I am not able to find the location of function next_posts_link(). I am looking for its implementation. Can you please tell in which folder should I look for inorder to be able to see the implementation of this function(). Thanks.
wp-includes/link-template.php. ~Line 1509
References the function above it, get_next_posts_link().
Related
I know the wc-template-hooks gives us a list of all the hooks but where do I find the original function code to understand what it does in order to alter it?
Thank you in advance.
All the best
You will find the original function code of wc-template-hooks code in below file.
plugins/woocommerce/includes/wc-template-functions.php
I'm using PHPUnit/WP_UnitTestCase to unit test a WP theme. I need to simulate that I'm on a page with a certain slug, and I've been told to use go_to() to do this. However, I can't figure out how to actually use the function.
If I do something like this, it won't work:
$this->go_to('test');
$this->assertTrue(is_page('test'));
Any Advice?
The go_to function requires a url
https://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/trunk/tests/phpunit/includes/testcase.php#L420
In my asp.net web application, one of my page, I am storing a list of objects(List<AgentDetails>) to ViewState. After that when I try to get it back as (List<AgentDetails>)ViewState["ViewStateAgentDetails"], i gets an error like
The type 'foo.Info.AgentDetails' exists in both 'foo.dll' and 'foo.dll'
I can't understand what is happening here.
I got stuck with this issue.
Could anybody help me out of this?
Thanks in advance.
If i interpret it correctly from answer to my comment, i can see that there might be some other DLL , that can have different dll name says bar.dll, but ultimately has same namespace and class name. So to fix this , find that second DLL, and use extern or change namespace to solve this error.
More explanation - http://blogs.msdn.com/b/abhinaba/archive/2005/11/30/498278.aspx
How do you allow two DLL's with same namespace.class to exist in the same application?
Is there a simple way to check if a content-type, or a specific object, has Versioning enabled/disabled in Plone (4.3.2)?
For context, I am making some unique conditionals around portal_actions. So instead of checking path('object/##iterate_control').checkout_allowed(), I need to first see if versioning is even enabled. Otherwise, the action in question does not display for items that have versioning disabled, because obviously it isn't checkout_allowed.
I didn't have any luck with good ole Google, and couldn't find this question anywhere here, so I hope it's not a dupe. Thanks!
I was able to get this working by creating a new script, importing getToolByName, and checking current content type against portal_repository.getVersionableContentTypes(). Then just included that script in the conditional.
I was looking for something like this that already existed, so if anyone knows of one let me know. Otherwise, I've got my own now. Thanks again!
The first thing that checkout_allowed does is check if the object in question supports versioning at all:
if not interfaces.IIterateAware.providedBy(context):
return False
(the interface being plone.app.iterate.interfaces.IIterateAware:
class IIterateAware( Interface ):
"""An object that can be used for check-in/check-out operations.
"""
The semantics Interface.providedBy(instance) are a bit unfortunate for usage in conditions or TAL scripts, because you'd need to import the interface, but there's a reversal helper:
context.portal_interface.objectImplements(context,
'plone.app.iterate.interfaces.IIterateAware')
I searched far and wide to find a working solution to this but couldn't find it.
What I want to do is change the argument that is passed to the view because I want for pathauto cleaned taxonomy terms to work as an argument. I have a code that transforms cleaned term back to a original one, but cannot make the view use it.
I saw some people changing it in hook_preprocess_views_view(&$vars) but in my case (Views 2.11) has a argument in $vars instanced so many times that it's not the way.
Can anyone please help me change this argument?
There may be a better way but you could use views_embed_view() and set the arguments yourself
I have two ideas, either to add some custom php code to the view's argument's phpcode section that does something like this
$args[0] = 1;
return $args;
or try to use the function
hook_views_pre_view(&$view, &$display_id, &$args) {
// modify $args value here
}
didn't test them so don't know which will work.
I think hook_views_pre_view might help you do just that.