Stick image to the div bottom - css

I have one div that should contain text and bellow it one image.
I don't want that image to ever go out of that div. Just to the bottom.
That image maximum should be 128px.
But when text on top of the div is too large image should become smaller.
I have tried something but this stick image to the bottom of the browser:
<div style="width:250px; height:300px;background:#ff0000;">
<div style="background:#00ff00;">hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/></div>
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2008/07/ea.logo.round.490.jpg" style="position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
set left: 0;
height: 24px;"/>
</div>
Update
<div style="width:250px; height:300px;background:#ff0000;">
<div style="background:#00ff00;">hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>
hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hjg<br/>jhg</div>
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2008/07/ea.logo.round.490.jpg" style="position: relative;bottom: 0;left: 0; height:100%;"/>
</div>
Update
http://jsfiddle.net/jjehN/

UPDATE:
For your needs use "float" instead. Remember to use the "clear" after floats so you dont break the page. Heres your code, working with textwrapping
<div style="position:relative;width:250px; min-height:300px;background:#ff0000;">
<div style="background:#00ff00;">hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hjg<br/>jhg</div>
<img src="http://tools.android.com/_/rsrc/1306369561351/recent/miscellaneousimprovements-1/android_icon_128.png"style="float:bottom;
bottom: 0;left: 0; background:#0000ff;max-height: 100%;"/>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
</div>
For making the picture shrink/grow. Use Javascript. Maybe jQuery will be easiest for you. Make a new tread here at Stackoverflow if you find any troubles using it.
Best Regards
Jonas

Try this:
<div style="width:250px; height:300px;background:#ff0000;position: relative;">
<div style="background:#00ff00;">hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>
hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hello<br/>hjg<br/>jhg</div>
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2008/07/ea.logo.round.490.jpg" style="position: absolute;bottom: 0;left: 0; height:100%;"/>
</div>

Related

Making a responsive web page

I am working on responsive web. I have an image that have content in front of that image. But, when I zoom out or zoom in to the max width, I found that the content ( in this case is text ) did not place on its first spot.
Do you have any idea how to make a web more responsive ? I mean responsive in here is whether we zoom in or zoom out, the position will be the same but the size maybe change.
Any idea will be appreciated. Big Thanks!
*I already am using bootstrap
Here the example of the code:
<div class="image-one">
<img src="http://sachinchoolur.github.io/lightslider/img/cS-1.jpg" style="padding:5px"/>
<h2 style="vertical-align:middle;margin-left:150px;margin-top:-150px;position:absolute;color:#ff0000">Kuta</h2>
</div>
Not sure I have a clue what you're asking, but take a look at this for a more responsive structure:
<div class="image-one" style="position: relative;display: inline-block;">
<img src="http://sachinchoolur.github.io/lightslider/img/cS-1.jpg" style=" max-width:100%; ">
<h2 style="vertical-align:middle;left: 31.5%;top: 50%;position:absolute;color:#ff0000;">Kuta</h2>
</div>
Not quite sure what´s your issue exactly. You want the text and/or the image rezie? Maybe this will help you:
<div class="image-one" style="background-image:url('http://sachinchoolur.github.io/lightslider/img/cS-1.jpg');background-size: contain;background-repeat: no-repeat; position: relative;width: 100%;height: 100%;">
<div class="centered_text" style="position: absolute;top: 50%; left: 50%;transform: translate(-50%,-50%);">
<h2 style="color:#ff0000">Kuta</h2>
</div>
</div>

CSS overlay not appearing over <img>?

The main structure I'm using is:
<div class="portfolio-thumbs">
<div class="col-md-4 thumb-item">
<a href="#">
<div class="thumb-img">
<img src="./img/portfolio/rocksea.jpg" class="img-responsive" />
<div class="thumb-overlay"></div>
</div>
</a>
</div>
...
</div>
I've created a full JS Fiddle here
I'm looking to add a semi-transparent overlay to the image (will later be adding transition and some content to slide in from bottom of each image), yet can't seem to get it to appear.
Have compared to couple of other articles on SO but none seemed to fit the bill.
I've done this a thousand times before, any idea what's going wrong with this?
With help of #ZachSaucier , adding 100% height to all elements in tree. Also adding:
div.latest-work div.portfolio-thumbs div.thumb-item a div.thumb-img div.thumb-overlay {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
}
Made the overlay sit on top of the img.
Updated fiddle here

why my container div is not as big as the divs inside

I have a CSS question.
<div id="middle">
<div id="middle-left">
<div id="middle-left-top">
MLT
</div>
<div id="middle-left-bottom">
MLB
</div>
<br class="clearFix">
</div>
<div id="middle-right">
MLR
</div>
<br class="clearFix">
</div><!-- #middle-->
the example is at http://jsfiddle.net/Z2yeq/
my questions is why does middle-left not contain the two divs inside?
I want middle-left to expand as middle-left-top and middle-left-bottom
get taller
Thanks for any help
Absoloutely-positioned elements are no longer part of the layout. The parent has no idea how large child items are.
If you want the parent to be as large as the positioned child items to need to calculate and set this using JavaScript.
In general you shouldn't use absolute-positioning for layouts. You should use FLOATS.
The reason it doesn't is because you have it set to position:absolute; Remove position absolute to fix the problem.
#middle-left{
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 800px;
}

Bootstrap Element 100% Width

I want to create alternating 100% colored blocks. An "ideal" situation is illustrated as an attachment, as well as the current situation.
Desired setup:
Currently:
My first idea was to create an div class, give it a background color, and give it 100% width.
.block {
width: 100%;
background: #fff;
}
However, you can see that this obviously doesn't work. It's confined to a container area. I tried to close the container and that didn't work either.
The container class is intentionally not 100% width. It is different fixed widths depending on the width of the viewport.
If you want to work with the full width of the screen, use .container-fluid:
Bootstrap 3:
<body>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
<div class="col-lg-6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-8"></div>
<div class="col-lg-4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-12"></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Bootstrap 2:
<body>
<div class="row">
<div class="span6"></div>
<div class="span6"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span8"></div>
<div class="span4"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="span12"></div>
</div>
</body>
QUICK ANSWER
Use multiple NOT NESTED .containers
Wrap those .containers you want to have a full-width background in a div
Add a CSS background to the wrapping div
Fiddles: Simple: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/ , Container borders: https://jsfiddle.net/vLhc35k4/1/
HTML:
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 1</h2>
</div>
<div class="specialBackground">
<div class="container">
<h2>Section 2</h2>
</div>
</div>
CSS: .specialBackground{ background-color: gold; /*replace with own background settings*/ }
FURTHER INFO
DON'T USE NESTED CONTAINERS
Many people will (wrongly) suggest, that you should use nested containers. Well, you should NOT.
They are not ment to be nested. (See to "Containers" section in the docs)
HOW IT WORKS
div is a block element, which by default spans to the full width of a document body - there is the full-width feature. It also has a height of it's content (if you don't specify otherwise).
The bootstrap containers are not required to be direct children of a body, they are just containers with some padding and possibly some screen-width-variable fixed widths.
If a basic grid .container has some fixed width it is also auto-centered horizontally.
So there is no difference whether you put it as a:
Direct child of a body
Direct child of a basic div that is a direct child of a body.
By "basic" div I mean div that does not have a CSS altering his border, padding, dimensions, position or content size. Really just a HTML element with display: block; CSS and possibly background.
But of course setting vertical-like CSS (height, padding-top, ...) should not break the bootstrap grid :-)
Bootstrap itself is using the same approach
...All over it's own website and in it's "JUMBOTRON" example:
http://getbootstrap.com/examples/jumbotron/
This is how you can achieve your desired setup with Bootstrap 3:
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row"> <!-- Give this div your desired background color -->
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-12">
... your content here ...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The container-fluid part makes sure that you can change the background over the full width. The container part makes sure that your content is still wrapped in a fixed width.
This approach works, but personally I don't like all the nesting. However, I haven't found a better solution so far.
There is a workaround using vw. Is useful when you can't create a new fluid container.
This, inside a classic 'container' div will be full size.
.row-full{
width: 100vw;
position: relative;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
After this there is the sidebar problem (thanks to #Typhlosaurus), solved with this js function, calling it on document load and resize:
function full_row_resize(){
var body_width = $('body').width();
$('.row-full').css('width', (body_width));
$('.row-full').css('margin-left', ('-'+(body_width/2)+'px'));
return false;
}
In bootstrap 4, you can use 'w-100' class (w as width, and 100 as 100%)
You can find documentation here:
https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.0/utilities/sizing/
If you can't change the HTML layout:
.full-width {
width: 100vw;
margin-left: -50vw;
left: 50%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xs-12">a</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">b</div>
<div class="col-xs-12 full-width">c</div>
<div class="col-xs-12">d</div>
</div>
</div>
Demo: http://www.bootply.com/tVkNyWJxA6
Sometimes it's not possible to close the content container.
The solution we are using is a bit different but prevent a overflow because of the
firefox scrollbar size!
.full-width {
margin-top: 15px;
margin-bottom: 15px;
position: relative;
width: calc(100vw - 10px);
margin-left: calc(-50vw + 5px);
left: 50%;
}
Here is a example: https://jsfiddle.net/RubbelDeKatz/wvt9253q
Instead of
style="width:100%"
try using
class="col-xs-12"
it will save you 1 character :)
Sorry, should have asked for your css as well. As is, basically what you need to look at is giving your container div the style .container { width: 100%; } in your css and then the enclosed divs will inherit this as long as you don't give them their own width. You were also missing a few closing tags, and the </center> closes a <center> without it ever being open, at least in this section of code. I wasn't sure if you wanted the image in the same div that contains your content or separate, so I created two examples. I changed the width of the img to 100px simply because jsfiddle offers a small viewing area. Let me know if it's not what you're looking for.
content and image separate: http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/2/
content and image in same div (img floated left): http://jsfiddle.net/QvqKS/3/
I would use two separate 'container' div as below:
<div class="container">
/* normal*/
</div>
<div class="container-fluid">
/*full width container*/
</div>
Bare in mind that container-fluid does not follow your breakpoints and it is a full width container.
I'd wonder why someone would try to "override" the container width, since its purpose is to keep its content with some padding, but I had a similar situation (that's why I wanted to share my solution, even though there're answers).
In my situation, I wanted to have all content (of all pages) rendered inside a container, so this was the piece of code from my _Layout.cshtml:
<div id="body">
#RenderSection("featured", required: false)
<section class="content-wrapper main-content clear-fix">
<div class="container">
#RenderBody()
</div>
</section>
</div>
In my Home Index page, I had a background header image I'd like to fill the whole screen width, so the solution was to make the Index.cshtml like this:
#section featured {
<!-- This content will be rendered outside the "container div" -->
<div class="intro-header">
<div class="container">SOME CONTENT WITH A NICE BACKGROUND</div>
</div>
}
<!-- The content below will be rendered INSIDE the "container div" -->
<div class="content-section-b">
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
MORE CONTENT
</div>
</div>
</div>
I think this is better than trying to make workarounds, since sections are made with the purpose of allowing (or forcing) views to dynamically replace some content in the layout.
Though people have mentioned that you will need to use .container-fluid in this case but you will also have to remove the padding from bootstrap.
The following answer is not exactly optimal by any measure, but I needed something that maintains its position within the container whilst it stretches the inner div fully.
https://jsfiddle.net/fah5axm5/
$(function() {
$(window).on('load resize', ppaFullWidth);
function ppaFullWidth() {
var $elements = $('[data-ppa-full-width="true"]');
$.each( $elements, function( key, item ) {
var $el = $(this);
var $container = $el.closest('.container');
var margin = parseInt($container.css('margin-left'), 10);
var padding = parseInt($container.css('padding-left'), 10)
var offset = margin + padding;
$el.css({
position: "relative",
left: -offset,
"box-sizing": "border-box",
width: $(window).width(),
"padding-left": offset + "px",
"padding-right": offset + "px"
});
});
}
});
This must work (Mobile phone as well as Desktop screen):
class: alignfull and class: img-fluid will do the magic.
<div class="alignfull">
<img class="img-fluid" style="background-size: cover;
background-position: center ;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: auto;
min-width: 100%;
width: -moz-available; "
src="{{ $image->image }}" alt="An image">
</div>

center div within 100% width div

I am trying the Blueprint CSS framework, and am having a hard time figuring out how to do the overall layout.
It seems Blueprint (as far as I have understood it so far) makes you use a set page width at 950px. I guess you could change that with some modification, but in any case there has to be some width, so that's fine. The problem is, even if I want the main content of the page to be 950px wide, I want 100% wide headers and footers.
So I have placed a header and a footer outside the main "container" div that's 950px wide. I set the header div to 100%. And then I have a "headerContent" div inside it (containing menu, logo, etc), which has a 950px width (span-24 in Blueprint terms). But I want the headerContent div to be centered within the header div.
I have always used the "margin: 0 auto" trick to do this, but for some reason it doesn't work at all now.
Here's the html:
<div id="header" class="blueheader">
<div id="headerContent" class="span-24">
<div id="logo" class="span-6">
<a href="/">
<img src="/images/expertinfo.png" width="230" height="62" />
</a>
</div>
<div id="menucontainer" class="span-14"><ul id="menu"><li>
<a href='/Services/Index'>TJÄNSTER</a></li>
<li>
<a href='/About/References'>KUNDER</a></li>
<li>
<a href='/About'>OM OSS</a></li>
<li>
<a href='/About/Contact'>KONTAKT</a></li>
</ul></div>
<div id="logindisplay" class="span-2">
Logga in
</div>
</div>
</div>
And here's the css for header and headercontent:
#headerContent
{
overflow: auto;
zoom: 1;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#header
{
width: 100%;
position: relative;
margin-bottom: 0px;
color: #000;
margin-bottom: 0px;
overflow: auto;
zoom: 1;
}
The overflow and zoom part is just another trick I read about to avoid having to use empty divs to clear containing divs, and I tried without them with no luck, so they have nothing to do with the problem.
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
You need to set a width the the #headerContent because without it defaults to width:100% if you place a 950px width to the div, you should be fine.
Found the answer: you shouldn't use span-24 on the headerContent apparently in the Blueprint framework, but rather the container class. Here's what worked:
<div id="header" class="blueheader">
<div id="headerContent" class="container">
<div id="logo" class="span-6">
<a href="#Url.Action("Index", "Home")">
<img src="/images/expertinfo.png" width="230" height="62" />
</a>
</div>
<div id="menucontainer" class="span-14">#Html.Raw(Html.Menu())</div>
<div id="logindisplay" class="span-2">
#Html.Partial("_LogOnPartial")
</div>
</div>
</div>
I cannot say I understand exactly why it didn't work before, and that worries me, because I am trying this framework to simplify layout, but this made it harder to understand. As far as I could see it should have worked with the first code too...

Resources