I have this problem that is driving me mad... I've been struggling with it for hours but can't figure out how to over come it.
I am using jqDock and want to place a toolbar in a "box" in a column. There is quite a lot of code included but you can see a sample here: http://ag.wasen.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&id=2&Itemid=17
Look at "Simple File Lister v2.0 #2" in the right hand side column where the toolbar is perfectly place. Then look at the left hand side where the toolbar goes vertical and is completely off track.
These two modules (as they are called in Joomla) is using the exact same code!
The difference between these two modules, the left one and the right is that the left one inherits a lot of CSS from the "div" statements in the left column.
The problem seems to be with the inherited "width" from a previously loaded CSS file. If I look at it in FireBug and remove the declaration for #leftcolumn div {width: 191px;} in FireBug the toolbar on the left is working fine.
I have tried to insert my own "width" on all different DIV's and using "!important" but even if FireBug shows the "#leftcolumn div" as stiked-out it still affects my toolbar DIV.
Regardless of how I have tried to "nullify" the inherited "#leftcolumn div" width it still affects my DIV.
Any clues on how I would be rid of it?
Regards,
Anders
Try the below css - Paste this in you template.css file and try to set the width if required on different selectors.
#main_bg #leftcolumn div.module_menu div div div, #main_bg #leftcolumn div.module div div .jqDocked div {
width: 20px;
}
see below image for output: Open the image in new window so you can see clearly.
Problem 1. You are trying to fit a horizontal Dock that has a maximum expanded width of 263px (7 48x48 icons) into a column that is only 191px wide: the Dock is going to overflow!
Problem 2. The template you are using is setting a specific width of 191px on any div more than 1 level below the div.module child of div#leftcolumn. Additionally, your template is specifiying both width and padding on some elements, which is going to cause cross-browser inconsistency and also makes some of the elements extend beyond the bounds of the column.
Since jqDock does not provide many ids on elements, the rules needed in order to override your template are going to have to be at least as 'specific' as the template's, if not more so.
For example, replace your page's rules for...
.sflpage {...}
.sflmenu {...}
#main_bg #leftcolumn div.module_menu div div div,
#main_bg #leftcolumn div.module div div {...}
with...
/*position the Dock's container, ensuring it's visible, and killing
the padding imposed by the template...*/
#leftcolumn div.module div div div div.sflpage {
padding: 0pt;
position: relative;
top: -20px;
width: auto;
z-index: 9999;
}
/*put the Dock in the center of its container, and give it plenty
of width for a fully-expanded Dock...*/
#leftcolumn div.module div div div div.jqDocked {
left: 50%;
margin-left: -150px;
padding: 0px 0pt;
position: absolute;
top: 0pt;
width: 300px;
}
/*kill the width and padding imposed by the template...*/
#leftcolumn div.module div div div div.jqDocked div {
width: auto;
padding: 0;
}
/*center the dock...*/
#leftcolumn div.module div div div div.jqDocked .jqDockWrap {
margin: 0pt auto;
}
/*use this to set/tweak the label's styling...*/
#leftcolumn div.module div div div div.jqDocked .jqDockLabelText {
}
I would also suggest that you need more horizontal space for the Dock (ie. between the module header and the file list), that your labels need better styling so that are visible and readable.
Related
Please visit my website at http://amrapps.ir/personal/indexbug.html
to visually see my problem.
Let me explain my problem:
In my website i have a fixed postion div which contains links and i takes and it takes 25 % of browser height.
Then it is the red div which takes 75 % of browser width.
When user clicks on -CLICK THERE TO READ MORE- in red div,it will be redirected to the next(yellow colored) div which takes 100 % of browser height.
Then you can click on go to top on the fixed div above to get back to red div.
Navigations are working well but there's a problem.
When you are at the 2nd(yellow) div,if you change browser width,the red div will be also visible! How can i fix that?
thank you for your effort.
Change your #aboutmore class to the below css:
#aboutmore {
background-color: #FFCE85;
margin-top: 5px;
top: 25%;
position: absolute;
/* height: 74%; */
width: 100%;
min-width: 1130px;
bottom: 0px;
z-index: 3;
}
Theres a couple of things going on here, and I'm not 100% of the result you want to accomplish, but we are working with CSS heights here so you need to keep some things in mind.
First of: when working with css heights, you need to make sure that all wrapping elements get the height of 100%. Including your body AND html tags. Without this, your body will just have the height of the elements inside it, and your 100% divs will do it to.
Second, you should turn of the body 'overflow: hidden' attribute, as it just obstructs correct testing.
Now, like I said, I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish, but your header should be taken out of the wrapper as it is fixed. This will allow your wrapper to become the scrollable area. You also mentioned you wanted the second div to be 100% heigh and the first one 75%. Now, with position fixed this would mean your yellow div is only 75% visible, with 25% hidden (either by being off screen or under the header). If you want the first div and header together to take up 100%, and any subsequent div to take up 100% on their own, you should position all elements relative and not fixed.
I'm going to add some code here to help with a fixed header:
div#page-wrap {
height: 75%;
position: absolute;
top: 25%;
width: 100%;
overflow: scroll;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
about,
#aboutmore {
height: 100%;
position: relative;
top: 0%;
}
Now this will break your javascript (as you can't actually scroll the body), although I couldn't get it working in the first place anyhow. You'll find more about scrolling inside a div (as now you need to scroll in your wrapper element) in this thread: How do I scroll to an element within an overflowed Div?
So basically, I want two divs to sit inside another div. The first one is sitting inside with no issues, but the second one floats underneath the parent. When I add overflow:hidden I can't see the div anymore. The closest I've gotten to a solution was to add overflow:auto, but that just creates a scroll bar. I have tried resizing, different positioning, overflow and clearfix but so far I can't find a solution. Any ideas guys? JSFiddle demo here http://jsfiddle.net/QLbGc/ Thanks for any help, it's been annoying me for a couple of days now.
You forgot to put float:left; at the slideshow div
It should be
#slideshow {
background-color: #000;
margin: 15px;
height: 95%;
width: 60%;
-moz-border-radius: 15px;
border-radius: 15px;
float: left;
}
So now you have the 'slideshow' div floating left and 'about' div floating right and they can fit inside the parent div.
Basically they were inside the parent div from the first time but the about div was under slideshow div.
Demo:
http://jsfiddle.net/QLbGc/2/
If you're looking to have the two divs side by side here's a fiddle for that.
http://jsfiddle.net/Hastig/QLbGc/6/
I stripped out a bunch of stuff as I wasn't sure you needed it or it was just stuff you were throwing at it to try and affect change.
Somebody mentioned you were missing a float: left; in what we assume you wanted as your left div.
Remember to compensate for margin and padding to match the container div.
In my example the main container was 500px wide. If I set each float div to 250px width when added to the 20px combined margins on those divs the total width goes to 520px and pushes that right div under the left div so you'll want each floated div at 240px to compensate. Same deal with percentages.
If I misundestood your intention and you're looking to hide one of those div use display: none; on it and double the width of the one you want to show.
try to put this code in your css.
.content::-webkit-scrollbar {
display: none;
}
I have boiled down my problem to a pretty simple single file with the CSS included in a <style> tag.
The problem is:
I have a floating right column with a transparent background to show some text and pictures. This works fine, as expected.
Now I want to position a "Site designed by.... " block just above the footer.
I want to use an absolute positioned div for this, which is positioned relative to the containing #content div, which must get the position:relative property to achieve this.
When I set this property, the floating right column disappears, and seems to be hidden behind the background image of the #content block.
I cannot find an explanation for this. A workaround would be to position it relative to the footer (in that case the #footer div would get the position:relative property).
But I just would like to understand what goes wrong here and why the floating column is hidden. See the links for the layouts without and with the relative positioned content div.
Understandably, in the case of no relative positioning, the text is positioned relative to the browser in the bottom left corner.
http://websites.drsklaus.nl/relativeproblem/index_withoutrelative.html
http://websites.drsklaus.nl/relativeproblem/index_withrelative.html
You were almost there! Heres a little help to finish it.
#main {
width: 1005px;
margin: 20px auto; /* shorthand margin for x and y axis */
border: solid black 1px;
/* Added background to main instead so it still covers the full background */
background-image: url('grey-repeating-background-4.jpg');
}
#content {
position: relative;
min-height: 500px;
/* made the padding here margin, made it slightly bigger to accomedate the right column */
margin: 5px 370px 5px 5px; /* Margin right should be as wide as the right column+extra space */
}
The reason for your right column to hide behind the content is that before you put position:relative; on it it is in normal flow, not 'positioned' and so z-index priority is really just by DOM order. Positioning it just made it a whole lot more important; obscuring the right column.
On my one page website at http://s361608839.websitehome.co.uk/pt-build/templatebuild/ if you click on a top menu option the page scrolls down to each section on the page.
Problem when it does scroll, the top part of the page is covering up the top part of the sections.
Is there anything I can do to my CSS to stop this from happening?
Thanks.
Replace some of your margin with padding. When jumping down the page to anchor spots like this it jumps to the edge of the inner box, outside of padding and inside border / margin. What you need to do is move that imaginary line up away from the content inside the div, so increase the padding and decrease some margin to keep the design working.
I did some playing around with your site, modifying to see how it would work for your trainingsessions section, I got this CSS:
margin-top: 0;
padding: 120px 350px 30px 0;
To adjust it with pure CSS, add an additional 151px (the height of your #topwrap element) to the padding-top of each navigable div. Then subtract 151px from the margin-bottom of each preceding navigable div.
A simplified version of this (you'll need to do the math to make it work with your already existing margins and paddings) would look like:
#div1 { /* first navigable div */
margin-bottom: -151px;
}
#div2 { /* all intermediate navigable divs */
padding-top: 151px;
margin-bottom: -151px;
}
#div3 { /* last navigable div */
padding-top: 151px;
}
Alternatively, you can adjust the scrolling position in the javascript by the 151px height of the #topwrap.
I am having a problem with some div's
The outer div has a min-height, but the inner divs are all varying heights. Because the inner divs are absolute positioned, they do not affect the outer divs height. Is there a way to make these inner divs affect the height of the outer div?
The reason I am styling these divs with position:absolute is so that they all start at the top of the container div.
As far as I know, there's no way for absolutely positioned child elements to affect the height of their statically, or relatively positioned parent elements using only CSS. Either:
Reorganize so that the child elements remain in the document flow
Use JavaScript on load of the page to set the height of the parent to the height of the largest child
This issue is common in fade-in/fade-out JavaScript slideshows, and from what I've seen either 1) the height of the parent container needs to be defined or 2) the parent container's height is set dynamically for each slide.
I recently had this problem with a fade in/out CSS transition slideshow, and ended up solving it by giving the first child element position: relative; and the others position: absolute; top:0; left: 0; which ensures that the containers height is the same as the height of first element. Since my CSS transition slideshow uses the opacity property the container dimensions never changes during the course of the slideshow.
Alas, since I also needed to supply a javascript fallback for older browsers I had to set the container height for these browsers anyway (because of jQuerys fadeIn/fadeOut actually setting display: none; I would guess).
Here is a long overdue cross-browser solution to your problem. No more static width, no more em hack.
<style>
/* clearfix */
.container:after {
content: '';
display: table;
clear: left;
}
.page {
float: left; /* display side-by-side */
width: 100%; /* be as wide as parent */
margin-right: -100%; /* take up no width */
}
</style>
<div class="container">
<div class="page"></div>
<div class="page"></div>
</div>
After searching for a solution to this problem for so long, I am baffled to see how simple it is. Granted, the .page elements are not absolutely positioned. However, all the same goals can be achieved through this method, with almost no pain or sacrifice.
Here's a demo: https://jsfiddle.net/eqe2muhv/
This also works for inline-blocks, of course. Though you might need to set the font-size or letter-spacing of the container to 0. I would also recommend using vertical-align: top on the .page, to simulate a regular block element.
Here's a demo: https://jsfiddle.net/dzouxurs/8/
Try to use display: inline-table, height: auto; .. it works for me
I think you should position them relatively and just change "vertical-align" to "top" in the interior divs. Then you won't have the issue of messing with abs divs.
You can simply float the divs if you want them to be on the same horizontal plane.
i've done this task without any JS. Only, by CSS:
.frame {
max-height: calc(100vh - 283px); // 283px gives me some space at the botoom of the frame
}
Maybe u can try max-height: calc(100% - 50%); it will work if the content that should be in the middle of the screen/div is super short/small.
position:absolute;
top:0;
bottom:0;
margin:auto;
width:auto;
height:auto
max-height: calc(100% - 50%);
...etc...
Test display: inline-block on the element that need auto height.