGMA. Or shall I really just ignore sqlite_master and move on to different methods?
Could someone please give some basic code on how to update items? I am using it an have an app that needs to add/delete values to list and map properties on table items without completely deleting the value. I also have a number property that I need to use as counter. In AWS documentation it simply states to re-save the entire object. I know it is possible to update items in this manner however I cannot seem to find any code. My app is in objective c however this seems like a problem for many people using many languages so this may be a great place to answer this for any and all languages. Thanks.
I've wondered this in many different situations, so here I come, looking for the experts knowledge.
Let's say I have to model something that requires a collection. A simple example: an application that stores famous quotes along with their author and a set of tags or keywords. The user should be able to enter a tag or keyword and get matching quotes for it.
My question is: do I really need a class that contains my collection of quotes? Something like this:
Or would this also be correct?
I'm asking this in the more abstract way possible (after all, UML should never depend on the implementation).
I've always thought the second example (just 1 class) was incorrect, but now I'm thinking that maybe the user can press a button on some interface and that button executes some code that gets a quote stored somewhere, and the second example would also be correct?
Basically, should I always have a collection stored somewhere, even if the storing class does nothing else but just store the collection (and provide the methods to access it)?
I definitelly prefer only one class, if there is no strong reason to have another container class (especially on abstract conceptual level). Then I add the collection methods as static functions. A separate container class would only bring more complexity, more dependencies and doubts like yours. :) Doubts often indicate the lack of a real need. When you really need something, you know it.
Here an example with some explanations. I find it simple, clear, elegant and abstract, meaning non-restrictive, easy to transform to any implementation you like:
When it comes to relationships of this class to other class, then you actially have your collection, without introducing new class. This diagram shows two examples. "Other class" actually sees a collection "quotes" which is ordered, like Vector. "One more class" also has a collection of Quotes with different characteristics.
Later on implementation level you can implement it directly like this or eventually adding a Factory or Container class, according to concrete, implemention resctrictions and special reqs.
I am relatively new to Drupal. We have a site and I've been asked to jump in and make some changes. I'm working on customizing the output of the Webforms module. I'm having trouble doing so because I can't seem to find a reference to the various data structures Webforms uses.
For example, I need to change something in a preprocess hook. Passed into the hook is a structure called $variables. I can see that attributes are being added to the piece I want to change, so I know I'm in the right hook. What I want to do is add something to the text. But I can't figure out where in $variables the text is so I can change it.
I'm sure what I need to change is in there, but I can't seem to get at it. All the documentation I've found on the web is either "paste this code in" or assumes you know the data structures.
So:
1. Is there a reference anywhere to these structures? $variables is one. $submission, $components are others. There are probably more. I know their contents vary widely with the specific webform, but looking for a general reference.
2. How can I see the contents of one of the structures from inside a hook? I've tried a lot of things, but no luck. Would be great to either have it output to the Apache log, or show up on the screen, something...
Any help would be greatly appreciated. It feels like there's real power here, but I can't get at it because I'm missing some basics.
I would say you need to install 2 modules to figure out what is going on...
First Devel, allowing you to use the dmp function. This will output a whole array to the message area.
And then my new favorite module, Search Krumo.
A webform is generated from large array of data and finding the bit that is relevant to you can often be difficult just looking though the dmp output. Search Krumo puts a search box in the message area allowing you to search for any instances of a string in the whole array structure. When you've found the bit that is relevant it also lets you copy the path to that array element so you can easily modify values buried deep in multi-arrays.
EDIT:
If you don't want the output on the screen but would rather log it then use Devel Debug Log. Very useful for debugging ajax requests etc.
If you just need to log simple strings not whole arrays then the dd function is useful combined with: tail -f /tmp/drupal_debug.txt assuming you have SSH access.
Background: I have a complex search form that stores the query and it's hash in a cache. Once the cache is set, I redirect to something like /searchresults/e6c86fadc7e4b7a2d068932efc9cc358 where that big long string on the end is the md5 hash of my query. I need to make a new argument for views to know what the hash is good for.
The reason for all this hastle is because my original search form is way to complex and has way to many arguments to consider putting them all into the path and expecting to do the filtering with the normal views arguments.
Now for my question. I have been reading views 2 documentation but not figuring out how to accomplish this custom argument. It doesn't seem to me like this should be as hard as it seems to me like it must be. Leaving aside any knowledge of the veiws api, it would seem that all I need is a callback function that will take the argument from the path as it's only argument and return a list of node id's to filter to.
Can anyone point me to a solution or give me some example code?
Thanks for your help! You guys are great.
PS. I am pretty sure that my design is the best I can come up with, lets don't get off my question and into cross checking my design logic if we can help it.
It's not as easy as you would like to make it.
In views, arguments are used to return objects, fx user, node, term, custom object. So you could make some custom code, to get the "query object". That would only be first step. You then need to get the info from the query object. You could either try making a custom relationship bond with the nodes or build your own filter to make the SQL needed. This can quickly become a confusing time sink.
Instead, I would suggest that you use hook_views_query_alter, which will allow you to alter the query. Since you already have the SQL, it's just a matter of checking for the hash, and if it's there, alter the query. Should be a pretty simple thing to do. Only thing that is a bit tricky, is that you have to make the query with the query object that views uses, but it's not that hard to figure out.